Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its so weird about all this. Doctors know that the vaccine and booster doesn't work and yet they keep pushing people to take these two-four shots that don't work. The reason why they want people to take the shots is because they meet face to face with patients, if patients get infected with Coronavirus then doctors get sick and they can't make money, especially with doctors who come from foreign countries who don't have family members here.

Also its very bizarre to see how obsess these people have become with booster shots. Your like a different species to them if you tell them you haven't been boosted, just as how militant and aggressive they become too. And again, knowing that boosters and vaccines still give you positive Coronavirus results. Well most of them don't know, or just want to believe the two shots work because they got them themselves. Buyer's remorse.
The holidays are an excellent way to gauge peoples' true natures if you tell them that you're not taking the shot/booster. Remember, when people show you how they really are, you should believe them.
Like people saying they want to shoot unvaccinated people?
 
Last edited:
Its so weird about all this. Doctors know that the vaccine and booster doesn't work and yet they keep pushing people to take these two-four shots that don't work. The reason why they want people to take the shots is because they meet face to face with patients, if patients get infected with Coronavirus then doctors get sick and they can't make money, especially with doctors who come from foreign countries who don't have family members here.

Also its very bizarre to see how obsess these people have become with booster shots. Your like a different species to them if you tell them you haven't been boosted, just as how militant and aggressive they become too. And again, knowing that boosters and vaccines still give you positive Coronavirus results. Well most of them don't know, or just want to believe the two shots work because they got them themselves. Buyer's remorse.

Like people saying they want to shoot unvaccinated people?
If they don't push the Jab, they're ignoring FDA guidelines.

If they ignore FDA guidelines they lose all grants and cannot take insurance payments, IIRC. It's a death knell for any hospital or clinic or doctor's office.

Who determines FDA guidelines?

1640318428320.png


This fucking ghoul, apparently.
 
Yea speaking of which, can anyone send me letters that doctors get that their medical license's will get revoked if they talk badly about the Coronavirus or if they advise patients from getting the vaccine? I saw a letter in this thread but its thousands of pages long.

And perhaps any studies, preferably peer reviewed, from America that shows the vaccines have adverse side effects? Some things to pass around, maybe convince a few people.
 
It's so absurd how people are losing their shit over a fucking cold virus. That's all Omicron is. Alec Baldwin has killed more people then Omicron.

Ben Shapiro is right. It's not about how sick it makes you. These idiots are literally terrified about being spiritually unclean if they become "Covid Positive". It's the only logical explanation at this point. We've passed the point of insanity.
 
I didn't see it ITT so if this is late I'm sorry...but today I learned that Texas A&M has had to pull out of the upcoming bowl games because of too many injuries and "COVID related issues."

Anyone know if that uni has a vax mandate for athletes?
No idea about the research you want someone else to do for you but, A&M was replaced by Rutgers which is lol. So much for 6 wins to go to a shit bowl.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Yea speaking of which, can anyone send me letters that doctors get that their medical license's will get revoked if they talk badly about the Coronavirus or if they advise patients from getting the vaccine? I saw a letter in this thread but its thousands of pages long.

And perhaps any studies, preferably peer reviewed, from America that shows the vaccines have adverse side effects? Some things to pass around, maybe convince a few people.
1640324363167.png
 

This was always going to be the outcome.
Whooping cough vaccine actually works though. I never knew anyone who had it, and as long as you take it like every 30-40 years you're pretty much immune. They probably inhibit transmission of the disease too since deaths and hospitalizations are way down from a century ago (although it was never that dangerous of a disease to begin with, even in infants/elderly).
I saw this prediction a while ago and I can see it happening: In the near future when the vaxxed require a booster every month to keep their transhuman servitor bodies operational they can flip from forcing "vaccines" to making them a privilege for those with a high enough social credit score.
I think they'll give you some insane choice of paying out the ass for it (for low social credit score), since as we know the global elite are benevolent and aren't into outright killing people. If you die without the vaxx because you wanted to use your UBI credits on extra bugs or troon porn, that's your choice, now pay your surcharge on your universal health insurance for your bad life choices that led to your low social credit score. Right thinkers will of course get their bimonthly vaxx free.
 
