The Holocaust Thread - The Great Debate Between Affirmers, Revisionists and Deniers

Well the Germans wouldn't have been to keen on posting pictures of mass killings they had committed. There are orders banning taking photos at shootings. Yet more than a few exist, due to just how widespread these killings were. MINNIEUR and HARTELT were discussing the shootings outside of the Vilna, that is at Ponary, and there are some photos of that


I don't think there are pictures of bodies there (at other places yes), but you can see certain details like how the Jews were taken to this location in fenced trenches so they couldn't easily escape


It does seem like a movie actually, the first good Holocaust movie? There's nothing sappy or overdramatic about the account. It has as David Irving says, an air of verisimilitude, which is exactly what you want it in a movie. Except it's not a movie.

There it is, note the political association and name of it. These people were training to be insurgents for the communist revolutions going on in that era. It puts in perspective why they were lined up against a wall and shot in masse.
Its safe to assume if this little backwater town was doing this, then its safe to assume MANY jewish communities were training for the same reasons.

In Hitler and his crew's eyes they were killing monsters. It also puts in perspective the callous and cold demeanor of the ones doing the killing if the book regarding solder accounts is to be believed.
You don't shed a tear for killing people you believe would have been more then happy to put a bullet in your kids heads given the chance.

The most horrible memes have a bit of truth to them, and my god is this a ugly one.
Hitler did nothing wrong.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: FunPosting101
So earlier you said more than half the resettled Jews died of hunger and disease, and we can add to that these large scale killings, which increase the number of dead further into the millions?

It seems like your views are pretty far from typical revisionism. According to metapedia, total deaths are likely between 250k and 750k

View attachment 2794251

Now you are closer (maybe much closer) to Holocaust believers in terms of death toll though you still reject the main thesis of organized genocide, instead saying it was a justified response to mass rebellions.
Essentially yes. There are massive gaps in public knowledge, but I think it is probably wishful thinking that most of the jews survived, and I can't find any evidence to support this. Though I can't say the majority of them died in shootings specifically, only that the majority of them died as a combination of shootings, famine, disease and the war (as collateral damage or conscription into the red army). Shootings were definitely a major factor though. What I cannot fathom, is how the mainstream historians have completely omitted this facet from the narrative, and neither sides of the debate have ever fully pressed upon the totality of the partisan war being fought in the east. First of all, what number of people would one assume to be partisans? Maybe 5-10% of able-bodied males? So 1-3% of the population? Yes, that is a rational estimate, but completely wrong. Try 100% in some places, literally entire ghettoes, fleeing into the forests with their families and linking up with Soviet groups. Or ghettoes that secretly fortified themselves with bunkers and shot at the Germans when they approached, which resulted in the entire town being executed in response.

We can test the two hypotheses against available evidence to see which one fits best. Earlier you presented trial testimony from Hans Lammers, an official who seems to have had very little to with the Holocaust or resettlement. Better to go as close to the source as possible

Here Mattogno quotes a report from the governor of Belarus 'Combating Partisans and Aktion Against Jews in the Generalbezirk of Byelorussia' which also talks about the near total planned reduction of Jews in the area. What do you make of it?

btw, the liquidations he is talking about are clearly shootings--see Mattogno's comments at the bottom

View attachment 2794261

These shootings don't seem to be in response to uprisings in ghettos. This isn't mentioned once--rather the report concludes on this note: "the danger that the partisans will, in future, derive any important support from the Jews will then have ceased to exist"

According to German records for the same time period (August 1942) , Minsk ghetto had been reduced (by perhaps 90% )to 9,000 Jews. The ghetto was not fully liquidated until October 1943.

EDIT: Forgot that the report continues actually, with Mattogno omitting an important line (different translation here)

I can definitely say that there was near-universal contact between jewish ghettoes (all the ghettoes, big and small) and partisan groups. Sometimes the German actions were preventative and based on the intelligence that was available to the Germans. Like anyone dealing with clandestine groups, they have to act based on tips and informants, they're not omniscient enough to know who is innocent and who isn't, and the Germans were more inclined to shoot innocent people on suspicion of partisan involvement than allow a mass rebellion to collapse their entire war effort. As the situation boiled over, it must have looked to the Germans something like "aha! I knew the jews would reveal their true colors... they're all communists!"; and to the jews it must have looked like "aha! I knew the Germans would reveal their true colors... they're going to kill us all!" So they began to sweep hot-spot regions, putting as many people as they could into camps and shooting the rest.




