Manosphere Jack Murphy / John Murphy Goldman / Bigbadbeard1000 / Jacked Brunch / Liminal Order - Bearded grifter of the Manosphere and an actual cuck

Maybe people need to stop writing satire for documents that will be read by a public with an average IQ of 100.
To be fair, A Modest Proposal was intended as a troll and Machiavelli wasn't writing for random people, he was writing for nobles, officials, and statesmen. That's not to say Machiavelli was targeting an intelligent audience, but he was targeting a powerful one, so it wouldn't be a leap to think that he may have wanted to find a politician to serve that was unstable and could be better controlled or to find someone who understood his work better. There's also the question if he was trying to put across anchoring before it was a thing, in that you propose an extreme but then dial it back, so that someone employing him could feel like a more just ruler by taking his thoughts and scaling them back.

There's always going to be an issue with historical texts in that fiction and reality exist in them, and the writer is often times in a state of duress in that if they say too much too openly they could be punished significantly. Just look at how we discuss things on mainstream platforms today, where language is coded to prevent bans and demonetization. Now imagine that, but you can't actively distribute your writing unless it's inflammatory enough to get attention but not controversial enough to have you put in a prison and all copies destroyed because there are only a few hundred copies total.
 
The best explanation I heard of it, was that he had to write something with information that he couldn't openly state in the writing. So a lot of it was masked in that autistic manner where he was both criticizing the reader and trying to push an idea. Think of it as an early version of "A Modest Proposal" which was taken seriously by some when it really just had a more abstract sense. It was very much a book about power and control, but it's not as simple as many people make it out to be in that they quote it at face value and think that's the way to go.

Machiavelli was after all someone trying to get the ear of nobles and serve them, so he had to sound smart enough to put an idea across, but not come off as a threat to them either.

Could just be me being an autist though.
Let's be honest, Machiavelli was also an autist. He got in trouble with the Medicis by being an obsessive stickler to detail and protocol as a Florentine civil servant and they used a convenient political conflict to lock him up on the excuse he was helping the opposition, if he actually had he would have lost his head. He also was an obssessive collector of Roman history to the point where his rooms of his villa were stuffed to hoarder level of objects, writing and documents. He was an anally retentive clerk who probably would have loved trains had he been born in the 20th century. Don't get me wrong the guy does know what he is talking about when it comes to the subjects he discussed. And as you pointed out his job was couching advice in a way that appealed to the nobility. I find him to be a fascinating and misunderstood historical figure.
 
Edit: Sorry frens, I’m my rush to get this out I didn’t take the time to skim previous posts, making me very late to the party.
74E69390-1BB5-440C-A504-814445296E39.jpeg
Attention gamers!
Renowned veteran of gamer gate the quartering has allegedly uncovered a gay porno featuring Jack

This is a link to a Twitter thread where some guy is trying to catalogue it

I wonder if Murphy will become a reformed gay man like Milo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A Modest Proposal was intended as a troll
Lord Bathurst's letter intimated that he certainly understood the message, and interpreted it as a work of comedy:

12 February 1729–30:

"I did immediately propose it to Lady Bathurst, as your advice, particularly for her last boy, which was born the plumpest, finest thing, that could be seen; but she fell in a passion, and bid me send you word, that she would not follow your direction, but that she would breed him up to be a parson, and he should live upon the fat of the land; or a lawyer, and then, instead of being eat himself, he should devour others. You know women in passion never mind what they say; but, as she is a very reasonable woman, I have almost brought her over now to your opinion; and having convinced her, that as matters stood, we could not possibly maintain all the nine, she does begin to think it reasonable the youngest should raise fortunes for the eldest: and upon that foot a man may perform family duty with more courage and zeal; for, if he should happen to get twins, the selling of one might provide for the other. Or if, by any accident, while his wife lies in with one child, he should get a second upon the body of another woman, he might dispose of the fattest of the two, and that would help to breed up the other.
The more I think upon this scheme, the more reasonable it appears to me; and it ought by no means to be confined to Ireland; for, in all probability, we shall, in a very little time, be altogether as poor here as you are there. I believe, indeed, we shall carry it farther, and not confine our luxury only to the eating of children; for I happened to peep the other day into a large assembly [Parliament] not far from Westminster-hall, and I found them roasting a great fat fellow, For my own part, I had not the least inclination to a slice of him; but, if I guessed right, four or five of the company had a devilish mind to be at him. Well, adieu, you begin now to wish I had ended, when I might have done it so conveniently"
 
