Manosphere SlayerOfTranny

[Rin]

Sexism couldn't exist though,if men and women were truly equal.Because women would have never allowed this if they were actually like men.

I've heard this explanation alot of times and it's literally laughable.My friend always says this to me.

Did women just "allow" men to oppress them?

Black people were also inferior overall to white people which is why things ended up as they did.

Slavery is wrong but in reality power is ultimately all that matters.Do you understand that?

The only way to have a good world is to have the most powerful people be righteous as well.

You don't actually have "rights" as a inherent quality.

If the bad guys are stronger than the good guys,they will win and enforce their evil will upon the world.

It doesn't matter if you are "good" if you are not "strong".Goodness counts for nothing to mother nature.

You can call that "racist" and "misogynistic" but it's just a cruel fact of reality.Reality doesn't care about being good,it just is what it is.



How do you know that the fifties were necessarily inferior to now?



Ok one of those is JK Rowling who wrote Harry Potter.

The second one is not very large.And additionally the accomplishments are not on the level of say a Einstein or a Isaac Newton or a Buddha or a Geogre Washington.

Same with the third one.

And also I never said women "never accomplished anything" I just said that it's like 1% or less while male accomplishment is 99%.

"There is no good or bad, only power and those too weak to seize it." That's basically your argument, I suppose?

 

[SlayerOfTyranny]

Oh, look. A lack of any actual scientific claims and instead asserting a lot of points that, on their own, sorta support your claim so long as you ignore every single cultural and historical context behind any of them.

Fantastic.

There's nothing to refute. You need to make a point before someone will take you seriously.

Are you trying to make the

"Women only didn't accomplish as much cause they were oppressed at the time"

Argument?

I just gave the evidence.

99% of great human accomplishment is male.

So either you have to argue:

1.99% of human accomplishment is not male (obviously false)
2.Give some explanation for 1.

So if you have that explanation,please go ahead.

"There is no good or bad, only power and those too weak to seize it." That's basically your argument, I suppose?

No.

I believe in right and wrong.

But I realize that "right" has little meaning without the power to enforce it.

Men should take care of women and treat them right but it's foolish to think that women are just as strong as men.

It is cause of men that (some) women enjoy the safe world that they currently live in,women would not have been able to create it independently.

It might be easy to forget that in today's world but in a primitive and brutal situation it would quickly become apparent.

 

[Sanshain]

Are you trying to make the

"Women only didn't accomplish as much cause they were oppressed at the time"

Argument?

I just gave the evidence.

99% of great human accomplishment is male.

So either you have to argue:

1.99% of human accomplishment is not male (obviously false)
2.Give some explanation for 1.

So if you have that explanation,please go ahead.



No.

I believe in right and wrong.

But I realize that "right" has little meaning without the power to enforce it.

Men should take care of women and treat them right but it's foolish to think that women are just as strong as men.

It is cause of men that (some) women enjoy the safe world that they currently live in,women would not have been able to create it independently.

It might be easy to forget that in today's world but in a primitive and brutal situation it would quickly become apparent.

How can you be so stupid as to make every single sentence it's own paragraph, yet continually forget to put spaces after your punctuation? Do you honestly expect us to take you seriously when you do this?

 

[Rin]

It might be easy to forget that in today's world but in a primitive and brutal situation it would quickly become apparent.

In a primitive and brutal situation, you would be the first one cannibalized. We wouldn't even wait to run low on food, we'd just straight-up cannibalize you for the shit of it.

 

[SlayerOfTyranny]

In a primitive and brutal situation, you would be the first one cannibalized. We wouldn't even wait to run low on food, we'd just straight-up cannibalize you for the shit of it.

Women say alot of things don't they.

By the way about evidence of the differences between men and women,I'll dig it up if I have to.

But I'm shocked that isn't just common sense.

I mean can you really not see the differences without me having to post some great scientific proof?

It's literally obvious and I didn't realize it was something that actually needed to be "proved" but alright then...

 

[FlamingPie]

"The only way to have a good world is to have the most powerful people be righteous as well."

Says the guy who supports people who hold Elliot Rodgers as a martyr.

 

[SlayerOfTyranny]

Says the guy who supports people who hold Elliot Rodgers as a martyr.

I don't support Elliot Rodgers at all.

But yes I do have far more compassion for incels than Kiwi farms that is for sure...

 

[Sanae Kochiya]

Are you trying to make the

"Women only didn't accomplish as much cause they were oppressed at the time"

Argument?

I just gave the evidence.

99% of great human accomplishment is male.

So either you have to argue:

1.99% of human accomplishment is not male (obviously false)
2.Give some explanation for 1.

So if you have that explanation,please go ahead.

Hunter-gatherer societies in the earliest iteration of human civilization focused primarily on males hunting game while women gathered fruit, berries, and the like. This was due to the athletic superiority of males (for hunting) and for the better visual clarity of women regarding colors (for not picking poisoned shit). When agriculture started to become a thing, this allowed males to stop hunting and focus more on toiling the land and cultivating crops. This subsequently sequestered women into a more domestic role tending to the family and ensuring that the children grew up healthy. While this was a fair compromise and division of roles, the fact that women were restricted to a more domestic role meant that there was a greater emphasis on males as the breadwinner and, as a result, the "head" of the family, forming the patriarchal structure that most of early civilizations operated on.