So first of all, for context:

Both before and after Geman occupation, there were MASSIVE amounts of jewish refugees. So regions the Germans occupied did not have their full population as censuses before the war, and in population censuses AFTER the war, losses are not fully attributable to deaths. There were >340,000 refugees from the Germans before occupation (according to mainstream sources); and there were hundreds of thousands more who fled to the USA and Israel and other places after the war. So there is a big question of whether these people are being wrongfully claimed as deaths.
Between the Nazi rise to power in 1933 and Nazi Germany's surrender in 1945, more than 340,000 Jews emigrated from Germany and Austria.
After Germany annexed Austria in March 1938 and particularly after the Kristallnacht pogroms of November 9–10, 1938, nations in western Europe and the Americas feared an influx of refugees. About 85,000 Jewish refugees (out of 120,000 Jewish emigrants) reached the United States between March 1938 and September 1939, but this level of immigration was far below the number seeking refuge. In late 1938, 125,000 applicants lined up outside US consulates hoping to obtain 27,000 visas under the existing immigration quota. By June 1939, the number of applicants had increased to over 300,000. Most visa applicants were unsuccessful. At the Evian Conference in July 1938, only the Dominican Republic stated that it was prepared to admit significant numbers of refugees, although Bolivia would admit around 30,000 Jewish immigrants between 1938 and 1941.
Over 60,000 German Jews immigrated to Palestine during the 1930s, most under the terms of the Haavara (Transfer) Agreement. This agreement between Germany and the Jewish authorities in Palestine facilitated Jewish emigration to Palestine. The main obstacle to emigration of Jews from Germany was German legislation banning the export of foreign currency. According to the agreement, Jewish assets in Germany would be disposed of in an orderly manner and the resulting capital transferred to Palestine through the export of German products. The British White Paper in May 1939, a policy statement approved by the British Parliament, contained measures that severely limited Jewish entry into Palestine.
After the war, hundreds of thousands of survivors found shelter as displaced persons in camps administered by the western Allies in Germany, Austria, and Italy. In the US, immigration restrictions were still in effect, although the Truman Directive of 1945, which authorized priority to be given within the quota system to displaced persons, permitted 16,000 Jewish DPs to enter the United States.
With the establishment of Israel in May 1948, Jewish refugees began streaming into that new sovereign state. Some 140,000 Holocaust survivors entered Israel during the next few years. The United States admitted 400,000 displaced persons between 1945 and 1952. Approximately 96,000 (roughly 24 percent) of them were Jews who had survived the Holocaust.
Jewish involvement in the red army was heavy
Citing Abba Kovner, the partisan fighter and later Israeli poet, Steve Bowman, Professor of Judaic Studies at the University of Cincinnati, writes that “the forefront of the battle against the Nazi invaders in Lithuania consisted of Jews” while “The Lithuanian division in the Red Army was 70 percent Jewish, including officers, and the language was Yiddish.”
Official sources are from very biased organizations, and admit to massive gaps in knowledge
Though this is the best information available, it is based on estimates and cannot take into the unknown number of victims whose bodies were never recovered or for whom there were no records. The Nazis kept detailed records of the people who passed through the camps; nevertheless, we do not know how many Jews may still have been unaccounted for in the many places where they were murdered. In addition, as the Allies began to close in on Germany, the Nazis began to destroy their records. We also don’t know the precise number of Jews in any of these areas. The population data ranges from 1937-1941 so, for example, the countries where the figures came from 1937 may not accurately reflect the number of Jews at the time the war began.




I've selected a few stories, which I think tell a good story of how things unfolded. These stories are all consecutive, one encyclopedia entry after the other, so they weren't cherry-picked or specially selected in any way, it is actually rather difficult to find an example of a story that doesn't unfold in a fashion something like this. Only the first case was selected by me particularly, because I think it shows an interesting case of Germans siding with jews against non-jews.

Keep in mind, soviet propaganda is in full effect here

Chocienczyce is located about 45 kilometers (28 miles) north
of Minsk. In mid-1941, the village had a Jewish population of
around 80 people.
Population of 80 shortly after being occupied.
At the end of July, a non-
Jew named Zakhar got drunk and tore down Adolf Hitler’s
portrait in the mill where he worked. The Germans arrested
him, but he denied any responsibility, blaming instead two
Jews, Iosif Sosenskii and Izrail Tsimmerman, the mill’s for-
mer owners. These two men were arrested as suspected Com-
munists, but then released following the intervention of deacon
Stepan Leshkevich, the village elder ( starosta), who explained
that the Soviets had confiscated the mill from the two Jews
during the occupation from September 1939 until June 1941.
The Germans then took Zakhar into the forest and shot him.
1941, 2 jews are accused of being communists. The Germans launch an investigation, realize the 2 jews are being falsely accused, and instead released the 2 jews and shot the false-accuser. This illustrates that the Germans were acting based on the belief that there were suspected communists in the occupied territory, and weren't just inventing false excuses to kill jews. They actually weighed the case, and brought about a just verdict. This was in 1941 before the situation boiled over.
Jewish survivors remember a German commander named
Seidler, who organized an Aktion in the late summer or fall of
1941, in which the Jews were first sent home to collect their
possessions. Then they were assembled, including some Jews
brought in from surrounding villages such as Ledwienie. The
Germans beat the Jews and strip- searched them, taking all
their valuables. Subsequently all the Jews were held in a school
hall for several days, while a ghetto was being prepared. Dur-
ing this internment Leshkevich helped them by ensuring that
they were supplied with some water.2
Here is an example of a local German commander abusing his status to abuse the jewish population. But more importantly, it is an example of an Aktion which is not actually a mass killing. It is just a resettlement. You had previously posted that "Aktion" always refers to a mass-killing.
After a few days, probably in October, the Jews were moved
into a ghetto located about 1 kilometer (0.6 miles) outside the
village, which comprised up to five small houses or huts. In
total, there were just under 100 Jews in the ghetto.
People
slept crammed together. Initially the ghetto was not enclosed,
but the Jews were forbidden to leave. Later, guards were
posted to enforce this regulation, and it was surrounded with
a barbed-wire fence.3
After resettling all the jews from surrounding villages into the ghetto there were <100 jews. Remember this number.