Let's be honest, Machiavelli was also an autist. He got in trouble with the Medicis by being an obsessive stickler to detail and protocol as a Florentine civil servant and they used a convenient political conflict to lock him up on the excuse he was helping the opposition, if he actually had he would have lost his head. He also was an obssessive collector of Roman history to the point where his rooms of his villa were stuffed to hoarder level of objects, writing and documents. He was an anally retentive clerk who probably would have loved trains had he been born in the 20th century. Don't get me wrong the guy does know what he is talking about when it comes to the subjects he discussed. And as you pointed out his job was couching advice in a way that appealed to the nobility. I find him to be a fascinating and misunderstood historical figure.
I don't know about his personal life well enough to comment on that, but it does sound reasonable for his writing style. Even if he wasn't any of that we do have to understand there's a lot of historical context we're probably missing and what was written then has probably been discussed and evolved since then. I'm a book nerd and the biggest thing I find about a lot of the popular authors of ancient times, especially in intellectual circles, is that it's very incomplete, most of it is very basic by now, and often times there's a lot of inserted information. The latter of that is probably less likely with Machiavelli as he's more recent but sometimes you read a Roman emperor and you have to wonder how they're interpreted as viewing something in modern terminology only to realize the translator inserted context.

The further back you go, the worse it probably becomes as stories are passed down from sources and context is changed. Just look at something like Islam with strong and weak Hadiths, which they kill each other over constantly.
 
Why in the world would you leave all your dirty cuck sex degen shit out there for people to find, and then act surprised and offended when it's found and put to light? What the fuck was he thinking, and why wouldn't you do your best to delete it all before you switch your grift from cuck to right wing trad shit.
 
I don't know about his personal life well enough to comment on that, but it does sound reasonable for his writing style. Even if he wasn't any of that we do have to understand there's a lot of historical context we're probably missing and what was written then has probably been discussed and evolved since then. I'm a book nerd and the biggest thing I find about a lot of the popular authors of ancient times, especially in intellectual circles, is that it's very incomplete, most of it is very basic by now, and often times there's a lot of inserted information. The latter of that is probably less likely with Machiavelli as he's more recent but sometimes you read a Roman emperor and you have to wonder how they're interpreted as viewing something in modern terminology only to realize the translator inserted context.

The further back you go, the worse it probably becomes as stories are passed down from sources and context is changed. Just look at something like Islam with strong and weak Hadiths, which they kill each other over constantly.
I got to admit that it why I never understood book burning. The problem isn't the book it is the idiots that read them, particularly the current generation of shallow status climbers. Not everyone is cut out for critical thinking, and even I'll admit there is a lot I don't grasp. I mean Jack Murphy and Tim Pool are great examples of people who read Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged and came away thinking it was a deep insight into how the world should be rather than an insight into what a delusional, bitter, selfish and unlikable cunt Ayn Rand actually was.
 
I got to admit that it why I never understood book burning.
It usually only happens when people want to erase an ideology. Hitler for example (I know, an eye rolling example but the best one that comes to mind) absolutely despised people who weren't nationalists. He was always seen arguing with people in bars and on the streets about how great Germany and the German people were/are. Most of these people, according to him, were apparently jewish. So when he took over, he assumed burning all the anti-nationalistic books/art would make it go away. It's also why he felt the need to get rid of the jews, he thought they were naturally anti-nationalistic due to his own experiences (My theory is that he just frequented liberal art towns which are probably anti-nationalist by default. He loved the arts).

The same thing happened in the soviet union or where ever you find a dictator. I just used hitler because there is nonstop documentaries about him everywhere so I know too much about that autist.
 
