- Joined
- May 21, 2015
Much of what's said here would be legally defined as libellous/slanderous. Not that I'm bringing legal action into it, but if we're talking definitions, no you are absolutely not "just talking" about someone.
It's not libel and slander if it's true. And we have screenshots.
How did I "make myself" a public figure? People have been posting shit about me looong before I started writing articles or doing talks or anything like that. And why is it okay to abuse someone just because they make themselves a public figure?
See - if I was actually a celebrity, I'd have some people discussing me and offering positive criticism. Your victims here don't, because they're not really "public figures" like you claim. You've turned them into celebrities, if anything.
None of this matters - your definition of what it means to be a "public figure" and your on-again/off-again internet celebrity status - because what you say is posted publicly and we are allowed to talk about it.
Can you please offer an actual factual, rational reason as to why your behaviour - which may I remind you is propped up by far more (transphobic, abusive) people than mine is - is acceptable, should be defended as your freedom, whereas mine is and should not?
Here she goes, Tranny Jesus onto her Cross.
(Psst. Nobody's saying that you shouldn't post your silly rants. People are saying that if you don't want them to be mocked, don't post them publicly. Minor difference.)