Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
I'm not a law person but it seems like these guys represent a lot of nuisance lawsuits with a poor track record of winning. Fellow windmill-tilters. No wonder they feel like repping Russ. They're going to run into real trouble with his quality of evidence, namely, that he can't screencap or archive anything that would actually prove he had a case.
I think they're trying to set up a track record of taking anti-fair use cases so they can sell their souls to Satan and work for some utterly evil intellectual property firm. This is sort of their demo reel for the legal equivalent of starring in a Facial Abuse video.
 
So let me see if I understand the story so far: Russell Greer- genius paralegal extraordinaire who knows more about the law than actual lawyers- unbent his pride long enough to find a shitty law firm to represent his case against Null, presumably by misrepresenting his case to convince them. Not only that, but the law firm he hired may have misrepresented themselves to the court and in doing so jeopardized their case.

Man, when Russell brings the laughs, he really brings the laughs.

Welp, time to donate to Null's war chest! I can think of a few people who deserve to be True and Honest Fans...
 
and in doing so jeopardized their case.
I'm not sure they jeopardized it (not that he had a case), but if the court cared enough it might not be a good look. Regardless, any punishment, if coming (for this possible misrepresentation), would be on them, not Russ, I believe.
 
I'm not sure they jeopardized it (not that he had a case), but if the court cared enough it might not be a good look. Regardless, any punishment, if coming (for this possible misrepresentation), would be on them, not Russ, I believe.
If they did misrepresent themselves, it'd be fitting, in a way. Russ misrepresented his case to the judge: on its face, it's a copyright case, but in reality, Russ wants us to stop saying mean things about him.
 
Man, when Russell brings the laughs, he really brings the laughs.

Welp, time to donate to Null's war chest! I can think of a few people who deserve to be True and Honest Fans...
If anyone wants to donate, and hasn’t yet, Privacy.com took me less than a minute to setup and send, easy peasy.

I enjoy laughing at Russell but this particular storyline has me disgusted. There’s assuredly genuine cases of copyright infringement that would be hard-pressed to afford representation/doesn’t know that they can sue for relief, but Russell Greer isn’t it.

Did he even cite the allegedly offending post? I’m curious if this firm will subpoena user information to ascertain who posted his book (an opportune time to mention ProtonVPN does their yearly sale right now, it’s fast and easy too.)

They can’t bring up new issues on appeal either so, they’re stuck with his initial complaint, right? I can’t imagine it will be fruitful b but alas, this is current year.
 
Russhole needs a tard jacket (the "giving myself a big hug" kind, not the red sequined blazer kind) and a nice padded room to spend the rest of his days in.
He needs a straight jacket meaning he deserves to be placed in a loony bin.

About the lawfirm:
The Digital Justice Foundation (“DJF”) advocates for individual rights in digital spaces and aims to ensure that traditional notions of justice and civil liberties continue to thrive in the digital age. In carrying out this mission, the DJF places a particular focus on being a voice for underrepresented individuals and interests.

The DJF’s work in copyright law serves as an important cornerstone of this mission. Indeed, the DJF sees individual copyright protections as an integral part of a stable digital economy and well-functioning political system, advancing important humanistic values such as privacy, consent, and digital dignity.


While certain organizations feel that digital technologies have undermined the importance of copyright’s protections, the DJF firmly believes that these technologies have made copyright more important than ever. For example, an often-overlooked consequence of the internet is that, for the first time in history, most citizens are now regular creators and publishers of content. The emergence of a content-creating public gives copyright’s protections a newfound importance to a vastly wider class of citizens than in previous times.

Public debates on copyright should reflect this development. Yet the public’s interest in copyright often goes unrepresented in the inter-industry disputes that shape the development of copyright law. To correct this absence, the Digital Justice Foundation is a committed advocate before courts and policymakers for the rights of individual creators and for the often-underappreciated public interest in their rights.

Beyond the copyright context, the DJF promotes and protects civil liberties, privacy rights and employee rights as they are affected by new technologies. For these reasons, the DJF and its attorneys have been at the forefront of emergent legal issues surrounding algorithmic discrimination and governmental adoption of new technologies to administer traditional government functions. The DJF is also exploring novel ways to harness the power of technology to expand access to law.

In an age of rapid technological development, entrenched interests often drown out individual voices and overshadow the development of individual rights. The DJF is committed to ensuring that technology and traditional rights develop hand-in-hand.
They have only 3 lawyers, two of which took on Russ' appeal.

View attachment 2779942

Info from:


They must be really desperate for business if they're willing to work for free for him.
 
(an opportune time to mention ProtonVPN does their yearly sale right now, it’s fast and easy too.)
Mullvad, baby, all the way. Always cheap, always 100% anonymity.

If anyone wants to donate, and hasn’t yet, Privacy.com took me less than a minute to setup and send, easy peasy.
I'd like to point out to any non-US readers, that Privacy.com is for US residents only as per their site:
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212105.png
Did he even cite the allegedly offending post?
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212325.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212401.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212456.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212515.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212557.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212618.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212640.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212651.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212713.png

Mind you, he's not actually suing Null or any user for copyright infringement, he is suing Null for allegedly contributing to said infringement. Users are not sued at all.

I look forward to this going nowhere and Russ losing even more money.
Screenshot 2021-12-07 212937.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 213011.png
Screenshot 2021-12-07 213049.png
 
Mullvad, baby, all the way. Always cheap, always 100% anonymity.


I'd like to point out to any non-US readers, that Privacy.com is for US residents only as per their site:
View attachment 2781530

View attachment 2781539
View attachment 2781540
View attachment 2781541
View attachment 2781542
View attachment 2781543
View attachment 2781544
View attachment 2781545
View attachment 2781546
View attachment 2781547

Mind you, he's not actually suing Null or any user for copyright infringement, he is suing Null for allegedly contributing to said infringement. Users are not sued at all.


View attachment 2781552
View attachment 2781553
View attachment 2781554
Ah, then in that case I'll settle for losing the case and making a further fool of himself.
 
I can't wait for this next lawsuit to be dismissed with prejudice like the last one. Seriously, why is it that Rusty never does anything interesting beyond vexatious litigation?

Melinda Scott only managed to make it funny because she was the first one to litigate Kiwi Farms and lose. You'd think that after 3 going on 4 years of failed litigation and DMCA requests that he would've gotten the memo by now.
 
Seriously, why is it that Rusty never does anything interesting beyond vexatious litigation?
It's literally the only way he knows to manifest his will to power. It doesn't matter to him if he loses, just that the courts listen to him and the people he takes to court lose money because he literally has nothing else left. It's like a kid throwing a tantrum. It doesn't generally work for more than expressing their dissatisfaction, but maaybe... just once it will.
 
Back