Also, we see that the ghetto was extremely tiny, with only 5 houses. I believe that the topic of a "housing crisis" was brought up earlier. The Wehrmacht needed houses for its soldiers, during the occupation. So people were forced to live in cramped conditions which aided the spread of disease.

From the ghetto the men were taken out to work, cleaning
and repairing the roads and railroads, while the women did
the washing and made soap for the German garrison. No
food was provided to the ghetto by the Germans, but the local
peasants bartered food with the Jews for their few remaining
possessions. Leshkevich also helped with some supplies of
potatoes, flour, and grain. In the winter of 1941–1942, the
Jews suffered from the extreme cold, but they used melted snow to obtain drinking water.
Daily life in the ghetto. Also: "Jews suffered from the extreme cold" can only mean one thing, deaths during the unusually-cold winter that occurred during that year.
The Jews on work details
heard rumors about killing Aktions conducted against other
Jewish communities nearby, and some Jews made plans to es-
cape to the forests to join the Soviet partisans.4
On March 14, 1942, Soviet partisans attacked the Cho-
cienczyce estate, which enabled some of the Jews from the
ghetto there to flee with the partisans into the forests. In re-
sponse, the German Security Police from Wilejka conducted
a reprisal Aktion against the ghetto in Ilja on March 17, in
which about 600 Jews were murdered.5
With an initial population of 100 jews from the town and surrounding villages, 600 jews were shot. This corroborates what I said that jews WERE resettled east, then died in the east.

Also, this shows the motivations for the jews (hearing rumors of killing Aktions) and contacting soviet partisans for self-preservation. And it shows the motivations of the Germans (response to partisan activity).
The German Security Police planned to liquidate the ghetto
in early June 1942. On the eve of the liquidation, the Jews of
Chocienczyce received warning of the impending Aktion. Ac-
cording to the account of survivor David Rubin, he rushed to
Chocienczyce from Ilja, as soon as he heard about the Aktion
against the Jews in Ilja, which took place on June 6–7, 1942.

Most of the Jews—that is, 15 families, or about 70 people—
fled to the forest; and thanks to the ingenuity, mutual assistance,
and support of local inhabitants, a number of them managed to
hide from the Germans and local police for two years and sur-
vive.7 The remaining Jews in the ghetto (13 people) were shot.8
The end of the ghetto... almost all the remaining jews heard rumors of another aktion and went to join partisans. Only a small number of people were left and were shot in reprisal.




Dereczyn is located 73 kilometers (46 miles) west-northwest
of Baranowicze. In 1921, the Jewish population of Dereczyn
was 1,346.
Another ghetto, 1346 people according to latest census
On October 6, 1941 (at the time of Sukkot), the German
authorities forced a group of Jews from Dereczyn to dig a
large pit some 45 meters (148 feet) long, 20 meters (66 feet)
wide, and 4 meters (13 feet) deep outside the town. The men
returned exhausted after 36 hours. It was not clear what the
pit was for, but many received the impression they had been
digging their own graves
Jews being used to dig pits, but no killings were taking place in 1941. This corroborates what I said in regards to our earlier conversation... "digging pit" isn't synonymous with "killed". They were most likely digging trenches or mass graves for soldiers.
The ghetto in Dereczyn was set up in several stages, such
that it is not possible to specify a precise date for its establish-
ment. Soon after their arrival, the Germans evicted Jews from
some of the best houses, taking them for themselves. Then,
during the winter of 1941– 1942, the German administration
issued certificates to those Jews deemed “essential” on account
of their skills as craftsmen, although some Jews were able also
to buy such certificates using bribes. These “essential” Jews
consisting of about 500 people, were permitted to live in their
own collective area composed of workshops, to which non-Jews
also had access in order to request their services. Probably in
March 1942, the remaining few hundred Jews from the nearby
villages of Hołynka, Jeziornica, and Kolonia Sinaiska were
brought to Dereczyn and confined within the same small area
as the 2,000 or so “non-essential” Jews living in Dereczyn.
Another ghetto was massively expanded in population, while once again we see the Germans seizing houses for military lodging. Here, the surrounding villages are brought to the ghetto AFTER the ghetto had already been doubled in size. Once again, corroborating that jews WERE resettled east by the Germans.
By May or June of 1942, at the latest, the ghetto for the non-
craftsmen had become enclosed, and according to one account,
some 2,880 Jews were living together crammed into only 34
small cottages.6
Housing crisis, wehrmacht lodgings, etc.
Due to poor sanitary conditions, there were
epidemics in the ghetto, and many Jews died of disease and
starvation.
Resulting disease
News of Aktions in the surrounding towns encouraged
Jewish youths to organize an underground movement. The
underground collected weapons clandestinely and prepared
to leave for the forests to join the partisans. However, as it was
feared that the Germans would murder the remaining Jews in
the event of an escape, the plan was only to use the weapons
and flee as a last resort, when an Aktion commenced. Many
Jews also prepared bunkers for hiding inside the ghetto, as the
expectation of an Aktion increased.8
Town becomes affiliated with partisans, forms bunkers in expectation of shootout with wehrmacht. Germans come in, how it ends is predictable. End of ghetto.