All's quiet on the federal legal front, but there were some developments in a trio of frequent flyer jurisdictions on Happenings threads -- IL, MI, and MN.

CoVax Federal Local Mandate Legal News Roundup -- Great Lakes Edition

Chicago cancer metastasizes to Cook County as a whole with a new mandate. (Archive)

Cook County followed Chicago’s lead and is imposing a COVID-19 vaccination mandate for patrons 5 and older of restaurants, bars, gyms and an assortment of other businesses, officials announced Thursday.

The mandate for suburban Cook County takes effect Monday, Jan. 3, as does Chicago’s.

Skokie, Evanston, Oak Park and Stickney Township are exempt from the order because they have their own health departments, but Skokie officials announced later Thursday that they will follow suit on Jan. 10, while Evanston, Oak Park and Stickney Township were still mulling the decision.

The indoor establishments that will be required to ask for proof of vaccination status also include gyms and anywhere else food and drink are served, according to the COVID-19 order from the Cook County Department of Public Health. That encompasses movie theaters, concert venues, arcades, sports arenas and more.

Those who are 16 and older also must show an ID, such as a driver’s license, that matches with vaccination card.

When does it expire? Lol, expire.

There is no timeline for dropping the mandate, Rubin said, adding that officials are looking at COVID-19 metrics daily. Suburban Cook County remains at a high community transmission level, with a 7.8% test positivity rate and a daily case rate of more than 500 per 100,000 residents. The region’s intensive care unit capacity is at 10.8%.

Fear!

“These numbers are beginning to mirror what we were seeing a year ago with the last surge that we experienced in the winter,” said Dr. Kiran Joshi, Rubin’s co-lead. “The surge of delta that we experienced between July and October never really ended. ... So this is really a surge on top of a surge, and now we’ve got omicron on top of that.”

Meanwhile, MI's Whitmer corrects the record to inform us all that no, she has not, in fact, developed a spine after all. (Archive) She apologizes for any confusion this may have caused.

Whitmer, a Democrat, acknowledged at her year-end roundtable with reporters that some comments she made during a visit to Montcalm County were misunderstood. She said she was trying to address the problem of possibly losing state employees but that she still supports the mandate.
"I am not going to join a lawsuit attempting to stop the vaccine mandate from going into effect and I think it is irresponsible and reckless for the AGs who have," Nessel said.

Lastly, in a medical miracle, MN grows two functioning brain cells out of nowhere and rubs them together, issuing an injunction against St. Paul's mandate for firemen and cops. (Archive)

A judge on Thursday ordered St. Paul to stop enforcing a vaccine requirement for some city employees while litigation over the mandate continues.

Ramsey County District Court Judge Robert Awsumb issued a temporary restraining order "to preserve the status quo" until questions related to state labor laws raised in lawsuits filed by the St. Paul Police Federation and Firefighters Local 21 can be decided, he wrote.

Peter Leggett, communications director for Mayor Melvin Carter, said St. Paul will postpone enforcement of the vaccine requirement for all city workers in light of the decision.

Also from this same judge recently:

Awsumb granted a separate request for a temporary restraining order from a group representing some St. Paul parks and public works union employees. Unlike police officers and firefighters, those workers have the right to strike if negotiations fail.

Judge Awsumb seems pretty cool.
 
I have been informed that since I'm not vaccinated I'll need a rapid COVID test to be welcome at a family Christmas party. I haven't been paying much attention to testing, and have no idea what the different kinds of tests are these days and how they work. Does anyone have any advice on the best way to get tested in the USA, specifically Michigan, on short notice? Preferably one that:
A. Does not involve giving out my personal information,
B. Is least likely to give a false positive,
C. Will be satisfactory to anyone at the party who might be nervous.
1. Purchase hatchet
2. Purchase Sharpie
3. Use sharpie to write "COVID Test" on side of hatchet blade.
 
