Nate Higgs
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2021
If enough vaccine warehouses catch fire (in Roblox) then it will.
Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big
- Thread starter JosephStalin
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
I was expecting a kike. There needs to be mandatory retirement ages for government jobs.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2021
Only state mandates, not federal ones (correct me if wrong). Doesn't mean it won't also ignored, but given the OSHA mandate is a veritable repeat of the CDC eviction moratorium it won't be as easily passed off.
Zarael
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2020
It's eerie the number of people who still haven't noticed the disparity between the messaging and the reality of what's going on. We've been hammered with endless propaganda for months and months now about how getting vaccinated will let us all get back to normal, how it will help stop the spread and how the vaccines are all very effective, etc. We have a population that is 90% vaccinated for over 16s now and surprise the virus is STILL going wild and the vaccines are doing jack shit to stop the spread. NSW just recorded a record high number of cases and this is after we're reaching the practical maximum for a double jabbed population.
Stupidity, sheer stupidity and gullibility. Wasted an entire year hiding, reassured if we all just complied and got the jab we could get our freedom back and it was nothing but lies and people are still buying it and even saying we need boosters even though the majority of the population got their second jab within the last 6 months and there is absolutely no fucking way if the things were effective in the first place they'd be wearing off already.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2016
This just needs a "ya'll" in there and it would be
Not only did she say 3, she said eventually businesses will only allow the vaccinated to work or shop there:In a word, yes.
Oh, and:
NY Gov. Hochul on Including Booster in Fully Vaccinated Requirement: 'We Will Make it Happen'
Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY) said Friday on MSNBC's "Katy Tur Reports" that New York State will eventually require people to get a booster shot to meet the state's vaccination requirements for COVID-19. | Clipswww.breitbart.com
NY Gov. Hochul on Including Booster in Fully Vaccinated Requirement: …
archived 18 Dec 2021 01:59:23 UTCarchive.ph
Don't think 2 will always be enough either.
She is planning on making NY the first state in the US to mandate vaccines, first for all adults, then all children. On Jan 15th she will say the mask measures didn't work (and people not following them helps her here) so unfortunately she has to do harsher measures for our own good and Science.
In a few months, once a few Euro countries have gone all in on mandatory vaxes, she will want to be the first state to do so here. She beat Newsom once by doing masks first, this would cement her as the Leader in COVID measures, maybe even a Presidential candidate in 2024.
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
Since Bidens jab is supposedly back on the table let me just remind everyone here of the standard procedure to refuse vaccination.
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2021
J&j way ahead of the game and ready to offload liability shell. Good luck sueing a shell with limited liability.
Here is real science: The vast majority of clots take a few years to actually kill you. They get stuck and eventually dislodge.
Imagine how many will die
Johnson & Johnson, Iconic Company Under Pressure, Plans to Split in Two
The 135-year-old company announced plans to divide itself into a consumer products business and a medical company.www.nytimes.com
And curiously enough, AZ, the other adenovirus vector vaccine maker which has also been plagued with reports of clotting, is wrapping up all of its Coronavirus R&D into its own separate, self-contained division that could be easily severed from the mother company. (Archive)
Well, fuck. Was thinking they wouldn't have a decision until next week for some reason. Need to read through the opinion(s), will be back later tonight with commentary.
Yes and yes. Unless I missed it somewhere along the way, none of the federal mandates have actually gotten in front of the Big Nine yet. I don't like how the healthcare mandates are going at all, but I'm not ready to blackpill on the private employer mandates yet. And I agree the CDC eviction moratorium is a ray of hope, for private employers at least.
Until we get a final decision from them, one thing to remember -- the courtroom is the original Clown World, anything can happen, good or bad, rational or retarded.
Billy Beer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2021
X-posting/Stealing from Joe Biden Thread.
Wales (the country attached to England) has announced that night clubs will close after boxing day. No new years celebrations for the sheep shaggers.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
France brings forward third COVID-19 vaccine shot
France will from next month reduce the time between second and third COVID-19 vaccination injections to four months and require people to show proof of vaccination to enter some venues, Prime Minister Jean Castex said on Friday.
