- Joined
- Oct 10, 2021
I have to admit in the first segment when they were reading through the "Idubbbz gaslighting document" I was laughing so much I started getting chest pains and had to watch the rest of it in 5 second segments.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the perfect example of Ian targeting someone who knows all his tricks and uses them regularly too, all the other targets of Ian where people who had no idea what Ian was up to and fell into all of his traps, the second he got inside Sam house he started setting off all the traps and quickly got thrown off his rhythm because he's only used to be the hunter not the huntedI think Sam's performance during their one-on-one interview is probably the main reason Idubbbz decided not to release the footage. Sam might not have specifically remembered that email exchange, but he obviously knew that Ian had ulterior motives for this documentary. He makes it immediately clear to Ian that he doesn't trust his questions, and shoots down one of them that seems like it's setting up a "gotcha" question for later, and judging by Ian's reaction he was probably right about that. Ian was too spineless to try to push back, and it looked like he was having a hard time recovering from being thrown off of his script.
Idubbbz would have been more than happy to take all of Sam's gaslighting attempts and spin them as completely genuine because they probably fit nicely into whatever message Ian wanted to make the documentary for in the first place. However, I think Sam disrupted Ian's script of questions too much and ultimately gave him nothing damning he could use in the interview, so he just scrapped the project and moved on. Also, the fact that Sam was recording his own footage alongside Ian's camera guy was probably a factor in his decision as well, since Sam had the means to defend himself against any smears via selective editing.
The way you speak about Vaervaf guarantees to me that you are either him or a close associate of his. In which case anything you say without actual proof to back it up should be discardedI am literally not him. And I tried to report Sam to the authorities. Maybe Sam is smart and has been doing this for almost a decade now. Why else would someone ask mulitple people in their circle "how to get rid of things on hard drives" and then smash everything to bits which was witnessed by his long time sound engineer who also knew he had cp on them. Sam might have been smart at one point and narrowly gotten away with it but I guarantee if he doesn't die from a heart attack from being obese and abusing roids he will most certainly eventually get caught.
Sam referencing the camera and touching it after that retarded line about making Sam look like an asshole, Ian looked liked he had a twinge of pain from the realization that he didn't have control of the narrative in that room anymore.The entire vibe of that "interview" felt like a police interrogation btw.
I'd like to believe it is because more often than not Facts and the Law are the topics of discussion and anything less than that will get thrown out of the court.which begs the question why all the people supposedly knowledgeable of Sam's behavior won't step forward and go to the proper authorities..
You'd think he's at least try to look in the general direction of the camera.View attachment 2873921
Here's Vaervaf/Gammon Favreau with his multiple lolicon pillows
alienmode.deviantart.comon sam hyde's wikipedia page it says he graduated from risd and got a bachelors of arts. did he ever do paintings or something?
RISD is more of a conceptual/performance school. He's done that, though not in a way he'd get good grades for.on sam hyde's wikipedia page it says he graduated from risd and got a bachelors of arts. did he ever do paintings or something?