US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[HTTP Error 404]

BREAKING: White House tries to walk back Biden's admission that there 'is no federal solution' to COVID-19

"The Biden-Harris Administration is making sure states have what they need to tackle COVID..." the White House tweeted a day after Biden said "there is no federal solution" to stop the coronavirus.

thepostmillennial.com

ALERT: The retard slipped the leash. Repeat, the retard slipped the leash. All shills on damage control, await further instructions.

 

[Ruin]

Do all the sudden goal post shifts imply at all what they think the SCOTUS will say?

That and I think it's dawned on even the dumbest Democrats that if they don't do something fast the 2022 midterms might be a complete sweep of both houses.

 

[tehpope]

View attachment 2835684
goal post has moved

View attachment 2835682

BREAKING: White House tries to walk back Biden's admission that there 'is no federal solution' to COVID-19

"The Biden-Harris Administration is making sure states have what they need to tackle COVID..." the White House tweeted a day after Biden said "there is no federal solution" to stop the coronavirus.

thepostmillennial.com

ALERT: The retard slipped the leash. Repeat, the retard slipped the leash. All shills on damage control, await further instructions.

I think the left civil war is about to kick into 5th gear. "The Car is on fire and there's no driver at the wheel".

 

[Oxous]

Do all the sudden goal post shifts imply at all what they think the SCOTUS will say?

It implies that common sense is prevailing and people are finally realizing that total cases is a useless statistic, with total hospitalization being the most helpful metric for determining how many people are seriously ill.

 

[X Prime]

Sounds like a way to juke the stats by only admitting unvaccinated people to the hospital and sending vaccinated people home, regardless of symptom severity.

 

[DejaThoris]

Civil War, Revolution, Troubles, whatever you want to call it it's coming. It's just deceptively slow like an oncoming train. You can see it in the distance and it looks like it's going slow when in reality it's going faster than you think.

That's a definite possibility. But it also looked that way back in the early 1970s, but shit eventually calmed down and petered out.

I'm pretty convinced that there is a lot of hurt in the future for us Americans but I think it will probably be in the form of economic troubles rather than civil war or anything like that.

 

[Non-breath oblige]

Do all the sudden goal post shifts imply at all what they think the SCOTUS will say?

It implies that common sense is prevailing and people are finally realizing that total cases is a useless statistic, with total hospitalization being the most helpful metric for determining how many people are seriously ill.

Also recent sportsball game cancellations and postponements at a ridiculous rate despite touted high vax rates and mandates. College hoops, which is one of the highest money makers for university athletic departments without a decent or any football team, is starting to feel the worst of it with conference games beginning to start. (These usually decide or influence which teams qualify for March Madness, where you usually get more money depending how far you make it in the tournament.)

 

[tehpope]

That's a definite possibility. But it also looked that way back in the early 1970s, but shit eventually calmed down and petered out.

I'm pretty convinced that there is a lot of hurt in the future for us Americans but I think it will probably be in the form of economic troubles rather than civil war or anything like that.

At least back in the 70s, the left cared about America and its health. The left doesn't fucking give a shit about America today. They'll easily let the country burn while they're sitting pretty.

 

[Terrifik]

Good news for the CUMO fans we reached bill cosby defence
Statue of limitations by the court

https://twitter.com/WestchesterDA/status/1475914979119452161/photo/1

 

[Sithis]

At least back in the 70s, the left cared about America and its health. The left doesn't fucking give a shit about America today. They'll easily let the country burn while they're sitting pretty.

The left hasn't given a shit about America or its health since Kennedy was assassinated (which I remain firmly convinced LBJ had a hand in). JFK was the last Democrat president who embodied that spirit you're referring to. Since LBJ poisoned the wells and claimed credit for the civil rights act while also setting up the permanent welfare state the left at large has only ever cared about continuing LBJs spirit of "ill keep those niggers voting Democrat for 200 years". They only care about what will most immediately give them more power.

 

[Nacho Man Randy Salsa]

If it was up to the modern left they would just dissolve the country as a sovereign state as penance for it's racism.

But alas they have to live here begrudgingly.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

Even if this is propaganda, this is WAY TOO obvious. There was someone I remember listening to just yesterday saying someone on the left was going to do more infighting amongst their own political affiliation.

At first, I thought it would be easy to laugh at him, but now this is getting serious. More mainstream outlets are attempting to shield deflection from their Omicron and BRANDON cases by not just blaming and lying about the other side, but by not even attempting to create and introduce viable solutions.

Joe Biden is no figurehead; he’s just truly a ghost at this point in time, and 2022 will be no different.

 

[Terrifik]

Jan. 6 committee agrees to defer request for Trump administration records

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol has agreed to defer its request for hundreds of pages of records from the Trump administration.

www.pbs.org

Cucked & seeth
Biden riding with trump Presidential exemption .

WASHINGTON (AP) —
WASHINGTON (AP) — The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol has agreed to defer its request for hundreds of pages of records from the Trump administration, bending to the wishes of the Biden White House.

