I was recently talking to a friend about this type of phenomenon where, the creation of social media was originally intended to be a reflection of one's own life and a way to share special moments that occur. However for Kevin and a few others it seems to be the exact reverse of that, where it's not that their twitters reflect their lives, but instead their twitter
IS THEIR LIFE. His entire identity
is his online persona. Simply put Kevin lives for twitter rather than in spite of it.
I was sort of thinking about Kevin's toy collection before, from a financial standpoint. Like every asset you purchase incurs some amount of depreciation once it's used right? Like how once you drive a car off a lot it immediately loses some percentage of it's value.
If you think about it, every time Kevin opens one of the boxes and fiddles around the toy with his hands for a few minutes and then chucks it into the bin, the act of doing that loses almost 98%ish of it's value. A Transformer that probably cost $20 on Amazon is now worth maybe less than two dollars, maybe five at the
absolute best. And then multiply that how many toys and plushies he actually owns and how many times he's done that. And then imagine that could have been used to put down a mortgage on a house or something.
I guess there could be the argument that if it makes you happy then it's simply the price of happiness. But can anyone really say that these toys are really meaningful to Kevin if he just throws them into a bin and forgotten about moments after they're purchased. If one of these bins disappeared would he even notice? When it comes time to sell them, I wanted to make a joke that they would have to sell them by the pound like in that movie Lord of War where they sell guns by weight because of how many there are.
View attachment 2855080