Of course this is all pointless because you haven't even given a reason for your claim to exist in the first place besides "HURR DURR MALES ARE BETTER IT'S OBVIOUS BECAUSE THEY CREATED EVERYTHING" which is around the same logic as "HURR DURR CREATION IS REAL IT'S OBVIOUS BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED."

 

[HickoryDickory]

How can you be so stupid as to make every single sentence it's own paragraph, yet continually forget to put spaces after your punctuation? Do you honestly expect us to take you seriously when you do this?

He's just trying to change up his writing style, because Thonis. That and ignoring and not tagging people because reasons, and focusing mostly on @Sanae Kochiya, because again... Thonis. Photoshopped or fiverr-style pics, plus thread spam, suspicious activity, and trying to get a reaction by trying to insult women... Because Thonis.

Even if he isn't Thonis, he's a reasonable facsimile and thus boring. Boring, predictable and a coward.

 

[Positron]

You do realize that 99% of all scientific,philosophical,and religious development throughout history has been done by men?

But you still can't get laid.

You do realize that 99% of all scientific,philosophical,and religious development throughout history has been done by people who got laid?

 

[GS 281]

@Frank Rizzo It's me you stupid faggot. Get a clue already you autists.

How'd the CPA go? Ready for the winter? January to June is a busy time, bro.

 

[Positron]

How'd the CPA go? Ready for the winter? January to June is a busy time, bro.

That's Hood Monkey. Different loveshy.

 

[GS 281]

These guys are the same. I think it will be interesting to see how it is that a guy who has the challenges that led him to come here and act like a complete dildo acts in a professional setting.

 

[ON 190]

It's been fun Kiwi's

But I can already see that this thread is already quickly becoming pointless again as all threads with you do

If you post something reasonable here I will respond.Otherwise it is pointless to continue.

Have a nice day.

If you wanna play then lets play.

I'll start with this:

You do realize that 99% of all scientific,philosophical,and religious development throughout history has been done by men?

Name me a religion that has a women at the head of it.Have you ever noticed that Buddha,Jesus,and Muhammad are all male?

Name me a bunch of female scientists that have ever done anything big.

Name me an army of women that conquered something or fought a war for something.

Name me an empire that wasn't built and developed by men.

Tell me why women have been oppressed up til now throughout history.

Sure there have been a super small handful but they are a drop in the bucket.99% of it is by men.

It's because of men that we are even having this conversation right now.Do you even realize that?

Most of all great human creation is because of men.

That's not "misogyny" it's just a verifiable fact.

Name me a good list of great female accomplishments in history.

I can easily name thousands of men...

23 minutes away from us. And then...

Yea right.There are hardly any great female achievements throughout history.But many many many male ones.

If men and women were truly "equal" then you would see that half the accomplishment was done by them.When it's more like 1% or even less.

This is simple historical fact.

How is having to campaign to be considered as equal citizens a huge accomplishment?

I'm sure that sounds rude but that is an inferior accomplishment.

It's good that you bring this up because if men and women were truly "equal" this situation could never even exist in the first place.Women are 1/2 of the species...

So explain how they could have ever been oppressed basically throughout all history until very recently.

Women can only have "rights" when good men allow it to be so.

Has there ever even been a single society on earth that has ever had women with rights independent of male permission?

If you know of one please enlighten me with the facts.

Would love to hear Sanae's genius explanation of both.

Sexism couldn't exist though,if men and women were truly equal.Because women would have never allowed this if they were actually like men.

I've heard this explanation alot of times and it's literally laughable.My friend always says this to me.

Did women just "allow" men to oppress them?

Black people were also inferior overall to white people which is why things ended up as they did.

Slavery is wrong but in reality power is ultimately all that matters.Do you understand that?

The only way to have a good world is to have the most powerful people be righteous as well.

You don't actually have "rights" as a inherent quality.

If the bad guys are stronger than the good guys,they will win and enforce their evil will upon the world.

It doesn't matter if you are "good" if you are not "strong".Goodness counts for nothing to mother nature.

You can call that "racist" and "misogynistic" but it's just a cruel fact of reality.Reality doesn't care about being good,it just is what it is.



How do you know that the fifties were necessarily inferior to now?



Ok one of those is JK Rowling who wrote Harry Potter.

The second one is not very large.And additionally the accomplishments are not on the level of say a Einstein or a Isaac Newton or a Buddha or a Geogre Washington.

Same with the third one.

And also I never said women "never accomplished anything" I just said that it's like 1% or less while male accomplishment is 99%.

Are you trying to make the

"Women only didn't accomplish as much cause they were oppressed at the time"

Argument?

I just gave the evidence.

99% of great human accomplishment is male.

So either you have to argue:

1.99% of human accomplishment is not male (obviously false)
2.Give some explanation for 1.

So if you have that explanation,please go ahead.



No.

I believe in right and wrong.

But I realize that "right" has little meaning without the power to enforce it.