Mandatory boosters for health staff after 30 jan . Length between booster and second doze is reduced from 5 months to 4
If the rest of them followed it with setting anything covid related on fire and some beatings doled out to the ones " just doing their job' this will be all over in a week.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
Man, fuck Pfizer for pushing the vax on kids, toddlers, and babies. With adults, I don't give a shit. They have the knowledge to research this shit and understand the risks. But kids, fuck. They don't know any better. There's a special place in hell for everyone that ends up with kid blood on their hands. From the CEO of Pfizer, Joe Biden, the parents, and their doctors. If there is a hell, I hope these cocksuckers end up on the highest level with Satan and Judas.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2019
I can’t recall the last time OSHA put a mandate in place that requires employees to do things that can potentially kill them to comply. We had our company mandated OSHA training this week and every single safety requirement was job specific and tailored to be the most effective and least onerous it could be. S
This requirement that someone take a death shot in order to be able to earn a living is pure evil and makes me wonder whether the intention here is to generate a violent backlash against the government to create the very “domestic terrorism” that they’ve been trying to claim exists. I’m not sure where this puts us on our need for 1776 to commence again but it unquestionably puts us closer. Anyone that doesn’t see this as a giant violation of one’s inherent rights does not deserve to live in this country or have the freedoms they’re entitled to under our constitution. If the Supreme Court doesn’t stop this we’re looking at giant supply chain disruptions at best and mass violence at worst. The supposed benefits of this policy are vastly outweighed by its costs.
ddw
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2021
this should be a stonetoss comic
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
In most places they've won. They normalized being forced to cover your face if an unelected bureaucrat tells you to. They normalized all sorts of insane capacity restrictions, closing the garden section of grocery stores, etc. if a politician says so. They normalized being able to mass-censor things under the guise of "misinformation" in a way that makes even 2019 Twitter look free and open, they normalized forcing people to present their papers to get into any place or maintain a job, and they normalized being able to close down society on a whim.
They normalized a totalitarian society, and no totalitarian society in the history of ever has voluntarily ceded power. They either are utterly destroyed by wars (like Nazi Germany or Pol Pot's Cambodia) or they are overthrown by internal revolution (the USSR/communism in Eastern Europe). Neither is a guarantee the resulting society will ever be free again. I wager it will take a generation before there's any real pushback against this as kids who remember freedom grow up and start agitating against the establishment. Coincidentally, that's probably when they'll release another scamdemic to keep the younger plebs in line, and by then, there won't be any places online where you can find accurate information to share and discuss with other dissenters.
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2014
Okay
Or more like middle height woman
This explains a bit
Kids are cruel but they don't know squat. Don't take their opinion to heart. If they weren't calling you fat they'd be making fun if zits or hair or some shit.
Your rellies were wrong though
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
So. Turns out another german state (the city-state of Hamburg) basically has no real information on the vaccination status of the "infected", and just made shit to continue the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" narrative.
www.spiegel.de
Sorry, my Internet is currently mostly down, so no archive yet.
The gist is that the mayor of Hamburg has for months proclaimed that 90% of the infected are unvaccinated, but in reality they'd just count everyone where they didn't know the vaccination status as "unvaccinated". Of course they have been using graphs showing the incidence rate divided between vaxxed and unvaxxed for ages to monger fear.
The reality is that in around 70% of the recognized cases the vaccination status was unknown. Boom, "pandemic of the unvaccinated".
The same thing happened in Bavaria, and I don't really see a reason why it wouldn't be like that in all other states.
This is THE foundation of the narrative, though. It's what everyone points at to demand mandatory vaccinations, and to show how useful the vaccines are.
The accompanying Twitter trend is just "Datastrophe", as if this wasn't corruption and falsehood running wide and deep, but just bad data collection.
This isn't incompetence, it's malice. Likely malice to continue the narrative to cover their asses and not bring the New World Order and depopulate the planet, but malice nonetheless.
Our new health minister (who has been the Prime Branch Covidian for the past years, appearing on talk shows every week and blabbering about how this virus is the worst through his meth teeth) is now on his fourth "This wave is gonna be the worst, but also the last" prediction.
Coronavirus: Hamburg kennt Impfstatus von Infizierten oft nicht
Seit Wochen unterscheidet Hamburg zwischen einer Inzidenz für Ungeimpfte und einer für Geimpfte. Doch es gibt Zweifel an den Daten.
The gist is that the mayor of Hamburg has for months proclaimed that 90% of the infected are unvaccinated, but in reality they'd just count everyone where they didn't know the vaccination status as "unvaccinated". Of course they have been using graphs showing the incidence rate divided between vaxxed and unvaxxed for ages to monger fear.
The reality is that in around 70% of the recognized cases the vaccination status was unknown. Boom, "pandemic of the unvaccinated".
The same thing happened in Bavaria, and I don't really see a reason why it wouldn't be like that in all other states.
This is THE foundation of the narrative, though. It's what everyone points at to demand mandatory vaccinations, and to show how useful the vaccines are.
The accompanying Twitter trend is just "Datastrophe", as if this wasn't corruption and falsehood running wide and deep, but just bad data collection.
This isn't incompetence, it's malice. Likely malice to continue the narrative to cover their asses and not bring the New World Order and depopulate the planet, but malice nonetheless.
Our new health minister (who has been the Prime Branch Covidian for the past years, appearing on talk shows every week and blabbering about how this virus is the worst through his meth teeth) is now on his fourth "This wave is gonna be the worst, but also the last" prediction.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg
Scathing letter from the editors of the BMJ (British Medical Journal) to Zuck about Facebooks fact checking and fake news flagging of an article on the Pfizer trials whistleblower.
