Manosphere Jack Murphy / John Murphy Goldman / Bigbadbeard1000 / Jacked Brunch / Liminal Order - Bearded grifter of the Manosphere and an actual cuck

[anionfarflung]

Get a load of how Jack pronounces "ennui" in that one podcast. What a sophisticate.

Spoiler

in-you-eye

 

[Popper Whiting]

 

[MunsterCheese]

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

I KNEW IT, the first time I watched this fucking guy, I knew he was full of shit...so satisfying.

@mindlessobserver Nice work OP....ty

 

[mindlessobserver]

Jeremy dunking on Jack again

 

[schizotypal]

this jew makes me ashamed to have a beard

 

[Iamthatis]

Why is this thread being kept in prospering grounds?

 

[Retink]

Possible image of Matt from Tinder:

Spoiler: Not safe for viewing

I really hope the boulder king comes out and makes a joke that he's the one.

Jeremy dunking on Jack again

"At age 15 they are already women..." - Jack Murphy

But he didn't mean little girls in that way. He just continues to defend being into women under the age of 18 and I remember at one time he has a Freudian Slip and says he has a 14 year old girl waiting for him at home instead of a girl 14 years younger than him. He corrected himself, but knowing what we know now it seems way worse.

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

But he didn't mean little girls in that way.

Is this sarcasim?

 

[Retink]

Is this sarcasim?

Yes, it was meant to be a sarcastic "sure he didn't" type of comment.

 

[Bloodfeast Island Man]

It still blows my mind that he's acting like he's 25 and he wrote this when he was 18. He was 35-40, right? And the fact that he's marrying the cumdumpster.

And wtf about this woman? I mean, it sounds like she didn't like it but just did as she was told. I'd really like to know the psychology of a woman who'll do this degrading shit like getting pissed on and still think that the man who orders her around like a dog would make a good life partner. I can't tell if she's looney or dumb.

When the inevitable Chris Benoit situation happens, I hope he starts the suicide note with

What I’m talking about is advanced stuff, guys, apex level.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Why is this thread being kept in prospering grounds?

I've put the request in to move it out. It's up to the mods now. If someone wants to do a "Talk to Staff" thread by all means go poke them. If I do more it just comes across as needy.

 

[MysticLord]

"At age 15 they are already women..." - Jack Murphy

But he didn't mean little girls in that way. He just continues to defend being into women under the age of 18 and I remember at one time he has a Freudian Slip and says he has a 14 year old girl waiting for him at home instead of a girl 14 years younger than him. He corrected himself, but knowing what we know now it seems way worse.

Do you remember anything else from whatever show or stream he was on when he said that?

 

[Retink]

He was 35-40, right?

He was 40 when he wrote the cuck article, as he openly states that in the introduction to the article. All of that retarded shit came out of a man who was 40 years old, and he wrote multiple articles about this kind of retarded shit in his early 40's.

Don't believe the people who say he was just coming out of a divorce either, that's cope. On his Liminal Order page his divorce was in 2009 and he was writing these articles in 2015-2016, so it's rather annoying when people excuse this shit because it was five years ago but then act like the divorce was almost at the same exact time. People change but if you're 40 and write something this stupid and publish it, there's no hope.

Do you remember anything else from whatever show or stream he was on when he said that?

It was TimCast, I'm pretty sure it was the same episode as the clip where he says women are mature by the age of 15. He was going on about how at 14-15 year gap wasn't a big deal and his girlfriend was 14 years younger than him, and instead of saying he had a girl X years younger than him he said he had one X years old.

 

[MysticLord]

It was TimCast, I'm pretty sure it was the same episode as the clip where he says women are mature by the age of 15. He was going on about how at 14-15 year gap wasn't a big deal and his girlfriend was 14 years younger than him, and instead of saying he had a girl X years younger than him he said he had one X years old.

How many episodes of the Timcast was he on? Can you think of anything else from that episode to narrow it down?

 

[Retink]

How many episodes of the Timcast was he on? Can you think of anything else from that episode to narrow it down?

He's on every week or every other week, except for breaks when he travels. This is why Tim is probably defending him so hard and it makes it such a pain to look things up. Luckily Metokur was kind enough to put a date on the clip he used which made it easier to find, here's the instance, video time stamped for convenience.

This episode probably has a lot of good content in retrospect.

 

[Willie Thrills]

It was TimCast, I'm pretty sure it was the same episode as the clip where he says women are mature by the age of 15. He was going on about how at 14-15 year gap wasn't a big deal and his girlfriend was 14 years younger than him, and instead of saying he had a girl X years younger than him he said he had one X years old.