Here's the latest Omicron data from the UK



1640324626629.png


Approx 91,000 confirmed Omicron cases in the UK up to the 22nd December

1640324682098.png


300 hospitalisations and 24 deaths. It bears repeating that many of these cases will be entirely incidental to being tested positive for Omicron Covid. But let's take this as the actual mortality and morbidity numbers and see what we're dealing with

A 0.3% hospitalisation rate and a 0.02% mortality rate. To put that in context the case fatality rate from seasonal flu ranges from 0.1 to 0.2% with a 1-2% hospitalisation rate depending on the severity of the flu strain. Note we do not and have never routinely screened all hospital admissions for flu with PCR testing so there are no incidental cases to speak of.

Now of course the argument is that there is a great deal of herd immunity from flu so even in a bad year most people won't catch it, which is true. Compared to Omicron Covid where there is little to no immunity, except from the sacred vaccines. So even though it may be a lot less lethal than the flu it has the potential to infect everyone (except the blessed boosted) and so put enormous strain on the hospital system. Except there is no evidence that purebloods are losing their cross immunity from Covid and past exposure to previous Covid strains remains robust. So it's overwhelmingly the vaccinated who're being infected. Solution is to vaccinate them even harder.


Among those who had received two doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, a Pfizer-BioNTech booster increased vaccine effectiveness against the omicron variant to 71.4% two weeks after it was received — that figure was 75.5% for people whose primary doses were the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to the study.

Here are the latest numbers as these reports are now out of date.


1640326016181.png


Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease from Omicron Covid. Remember with vaccines anything below 60% is considered poor and 40% useless. For sure no EUA would ever have been granted with efficacy data like this.

Two doses of vaccine- 3 months after administration is negative. In other words you are more likely to suffer symptomatic disease if you've had the jab than if you haven't. Vaccine enhanced infection has now been confirmed. This is not ADE, more likely a sign that OAS is kicking in hard with the vaxxed. But at least now we understand the need to reduce the booster time and the urgency to get the double dosed boosted.

With the boosters protection from symptomatic disease ranges from 20-60% 1 month post administration. I think we'll be moving on to recommended monthly booster dosing for the old and 'immunocompromised' in the New Year. Sounds crazy but that's what the data is telling us. It will be minimum 3 monthly for everyone else and may be reduced further depending on how the disease progresses and the compliance of the public.

Of course that's supposing that governments continue with the present insanity and refuse to acknowledge that Omicron Covid is literally the common cold, and all signs are that's exactly right.
 
Last edited:
People are basically fighting each other over vaccine/test line ups and those autistic rapid tests here in Canada. I know people doing rapid tests nearly everyday. Not once have I heard our government give straight facts about this variant. Nah just listen to us! Do it for the community. Put your livlihood at stake for the community just isolate bro your bills can wait!
 
Its so weird about all this. Doctors know that the vaccine and booster doesn't work and yet they keep pushing people to take these two-four shots that don't work. The reason why they want people to take the shots is because they meet face to face with patients, if patients get infected with Coronavirus then doctors get sick and they can't make money, especially with doctors who come from foreign countries who don't have family members here.

Also its very bizarre to see how obsess these people have become with booster shots. Your like a different species to them if you tell them you haven't been boosted, just as how militant and aggressive they become too. And again, knowing that boosters and vaccines still give you positive Coronavirus results. Well most of them don't know, or just want to believe the two shots work because they got them themselves. Buyer's remorse.

Like people saying they want to shoot unvaccinated people?
People want to shoot you? That's really unnecessary.

The shots just keep you off my table. (The morgue.) That's all. It's not a moral high ground, which is what these people are doing. It's just keeping you from dying or using up resources. If you'd rather be dead or sick that is up to you.
It's not "oh I'm a saint protecting people". It's literally "I got this shot so I won't get as sick if I catch this". Self interest. Nothing wrong with that.

At the start of this I had sentimental feelings and had hoped to see farmers get through this by doing the safe things to protect themselves, but I got over it.
 
People want to shoot you? That's really unnecessary.