Dear Mark Zuckerberg,
We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.
In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.
The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.[1]
But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context ... Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”
Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.[2]
We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.
-- It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong
-- It has a nonsensical title: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”
-- The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”
-- It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article
-- It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”
We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.
We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.
There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.[3] Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.
We hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.
Best wishes,
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief
The BMJ
We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.
In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.
The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.[1]
But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context ... Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”
Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.[2]
We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.
-- It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong
-- It has a nonsensical title: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”
-- The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”
-- It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article
-- It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”
We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.
We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.
There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.[3] Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.
We hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.
Best wishes,
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief
The BMJ
The fact checking article on Lead Stories:
Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials | Lead Stories
Update: In response to this fact check the BMJ published an open letter to Mark Zuckerberg. Our response is here,...
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
School District in New York Sends out Email Warning Parents of Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Students Grades K-12
Source: ESM Twitter Eastport-South Manor Central School District (ESM) in Suffolk County, New York sent out an email to all parents informing them about the new physician in their district. The new hiring was part of the new regulations regarding Sudden Cardiac Arrest of students Grades K- 12...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
They brought in staff specialized in cardiac events and send out emails warning parents for sudden cardiac arrest in kids...
LoL . Honk honk motherfuckers
ddw
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2021
1. all that stuff was going to have been normalized in the next few years regardless
2. stop fucking saying "in 2040 mask-wearing, social distancing, and vaccine passports will be normal because patriot act" like there's brick-to-the-face obvious similarities between them that i saw back in march 2020 but you seriously can't use that as a perfect reference guide when there's this much pushback. since around late last year and especially over the course of this year i've noticed the republican party become significantly more embattled in general so you really can't say it'll go on indefinitely
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
Btw., question regarding Ivermectin. A friend of mine is a pharmacologist and besides doing his PhD in public health he's working in a pharmacy. He was talking about his colleagues talking about Ivermectin and how it's complete bullshit, which didn't quite fit with what I heard about it.
He was saying that Ivermectin has to be given via injection, otherwise it would just work against intestinal parasites, and that the injection in horses would hurt the horses and subsequently humans a whole lot.
But Ivermectin is used as an oral treatment against scabies and ochnocerciasus (river blindness), which decidedly aren't intestinal, and all I found about Ivermectin causing pain is that when used as a subcutaneous injection it can cause mild pain in some swine. He had that from colleagues who owned horses, apparently, but I also know that pharmacists and horse owners are dumb as fuck.
I don't remember if he said Ivermectin had to be injected intramusculary, which is another thing that all the information for Ivermectin as injections I found said not to do because it's not designed for that. It might be that these people are either extremely dumb and would potentially harm their horses if they treated them against parasites, or they're lying.
I think there might be a lot of misinformation around (big shock, I know).
He was saying that Ivermectin has to be given via injection, otherwise it would just work against intestinal parasites, and that the injection in horses would hurt the horses and subsequently humans a whole lot.
But Ivermectin is used as an oral treatment against scabies and ochnocerciasus (river blindness), which decidedly aren't intestinal, and all I found about Ivermectin causing pain is that when used as a subcutaneous injection it can cause mild pain in some swine. He had that from colleagues who owned horses, apparently, but I also know that pharmacists and horse owners are dumb as fuck.
I don't remember if he said Ivermectin had to be injected intramusculary, which is another thing that all the information for Ivermectin as injections I found said not to do because it's not designed for that. It might be that these people are either extremely dumb and would potentially harm their horses if they treated them against parasites, or they're lying.
I think there might be a lot of misinformation around (big shock, I know).
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
Officials drawing up plans for 2 week post xmas circuit breaker lockdown - (another link) including pubs/restaurants outdoor only, indoor mixing banned, rule of 6 again etc // more scandals with the whole downing street party revelations as the guy investigating them turned out to be having his own parties, rules for thee. This is clearly one of those ‘testing public reaction by leaking gov plans’ , will be interesting to see if public remember last weeks partys in lockdown scandal. The whole of my vaxxed house + wider friendship/colleague group all tested positive yesterday for pwetty please get your booster
they areny allowed to visit parents etc over xmas and one isnt leaving his house at all for fear of getting fired if anyone comes round to see him in his 10 day isolation (works for nhs but unsure if true). Pretty sure the cold i (unvax) got off a vaxxed friend and had for 3 days last week was omicron, unreal to see everyone i know lose their minds over something that was barely annoyance when 3-4 years ago if someone had strep throat or a real nasty cold theyd go home without second thought. I thought the cough i woke up with and then would go away as the day went on was because of the cold morning weather, not some fuckin world ending nana killing virus that justifies anudda lockdown. Sucks to see the madness up close
- Status