There is no realistic way to say a product is safe after 1 year of testing while having any clue about the pharmaceutical industry at all.
Thalidomide was sold for 5 years to pregnant women before they finally acknowledged what it was doing to their children. The FDA back in the 1950s still had enough sense to introduce it experimentally to only a few patients first.
Anyone else remember the opioid crisis?
All the companies involved in making vaccines, with the exception of Moderna, who has the distinction of having failed to bring every product to market that they've attempted prior to this, have paid billions in fines for deceptive information and marketing of their products in the past. What is your argument for assuming that this time surely they can't be lying? This chart is in wikipedia too, if you want to consider how biased the source has become.
The man who is pushing the vaccines the most, our lord and savior Fauci, killed 87 foster children by illegally turning them over to pharmaceutical companies for drug tolerance limit testing. He approved one medication during the AIDS crisis and it killed far more people than it saved.
VAERS lists the current confirmed vaccine adverse reactions, and the numbers are generally estimated (see lazarus report attached) to be about 1% of the actual cases.
Bearing that in mind, the vaccines have killed a suggested 2 million people. Covid has supposedly killed 800000 people in the US.
The other lovely part about VAERS data is that it has to be confirmed in order to be posted. Someone needs to call the CDC and talk to an official, then both have to confirm that it was indeed caused by the vaccine before that event is included.
These are the deadliest "vaccines" in history, and they don't even give sterilizing immunity, thereby utterly negating the original purpose of a vaccine; this would certainly explain why they redefined the term vaccine. I'm sure we've all seen this tactic in places on this forum through our favorite cows. If you can't win an argument with the current definition of a word, just change it, yes?
Former Definition in August
Immunization: The Basics
web.archive.org
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
New definition
Immunization: The Basics
www.cdc.gov
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
When I got some medical training for the career path I'm not in anymore, I was told to not take any experimental drug for at least 7 years, in order for safety data to accumulate. I dare say this advice remains quite relevant.
You can advocate for the vaccines if you want, but these are things to keep in mind. I would also suggest looking for evidence that isn't provided by the pharma companies themselves. If Pfizer, and every other company, lied to the tune of several billion dollars in the past, why would they not do it again?
As for the state of our current regulatory agencies, well...
www.science.org