Culture No laughing matter: Why it’s time to cancel Facebook’s haha reaction - Journalist cries about mean words online, news at 11

https://thespinoff.co.nz/media/15-1...hy-its-time-to-cancel-facebooks-haha-reaction
Facebook’s haha reaction was developed to enable users to express laughter, but it has turned into the emoji of ridicule and scorn.

The haha emoji is poisoning Facebook. Created 11 years ago to express laughter, the emoji – officially dubbed Grinning Squinting Face – has become the emoji of ridicule. Every time I see that little yellow ball of derision sitting at the bottom of news stories and posts, cackling at the pandemic, climate change, inequality – actually anything where someone is trying to make the world a better place – my faith in humanity slips a little further.

While I’m training myself not to click on Facebook’s comments section – and that addictive rush of outrage of reading the horrendous views of strangers – the haha emoji is unavoidable. It takes just one person to click that avatar of vitriol and the post and my newsfeed is tainted forever. Even on stories where the comments are turned off, you’ll still find that little androgynous face of scorn.

My experience of social media is now like being followed everywhere by Nelson Muntz from The Simpsons – like every earnest view I hold is a source of belittlement for the world.

In a way it has become the emoji of the moment. The emoji of Brexit, Donald Trump and the anti-vaxxers. A weapon of the trolls in the time of the culture wars.

So how did the emoji of joy become the emoji of hate?

537724-face-with-tears-of-joy-emoji.webp


One columnist called the Tears of Joy emoji a “sobbing cretin popular with right-wing bullies and those with no imagination”.
The haha emoji started its life as the innocuous emoticon, XD, during a simpler time where lol, :) and MSN messenger were at the forefront of online communication. The emoji itself was developed in Japan and in 2010 was part of the first great global emoji cache known as Unicode 6.0 – a worldwide emoji standard, sometimes called the UN for emojis.

But Grinning Squinting Face soon fell into the shadow of its cousin, Tears of Joy emoji, another Unicode 6.0 alumnus, and part of the first batch of emojis available on iPhone. By 2015, Tears of Joy had changed the world’s communication and was named Oxford Dictionaries’ word of the year, the first time an emoji has taken the title. Interestingly, “post-truth” won the following year.

But not everyone was besotted with Tears of Joy. In 2016, Guardian columnist Abi Wilkinson called it an “obnoxious, chortling little yellow dickhead”.

“There’s something about this particular character – with its broad, cackling grin and the performatively prominent tears of mirth – that just feels inherently mocking and cruel,” Wilkinson said.

It wasn’t just the design that produced such a visceral reaction in Wilkinson, but how it was used – it could be found in comments on stories about refugees who drowned at sea and articles on the rise of hate crime in post-Brexit Britain. The emoji wasn’t being used to express joy, but hate. As she saw it, Tears of Joy had become a weapon of the right in the culture wars.

“When I look at its yellow face, I see the detestable, carefree smirks of Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson as they merrily dance through the current chaos – hop, skip and jumping over the cracks in society they’ve helped drive deeper and wider, safe in the knowledge they’ll personally be just fine no matter what.”

An Irish Times columnist called Tears of Joy “more beastly than any other [emoji]” and a “sobbing cretin popular with right-wing bullies and those with no imagination”.

But Tears of Joy soon took a backseat – 2016 was the year of the arguably more divisive Grinning Squinting Face. That year, Facebook made a momentous decision. The “like” – the big blue thumbs up that had become a symbol of the social media platform – would be expanded to include a sweet of emojis: love, wow, sad, angry… and “haha”. Those bullies were gifted a new and more powerful tool.

Screen-Shot-2021-12-14-at-4.11.55-PM.jpg
After almost 100 Facebook users reacted to this tragedy with a laughing emoji, a Kent Online journalist contacted some of them to ask them what they were thinking (Screenshot)
As people were given more ways to express their views on Facebook, it soon became clear that, as journalist Daniel Walters wrote, the haha emoji is “an A-hole”. Walters said, rather than laughter, the emoji had been “pressed into service for a more sinister purpose: Derisive mockery of sincere statements”.

“Make no mistake, Facebook’s laughing face emoji is laughing at you, and it’s doing so in a way far more infuriating than simply a written-out ‘ha ha’ or ‘lol’.”

The sneering contempt of Grinning Squinty was used to belittle millions around the world. A journalist writing on Medium said the emoji had even been used to discredit victims of sexual abuse in India and the #MeToo movement.

“How do you expect women to come forward and report such crimes? It is one thing to not believe them. But it is worse when you laugh at them, mock them and reduce their self-worth to nothingness.”

This year, a Bangladeshi cleric actually issued a fatwa on the haha emoji, telling his 3 million followers that “if your reaction was intended to mock or ridicule people who posted or made comments on social media, it’s totally forbidden in Islam”.

There is also something about Grinning Squinting Face that seems objectively worse than Tears of Joy – the aggressive eyebrows angling forward and the slightly tilted back head, looking down on you. While most descriptions of the emoji say it is used to convey laughter, one definition gets closer to its true meaning: “Verb: Treat with ridicule or scorn; deride, mock, laugh, sneer”.

