- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
I didn't know it was possible to drive through West Virginia while looking through a mirror the whole time. Learn something new every day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nicotine is an anti-inflammatory.At least early on there was fairly convincing evidence that smoking not only didn't make your chances of dying from covid worse, it might have slightly made you less likely to die. No one was quite sure how to square that, but it's why there haven't been big anti-smoking campaigns around this. There's just no evidence it makes it worse.
At least early on there was fairly convincing evidence that smoking not only didn't make your chances of dying from covid worse, it might have slightly made you less likely to die. No one was quite sure how to square that, but it's why there haven't been big anti-smoking campaigns around this. There's just no evidence it makes it worse.
The vaccine is over a year old now and doesn’t look to be harmful. I think perhaps in another year or two it will be safe enough to get it. Would love some input from our experts in the field.
Good suggestion. These articles are great.Per a neat study Harvard did, you should wait 7 years after approval before taking a medication given how often they yank shit, and how many years it often takes. But I can't remember the study saying anything about an emergency approval for use.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/1105913Do Not Rush to Use Newly Marketed Drugs
Even when new drugs are seemingly safer or more effective, experience with them is generally limited; not enough time has elapsed and/or too few patients have been exposed to them for longer-term or rarer adverse effects to be identified.67-71 Generic, hence older, drugs are generally safer owing to their longer track record. Some have advocated a 7-year rule (ie, wait 7 years before using a new drug), based on data showing that it often takes 5 to 10 years to identify significant adverse effects.72,73
This evidence indicates why we can no longer trust the FDA to carry out its historic mission to protect the public from harmful and ineffective drugs. Strong public demand that government “do something” about periodic drug disasters has played a central role in developing the FDA.2 Yet close, constant contact by companies with FDA staff and officials has contributed to vague, minimal criteria of what “safe” and “effective” mean. The FDA routinely approves scores of new minor variations each year, with minimal evidence about risks of harm. Then very effective mass marketing takes over, and the FDA devotes only a small percent of its budget to protect physicians or patients from receiving biased or untruthful information.34 The further corruption of medical knowledge through company-funded teams that craft the published literature to overstate benefits and understate harms, unmonitored by the FDA, leaves good physicians with corrupted knowledge.5 6 Patients are the innocent victims.
Good suggestion. These articles are great.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/1105913
Article from Harvard. I wish they would refresh themselves and the rest of the world on their findings..
https://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/risky-drugs-why-fda-cannot-be-trusted#enref-10
I feel cynical even so. That's partially because every fucker in my family is fully on board the Boris Brigade, to the point that they fellate the turk every chance they get and refuse to see his very obvious fuck-ups for what they are. I probably shouldn't be surprised; they all had their tongues rammed up Cameron's backside when he was PM, even when he was repeatedly promising lies and bearing his arse at the country when he was called to account.Interesting news for UK kiwis. Also interesting for Euro Kiwis and several paragraphs in there is a sentence, or two, putting Sage in its place.
-------
Lunchtime update in The Spectator
What happened in cabinet By Katy Balls
When Boris Johnson held a cabinet call yesterday afternoon, the expectation was that an announcement on new restrictions would be imminent. But the meeting dragged on for three hours and the Prime Minister emerged afterwards announcing that nothing had changed. The situation is ‘extremely difficult’ and arguments both for and against restrictions are ‘finely balanced’ so the government would ‘keep its eye on the data’. In a battle of Sage forecasts vs data realists, the latter had won. For now.
So what happened in that meeting? ‘Boris did a great job and encouraged a proper discussion and respected other views,’ says one minister. ‘He had quite a lot [of] humility’. Michael Gove was, as usual, leading the arguments for more lockdown. But this was based on Sage forecasts of what might happen which have lost some credibility in the eyes of cabinet members who were — for the first time in a while — genuinely being consulted.
Chris Whitty started off with a presentation making the case for restrictions (yet he stopped just short of calling for them directly). But several members of Johnson’s cabinet are vocally opposed to new restrictions. They argue that there needs to be clearer data before any restrictions are brought in — with whispers of resignations if Johnson pressed on without this. These members of government hope that more time (even a few more days) will offer clarity that could show Omicron is milder than previous variants.
Behind the scenes, the Chancellor is understood to have played a key role in warning against rushing into decisions that could cost billions — although he was quieter in the meeting, only giving his thoughts when asked directly to by the Prime Minister. Other ministers keen to see more modelling include Kwasi Kwarteng, Commons leader Jacob Rees-Mogg (who highlighted how people can reduce their travel without being under lockdown orders) and Transport Secretary Grant Shapps (‘although it was never quite clear what he was saying,’ I’m told). Other ministers have been pressing on Johnson that any new measures are guidance, not law.
When Johnson emerged, talking about the need to wait for the data to work out Omicron’s severity, he was using the language of those who opposed lockdown. They argue, in effect, that Sage models cannot be trusted as they are composed of hypotheticals with a negativity bias baked in. The next few days of hospital data, it’s argued, will tell us much about how severe Omicron is and if lockdown is needed. Data is emerging not just from South Africa (where cases now seem to be falling) but Denmark where Omicron has been found to be significantly less likely to put patients in hospital.
