Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

1638536169923.png

No correlation between the 2, but it's the basic defense being presented by Maxwell's side.
 
For context, she was adopted by white professionals, and given absolutely everything in life.... and she's repaying them by accusing them of "colonizing her" and "using her as a virtue token", essentially.

SJW tax:
Charlotte is an idiot feminist, that thinks women don't do anything unless men are the root cause of those actions.
View attachment 2770153

You could call this "Schrodinger's Feminist".

Do women have agency, and are individuals, or is everthing harmful they do because of men? 🤔
 
Wouldn

Wouldn't it be easier just to adopt a monkey? Surely they would be more grateful and better behaved, as well.
Not really. There have been several incidents where a pet monkey has done severe harm or even outright killed their owners out of the blue. One woman got her face ripped off by a monkey who she raised as an infant and took care of for several years.
 
Not really. There have been several incidents where a pet monkey has done severe harm or even outright killed their owners out of the blue. One woman got her face ripped off by a monkey who she raised as an infant and took care of for several years.
My guess is that black "utes" are far more dangerous than any but the most face-eating of face-eating monkeys.

Stolen from social media:
View attachment 2770686
Wall of Text + Egregious Strawman.
Verily, they dwell in Opposite Land.
 
School abolition? So, no school? Clearly this person has never known any long-term home schooled kids. They're either feral complete ignorant idiots or socially retarded savants in one or two areas and ignorant idiot retards in all other areas.
So perfect antifa.
 
University of Oregon's student government requested that CRT be a criteria for graduating

Requiring critical race theory at University of Oregon requested by student government​


At a board of trustees meeting Wednesday, UO’s student government proposed working with administrators on the possible graduation requirement.
The University of Oregon’s student government is hoping university administrators will consider implementing critical race theory as a curriculum requirement for all undergraduate students, among a variety of priorities this year.

“I think we’ve identified this as an issue across the nation, as something that’s relevant to not only the educational value for students, but also to the wellbeing of our community,” Associated Students of UO President Isaiah Boyd told trustees Wednesday.

Critical race theory is an advanced academic concept that shows systemic racism is inherent in American society. Recently, critics have used the term as an inaccurate catch-all to characterize lessons and policies related to race and equity.

Most of the arguments surrounding critical race theory have taken place in K-12 schools, with some states passing legislation against the academic framework. In Oregon and Southwest Washington, similar disagreements have flared at individual school districts.

Though a big focus on critical race theory is in K-12 schools, some academics have worried legislation in opposition to critical race theory could restrict the academic concept being taught in higher education as well.

ASUO President Boyd said the student government hopes to work on its request for a critical race theory requirement this upcoming winter term with the UO Provost’s office as well as the University Senate — UO’s version of a faculty senate, which also includes students, staff and other campus stakeholders.

The UO Senate has been having separate discussions about critical race theory at the university, specifically in terms of academic freedom for faculty teaching it.

The senate wrote in its report to the board of trustees that it plans to vote on a motion in support of defending the right of faculty to conduct research and teach about controversial issues of race and gender, such as critical race theory.

“By passing this motion, which is one of many being considered by academic senates across the country, we will stand in solidarity with faculty at all levels of education who face explicit attempts by state legislatures, school boards, and even some Boards of Trustees, to prevent them from broaching topics that are claimed to be ‘divisive,’” UO Senate President Spike Gildea wrote in the report.

As far as creating a requirement for undergraduate students to learn about critical race theory, UO’s Office of the Provost says it is open to more conversations with student leadership.

“The University of Oregon is committed to the core belief that diversity of background, thought, and perspective is an absolute necessity for building academic excellence,” the Provost’s office said in a statement. “To that end, we continuously seek opportunities to expand scholarship of racial injustice and to raise awareness of and address systemic racism and inequities on campus. This is an ongoing endeavor.”

The Office of the Provost said the university recently updated its undergraduate core requirements focused on issues of race and inequality. That came out of a vote from the University Senate in the 2017-18 academic year.

Currently, every UO student is required to take at least one course about “Difference, Inequality and Agency” in the United States, as well as one “Global Perspective” course. However, a wide variety of classes fall under those categories, and not all of them are explicitly about racial inequity — meaning students can sidestep classes focused on race, if they wish. For example, among the “US: Difference, Inequality, Agency” courses are a contemporary art history class and a North American archaeology class.

“Increasing awareness of systemic racial inequities creates opportunity for people in power to engage in socially conscious action and decision-making within higher education,” ASUO President Boyd wrote in his report to the board.

Boyd said critical race theory will also have positive effects on UO students outside of their time at the university. He said the student government hopes to “find a way to implement that into our curriculum and kind of build up a little bit more around an issue that pertains to everyone’s lives, post-graduate and throughout their careers.”



The student body president who's a strong proponent looks exactly as you would imagine and from commiefornia

1638551237839.png



What a messed up pipe dream when no one can agree to what CRT is, a good example can be seen in the relevant reddit post

1638551152992.png



Fuck this divisive ideology.
 
View attachment 2768906

Question from old post answered.
The entire fitness movement is intrinsically opposed to the radical leftist viewpoint, since being fit involves:
1) Taking personal responsibility for your fitness.
2) Setting up and executing plans that involve hard work and self-sacrifice.
3) Using empirical means and gauging your efforts based on empirical evidence ( body weight, % body fat ratios, weight/rep tracking, calories, etc)
4) Reaping unquestionable individual rewards and self-actualization (can now run a mile in X time/lift X amount of weight, achieved self improvement goals)

Fitness is individualist, empirical, and demonstrable. You can't redistribute muscle mass or good running times, you can't use academic weasel words to levitate a big heavy object, and everybody can simply fucking look to see if you're fit. It is the antithesis of the leftist worldview and one of the many many reasons SJWs are unhealthy hamplanets or shrimpy waifs. If working out actually causes an alignment with a more rightist political view, I don't know for sure, but it definitely clashes with the Marxists on a fundamental level.
 
Last edited:
I have never tolerated crap from gay retards.

I'm not starting now.

Ban away, faggot.
Can I have your stuff?
R/DR. Reddit/Didn't Read.

Any criticism of the movie is presented as coming from an anti-Semitic place, but the reality is, I've never like Seth Rogen, or his stoner humor. It's entirely possible to simply not like him, or his work, and it has nothing to do with liking/disliking Jews/Judaism.
 
Any criticism of the movie is presented as coming from an anti-Semitic place, but the reality is, I've never like Seth Rogen, or his stoner humor. It's entirely possible to simply not like him, or his work, and it has nothing to do with liking/disliking Jews/Judaism.
I don't like the movies that are shitting on Christmas.

I don't like spoiled brats as the heroes.

And I don't like Seth Rogan or Sarah Silverman and won't give them a fucking dime.

So, I've got no reason to recommend or watch their shitty movie.
 
View attachment 2769524
Listen, you dumb commie fuck, if you let children exist completely without any kind of structure, or consequences, we end up with more fucks like you. Also, just admit that you want to diddle kids, so we can take you out into the street and shoot you, because that's 100% the tweet you left in your drafts.
Children are not autonomous individuals. They are literally called "dependents" legally. A child under the age of 18 in the US has to go through A LOT of legal paperwork to be declared autonomous, or commonly known as emancipation.
 
View attachment 2771442

British feminists are more likely to be TERFs but only because they hate men more than they love progress.
It's exceedingly dumb considering women make up a minority of murder victims and of those who are only a small percentage of that minority are killed out in the street. The Everard thing got blown massively out of proportion.
 
Back