Men should take care of women and treat them right but it's foolish to think that women are just as strong as men.

It is cause of men that (some) women enjoy the safe world that they currently live in,women would not have been able to create it independently.

It might be easy to forget that in today's world but in a primitive and brutal situation it would quickly become apparent.

Women say alot of things don't they.

By the way about evidence of the differences between men and women,I'll dig it up if I have to.

But I'm shocked that isn't just common sense.

I mean can you really not see the differences without me having to post some great scientific proof?

It's literally obvious and I didn't realize it was something that actually needed to be "proved" but alright then...

I don't support Elliot Rodgers at all.

But yes I do have far more compassion for incels than Kiwi farms that is for sure...

9 more posts. You're definitely showing us, Gayer.

 

[*Asterisk*]

Hunter-gatherer societies in the earliest iteration of human civilization focused primarily on males hunting game while women gathered fruit, berries, and the like. This was due to the athletic superiority of males (for hunting) and for the better visual clarity of women regarding colors (for not picking poisoned shit). When agriculture started to become a thing, this allowed males to stop hunting and focus more on toiling the land and cultivating crops. This subsequently sequestered women into a more domestic role tending to the family and ensuring that the children grew up healthy. While this was a fair compromise and division of roles, the fact that women were restricted to a more domestic role meant that there was a greater emphasis on males as the breadwinner and, as a result, the "head" of the family, forming the patriarchal structure that most of early civilizations operated on.

Of course this is all pointless because you haven't even given a reason for your claim to exist in the first place besides "HURR DURR MALES ARE BETTER IT'S OBVIOUS BECAUSE THEY CREATED EVERYTHING" which is around the same logic as "HURR DURR CREATION IS REAL IT'S OBVIOUS BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED."

If athletic superiority were the measure of human superiority, wouldn't blacks be the unquestioned master race? They utterly crush whites in almost every sport.

If mental superiority were the measure of human superiority, wouldn't yellows be the unquestioned master race? They get way better grades than whites.

If survival superiority were the measure of human superiority, wouldn't reds be the unquestioned master race? Some of them can drink anthrax water.

If genetic superiority were the measure of human superiority, wouldn't women be the unquestioned master race? Men suffer genetic defects and problems way more than women, what with women having two X chromosomes and thus being able to double up on shielding for things like lethal recessives.

If sexual superiority were the measure of human superiority, wouldn't 99% of humanity be unquestionably superior to @SlayerOfTyranny?

Rhetorical question, Thonis.

 

[Pope Gregory IX]

Isn't the flipside of this "women are inferior" argument the unpleasant fact that Sluthaters can't talk to, get dates with, get the attention of, or basically even register with this "inferior gender"? All that genetic superiority, all that penis ownership, counts for less than fuck all for a Sluthater?

So by your own argument it goes Men > Women > Sluthaters

Is this correct? If so, what are Sluthaters superior to?

Men > Women > Sluthaters > ...Moss?

 

[supdup]

Are you trying to make the

"Women only didn't accomplish as much cause they were oppressed at the time"

Argument?

I just gave the evidence.

99% of great human accomplishment is male.

How is that evidence? If women have been oppressed, we would definitely see men getting all the credit for human accomplishment. And the 99% figure you pulled out of your ass would hold true. I think something you're ignoring is that history is written by those in power. Women historically have not been allowed to pursuit things that would lead to human accomplishment, therefore you are going to see more men making those accomplishments. It has nothing to do with the capabilities of women.

Dude, seriously, basic logic is not hard.

Men should take care of women and treat them right but it's foolish to think that women are just as strong as men.

They can be. There are women who are stronger than most men, just as there are men weaker than most women. I think your whole tired "women are different" argument is pretty darned weak. If we look at a population of men, there is going to be vast differences between them. Differences that can be even more drastic than the generalized differences between men and women. And as society moves further and further away from manual labor, men being physically stronger is less and less important.

You keep arguing with assertions and you haven't demonstrated even a rudimentary understanding of culture and history. Your arguments and ideas are pretty darned simplistic and stuff that usually will come out of a teenagers mouth. I suggest you do some more reading and studying before you sperg out on the internet and make yourself look ignorant.

It is cause of men that (some) women enjoy the safe world that they currently live in,women would not have been able to create it independently.

It might be easy to forget that in today's world but in a primitive and brutal situation it would quickly become apparent.

And men couldn't exist or do anything without women. Men would not have been able to create anything independently either. Your point is moot.

 

[Frank Rizzo]

So, I fell asleep from Slayer's boring ass, and wake up to see my fellow Kiwi's schooling him in a debate.

I assume his response was basically to go "LA LA LA LA, NOPE, YOU'RE WRONG, I'M RIGHT!"

 

[Pope Gregory IX]

history is written by those in power

For some reason I'm reminded of Crick and Watson screwing Rosalind Franklin out of a Nobel prize for her research into DNA.

But, y'know, penis, superiority, dominance, raaar, etc.

 

[ON 190]

I assume his response was basically to go "LA LA LA LA, NOPE, YOU'RE WRONG, I'M RIGHT!"

This is accurate.