The deferral is in response to concerns by the Biden White House that releasing all the Trump administration documents sought by the committee could compromise national security and executive privilege.

President Joe Biden has repeatedly rejected former President Donald Trump’s blanket efforts to cite executive privilege to block the release of documents surrounding that day. But Biden’s White House is still working with the committee to shield some documents from being turned over.

Trump is appealing to the Supreme Court to try to block the National Archives and Records Administration, which maintains custody of the documents from his time in office, from giving them to the committee.



The agreement to keep some Trump-era records away from the committee is memorialized in a Dec. 16 letter from the White House counsel’s office. It mostly shields records that do not involve the events of Jan. 6 but were covered by the committee’s sweeping request for documents from the Trump White House about the events of that day.

Dozen of pages created Jan. 6 don’t pertain to the assault on the Capitol. Other documents involve sensitive preparations and deliberations by the National Security Council. Biden’s officials were worried that if those pages were turned over to Congress, that would set a troublesome precedent for the executive branch, no matter who is president.

Still other documents are highly classified and the White House asked Congress to work with the federal agencies that created them to discuss their release.

“The documents for which the Select Committee has agreed to withdraw or defer its request do not appear to bear on the White House’s preparations for or response to the events of January 6, or on efforts to overturn the election or otherwise obstruct the peaceful transfer of power,” White House deputy counsel Jonathan Su wrote in one of two letters to the committee obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press.

Su wrote that for the committee, withholding the documents “should not compromise its ability to complete its critical investigation expeditiously.”

For the last several months the National Archives has been transmitting tranches of documents to the White House and to lawyers for Trump to determine whether they contain any privileged information. Trump has raised both broad objections to the release of the documents as well as specific concerns about particular documents.

The National Archives has said that the records Trump wants to block include presidential diaries, visitor logs, speech drafts, handwritten notes “concerning the events of January 6” from the files of former chief of staff Mark Meadows, and “a draft Executive Order on the topic of election integrity.”

Biden has repeatedly rejected Trump’s claims of executive privilege over those documents, including in a letter sent Dec. 23 regarding about 20 pages of documents.

“The President has determined that an assertion of executive privilege is not in the best interests of the United States, and therefore is not justified,” White House counsel Dana Remus reiterated in the latest letter.



Trump has taken to the courts to block the document releases. A federal appeals court ruled this month against Trump, and he has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, though the high court has yet to decide whether to take up the case.

Judge Patricia Millett, writing for the court in the Dec. 9 opinion, said Congress had a “uniquely vital interest” in studying the events of Jan. 6 and Biden had made a “carefully reasoned” determination that the documents were in the public interest and that executive privilege should therefore not be invoked. Trump also failed to show any harm that would occur from the release of the sought-after records, Millett wrote.

“On the record before us, former President Trump has provided no basis for this court to override President Biden’s judgment and the agreement and accommodations worked out between the Political Branches over these documents,” the opinion stated.

The deferral is in response to concerns by the Biden White House that releasing all the Trump administration documents sought by the committee could compromise national security and executive privilege.

President Joe Biden has repeatedly rejected former President Donald Trump’s blanket efforts to cite executive privilege to block the release of documents surrounding that day. But Biden’s White House is still working with the committee to shield some documents from being turned over.

Trump is appealing to the Supreme Court to try to block the National Archives and Records Administration, which maintains custody of the documents from his time in office, from giving them to the committee.
The agreement to keep some Trump-era records away from the committee is memorialized in a Dec. 16 letter from the White House counsel’s office. It mostly shields records that do not involve the events of Jan. 6 but were covered by the committee’s sweeping request for documents from the Trump White House about the events of that day.

Dozen of pages created Jan. 6 don’t pertain to the assault on the Capitol. Other documents involve sensitive preparations and deliberations by the National Security Council. Biden’s officials were worried that if those pages were turned over to Congress, that would set a troublesome precedent for the executive branch, no matter who is president.

Still other documents are highly classified and the White House asked Congress to work with the federal agencies that created them to discuss their release.

“The documents for which the Select Committee has agreed to withdraw or defer its request do not appear to bear on the White House’s preparations for or response to the events of January 6, or on efforts to overturn the election or otherwise obstruct the peaceful transfer of power,” White House deputy counsel Jonathan Su wrote in one of two letters to the committee obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press.

Su wrote that for the committee, withholding the documents “should not compromise its ability to complete its critical investigation expeditiously.”

For the last several months the National Archives has been transmitting tranches of documents to the White House and to lawyers for Trump to determine whether they contain any privileged information. Trump has raised both broad objections to the release of the documents as well as specific concerns about particular documents.

The National Archives has said that the records Trump wants to block include presidential diaries, visitor logs, speech drafts, handwritten notes “concerning the events of January 6” from the files of former chief of staff Mark Meadows, and “a draft Executive Order on the topic of election integrity.”

Biden has repeatedly rejected Trump’s claims of executive privilege over those documents, including in a letter sent Dec. 23 regarding about 20 pages of documents.

