Manosphere Jack Murphy / John Murphy Goldman / Bigbadbeard1000 / Jacked Brunch / Liminal Order - Bearded grifter of the Manosphere and an actual cuck

DelusionTree said:
Nick believes John Goldman hired a PR firm for disaster reputation management by his most recent public tweets, which means we might see paid shills trying to astroturf the cuckolding and pegging.
Click to expand...
That's going to be a hell of a task...

ShoFuKan said:
Rekita posting DMs, posting in order.
View attachment 2837384
View attachment 2837393
View attachment 2837394
View attachment 2837400
View attachment 2837401
Click to expand...
He threatened Rackets more than once with mutuals and when he says he never recommended people to try it, well there's this from a second article of his months later:
1640764037757.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska, FeatherPlucker, Mad Butcher and 11 others
Retink said:
That's going to be a hell of a task...


He threatened Rackets more than once with mutuals and when he says he never recommended people to try it, well there's this from a second article of his months later:
View attachment 2837405
Click to expand...
Man, all this "Erotic Energy," "Masculine Energy," "Feminine Energy," is just vagina crystals for MGTOWs.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Buck Russell, FeatherPlucker, Mad Butcher and 47 others
FallOfGrumps said:
Man, all this "Erotic Energy," "Masculine Energy," "Feminine Energy," is just vagina crystals for MGTOWs.
Click to expand...
Now you're just thinking with dark feminine energy as Mr. Murphy would say. Have you aligned your man chakras recently?

WhimsicalTrolli said:
Honestly monogamous relationships are mostly dead, everything is just seeking entanglements and hookups. Any relationship you guys see is probably open. But this is my doomer take on this.
Click to expand...
Most people are monogamous when together probably, they just don't talk about their sex life so all you really hear is all the degenerate shit.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Kamikirimushi, GrumbleBum2, marisa # and 31 others
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: Caramelized Squid, Mad Butcher, Clockwork_PurBle and 17 others
Retink said:
Most people are monogamous when together probably, they just don't talk about their sex life so all you really hear is all the degenerate shit.
Click to expand...
But marriage rates plummet and divorce and infidelity is on meteoric rise.

It's just not really surprising because those of jack's critics are cucks and most relationships its guarantee one or both partners are unfaithful. We live in hedonistic times.
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
  • Feels
Reactions: Tranny Slapfight, Kamikirimushi, Chopped Salads and 13 others
FallOfGrumps said:
I've said it before, and I will say it again: I don't really understand why. Machiavelli fucking lost. He spent a year in prison after the entire government he served was overthrown and then when he got out he gifted an ignored book to the new government. He isn't some evil super genius, he is a weird cuck who thinks being kind is a weakness. I have read The Prince, yes it is interesting. Clearly, though, the guy didn't have a complete philosophy. If he did, he wouldn't have spent so much time as a nobody.

Edit: Ultimately, being manipulative only works until people figure out that you are a manipulative asshole. You can't do it forever. I always roll my eyes when I see characters like Little Finger in Game of Thrones being shown off as some kind of bad ass political figures. Little Finger would've died way earlier, everyone knew the guy was shady and couldn't be trusted.
Click to expand...
If you read Machiavelli's work outside of The Prince you'll find he was more a republican idealist than a supporter of the dishonest and manipulative practices discussed in Il Principe. Given that the book was a "gift" he was obligated to give the Medicis, the same people who locked him up and tortured him, I lean into the belief the book was criticism disguised as advice. By praising the behavior of the Italian nobility as neccessary but not Christian or moral I'm of the opinion he was hiding an insult in a compliment. Especially when compared to his other political works and the contrast to his stated ideals in other books. Which makes it all the more funny that people mistake veiled autistic criticism from a renaissance politics nerd as deep and insightful political advice to follow.

I kind of find it funny that people, like Jack, praise Machiavelli, claim to be just like him, but not having read his other works or taken into historical context as to why it was written, haven't considered it was Machiavelli taking a huge autistic shit on a group of people he despised but doing so in a way which wouldn't end up with him losing his head. The Prince is a work of fart huffing criticism that the author figured the people he was aiming it at would be too dumb to realize what it was.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kars den Karb, Adamska, Tranny Slapfight and 43 others
WhimsicalTrolli said:
But marriage rates plummet and divorce and infidelity is on meteoric rise.
Click to expand...
There are always going to be stupid people, and small numbers of idiots can inflate metrics really easily. A lot of that is probably the people who didn't want to marry but had to before just stay out of the pool now or fail. Focus on making the relationship you want to have and if shit goes south don't be afraid to try again.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Tranny Slapfight, Kamikirimushi, Vetinari and 11 others
Popper Whiting said:
If you read Machiavelli's work outside of The Prince you'll find he was more a republican idealist than a supporter of the dishonest and manipulative practices discussed in Il Principe. Given that the book was a "gift" he was obligated to give the Medicis, the same people who locked him up and tortured him, I lean into the belief the book was criticism disguised as advice. By praising the behavior of the Italian nobility as neccessary but not Christian or moral I'm of the opinion he was hiding an insult in a compliment. Especially when compared to his other political works and the contrast to his stated ideals in other books. Which makes it all the more funny that people mistake veiled autistic criticism from a renaissance politics nerd as deep and insightful political advice to follow.

I kind of find it funny that people, like Jack, praise Machiavelli, claim to be just like him, but not having read his other works or taken into historical context as to why it was written, haven't considered it was Machiavelli taking a huge autistic shit on a group of people he despised but doing so in a way which wouldn't end up with him losing his head. The Prince is a work of fart huffing criticism that the author figured the people he was aiming it at would be too dumb to realize what it was.
Click to expand...
That's a really interesting theory that I am surprised I haven't heard before. The only two theories I have ever heard are "He is a realistic genius!" or "HE IS AN EVIL SATAN WORSHIPPER!"
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Ted_Logan, Apocalypse Chew Chew, UVB-76 and 5 others
Popper Whiting said:
I lean into the belief the book was criticism disguised as advice.
Click to expand...
The best explanation I heard of it, was that he had to write something with information that he couldn't openly state in the writing. So a lot of it was masked in that autistic manner where he was both criticizing the reader and trying to push an idea. Think of it as an early version of "A Modest Proposal" which was taken seriously by some when it really just had a more abstract sense. It was very much a book about power and control, but it's not as simple as many people make it out to be in that they quote it at face value and think that's the way to go.

Machiavelli was after all someone trying to get the ear of nobles and serve them, so he had to sound smart enough to put an idea across, but not come off as a threat to them either.

Could just be me being an autist though.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kars den Karb, Adamska, Shig O'nella and 9 others
mindlessobserver said:
With a logo like this why would you think that?
lo-logo-white-2-258x300.png
Click to expand...
It's Chinese knock-off NXIVM.

Retink said:
it's a group with super secret millionaire CEOs, but you've probably never heard about them:
Click to expand...
This is the same shit you see from just about any of these masculinity grifters: This super secret group of high rollers who'll make you earn a million dollars flat per month and when you get in it's a bunch of "hustlers" who make money with serious and sustainable enterprises like trading penny stocks with leverage and dropshipping questionable health pills on boomers on Facebook.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kars den Karb, FeatherPlucker, Gorilla Tessellator and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back