Georgia 'LYNCHING' citizen fatally shoots unarmed black man ... Video Emerges, Grand Jury to Convene



The fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery -- a 25-year-old black man out for a jog when he was chased and killed -- was caught on video, prompting a call for a grand jury to review the case.

Arbery's death is being referred to as a modern-day lynching, as he was unarmed when he was gunned down in Brunswick, GA on February 23 by a white citizen named Travis McMichael ... who has not been arrested or charged. He also happens to be the son of a former district attorney investigator.

As you can see in the video, Arbery was jogging when he was stopped by McMichael and his father in a white pickup truck. McMichael was armed with a shotgun. Arbery appears to attempt to run around the truck before he and McMichael start grappling.

After at least 2 shots, the men continued struggling over the gun ... until Arbery stumbles away, shot in the mid-section, and then collapses to the ground. He was later pronounced dead.
94a5b7dd35e448f585d3b6ecf3e83e3e_md.jpg


McMichael has not been charged in the shooting ... reportedly because he and his father, who was in the back of the truck, claim they were trying to make a citizen's arrest. They claim Ahmaud fit the description of a suspect in a string of recent break-ins in the area.

After the emergence of the video, D.A. Pro Tempore Tom Durden has decided the case "should be presented to the grand jury of Glynn County for consideration of criminal charges against those involved in the death of Mr. Arbery.”

Ahmaud's family says the use of deadly force was unnecessary.

Here's the statement from the district attorney who was brought in to oversee the case and decide how and whether the case should be prosecuted.
EXRhs2vXkAINOAA.jpg


Attorney Lee Merritt, who represents Arberys mother, claims "The series of events captured in this video confirm what all the evidence indicated prior to its release— Ahmaud Arbery was pursued by three white men that targeted him solely because of his race and murdered him..."


EXRmSCPXsAYkx0v.jpg


==============

Imagine being hunted by two fat hillbillies in a truck.
 
Last edited:
What a terrible sentence. Oh well, I'll be praying for the appeal to go through, the entire trial was a farce.
I mean, it's the sentence a person gets for the crimes they were convicted of. Shouldn't really be a surprise.

edit: Like, take that one black kid in Florida who broke into a woman's house with a knife, tied her up and robbed her, then stabbed her over 20 times to kill her. If he had been convicted of felony murder, he'd be looking at a similar sentence, but because the jury decided to only convict him of manslaughter, he's going to get time served.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: What the shit
I'm curious if anybody thinks he isn't guilty, then why, and if he is guilty, what sentence would you give him personally?
 
I agree with that.

But I'm not hiding that I'm not so fond about the person Arbery and I don't think he was a great contribution to society.
I solely base myself on his criminal history. It seems that the last 2 years of his life things really started to escalate and that's why I'm pretty sure that
he wouldn't have stopped.
Maybe he just kept doing what he did before? Maybe it evolved to armed robberies and possibly people getting shot? I don't know.

Repost of his criminal history:
View attachment 2755395
Well unfortunately for you guys, killing somebody on the street is murder, regardless of their criminal background.
 
I'm curious if anybody thinks he isn't guilty, then why, and if he is guilty, what sentence would you give him personally?

Well, Ahmaud rushed the son and fought him for the shotgun. In the course of that struggle, Ahmaud was shot and died. His death was the result of a violent felon (Ahmaud) continuing his pattern of violent behavior.

This should have never gone to trial, and was entirely motivated by race politics.
 
Well, Ahmaud rushed the son and fought him for the shotgun. In the course of that struggle, Ahmaud was shot and died. His death was the result of a violent felon (Ahmaud) continuing his pattern of violent behavior.

This should have never gone to trial, and was entirely motivated by race politics.
Agree to disagree Mr. @JohnDoe but I do appreciate you answering my questions with your thoughts on the matter. :)
 
I'm curious if anybody thinks he isn't guilty, then why, and if he is guilty, what sentence would you give him personally?
Right wingers live in their own world, they're masters of cognitive dissonance to the point where they're able to ignore recorded videos and rationalize things in their head to make it so that their side is right despite reality saying otherwise.

They're able to mentally block themselves off from video of the McMichaels chasing down Arbery and killing him in cold blood, then trying to cover up that murder for a month with their friends in high places.

They're able to ignore video of Chauvin strangling the life out of Floyd. etc etc etc

and then when the guilty verdict comes in they're always surprised. It's a mental disease, I tell you.
There's over 100 pages talking about this. Just go back a few.
Most of the "reasoning" I read in the past 100 pages is that Ahmaud deserved it because he's black. Didn't look like that explanation held up very well in real world court, judging by today.
 