Dokshytsy is located about 110 kilometers (69 miles) north-
northeast of Minsk. In 1925, the Jewish population was
around 3,000.

An underground movement existed in the ghetto, estab-
lished by members of a Zionist or ganization. The Germans
forced the Jewish men to perform heavy labor, and Jewish
women also had to work as maids in private households. The
Jews received no payment for their work other than some
slices of bread, pieces of meat, or a little tobacco.4 The daily
ration was only about 200 to 300 grams (7 to 11 ounces) of
bread, and there were cases of death by starvation and disease
in the ghetto. J
Yet more talk about starvation and disease and organized partisan activity

On several occasions the Judenrat intervened with the Ger-
man authorities to try to alleviate harsh conditions. For exam-
ple, they managed to open a synagogue in the ghetto and even
got the ghetto area expanded slightly, adding Keydarum Street,
by complaining about the threat of disease.
Germans actually did try to alleviate the harsh conditions to the degree they were able to, by reopening the synagogue and expanding the housing available to the jews, to alleviate disease

5 The Judenrat was
not directly involved in the Aktions against the Jews. In 1942,
the Judenrat organized a system of internal guards (probably
the Jewish policemen) that closely observed the activities of the
Germans and local police guarding the ghetto, warning the
inhabitants about any hint of an upcoming Aktion
Town council (Judenrat) was spying on the Germans

The liquidation of the Dokszyce ghetto took place in three
separate Aktions conducted between March and June 1942. In
the first Aktion, about two weeks after the Purim holiday, the
German Gendarmerie shot some 60 Jews in Dokszyce, appar-
ently intended by the Gebietskommissar as a warning to the
Jews against having any contact with the partisans. 6
First shooting was only 60 people, warning them against collaborating with partisans. So clearly German suspicion was on them, but it doesn't mention specifically why.

During the sweep, the Germans found 15 Russian bullets in the possession of the head of the Jewish Council.
Germans found partisan weaponry in the possession of the jewish council leader.

Ghetto liquidated, end of ghetto.




Dothinów is located 41.5 kilometers (26 miles) east-northeast
of Wilejka. In 1921, the Jewish population was 1,747 (out of a
total of 2,671). At the time of the German occupation, there
were approximately 5,000 inhabitants in the town, of which
about 3,000 were Jews.

After a few days of occupation, the Germans arrested five
Jews on suspicion of collaborating with the Soviets. They
dragged the suspects out of their houses, took them outside
the town on the road to Wilejka, and shot them.
Germans executed only suspected communists early on in the occupation
After a few weeks, a food shortage began to take its toll on
the Jewish population, whose major means of obtaining food
was to barter with the Poles and Belorus sians in contraven-
tion of German regulations. Some Jews gave their valuables
to non-Jewish friends to keep them safe from German searches
and demands for contributions. Jews were conscripted for
physical labor on a regular basis by the Germans via the
Judenrat. Jewish girls also had to work as housemaids for the
Germans.1
Food shortages, forced labor. Women were given lighter work than the men.

In March 1942, two Jews, named Mincel and Sigalczyk,
tried to leave for the forests to establish contact with the parti-
sans. They were intercepted by German guards but managed
to escape from prison. The German authorities then threat-
ened Niomka Riyer, the head of the Judenrat, that all the Jews
of Dołhinów would be killed if the two were not handed over.
This is where things get bad for this ghetto. Here we can see that the Germans DID warn them.

Shortly afterwards, on March 30, just before Passover, the
Jews woke up to discover that German forces had arrived in
trucks. Together with local collaborators, they began arrest-
ing Jews and bringing them to the market square, where a se-
lection took place. A small number of those arrested whowere
necessary to the Germans were left alive; the rest were taken
outside the town, to Lemlin’s factory at “Krochmalniyah” on
the road to Minsk, where they were stripped of their clothes
and shot without delay.
Germans make good on their earlier promise.

As many Jews emerged from their hiding places, they beheld a horrifying sight: houses broken into and corpses in the streets. The Germans issued instructions through the Judenrat to collect the bodies and bury them in mass graves. As the earth was still frozen, it took many days before all the bodies were buried.
So many holocaust advocates seem to emphasize the idea that the massacres were all secretive and carried out in the woods where nobody could see, against an unsuspecting jewish population. That is a lie. The Germans were very clear, they were shooting anyone involved in partisan activity, and the killings were very open, as a warning.