Elevating Grinning Squinty to the status of Facebook reaction has also given the “A-hole” emoji outsized power. The reactions at the bottom of the post are not weighted to represent the number of people who click on a certain reaction. A single click on Grinning Squinty and it’s anchored to a post and an ocean of hearts and likes can’t wash it away. In a global pandemic, when social media feels more toxic and divisive than ever, this has made Facebook feel even more like the home of sneering bullies.

But do we want social media to be forever polluted with this sneering face of contempt and division? After five years, there seems to be only one solution. Just like Lonely lingerie, Charlie Chaplin and all musicals, it’s time to cancel the haha emoji. Bring back the like and the lol if we must, but Grinning Squinting Face must be excommunicated from Facebook and purged from our newsfeeds forever.

Although I know which emoji I’ll see when this story pops up on Facebook.
 
I think one of the funnier aspects of facebook is the amount of based boomers. These dudes are posting shit you would see on here, but they're doing it from their personal accounts with their identity public. And they can't be cancelled because most of them are retired or work for places ran by other boomers that don't give a shit.
This. 👍 👍 👍

Actually, let's make the sack of shit who wrote this whiny drivel really happy and just cancel Facebook entirely. I don't use the shit or any "social media". Fuck all that shit.
 
Dammit, how fucking hard is it to find one fucking .gif? Sadly my searchfu is beyond terrible, so for all of my fellow GuP fans...
EDIT:
Smug GuP.gif

Found it. Now I too can laugh at journo fags.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Secret Messages
"The haha emoji started its life as the innocuous emoticon, XD, during a simpler time where lol, :) and MSN messenger were at the forefront of online communication."

Hm, before I even look, I'm going to say that the Eternal Journalist who wrote this thinkpiece garbage isn't older than 30. "XD" was a thing on Usenet and in email well prior to "MSN messenger" being the "forefront of online communication."
 
"The haha emoji started its life as the innocuous emoticon, XD, during a simpler time where lol, :) and MSN messenger were at the forefront of online communication."

Hm, before I even look, I'm going to say that the Eternal Journalist who wrote this thinkpiece garbage isn't older than 30. "XD" was a thing on Usenet and in email well prior to "MSN messenger" being the "forefront of online communication."
1993's ASCII smilies? Anyone?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Sacred Chao
I have a theory that memes are lesser than they used to be because of how easy it is to convey emotions via emojis these days.

Please prove me right by limiting emojis and forcing people to meme, journoscum. My folders are empty, and my cups are dry.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Ebonic Tutor
I have a theory that memes are lesser than they used to be because of how easy it is to convey emotions via emojis these days.

Please prove me right by limiting emojis and forcing people to meme, journoscum. My folders are empty, and my cups are dry.

Tendies and memes are not only dreams and some day you won't have to worry about money so much.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: derpherp2
Evidently, Kiwis aren't the only ones who get triggered over Internet stickers.
He should join us here in the thunderdome, I'm sure he'd have a good time.

If I was a mod i'd link this every time someone complained about stickers.
This. 👍 👍 👍

Actually, let's make the sack of shit who wrote this whiny drivel really happy and just cancel Facebook entirely. I don't use the shit or any "social media". Fuck all that shit.
But where will we get Social Media Indians shitposting now?
Why doesn't A&N have a sinister laughing reaction?
The 4th pinned thread on this board is why. It is literally because Josh and the mods were flooded with too many goddamn sticker complaints that removing all but positive and neutral was the only option. It unfortunately means we have to put extra work in calling people dumb retarded lunatics but it works. I just miss the neutral horrifying rating. :(
 
This poor fucker should unironically kill themselves.

They are nonfunctional and their suffering needs to come to an end.

Also they look like a guy, but the amount of pointless whining points toward a vagina overflowing with sand...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: EnemyStand
How long will it take for the ADL to label that emoji as a symbol of the far right?
 
Who thought it was a good idea to let Russell Greer become a journalist?

If you're such a fragile and thin-skinned faggot that a little smiley face gets you all ass-assaulted and you obsess over it like this, then you have no place in the real world. People like this need to be locked away in high security day care.
 
Sorry jurnos, but taking away the last few ways for people to express themselves on social media won't stop them thinking the bad thoughts.

satania-laugh.gif
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ufukiniggas
Journalists, you can do whatever you want online...but you wont be able to change one simple truth.


You are a fucking loser no one would miss if you happen to suddenly die.

In fact...I would personally celebrate it. Because you are that much of an awful person to invoke this from me. You can hide my feelings online but in real life? I will spit at you wherever you walk.

DISABLE COMMENTS. REMOVE THE DISLIKE BUTTON. REMOVE LAUGHING.

Whatever it takes to prevent criticism of journoscum. Soon it'll be illegal to publicly raise your eyebrows questioningly when some faggot on CNN says something disconnected from reality.

Dont give them ideas
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ufukiniggas
Back