Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

View attachment 2857782
So he claims to have studied etymology, yet wasn't able to figure out what "proto" actually means? As in prototypical? It means "the first" or "the original", not "something that is assumed to have existed". What a tard.

As much as it pains me to admit he is right. The proto-prefix in linguistics always means a language assumed to exist, and almost always reconstructed, that other languages descended from, its a bit of jargon from linguistics. Like for example as to why this is useful is that sometime we have a corpus(body of written material) of a language but it is incomplete or certain words from its daughters haven't been attested yet. A perfect example of this is vulgar latin and proto-romance, Vulgar Latin is what we call the group of dialects that eventually became the languages of French, Italian, Spanish etc, but Proto-Romance is what we get when we work backwards from French Italian Spainish etc., they usually agree. This is sorta abstract so if you have questions ill be happy to explain.
(Any linguists who see any errors feel free to call me a retard and correct me, I am very much an amateur and very aware of my limitations)
 
View attachment 2857782
So he claims to have studied etymology, yet wasn't able to figure out what "proto" actually means? As in prototypical? It means "the first" or "the original", not "something that is assumed to have existed". What a tard.
Linguistic pedantics aside, the position of the chariot relative to the horse is really bothering me. Like either Stephie is on a ledge, that horse has no legs, or ( going by the look on it's face) Stephie's kiddy cart is being held aloft by something jammed deep in that horse's ass.
 
As much as it pains me to admit he is right. The proto-prefix in linguistics always means a language assumed to exist, and almost always reconstructed, that other languages descended from, its a bit of jargon from linguistics. Like for example as to why this is useful is that sometime we have a corpus(body of written material) of a language but it is incomplete or certain words from its daughters haven't been attested yet. A perfect example of this is vulgar latin and proto-romance, Vulgar Latin is what we call the group of dialects that eventually became the languages of French, Italian, Spanish etc, but Proto-Romance is what we get when we work backwards from French Italian Spainish etc., they usually agree. This is sorta abstract so if you have questions ill be happy to explain.
(Any linguists who see any errors feel free to call me a retard and correct me, I am very much an amateur and very aware of my limitations)
Nah, dude. You're not 100% here.

There was a language that existed that gave rise to French, Italian, Spanish, etc. It's not "assumed to have existed," it did exist. We know it existed. There are written and verbal records attesting to its existence and its relationship to vulgar Latin.

"Proto" does mean "what came before."

Even though most "proto" languages rely on varying levels of assumption to piece together, there's no "assumption" required for such a thing to exist. The only place assumption comes in is that there's going to be some guesswork in trying to piece together a long-dead language.
 
Linguistic pedantics aside, the position of the chariot relative to the horse is really bothering me. Like either Stephie is on a ledge, that horse has no legs, or ( going by the look on it's face) Stephie's kiddy cart is being held aloft by something jammed deep in that horse's ass.
Considering it looks like it's attached to the horse by fucking ropes, a levitating chariot is the least of my concerns.
 
Considering it looks like it's attached to the horse by fucking ropes, a levitating chariot is the least of my concerns.

Labelle's traced work is kind of like one of those "when you notice it" pictures, which I guess is the only thing kind of fun about anything Labelle does.
What baffles me the most about the whole tableau is that there is SO MUCH wasted horizontal space in these (and lazy ass wasted space in general, what the fuck is that social media page? When you're using a tablet you make perfectly straight lines by holding down shift. Just. So fucking stupid and lazy) why not just push the horse up a bit and finish drawing it? Yeah it wouldn't be accurate but nothing in this pic is so why start caring now?

Instead we have friggin Artax here purposely submitting itself to the Swamp of Sadness rather than be used as Labelle's prop.
 
050122.png
 
One of the things that pisses me off is how fucking coy journos are about describing or not describing what's involved so you can't tell whether they're talking about surgery to correct hypospadias or surgery to correct, er, vending machines


Also Senator Wiener of California is a chomo and you can't prove me wrong. Every creepy bill, he's behind.

That bill is transphobic!!!! reeee

I mean, say a brave transwoman such as myself puts a vending machine near a school that sells dildos, lube*, and Assigned Male comics to serve our urderage prey...I...I mean fine 'young adults' (aka children)
Are they seriously requiring me to self-dox !?!?!
Do they not realize I receive hundreds of death threats through my browser...every time I google "examples of death threats" Sure, none of them are actually addressed to me or have anything to do with me, but it's systemic so it still counts!


*Hint : more lube is always the answer. You can now ace the SAT by writing "more Lube" on every question with a number 2 (eww, I never knew that's why they called it that) pencil. Be sure to make your marks heavy and dark!
You're welcome future Gender Studies majors!
 
Last edited:
Now, if having biological kids with your mate is important to you...wouldn't it disrespect and devalue the time/opportunity-cost to date someone who you know you don't have a future with?
I mean it sounds like ole Dan is promoting using someone as a fucktoy and just eventually throwing them away.
Shame on you Dan,...shame shame shame... trannies are NOT to be objectified, exotified and used as you are espousing!!!
Troons are NOT your personal Joy Division, Dan you literal nazi!!!............... PERIOD! (HA! now it's incontrovertible)
 
Last edited:
My My My
So to Sophie , that transgender child is a "man in a dress" and NOT female...a fraud
Sophie has really internalized transphobia.

Sophie is also shaming the transvestite community (calling them "cross dressers" is an attempt to invalidate their transness and trying to dissociate them from their deity-adjacent identity)

It's obvious that Sophie was exposed to to Flip Wilson's Geraldine and Tyler Perry's Media as a youngster and that. kicked in Sophie's inherent anti-black racism. It is clear and undeniable that Sophie considers that comedic device "darkie humor" (as Sophie would call it) and that the likes of Robin Williams et al are race traitors and probably even consort with those (in Sophie's parlance) ''evil coons'

So much hate from Sophie - Sophies true colors are showing and it's pure white, like the hooded sheet Sophie dons in the night
 
2022-01-06 13_18_41-Sophie Labelle Verville _ Guillaume Labelle _ Assigned Male _ Candycore Co...png


I think this one answered their own question "mocking everything I am" - everything.

That means THEY are a one-dimensional caricature, not an actual person with depth or various facets or anything -- "trans" is the entirety of their existence...it's everything I am

I mean Jesus, this one doesn't even get that they are SELF-IDENTIFYING as a man in a dress. If they really truly thought of themselves as an actual woman then they could maybe be upset at a representation of women being hysterical or moody or slutty or bitchy or something, but not just a dude dressed up as a woman.
The whole comedy there is fish-out-of-water impostor stuff, that the man makes funny missteps becuase...he's not ACTUALLY a woman.
 
Back