Over the following two days
the ghetto was liquidated except for several hundred skilled
craftsmen who were spared immediate death. More than 1,000
Jews were escorted out of town to the east and shot. According
to a Waffen-SS report, “the Aktion in Dołhinów was remark-
able in that the Jews had prepared proper bunkers as hiding
places. For two days we had to search and clear out [the ghetto]
partly with the aid of hand-grenades.”5
The town had prepared bunkers and had a shoot-out with the Wehrmacht. In reprisal, the Germans carried out a mass shooting, send the most valuable workers elsewhere, and dissolved the ghetto.
 
Maschinenpistolenschützen is absolutely the correct term
That doesn't mean Tommy gun, though, not even close. If you're going to post shitthatneverhappened.txt in German you could at least provide text that originated in that language. I don't like reading the English language fantasies of revisionists through the lens of a poor translation. It's tiresome.

Y'know the thing I don't get about holocaust deniers is that they are most often Nazi's themselves. If you hate "de jooz" so much why not be proud of the time they nearly got wiped off the fucking earth.
You might want to climb Mount Everest, but if somebody went around writing books and doing news stories saying you climbed the mountain with a cactus up your ass while eating aborted fetuses you'd protest, right?

If the actual history was being taught, with the context showing the social friction between the indigenous German population and the (mostly Jewish and wealthy) Communist intelligentsia, that would be okay. If the reality of the political violence in the Weimar was being taught, including the Spartacus uprisings and red reigns of terror (and the Freikorps, of course) that would be okay.

If the reality of the war, including the mass genocides and atrocities committed by all sides was being taught, it might be okay. If the starvation and mass deaths due to disease and famine across Europe were being displayed and shown, that would be okay.

All of that would be fair and fine because it would be real.

Instead of anything approaching reality is a ridiculously skewed narrative intended to paint the Germans as genocidal demons that just decided one day to kill all the Jews for no reason. That the Germans just picked on the Jews because they could, that the Jews were perfectly innocent and never did anything wrong, ever. That the Germans, in the middle of a war they were losing because they didn't have enough manpower or logistic support to fuel or man their tanks and trucks somehow found the resources needed to genocide 6 million people and destroy all evidence. Not just that, but in ridiculously elaborate ways with trained bears and eagles, with rollercoasters, with milking machines, and so on.

Despite claiming that the Germans built 'the most efficient industrial murder machine' in history, these seem to keep finding more and more survivors with incredible tales. Those that survived deadly gas by 'holding their breath' or that lived through 8 or more 'death camps'. Some death camp, eh? And for the ones that come clean about making it all up a hundred more insist that they really escaped the bear cage with the help of a smuggled cupcake.

In many countries, by law, you cannot challenge their stories. Even as they change and revise their tales with new survivors, with moon laser guillotines, and constantly changing numbers you can't say a thing. It's their truth, you see, and it's a cudgel to beat you into submission.

That's the problem.

I don't care how much pseudo-science bullshit you show me, you can't fake over 6 million deaths.

That's why they keep blocking any attempts to verify the so-called graves or ash pits. Cursory examination would demonstrate that there isn't enough human cremains in them to make up even a fraction of a fraction of the numbers claimed.
 
Last edited:
That doesn't mean Tommy gun, though, not even close. If you're going to post shitthatneverhappened.txt in German you could at least provide text that originated in that language. I don't like reading the English language fantasies of revisionists through the lens of a poor translation. It's tiresome.
Schutzen means infantryman, so the people shooting these guns


Maschinenpistole is literally submachine gun in German

A tommy gun is kind of submachine gun, popular with in Britain at the time and used in the military (Churchill in 1940)

1639443748282.png


What is your point here? There is no translation issue (in that nothing even close to substantial about the account is being altered), and more than that the original German transcripts are there and they say what they say.
 
Last edited:
Schutzen means infantryman, so the people shooting these guns

And where in 'tommy-gun' is 'infantryman'? Nowhere? Its like you wanted to claim 'its correct, its correct!' when you didn't even know what the hell you are reading until challenged and had to run to wikipedia or google translate. Which is all part of your bad faith strategy to just throw up whatever flimsy bullshit you can find. Its like Ryu289 is in this thread, just with slightly less pedophilia.

What is your point here?

Besides the fact that it sounds like some bullshit made up by the British first in English then poorly translated?

There is no translation issue

How do you know? Are you fluent in German? (Not Yiddish.)

BTW, I wonder if you are ready to answer my simple question. Are you a Jew?
 