Historic sexual relationships are a rabbit hole to go down, but worth mentioning that it's a load of bullshit. I can't stand the ahistorical bullshit these nonces come out with.

Weird older men trying to get young women is a common theme, but not backed up by any record - instead, it's usually found in written fantasies by men at the time, similar to today. There are cases of arranged marriages, but those went both ways - a princess was equally likely as a prince to get married off at aged 4 to an adult. This was a political move, not a sexual move.

However.

There is one thing which is evidently quite common, which is the reverse, older women seeking younger men for recreational sex, due to lower risk of pregnancy. Men would marry younger women, but those who didn't "save themselves for marriage" would behave less like John Goldman and more like Ben Franklin.

 

[Retink]

Historic sexual relationships are a rabbit hole to go down, but worth mentioning that it's a load of bullshit. I can't stand the ahistorical bullshit these nonces come out with.

Weird older men trying to get young women is a common theme, but not backed up by any record - instead, it's usually found in written fantasies by men at the time, similar to today. There are cases of arranged marriages, but those went both ways - a princess was equally likely as a prince to get married off at aged 4 to an adult. This was a political move, not a sexual move.

However.

There is one thing which is evidently quite common, which is the reverse, older women seeking younger men for recreational sex, due to lower risk of pregnancy. Men would marry younger women, but those who didn't "save themselves for marriage" would behave less like John Goldman and more like Ben Franklin.

That's actually an interesting thought. I never looked into this, so I'm potentially wildly off base here, but the idea of an older man being attractive to a younger woman because he is more established and capable of providing does seem like a more modern idea. Historically we didn't have such long periods of training to start a career as apprenticeships were the norm prior.

More importantly there wasn't as much stuff back in the day, you didn't have things like cell phones, computers, wireless/internet plans, you weren't saving up to put kids through college, and you didn't have a car loan either. Sure, people can argue horses existed and were expensive, but how many people truly needed horses to function in society? Most older towns were designed to have what you need within walking distance as commuting is something that's still a complicated topic in parts of Europe.

I can maybe see an argument that because communities were smaller and more insulated you had more spread in ages overall, just because there was a more limited pool of partners, but I do also think younger men had more opportunity to be established and less expenses as a whole made an age gap less desirable financially.

 

[Willie Thrills]

That's actually an interesting thought. I never looked into this, so I'm potentially wildly off base here, but the idea of an older man being attractive to a younger woman because he is more established and capable of providing does seem like a more modern idea. Historically we didn't have such long periods of training to start a career as apprenticeships were the norm prior.

More importantly there wasn't as much stuff back in the day, you didn't have things like cell phones, computers, wireless/internet plans, you weren't saving up to put kids through college, and you didn't have a car loan either. Sure, people can argue horses existed and were expensive, but how many people truly needed horses to function in society? Most older towns were designed to have what you need within walking distance as commuting is something that's still a complicated topic in parts of Europe.

I can maybe see an argument that because communities were smaller and more insulated you had more spread in ages overall, just because there was a more limited pool of partners, but I do also think younger men had more opportunity to be established and less expenses as a whole made an age gap less desirable financially.

This is 100% true for Europe.

I think you didn't put enough attention to the however segment.

Age gaps did happen, for sexual encounters, and casual sex was common.

But it wasn't common for young women or old men - the two groups who evidently had the most extramarital sex were unmarried men under 25 and married or widowed/single women over 35.

This was extremely common.

I went down this rabbit hole and discovered that whereas most older men seem to want a younger partner, women are more likely to have actually had or pursued significantly younger partners.

The reaction then was the same as now - if you heard that a 17 year old girl was fucking a 23 year old man, it would be weird now and was weird then.

But the alternative, a 17 year old boy fucking a 23 year old woman, was Henry VIII's first marriage! And he was well-liked for this, being seen as a handsome and masculine king for it.

 

[MysticLord]

Historic sexual relationships are a rabbit hole to go down, but worth mentioning that it's a load of bullshit. I can't stand the ahistorical bullshit these nonces come out with.

Weird older men trying to get young women is a common theme, but not backed up by any record - instead, it's usually found in written fantasies by men at the time, similar to today. There are cases of arranged marriages, but those went both ways - a princess was equally likely as a prince to get married off at aged 4 to an adult. This was a political move, not a sexual move.

However.

There is one thing which is evidently quite common, which is the reverse, older women seeking younger men for recreational sex, due to lower risk of pregnancy. Men would marry younger women, but those who didn't "save themselves for marriage" would behave less like John Goldman and more like Ben Franklin.

Historically marriage was for life; barring death no guy wants to wait until he's 40 to marry a 18 year old. Most guys who did marry were a few years older than the women they married, barring a few exceptional ethnic or religious groups. Think 5 year age gap.