Well, Ahmaud rushed the son and fought him for the shotgun. In the course of that struggle, Ahmaud was shot and died. His death was the result of a violent felon (Ahmaud) continuing his pattern of violent behavior.

This should have never gone to trial, and was entirely motivated by race politics.
Yeah no. When you have no reason to stop someone, are armed, and are pursuing them, whoever you’re chasing has every right to attempt to defend themselves - including trying to grab a shotgun from you. If Arbery had been carrying and plugged both the McMicheals, he would have been justified in self defense - he was being chased by armed men and had reason to believe his life is in danger, and had committed no crime. Get fucked.
 
Agree to disagree Mr. @JohnDoe but I do appreciate you answering my questions with your thoughts on the matter. :)

Well I'm happy to have discussions on the topic, I'd just like them to be reasonable and based in what the law and evidence show. I feel that the law gave them the right to affect a citizens arrest, and in the course of that arrest Ahmaud attacked them and died while struggling over the gun.

I get a little annoyed by people that go off some ridiculous media narrative and act like these guys chased Ahmaud down while wearing Klan hoods and executed him in the street.
 
I would hate to argue about the trial with people who remain willfully ignorant about the facts let alone actually watched it, but speaking of violent behavior, in the McMicheals bid to stop petty crime they committed the most violent crime in Satilla Shores. :stress:
 
Last edited:
I get a little annoyed by people that go off some ridiculous media narrative and act like these guys chased Ahmaud down while wearing Klan hoods and executed him in the street.
Well that's going to be obvious with anything resulting in the death of an African American by a white man.
Well I'm happy to have discussions on the topic, I'd just like them to be reasonable and based in what the law and evidence show. I feel that the law gave them the right to affect a citizens arrest, and in the course of that arrest Ahmaud attacked them and died while struggling over the gun.
I do think, that Ahmaud had every right to grab the gun though. It's not everyday a group of people in a pickup truck follows you with the people also holding guns and pointing at you. It's not something anyone is exactly prepared to be in such a situation. Ahmaud could've thought many different circumstances at the moment. He didn't know what they wanted. He didn't know what to do. He didn't know he was going to die in the coming moments, all he really knew was that he was jogging at one moment and then people with guns started pointing at him. It was fight-or-flight and either of those could've ended badly. There was really no good course of action with him, and unfortunately, he chose to fight and that ended up costing his life.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lord Neeba
Reminder that @JohnDoe is the guy who threw a temper tantrum when an underage black girl shot and killed the pedophile who paid to rape her and had her initial life sentence reduced after serving 15 years, because he thinks she should have served the full life sentence.

There's no point in arguing rationally or reasonably with these people because they are racist crackers and literally nothing matters to them except the race of the people involved, and they will always, always, always side with the white guy, no matter how egregiously wrong that stance is.
 
I'm curious if anybody thinks he isn't guilty, then why, and if he is guilty, what sentence would you give him personally?
The argument for them not being guilty is they were performing a lawful citizens arrest and/were doing what they were told to do by the police. Also they were protecting their neighborhood. The McMichaels were then justified in shooting the man that attacked them while performing a lawful citizens arrest.

(I'm ignoring all the fuck shit the judge did with the jury instructions because ultimately those boys were going to jail no matter what and did it to themselves by elder McMichael leaking the video because he got upset what people were saying on Twitter)

I do not agree with this argument primarily because the McMichaels don't agree with this argument and in their opening statement their lawyer said they had no reason to perform said citizens arrest which kinda makes that lawful citizens arrest a kidnapping.

Anyway, I feel bad the last guy. He got life with parole for recording something. He also could have had a deal that his lawyer didn't notify him of(so I heard). That sucks major balls and he's going to state with the rest of them. Odds on them lasting a month?

Edit: If Arbury had taken the gun and shot all of them he would have been justified. If the McMichaels weren't idiots they could have a more convincing argument for why they were justified.
 
Anyway, I feel bad the last guy. He got life with parole for recording something. He also could have had a deal that his lawyer didn't notify him of(so I heard). That sucks major balls and he's going to state with the rest of them. Odds on them lasting a month?
I do agree with this. It's really just bad circumstances at being there at the wrong time.
 
If you think people disagreeing with racist white supremacist crackers need to be planned out in discords you're dreaming mate. 99% of the world disagrees with you on sight.
Its not supremacist to think I shouldn't have to let feral niggers rape and steal bc I'm white. Dog whistle Twitter words from the bait poster. Throw in a chud next time you try hard faggot
 
Back