Sam Hyde

Anyone else here get a kick out of the long blond haired glasses wearing troon doing nothing but giving the camera a few thousand yard stares? Has to be the one that did an expose on Sam recently.
This one:
who's this robert wheeler iii lookin ass nigga? maybe sam really is fucking trannies on the low...View attachment 2873607
 
Last edited:
No, I don't use weirdly cropped screenshots of texts supposedly from Sam Hyde to justify calling him a pedophile rapist, that's an intensely stupid thing to do. I'm sure former employees would find their old boss "toxic", depends on the reasons they were fired or quit.

You've addressed nothing I've said about substance, and now you've insinuated that Sam being a potentially "toxic" employer directly correlates with his potential to be a serial child predator. Which is an intensely stupid equivocation that absolutely no one should take seriously.

The idea that you're saying people should suspend disbelief and take anonymous sources posting on 8chan at face value with 0 corroborating evidence is shit-tier gaslighting.
I don't get why there's such heated arguments on the farms of all places about dubious sexual assault allegations. Seems retarded when I type it, but with the amount of proven false ones that have consistently come up over the past decade at this rate, particularly Vinny last year comes to mind, you'd think people wouldn't take screenshots as gospel and rant, rave and shit up a thread like they're fact. That's some twitter behavior. Obviously these threads are here to talk about everything relating to the person, but talking about filing police reports and shit based off some screenshots and internet hearsay? :story:
 
It seems to me that Idub is trying really hard to emulate Louis Theroux, especially in that scene where he's asking about the terminology they speak in. What he completely missed here is that Louis is really good at diffusing people and earning their trust. Everyone says there's a palpable tension in the air whenever he's around, so by carrying some sort of grudge or by being there under false pretenses to create a hitpiece, he's completely failing to do that. It all falls apart in the interview when he tips his hand and he's the one coming out looking like a snake since he failed to set his traps. I think this is why he hasn't released this. His commentary as its all occurring is probably all about how Sam is a piece of shit and he completely fails to portray that.
 
>trust me bro its all been anonymous bro! not like you can contact ppl and straight up ask them from multiple verified email addresses that have also been posted online!
Like I said, shit-tier gaslighting. If there's multiple corroborating eye-witnesses to Sam's supposedly illicit activity, that would not only make the news in a substantial way due to his controversial career, but that would immediately trigger an investigation.
 
I honestly expected it to be much wilder. They clearly knew the typical format of his documentaries and were leaning into the beats, but the funniest part was undeniably when they were discussing their plans at the beginning. That should have come afterwards. The whole thing felt really front-loaded because aside from the poster (that scene was exquisitely uncomfortable and quite possibly one of the funniest things Sam Hyde has ever done) it made everything else feel really tame and subdued in contrast.

Ian came across as really condescending with his constant assertions that they'd make it big if they just dropped the surrealism from their comedic routine. There's a word for discarding what made you unique for the sake of mass appeal, it's called selling out. It's kind of funny, because Sam Hyde's group of oddballs seem like they're having fun and perfectly content with their present level of success. They don't have a giant hole that they need to fill with ever-increasing attention and revenue, which Ian simply cannot comprehend. Is this what fame and fortune does to a man?
 
It seems to me that Idub is trying really hard to emulate Louis Theroux, especially in that scene where he's asking about the terminology they speak in. What he completely missed here is that Louis is really good at diffusing people and earning their trust. Everyone says there's a palpable tension in the air whenever he's around, so by carrying some sort of grudge or by being there under false pretenses to create a hitpiece, he's completely failing to do that. It all falls apart in the interview when he tips his hand and he's the one coming out looking like a snake since he failed to set his traps. I think this is why he hasn't released this. His commentary as its all occurring is probably all about how Sam is a piece of shit and he completely fails to portray that.
Slightly OT about Louis:

I know folks who have known him well for a long time. They always say the same thing about him; that in person he is someone who people really want to confide in. That he’s one of those people who other folk naturally take to. All animals and children like him etc. They said it’s not fake, that is his actual personality, but because people take to him so easily and because he’s an excellent empathetic listener, people always did just vomit their problems and feelings at him. It’s quite a rare gift. But I think the reason it works for Louis is that it is authentic for him: when he’s concerned about someone he’s interviewing, it’s real concern. I don’t think you can successfully fake it well enough for people to not sniff out the lack of authenticity there.
 
yeah if you believe a wall of text from Sam. Apparently that's enough evidence for you but the multiple people who have come out about Sam with screenshots and all kinds of evidence is not. Not to mention its not hard to see the reason he hangs out with his current crew is because hes been left behind for being "toxic" by his former crew and only his scum of the earth fanbase thinks he is someone to be associated with.
What makes his fan base scum of th earth if you don't mind me asking? Because you just called me a MIGAtard a while ago so I'm wondering if your complaints apply to you as well
 