I got to admit that it why I never understood book burning. The problem isn't the book it is the idiots that read them, particularly the current generation of shallow status climbers. Not everyone is cut out for critical thinking, and even I'll admit there is a lot I don't grasp. I mean Jack Murphy and Tim Pool are great examples of people who read Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged and came away thinking it was a deep insight into how the world should be rather than an insight into what a delusional, bitter, selfish and unlikable cunt Ayn Rand actually was.
I really doubt Jack or Tim read Atlas Shrugged as it's a long read. I doubt they really read much outside of articles and synopsis style of stuff.

I personally like Ayn Rand's work, but I wasn't that much of a fan of Atlas Shrugged. The first book/section of the three was actually rather good and should have been how the rest went but then it went off to sci-fi which just didn't really work for me. The ending with Eddie did hit rather hard though as it was left so open in a state of despair while the other characters had a more defined ending. If I had to pick a book by Rand, I'd go with Fountain Head, it has the same theme of two people starting at the same point (Roark and Keating vs Dagny and James) and then picking different paths in terms of how they advance themselves, but Fountain Head is a much more clear and consistent story which explores a lot more. The weakest part was probably Gail Wynand as he was a great character but his simping of Rand's crush got old quick.
 
Some more porn, some of it butt stuff and homoerotic, from our pal Jack Goldman and his wife. Someone posted it on 4chan. @Ride please tag this as private if necessary. edit Nevermind, I figured out how to private tag something. /edit

He posted this online, in his own home, with his face and distinctive beard in frame, without changing his voice, and with his wife. On a paid camera porn site, no less. This is idiocy, not revenge porn.
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
 
Last edited:
Apparently this was just posted and deleted. Kvetch much? Also how the fuck is Quartering now a sexual predator?
View attachment 2837298
If he did actually post that I think the guy is in for a world of pain. There are plenty of cucks (in this case I'm not talking about the literal ones) on the right but not many of them openly endorse this kind of kvetching cancel culture bullshit. To the extent I think he might cop more blowback from his associates for that tweet and overall strategy (DMing people alluding to threats involving their mutuals, the supposed PI threat sent to quartering etc) than he would have for being a fucking degenerate.
 
Rekita saying "Sorry not sorry" because of how Jack was appealing to Glenn Beck and tagging in Sydney and Elijah in a tweet earlier.
According to this, Jack is an active Democrat
View attachment 2837456
So basically Jack “precious metal” Murphy is a liberal trying to subvert right leaning spaces, and he would have gotten away with it, if the meddling quartering didn’t point out John tripped and fell on a dildo live on chaturbate?

I’m gonna need a lot more popcorn for this.
 
So basically Jack “precious metal” Murphy is a liberal trying to subvert right leaning spaces, and he would have gotten away with it, if the meddling quartering didn’t point out John tripped and fell on a dildo live on chaturbate?

I’m gonna need a lot more popcorn for this.
It's not even subversion, the man is just trying to make some money while going on an ego trip. If he's anything more than a grifting degenerate I'll eat my hat.
 
So basically Jack “precious metal” Murphy is a liberal trying to subvert right leaning spaces, and he would have gotten away with it, if the meddling quartering didn’t point out John tripped and fell on a dildo live on chaturbate?
He has written a book called "Democrat to Deplorable" where he goes on to explain why so many Obama voters voted for Trump and you could say that's when he "switched sides" but the thing is that was written 2018 with the sex vids from 2019 and that democrat declaration a few days ago I think if it's recent. So he's been grifting for 3 years trying to cultivate the "ALPHA GIGA CHAD MALE" image but all it took was one super chat for him to reveal what a degenerate he is.
 
"I've definitely fucked guys before, I'm heteroflexible." -Jack Murphy. In his own words. In his own voice. Looks like this was clipped from one of his chatterbate videos.

View attachment 2837530
Any guy that is that fixated on having his ass eaten and shoving dildos up his ass is 100% gay, not even bi. It seems his fiancé really is his beard, no pun intended.
 
Back