Remember that chugger can't admit he doesn't have a single autopsy report proving one person was actually gassed by the Nazis nor that Hitler ever ordered the extermination of Jews. Saying it doesn't exist undermines his entire factless narrative. Not addressing it also undermines his narrative. I guess Catch-22 should have been about the holocaust.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JohnDoe
Confirmation bias is a powerful thing.
At least we agree on one thing. But it cuts both ways.
That doesn't mean Tommy gun, though, not even close. If you're going to post shitthatneverhappened.txt in German you could at least provide text that originated in that language. I don't like reading the English language fantasies of revisionists through the lens of a poor translation. It's tiresome.
This is true. Though he is quoting david irving's website apparently. There are very few people in the world who have done comparable amount of research in regards to the 2nd world war and holocaust that relied both on exhaustive archival research (including being able to get access to all kinds of diaries and letters from some of the top brass of the national socialist leadership). The man has been jailed for his views. The earlier post I made about denial movie is about him.

Besides he did post the link in the original german, if I'm not mistaken.
How do you know? Are you fluent in German? (Not Yiddish.)
I know enough german to know that while tommy gun is a specific gun and therefor can see how you see it as an indication of bad translation (and I agree that that word might be misleading), sch"utzen technically means shooter and is indeed a kind of infantryman.

I haven't compared the whole document translations. Are there any specific parts that you're doubtful about that you would like me to have a look at? I'm not fluent in German, but I'm good enough.
 
Just let it be known, the ADL lists the following as hate symbols and speech:
Muh Holocaust
Six Gorillion
The Goyim Know, Shut It Down!
Anudda Shoah
It's OK To Be White
We Wuz Kangz
 
This is true. Though he is quoting david irving's website apparently. There are very few people in the world who have done comparable amount of research in regards to the 2nd world war and holocaust that relied both on exhaustive archival research (including being able to get access to all kinds of diaries and letters from some of the top brass of the national socialist leadership). The man has been jailed for his views. The earlier post I made about denial movie is about him.
That he's quoting a real, official British forgery made with the help of captured personnel isn't the issue, the problem is the way he reflexively stammers out 'i-i-i-ts real and perfect!' when he doesn't even know what he's posting and then tries to act smug and insufferable about it.

I know enough german to know that while tommy gun is a specific gun and therefor can see how you see it as an indication of bad translation (and I agree that that word might be misleading), sch"utzen technically means shooter and is indeed a kind of infantryman.

I haven't compared the whole document translations. Are there any specific parts that you're doubtful about that you would like me to have a look at? I'm not fluent in German, but I'm good enough.

I don't any help translating German documents from the modern period, thanks.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Lemmingwise
@Rapechu (example of Germans treating Jews fairly)

Various SS Police units, though probably numbering easily in the tens of thousands, were more or less concentrated in groups that roved the country. Therefore Jews in certain areas were left unmolested for long periods (see the Jews of Wolhynien, which we discussed in the other thread). No doubt certain Germans did treat Jews very fairly, and did not view them as a threat, and were alarmed or stunned about what was going on

Some Germans even risked their lives to save and protect Jews https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=558097#p558097

---

I think it makes sense to look at a fuller account of these liquidations IE with Dokshytsy

The liquidation of the Dokszyce ghetto took place in three separate Aktions conducted between March and June 1942. In the fi rst Aktion, about two weeks after the Purim holiday, the German Gendarmerie shot some 60 Jews in Dokszyce, apparently intended by the Gebietskommissar as a warning to the Jews against having any contact with the partisans.6 Borys Kazhinits recalled that the raid started at 10:00 p.m., when Germans and local police entered the ghetto and arrested about 60 Jews, plundering apartments at the same time. The following morning, the police shot those arrested in pits close to the Polish cemetery. The sound of gunfi re could be heard in the ghetto: initially continuous salvos and then separate shots, as wounded victims were fi nished off.7

The second Aktion probably took place in early May 1942.8 At that time, the Jewish population was transferred to a school where Nikodem Derwinski carried out a selection, deciding who would be shot and who would remain in the ghetto. Commander S. Komulko was in charge of the shooting. During this operation, about 400 Jews were killed; apparently most of those released had work permits. After the Aktion, the local German agricultural leader (Sonderführer) and the police chief Komulko compelled the Judenrat to reduce the size of the ghetto along Koszciuszko Street and several of the adjoining small streets.9

The fi nal Aktion took place on May 29, 1942, when according to a German report 2,653 Jews were living in the ghetto. On that morning, local police and German forces— Gestapo men (from the Security Police post in Lepel’) and German Gendarmerie from throughout Gebiet Glebokie— surrounded the ghetto. On the same day, they had already liquidated the nearby ghetto in Parafjanów. Members of the Judenrat warned the Jews, and many tried to hide in bunkers and other places. When the Germans forced their way into the ghetto, only the members of the Judenrat were waiting in the building of the Jewish Council. One of the bunkers used by ghetto residents was located close to the school, and more than 50 individuals hid there. During this Aktion, the Jews managed to hide so well that the Gendarmerie and the local police spent a whole week searching for them with the aid of trained dogs. During the sweep, the Germans found 15 Russian bullets in the possession of the head of the Jewish Council.10 Those seized during the liquidation were taken to a gravel pit on the edge of town and shot.