The shots just keep you off my table. (The morgue.) That's all. It's not a moral high ground, which is what these people are doing. It's just keeping you from dying or using up resources. If you'd rather be dead or sick that is up to you.
It's not "oh I'm a saint protecting people". It's literally "I got this shot so I won't get as sick if I catch this". Self interest. Nothing wrong with that.

At the start of this I had sentimental feelings and had hoped to see farmers get through this by doing the safe things to protect themselves, but I got over it.
Here's the issue though. Many of us already had COVID. I was personally asymptomatic.
Most healthy young adults will be asymptomatic or extremely mild. Overall COVID has a 0.2% infection lethality rate, yet its like 0.02 for 20-39 - and that's not excluding the deathfats from the demographic.

So the vast, overwhelming majority of us will not end up dead or under severe (or even moderate) illness, yet when we point this out pro-vaccination types just revert back to collectivist/utilitarian logic "oh well get the shot for muh greatur guud!11"
 
As an experiment, let's see how many things I was right about when it came to COVID-19 back when I sounded the alarm in April, 2020. Many of these things came from primary sources that were available around that time.
  • Claim: There are a number of antivirals that may work for COVID-19, including Chloroquine Phosphate, HCQ, Remdesivir, monoclonal antibodies, and so on.
    • Outcome: Actually, any antiviral will work for COVID-19 if given prophylactically, but the media and medical establishment strangely suppressed both antivirals and early treatment, using studies with utterly futile late treatment as proof of their inefficacy. Antivirals don't work on hospitalized COVID-19 patients because the virus is already gone.
  • C: COVID-19 transmits very rapidly, with an R0 of about 6.6.
    • O: The R0 has been revised downward significantly. PCR tests may have over-diagnosed the virus with false positives.
  • C: The median incubation period is 5 days, with some outliers out to 24 days.
    • O: Still correct, but the vast majority of cases take 2 to 5 days to incubate.
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 is airborne and transmits in aerosols.
    • O: Yes, it does have aerosol transmission. The CDC and WHO waffled on this, claiming it was droplet-borne. Wrong.
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 is detectable on surfaces for up to 17 days.
    • O: It actually only survives on surfaces for about 2 hours and is extremely weak to ultraviolet light. Surface disinfection protocols employed early on were absolutely useless medical theater. The best preventive measure would have been UV irradiators installed in air ducts.
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 can spread by the oral-fecal route.
    • O: Live virus has been detected in wastewater, but transmission by this route has not been conclusively proven.
  • C: There may be asymptomatic spread.
    • O: Incorrect. The vast majority of spreaders are symptomatic.
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 can infect someone by landing in their eye.
    • O: Yes, it can infect through the ocular mucosa, but it isn't as common as respiratory transmission.
  • C: The virus may be a recombinant chimera.
    • O: Actually, it's possible that it was not a recombinant chimera at all, but produced in a laboratory by serial passaging (as in, "forced evolution").
  • C: There are now two recognized strains of the disease, the L strain and the S strain.
    • O: These strains are now basically extinct and have already been replaced by a multitude of descendants.
  • C: SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are around 80% genetically similar and share many attributes.
    • O: Yes. COVID-19 and SARS are very similar diseases caused by a very similar pathogen. They even have similar sequelae. Before "Long COVID", there was "Long SARS", with many SARS sufferers developing chronic fatigue, mental issues, and persistent lung scarring.
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 receptors.
    • O: Yes, but not only ACE2. There are many other potential host factors, such as neuropilin-1.
  • C: When the virus binds to ACE2, it causes serum Angiotensin II to rise, leading to inflammation.
    • O: Actually, COVID-19 patients have normal serum Ang II. The inflammation may be mediated by intracellular calcium rise, a bradykinin storm, complement system activation, mast cell reactions, and delayed host response leading to a cytokine storm.