“The President has determined that an assertion of executive privilege is not in the best interests of the United States, and therefore is not justified,” White House counsel Dana Remus reiterated in the latest letter.
Trump has taken to the courts to block the document releases. A federal appeals court ruled this month against Trump, and he has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, though the high court has yet to decide whether to take up the case.

Judge Patricia Millett, writing for the court in the Dec. 9 opinion, said Congress had a “uniquely vital interest” in studying the events of Jan. 6 and Biden had made a “carefully reasoned” determination that the documents were in the public interest and that executive privilege should therefore not be invoked. Trump also failed to show any harm that would occur from the release of the sought-after records, Millett wrote.

“On the record before us, former President Trump has provided no basis for this court to override President Biden’s judgment and the agreement and accommodations worked out between the Political Branches over these documents,” the opinion stated.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol has agreed to defer its request for hundreds of pages of records from the Trump administration, bending to the wishes of the Biden White House.

 

[Oxous]

Jan. 6 committee agrees to defer request for Trump administration records

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol has agreed to defer its request for hundreds of pages of records from the Trump administration.

www.pbs.org

Cucked & seeth
Biden riding with trump presental exclusion .

Jan. 6 House Committee is the biggest nothingburger in the history of nothingburgers. It's going to set a new world record for nothingburgering by the time it's done.

 

[Spasticus Autisticus]

The left hasn't given a shit about America or its health since Kennedy was assassinated (which I remain firmly convinced LBJ had a hand in). JFK was the last Democrat president who embodied that spirit you're referring to. Since LBJ poisoned the wells and claimed credit for the civil rights act while also setting up the permanent welfare state the left at large has only ever cared about continuing LBJs spirit of "ill keep those niggers voting Democrat for 200 years". They only care about what will most immediately give them more power.

After reading James Burnham's Suicide of the West, which was written around that time, I have to agree. That book put to rest for me the idea that the left of that time cared about America or Western civilization in general. Even on the issues where they appear superficially to have flipped like freedom of speech or academic freedom, it becomes clear that their stated views on these issues were never really held with sincerity. What we see with the left now is just a natural consequence of their capture of so much cultural and economic power. As an aside it's also interesting to see that RINOs were a problem even then.

 

[Absolutego]

Do all the sudden goal post shifts imply at all what they think the SCOTUS will say?

No, it's more that they and all their triple-vaxxed friends are getting Omicron despite adhering to all the useless security theater measures to avoid COVID, so suddenly they have to recant on how it's a moral failing to ever catch the virus and focus on what always was the only thing that ever mattered: keeping hospital beds available for bad cases.
A shift in public health policy that should've had people scratching their heads when it was first introduced ca. March 2020 is finally, mercifully, coming to a close, now that coastal elitists can't simply use it as a sledgehammer to moralize to the rest of the country.

 

[Salubrious]

Jan. 6 House Committee is the biggest nothingburger in the history of nothingburgers. It's going to set a new world record for nothingburgering by the time it's done.

It'll mean more in name than anything. The left will just say the words "January Sixth" as proof of how evil Republican citizens are, the same way video game journalists STILL scream about GAMERGATE!!!!

I expect a big to-do on the "anniversary" next week, but outside that not much other than politicans waving their dicks at each other per usual like with the Steele Dossier or whatever.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Can Fauci get kicked upstairs? That's what I would expect. But I don't think he has anywhere to go but down, from the position he's currently in. He's been in his position since the 80s. I'm not sure he won't go down without a fight. I can see the media getting a ban on any interviews with Fauci.

Regardless, he's not only apparently the highest-compensated government employee, he's also apparently going to have the largest US Government pension in history; being a soulless, dishonest, propagandizing Government hand-puppet really pays:

[A]uditors at OpenTheBooks.com estimate Dr. Fauci’s annual retirement would exceed $350,000. Thereafter, his pension and benefits would continue to increase through annual cost-of-living adjustments.

Fauci has 55 years of service as a federal employee.

For the second year in a row, Fauci was the most highly compensated federal employee and out earned the president, four star generals, and roughly 4.3 million of his colleagues. As director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Fauci earned $434,312 in 2020, the latest year available, up from $417,608 in 2019.

Dr Fauci's Retirement Pay Will Exceed $350,000 Per Year: The Largest In U.S. Federal Government History | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[CrippleThreat]

It'll mean more in name than anything. The left will just say the words "January Sixth" as proof of how evil Republican citizens are, the same way video game journalists STILL scream about GAMERGATE!!!!

I expect a big to-do on the "anniversary" next week, but outside that not much other than politicans waving their dicks at each other per usual like with the Steele Dossier or whatever.

And I expect every GOPer, except the Freedom Caucus, to sit on their hands, falling for the threat of expulsion if they give an iota of care for Jan. 6th.

 

[deeplyhigh]

Well well well…

https://www.infowars.com/posts/ny-gov-drops-covid-vax-requirement-for-transportation-workers-citing-crew-shortages/