Second action seems entirely unprovoked, final action took place with 2600 Jews still alive (town original population was 3000 Jews). No mention of resistance against the Germans, all they did was try to hide, and the Germans sniffed them out with dogs. 15 Russian bullets in the possession of one dude seems a crazy way to justify killing of thousands, and the ghetto was in the process of being liquidated before then?

Examples of armed resistance to these liquidations are pretty common, but if indeed the Germans were systematically liquidating these ghettos in planned fashion, not resisting at all is kind of crazy. Revisionists make a big fuss about Jews at the death camps in Poland not busting out and fighting their captors. Well it's hard to do that if you don't have guns, pure suicide. At some of these larger ghettos, guns clearly could be smuggled in, and if you fought, you actually had a chance of creating a diversion for some people to escape. Unlike with Poland there were partisans in the woods that you had a chance of joining up with if you were lucky.

=====
But more importantly, it is an example of an Aktion which is not actually a mass killing. It is just a resettlement.
With an initial population of 100 jews from the town and surrounding villages, 600 jews were shot. This corroborates what I said that jews WERE resettled east, then died in the east.

The example of resettlement you post is from 1941, when Jews were still being consolidated throughout Russia. These would indeed qualify as resettlements. After maybe midpoint of 1942 (the time when ~1.25 million Jews were rapidly "transported into the Russian East" through the Reinhard camps), I don't think there are any examples of this.

====
@Rapechu said (about Jewish role in partisan conflict possibly justifying these widespread shootings?)
What I cannot fathom, is how the mainstream historians have completely omitted this facet from the narrative, and neither sides of the debate have ever fully pressed upon the totality of the partisan war being fought in the east.

historians don't take this notion seriously for a few reasons

#1 the killings were indiscriminate, including women, children, elderly, sick, Jews who didn't know Russian or Polish (German settlers) and couldn't possibly be of much help to the partisans

#2 There is no evidence of killings being primarily reprisals. Killings were scheduled so to speak, which means they were not direct reactions to particular events. They were also not carried out in public or even publicized, which is the point of a reprisal. You want to disincentive people from doing you harm, and if they don't know it's happening, there's no deterrent

#3 They believe the Jews were mostly all killed by mid-1942 before the partisan movement even became particularly organized or numerous. By the end of 1943 in Belarus, partisans controlled huge swaths of territory, this was not the case in 1942.

#4 Elements within the German government, particularly the Wehrmacht often resented SS killing Jews under their employ and tried to protect them. We've been talking about the Bruns (military) conversation as seen on Irving's site, he tried to save some

Lastly I want to return us to this document, which to me (in @Bonesjones words) shows "intent and execution" of genocidal activities, though some justification is given

Mattogno's translation
1639450709465.png

and the part he did not include at the end. "Naturally I and the SD would like it best if Jewry in the Generalbezirk of Byelorussia was finally eliminated after their labor is no longer required by the Wehrmacht."

This is coming from the highest civilian authority in Belarus, and actually demonstrates each of the 4 points above

1. indiscriminate killings (of old people, women, children, Jews unfit for work, Jews that didn't speak Russian or Polish)

2. These killings were not reprisals since they were in numerous cases "scheduled" (Kube's word) and also clearly desired.

3. Belarus Jewish population is stated to soon be around 15,000 with further reductions planned. Minsk ghetto had been reduced 90% by this time.

4. Wehrmacht can be seen as primary entity maintaining these Jews

"Naturally I and the SD would like it best if Jewry in the Generalbezirk of Byelorussia was finally eliminated after their labor is no longer required by the Wehrmacht. For the time being the essential requirements of the Wehrmacht, the main employer of Jewry, are being taken into consideration."

What do you make of a document like this, particularly the fact that they viewed all Jews as a threat to be eliminated? Now the 'threat' might have been real, we haven't really evaluated this yet. I think certainly they viewed it as a real threat.

Mattogno is right and wrong to say that this is not evidence of an extermination order to kill Jews for being Jews.

Jews clearly weren't being killed just on account of their Jewishness, taken by itself, but for the fact of what Jews were to Nazis--people with anti-German animus, carriers of disease, degeneracy, and bolshevism, vicious present and future (in the case of children) partisan threats, breeding grounds (women) of potential threats

It is also quite obvious that they could have moved the ghettoized Jews to fully isolated and secure internment camps instead of shooting of them, but for whatever reason they did not do this (or there is zero evidence of them doing this)
 
Last edited:
That he's quoting a real, official British forgery made with the help of captured personnel isn't the issue, the problem is the way he reflexively stammers out 'i-i-i-ts real and perfect!' when he doesn't even know what he's posting and then tries to act smug and insufferable about it.
I said the original German was absolutely correct. It is absolutely correct. Submachine guns no doubt would have been used for killings like this.

David Irving is fluent in German, openly anti-Semitic, and a conspiracy theorist (he thinks the Brits faked Himmler's suicide) and he sees nothing questionable about these documents. So you're gonna have to do better then, 'they translated submachine gun as a [type of submachine gun colloquially known to Brits at this time]!'
 
