Debate user Taarna on the ethics of child porn thread - Obvious low quality troll bait, thread is actually arguing with BoxerShorts

I can't continue to post in this thread with a thread title like that.

A 14-year-old girl sending a nude picture of herself to a guy she's interested in is not child pornography.

Calling this child pornography, where little kids get raped and recorded for the pleasure of adult men, shows how sick you are.

Also Josh jerks off to little boys you fucking retards.
 
I can't continue to post in this thread with a thread title like that.

A 14-year-old girl sending a nude picture of herself to a guy she's interested in is not child pornography.

Calling this child pornography, where little kids get raped and recorded for the pleasure of adult men, shows how sick you are.

Also Josh jerks off to little boys you fucking retards.
get them to change the title to age of consent rather than child porn.
 
It's called honesty. Is that concept alien to you?

Priscilla wanted his dick. He made her biggest dream come true. Young girls love older men. Especially if they are in positions of power, of high social status or even celebrities. Teenage girls touch themselves thinking about their idols, even guys in their 20's and 30's, especially guys in their 20's and 30's. Girls are no different than guys. We jerked off to women 10-20 years older than us and it's no different for girls. Girls are just as sexual, if not more sexual than guys.

One day you have to face reality.
Have you considered the refreshing taste of a shotgun?
 
I can't continue to post in this thread with a thread title like that.

A 14-year-old girl sending a nude picture of herself to a guy she's interested in is not child pornography.

Calling this child pornography, where little kids get raped and recorded for the pleasure of adult men, shows how sick you are.

Also Josh jerks off to little boys you fucking retards.
You should commit not alive
 
Also Josh jerks off to little boys you fucking retards.
He jerked off to teenage boys when he was a teenage boy himself. He's not lusting after 14 year olds as a 30 year old incel.
 
So, @0 1 What post did OP make that got deleted when they first joined? I also think OP is an incel because he was also active in the incel thread and Sperged about it so the warning signs were already there.
1641822341221.png


Also,
1641823078564.png
 
Last edited:
Imagine thinking it’s acceptable to date someone who after having sex with you has to finish their homework and study for a test they have during 3rd period tomorrow. Where will you take her out @Taarna? She can’t go to an R rated film, she probably still has a 10:00 curfew, and she can’t drink. Gonna take her to dinner where the waitress will think she’s your sister or your kidnapping target?

And let’s be real, her parents would probably try to murder you. I don’t think the argument “I’m just like Elvis” will work, pedo.
 
So, @0 1 What post did OP make that got deleted when they first joined? I also think OP is an incel because he was also active in the incel thread and Sperged about it so the warning signs were already there.
View attachment 2875410
New users must have the first handful of posts approved as a measure to reduce driveby posts or spam accounts. I don't believe posts which were denied are written to disk, but I'm also not sure if it's not tucked away somewhere. Either way, I can't tell you what their post said, but considering the abysmally low quality of posts which get approved anyway, it was horrendous enough to make the moderator who first read it to turn it down.
 
I can't continue to post in this thread with a thread title like that.

A 14-year-old girl sending a nude picture of herself to a guy she's interested in is not child pornography.

Calling this child pornography, where little kids get raped and recorded for the pleasure of adult men, shows how sick you are.

Also Josh jerks off to little boys you fucking retards.
If a 22 year old girl send nudes of herself, is it pornography?
The anwer is yes!

If a 14 year old girl does the same then it's Child(because she's a child you know) pornography.
 
New users must have the first handful of posts approved as a measure to reduce driveby posts or spam accounts. I don't believe posts which were denied are written to disk, but I'm also not sure if it's not tucked away somewhere. Either way, I can't tell you what their post said, but considering the abysmally low quality of posts which get approved anyway, it was horrendous enough to make the moderator who first read it to turn it down.
He has managed to be one of the select few individuals to get a debate thread right off their first couple of posts because a mod had to turn it down for how fucking laughable dumb it is.
:story:
 
Shut up, pedo apologist. Who the hell do pedo apologists worship? Peter Scully? You can't defend pedophiles. Look what happened to richard Huckle. He's nothing but a dead corpse because he was a sexual predator.


 
Back