Yet there remains a sense in government that, on the current direction of travel, restrictions are still more likely than not — it is just a question of when. Civil servants have been working on plans for a two-week ‘circuit breaker’ after Christmas. The fact that Sajid Javid said on Sunday that any new measures would have to be put to parliament before being implemented suggests that Christmas day could avoid being affected by new measures. Instead, it’s more likely that the measures will be brought in from 28 December.
While we're at it, let's play "Weird Al" song "Fat".
"Yo, Ding Dong man, Ding Dong, Ding Dong Yo"While we're at it, let's play "Weird Al" song "Fat".
I feel cynical even so. That's partially because every fucker in my family is fully on board the Boris Brigade, to the point that they fellate the turk every chance they get and refuse to see his very obvious fuck-ups for what they are. I probably shouldn't be surprised; they all had their tongues rammed up Cameron's backside when he was PM, even when he was repeatedly promising lies and bearing his arse at the country when he was called to account.
Well. I can get well and truly ratted at christmas, so that's a small mercy. Boris hasn't quite followed Cromwell on that account yet, though it's pretty clear he wants to - or more accurately, his string-pullers want to. Banning or otherwise fucking over christmas is one of the weirdly obvious tells for authoritarian shites.
When Omicron turns into a nothingburger, they'll surely spin it as a success for the vaccines and push for everyone to take more doses of the aids juice, because admitting that the disease just turned itself into another common cold, like every other coronavirus, would mean admitting that the last two years of pain were all for n othing. And the fucking believers will go along with it, because they're all invested in the fear porn to the point that they will demand useless tests before you can enter their god damn homes, even while they complain about security theatre and tell you how tired they are of the masks and the performative lockdowns.
So Trump in Dallas - to the horror of the Far Right, actually admitted he had been vaccinated AND got a booster shot.
Despite the far right portraying the vaccine as dangerous or worthless, claiming it prevents a disease that either doesn't exist or is so harmless that it is a joke...Trump claims that the vaccine has saved millions of lives.
It is time to ponder what the right is going to do. Break with Trump and maintain that Covid is a nothing burger, or switch positions and suddenly decide Covid is real.
"we saved tens of millions of lives worldwide" was the quote from Trump about the vaccine.
So Trump in Dallas - to the horror of the Far Right, actually admitted he had been vaccinated AND got a booster shot.
Despite the far right portraying the vaccine as dangerous or worthless, claiming it prevents a disease that either doesn't exist or is so harmless that it is a joke...Trump claims that the vaccine has saved millions of lives.
It is time to ponder what the right is going to do. Break with Trump and maintain that Covid is a nothing burger, or switch positions and suddenly decide Covid is real.
"we saved tens of millions of lives worldwide" was the quote from Trump about the vaccine.
You were looking in the mirror, that's cheating.
I agree with you; I have no concern about his position on whether or not anyone should get vaccinated; but he has opened up an untenable position with his statements in Dallas.Well he is fucking old already and I don't care if he gets the shot but if he says that you and your kids must be vaccinated, he can fuck off.
The difference is he will try to sell the vaccines (and had great things to say about regeneron) and encourage people to take them, but not deprive them of societal participation and curse them to doom and death for defying him,So Trump in Dallas - to the horror of the Far Right, actually admitted he had been vaccinated AND got a booster shot.
Despite the far right portraying the vaccine as dangerous or worthless, claiming it prevents a disease that either doesn't exist or is so harmless that it is a joke...Trump claims that the vaccine has saved millions of lives.
It is time to ponder what the right is going to do. Break with Trump and maintain that Covid is a nothing burger, or switch positions and suddenly decide Covid is real.
"we saved tens of millions of lives worldwide" was the quote from Trump about the vaccine.
I agree with you; I have no concern about his position on whether or not anyone should get vaccinated; but he has opened up an untenable position with his statements in Dallas.
A great portion of his followers are in direct opposition to the statement that the vaccine saves anyone - or that Covid is anything to worry about.
It is a hard statement to back track on, especially when coupled with his admission to being vaccinated and receiving the booster. It flies in the face of the position many of his supporters have towards the vaccine and it will be interesting to see how this unfolds.
It also puts the GOP in an awkward position also.
If they saved millions of lives then Covid is very real. If Trump got vaccinated and booster shots then Covid is very real. Both positions can not hold and it is fodder for the media if they opt to use it.
I feel cynical even so. That's partially because every fucker in my family is fully on board the Boris Brigade, to the point that they fellate the turk every chance they get and refuse to see his very obvious fuck-ups for what they are. I probably shouldn't be surprised; they all had their tongues rammed up Cameron's backside when he was PM, even when he was repeatedly promising lies and bearing his arse at the country when he was called to account.
Well. I can get well and truly ratted at christmas, so that's a small mercy. Boris hasn't quite followed Cromwell on that account yet, though it's pretty clear he wants to - or more accurately, his string-pullers want to. Banning or otherwise fucking over christmas is one of the weirdly obvious tells for authoritarian shites.
When Omicron turns into a nothingburger, they'll surely spin it as a success for the vaccines and push for everyone to take more doses of the aids juice, because admitting that the disease just turned itself into another common cold, like every other coronavirus, would mean admitting that the last two years of pain were all for n othing. And the fucking believers will go along with it, because they're all invested in the fear porn to the point that they will demand useless tests before you can enter their god damn homes, even while they complain about security theatre and tell you how tired they are of the masks and the performative lockdowns.