Hey look chugger pretends he answers a simple yes or no question with something that isn't even tangentially involved in what I was saying. You make it so easy to disprove the holocaust at its most basic level. Nothing you post or say matters until you answer these two questions.

1. Do you have physical proof Hitler directly ordered the extermination of jews?

2. Do you have a single autopsy report of someone being killed by gassing?

There's no amount of dodging and misdirection you can do that will cover your failures. Your only solution is to knock over the chessboard and pretend you won.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NSJAP and JohnDoe
Hey look chugger pretends he answers a simple yes or no question with something that isn't even tangentially involved in what I was saying. You make it so easy to disprove the holocaust at its most basic level. Nothing you post or say matters until you answer these two questions.

1. Do you have physical proof Hitler directly ordered the extermination of jews?

2. Do you have a single autopsy report of someone being killed by gassing?

There's no amount of dodging and misdirection you can do that will cover your failures. Your only solution is to knock over the chessboard and pretend you won.
Bonesjones you should go start a Chugger thread somewhere on this site. (lolcows?) Where you complain about how I constantly ignore you and never address these two questions.
 
I said the original German was absolutely correct.

It makes sense if you're translating from English because the Allies are manufacturing evidence to 'prove' a genocide and have tasked you, a prisoner of war being threatened with execution, to translate it into German and add your personal touches. Hence the very strange Americanism of 'Tommy guns' when the British would be more familiar with Stens or Sterlings or simply used the technically correct and direct translation of 'submachine gunners'. It sticks out like a CIA glowie in a dark basement.

I said the original German was absolutely correct. It is absolutely correct

How the fuck would you even know? Do you read or speak German? How can you be sure?

David Irving is.............a conspiracy theorist

Same as you then, or does he not believe in Hitler's Magical Endless Fuel Barrel and Psychic Ring?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrolonzo
It makes sense if you're translating from English because the Allies are manufacturing evidence to 'prove' a genocide and have tasked you, a prisoner of war being threatened with execution, to translate it into German and add your personal touches. Hence the very strange Americanism of 'Tommy guns' when the British would be more familiar with Stens or Sterlings or simply used the technically correct and direct translation of 'submachine gunners'. It sticks out like a CIA glowie in a dark basement.
They were familiar with tommy guns. They were translating from German

Sterling:
1639454408506.png


Sten:
1639454442626.png


As usual denier efforts backfire
How the fuck would you even know? Do you read or speak German? How can you be sure?
1639454497774.png


Same as you then, or does he not believe in Hitler's Magical Endless Fuel Barrel and Psychic Ring?
Yeah he doesn't believe in mass gassings at Auschwitz but he does believe millions were gassed and bodies destroyed at the Reinhard camps (Magical Endless Fuel Barrel and Psychic Ring)
 

Attachments

  • 1639454296246.png
    1639454296246.png
    289.5 KB · Views: 28
  • 1639454393778.png
    1639454393778.png
    52.5 KB · Views: 32
Bonesjones you should go start a Chugger thread somewhere on this site. (lolcows?) Where you complain about how I constantly ignore you and never address these two questions.
I would ask a mod to pull it, you came here under dime to shill. There is no laughter to farm from people like you, if I had it my way you would have been banned from this site the moment you admitted to it. Your kind destroys any community it touches, with backing of groups like Shareblue.

Also I love how goalpost moving this has become. You quit harping about all the gas chamber and van bullshit once you were stomped in that argument, and now you are screeching about how we are tearing apart one of the books you provided as a source.

Many people here are skeptical about the sources you are posting to begin with, the fact you are here in bad faith only cements it more.
 
I'm pretty sure this isn't the case.
I posted a link to this interview earlier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5xmLj1Vn6Y&t=6674s

van bullshit once you were stomped in that argument
Last we ended there people said 10 starving adults and children couldn't fit in 1 square meter, and then I showed non-homicidal subway trains in china are spec'd to max 9 per square meter

you are living in an alternate reality bro
 
I posted a link to this interview earlier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5xmLj1Vn6Y&t=6674s


Last we ended there people said 10 starving adults and children couldn't fit in 1 square meter, and then I showed non-homicidal subway trains in china are spec'd to max 9 per square meter

you are living in an alternate reality bro
And people rebutted at how stupid hard it is to fit that many people in enclosed spaces, you are citing depictions of willing and organized people and not prisoners of war. Even then, the numbers of vans VS number of people they supposedly killed didn't add up.

No i'm not living in a alternative reality, it was simply 2 pages ago. You are simply goalpost moving again.
 
Bonesjones you should go start a Chugger thread somewhere on this site. (lolcows?) Where you complain about how I constantly ignore you and never address these two questions.
I like how you pretend you read the rest of the site. I don't need any thread to point out your personal failings. You expose them for all to see here, you again wish I would go away and stop hounding your flaws. They are self evident, there's no blame but your own.

You can just admit that you have zero physical proof Hitler ordered the holocaust, you can admit there is not a single autopsy done proving a single jew out of over 6 million was gassed. I'll shutup if you do it. You can either post the proof or admit all your claims are baseless. It's all you have to do.
 
Back