I have a theory that Sam Hyde is trying to return to the main stream either by threatening Hasan to a fight or making this I dubbbz vid. I'm not really a fan of Idubbz and I'm starting to lose respect for Sam Hyde.
There's definitely a lot of that, and he's not really hiding it. He put together a decent kayfabe, did some light boxing training, rented a zippy looking roadster, and brought out a nice little assortment of guns for everybody to shoot. I feel pretty bad for him seeing as it looked like he really put some effort into giving Ian some entertaining content to work with.
The interview is pretty revealing, but I think for reasons other than people here are saying. Ian seemed genuinely confused that Sam doesn't try branching into less controversial forms of content to regain the ability to monetize his humor. He thinks that the nature of both of their "cancelling" was the same, and that he could just bounce back under a new channel. Meanwhile, Sam understands that he could make a Bob Ross tribute series, and he would have several Vice and HuffPo articles on how his fluffy little clouds are a coded dogwhistle for white supremacy.
I see Ian bringing up the copyright claim as a genuine attempt to break the ice that he was just too awkward to pull off successfully. He probably assumed that Sam would've done a fair amount of research into someone who was going to be filming them for a week and a half, and come across that he copyright claimed the guy coming over. I don't think he's actually been stewing on it for several years, especially when it came out that Sam was using the claim to try to cover up that the whole kickstarter was a bit.
 
I've been on this site long enough to know that's not remotely outside the realm of possibility.
Yeah, it could be an extremely dedicated effort over a decade by one man ...but it's all very convenient that it lines up exactly with Sam's staple in-jokes and behaviour elsewhere.
If you don't believe the evidence that's fine but calling it "a single photo" is extremely disingenuous.

who's this robert wheeler iii lookin ass nigga? maybe sam really is fucking trannies on the low...View attachment 2873607
Can someone look this nigga up? My initial thoughts were that this was a stunt for the video but you can never be 100% sure.
E: What about that lil' hispanic nigga with the giant piece of chocolate caramel popcorn on his head?
 
Last edited:
Anyone else here get a kick out of the long blond haired glasses wearing troon doing nothing but giving the camera a few thousand yard stares? Has to be the one that did an expose on Sam recently.
This one:
also when they were throwing shit around for the "unboxing" a beer got knocked over onto his laptop lmfao
 
Saim hyde was in epstein island where he would constantly molest 7 year old femboys
He was also Q, created coronavirus and stagged 9/11 2.0 aka the biggest attack on our democracy: the 1/6 boomer tourist visit
Want proof? Fuck you, just trust me, why would i lie
 
Yeah, it could be an extremely dedicated effort over a decade by one man ...but it's all very convenient that it lines up exactly with Sam's staple in-jokes and behaviour elsewhere.
If you don't believe the evidence that's fine but calling it "a single photo" is extremely disingenuous.
Corroborating eye-witnesses are all the police need to go on to investigate child abuse. The absence of a police report already tells me whoever is making these claims is lying on a fundamental part of the accusation, considering they claim to have gone to the cops. If the cops won't investigate Sam considering there are several supposed witnesses, that's basically saying Sam has Harvey Weinstein levels of influence with a department of a city he doesn't even live in.

Lazily cropped and redacted texts are not "photographic evidence", it's hearsay, plain and simple. A jury could convict on eye-witness testimony alone, which begs the question why all the people supposedly knowledgeable of Sam's behavior won't step forward and go to the proper authorities..
 
a lot of the fan base don't seem to pay attention and think he is some self made man...
Who cares? Every fanbase is deluded into thinking their favorite e-celebs are heroes. The fact that they can't see through the deliberate irony of Sam's exploits is their problem, and theirs alone.

If they weren't listening when Sam flat-out said his dad wasted a quarter million dollars on his film production education, like it wasn't a big deal (because it wasn't), that's on them.
 
That interview was super uncomfortable and it felt like iDubbbz was trying to lure Sam into a trap, which Sam didn't fall into at all. I'm not sure what to think here but I think iDubbbz definitely had some kind of shitty motive behind making a 'documentary' about Sam, and when iDubbbz wasn't able to frame it in a way he wanted he just scrapped the whole thing.
Of course he did. Ian is a beta with Machiavellian traits. Problem is Sam puts on the character of an alpha with Machiavellian traits, guess who wins that engagement handedly.

Other people also noticed that Sam was mocking Ian, but it's more nuanced than that. Ian was retarded enough to marry a crazy whore, Sam hired a chick to pretend he was. He had retards running around him worshipping every shitty joke he made and the ground he walked on. He was holding up a mirror to Ian, while making any gayop unusable and uninviting in the future. Ian would've been better off sending his BPD leash holder to do this, she would've known when to cut her loses.

The entire vibe of that "interview" felt like a police interrogation btw.
 
The whole video is a brilliant look at how two edgy retards in their late 30s are maliciously playing mind games with each other until the sparks fly and they burn out & get bored.
They are both trying to snake and cut into the other in little ways, lmfao, these men are two-faced and catty like women. Both Ian and Sam show off their femininity here.
Nothing but disdain for this kind of behavior. It disgusts me and it's why I don't watch either of these clowns. They're like this all the time.
 
Back