  • C: SARS-CoV has Dengue-like ADE. SARS-CoV-2 may have the same.
    • O: COVID-19 vaccines based on the Wuhan strain appear to enhance infection by Omicron. ADE may already be setting in, or the vaccines may be harming adaptive immunity somehow (VDJ recombination inhibition by Spike, anyone?).
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 has a furin cleavage site that may enhance its infectivity compared to SARS-CoV.
    • O: Yes and yes.
  • C: Angiotensin receptor blockers may actually make the virus more severe.
    • O: Studies on this are inconclusive, but they seem to indicate there is no harm for COVID-19 patients previously using ARBs to continue their ARB therapy.
  • C: COVID-19 causes a bilateral pneumonia with ground-glass opacities visible on CT scan.
    • O: Actually, these CT findings may be pulmonary emboli from the virus's very aggressive endothelial assault triggering micro-clotting in the lungs.
  • C: COVID-19 can cause lung monocytosis and irreversible fibrosis, like SARS.
    • O: Yes, it can.
  • C: COVID-19 can cause myocarditis.
    • O: Yes, but it's very rare.
  • C: SARS-CoV has been known to cause vasculitis. It is unknown if SARS-CoV-2 can do the same.
    • O: Yes, SARS-CoV-2 harms vascular endothelial cells and pericytes.
  • C: SARS-CoV was known to cause neural damage to humanized mice. SARS-CoV-2 may be neurotropic.
    • O: Actually, SARS-CoV-2 does not readily infect neurons directly, but it does infect brain astrocytes and vasculature, starving neurons of nutrients and oxygenated blood and damaging their supporting structures.
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 can cause brain damage.
    • O: On rare occasions, COVID-19 patients have presented with severe encephalitis and brain lesions, yes. One pre-print study indicated that SARS-CoV-2 may cause Lewy body formation in the brains of macaques. Other studies indicate that the Spike protein (which is also used in the vaccine) may be highly neurotoxic on its own.
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 can cause kidney failure.
    • O: Yes, it can, but it's variable.
  • C: SARS-CoV-2 can cause liver failure.
    • O: Only very rarely. It's actually more likely that toxic antivirals could contribute to this.
  • C: Patients with digestive symptoms have worse clinical outcomes.
    • O: Yes. It is possible for COVID-19 to set up shop in the GI tract and cause GI symptoms, and this is a predictor of more severe illness.
  • C: COVID-19 may form a sort of symbiosis with prevotella bacteria in the gut.
    • O: No, it can't. However, an overworked immune system may lead to gut dysbiosis.
  • C: SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 can both cause cytokine storms.
    • O: Yes, very profound ones.
  • C: COVID-19 may be treated with blood filtration therapy, like CytoSorb.
    • O: No, the devices fill up with blood clots almost immediately and become useless for treating late-stage COVID-19-induced sepsis.
  • C: The virus is reliant on TMPRSS2 and inhibitors of that protease may help fight the virus.
    • O: Ivermectin actually has activity against TMPRSS2.
  • C: Novel super-proteins like DRACO might help.
    • O: They're not available and have not been tested.
The first time I saw one of the papers on the potential for SARS to have ADE was actually back in February, 2020:


One of the lead researchers on this paper was Shi Zhengli, the "Bat Lady" herself. I tried warning folks the vaccine could be harmful (i.e. it could cause original antigenic sin) early on, and was told by 'tarded Redditors that I was an "infodemic spreader".

Now look what people are saying.



Welp. :stress:
 

Attachments

People want to shoot you? That's really unnecessary.

The shots just keep you off my table. (The morgue.) That's all. It's not a moral high ground, which is what these people are doing. It's just keeping you from dying or using up resources. If you'd rather be dead or sick that is up to you.
It's not "oh I'm a saint protecting people". It's literally "I got this shot so I won't get as sick if I catch this". Self interest. Nothing wrong with that.

At the start of this I had sentimental feelings and had hoped to see farmers get through this by doing the safe things to protect themselves, but I got over it.
Vaccines provide immunity. These aren't vaccines. They're also more likely to kill you than the virus they're supposed to protect you against.

You're a fucking retard.

And none of this touches on the violations of the Nuremburg Code and human decency.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back