It's kinda cringe seeing a few people pretend like Egypt is some half-decent guy and Chantal is uniquely a lying, narcissistic bitch. They're both bad and when they talk shit about each other, they're probably both telling the truth and the lies come in to protect their own actions. Just because people don't like Chantal doesn't mean that the bad things she has told us about Nader aren't true, they probably are. They're both awful and your best bet is to think the worst of both of them, not just the one.
Maybe I'm in the minority here but to me it seems like Nader is acting exactly the way Chantal has described him to be. This whole "Chantal lies" thing seems to often be taken a bit too literally and watching people proclaim with certainty that this is all scripted is honestly embarrassing to watch. There's a difference between something being performative and something being scripted. Chantal's behaviour is often performative to elicit certain reactions or emotions from people. That doesn't mean these two retards sat down and collaborated on the script for the next story arc. Take your schizo meds.
Sorry for the rant. I sometimes forget this subforum is mostly filled with women.
Chantal has described Nader as being an amazing, wonderful, funny, talented, chef, dancer, musician, athlete, handsome, sober, catch of a man who is loyal, affectionate, witty, charming, and funny.
...
The part about Nader being a woman beater, abuser, stealing her money, whatever - has mostly came from people who cow-tip like shannon, FFG, ect.... She has walked those allegations back, confirmed them, walked them back, confirmed them, walked them back over and over and over.
The reason people call Chantal a liar is because she has yet to make a claim she didn't later walk back and then confirm again and then walk back again.
...
You literally CAN'T believe Chantal. She won't let you. Ever time she makes a claim, she walks it back. Every time she says she's going to do something - she doesn't and then apologies for it. Every statement she uploads, she later deletes or retracts. I like giving benefit of the doubt but with Chantal you can't because today she will say the sky is blue, tomorrow she will say she never said that, she didn't mean that, delete that she ever said it at all, or claim that she didn't mean blue she actually meant green, ect..
Yes, I agree she doesn't collaborate - but it sure is fucking predictable.
What's the difference if the script is collaborated or not when the plot line stays the fucking same.