Sam Hyde

Yeah, was gonna say 16 might be a bit too old for Twitter to talk about being a pedophile - especially since outside of the US people are even more lax about age of consent. But Twitter is also where a lot of the infantilizing of women 18+ goes on. So this is up their ally. This is a weird area for me as it is absolutely grooming and scummy for a 30yo man to go after a 16yo, but I also don't consider 16yos children. Most people are sexually active by that age. The larger problem is the probable power differential. There is a reason though that the oldest decoy ages TCAP ever used was 15, and they met with critique even for that. 12-13 was the typical age that drew in really depraved people, 16-17 is more likely to just pull desperate losers.
Is there even any evidence that this person was 16 when she met Hyde or is that part hearsay too?
 
Is there even any evidence that this person was 16 when she met Hyde or is that part hearsay too?
That I'm not sure of, I'm entertaining it as a theoretical since like I said it isn't really something I'd say was out of line with Sam's sexual character. My skepticism about the situation is more about the fact that there are people who would have a motive to gay op someone like Sam, plus the sloppiness of leaving that much evidence. Especially a photo.

On a related topic, Autistic Boys Money Clan was suspected to be behind the Worldcorp rabbit hole that may or may not have shared dark web hurtcore type stuff. It is hard to find confirmed info on whether the videos they had on their promotional/ARG website was actually real footage or if some of it was faked/staged by the people behind it.
 
I wouldn't necessarily consider 16 pedophilia
1635972378099.jpg
 
Here's the thing. You said ephebophilia is pedophilia.

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a diddler who studies children, I am telling you, specifically, in diddling, no one calls ephebophilia pedophilia. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "pedophile family" you're referring to the paraphilia grouping of chronophilia, which includes things from nepiophibilia to hebepohilia to gerontophilia.

So your reasoning for calling ephebophilia pedophilia is because random people "call the ephebopophile ones pedophiles?" Let's get teleiophiles and mesophiles in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. An ephebophile is an ephebophile and a member of the chronophilia classification. But that's not what you said. You said ephebophilia is pedophilia, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the chronophilia class ephebophiles, which means you'd call nepiophiles, teliophiles, and other sexual attractions pedophilia, too. Which you said you don't.

It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?
 
What people accusing Sam of fucking a kid need to remember, is that if he had, every buzzcuck and vice wannabe would have flooded their front page with the story. If he were a breadtuber I could understand a cover up. No one would cover for Sam hyde. I'm sure anything anyone posts here has already been across the desks of every verified leftist news outlet. Keep reposting the "abuse" copy pasta, no one that likes Sam will ever give a shit.
 
Finally watched the idubbbz documentary and while I don't usually like Sam's content this was some good stuff. The interview was especially great with Sam just openly telling idubz that his content is auto banned on television and platforms like youtube while idubz tries to convince him he can make neutered crap content like idubz does these days. Something a lot of people miss is Sam has a couple layers to his style, he'll throw out something that's obviously fake and make people think that's the joke and then follows up with something more normal that's still fake to get people into the bit as they think they've already managed to avoid the troll.
 
I don't trust the screencaps but the photos are strange.
People screeching about this are unbelievably autistic, they are literally falling for the same 4chan game of calling him a serial killer that "can't keep getting away with it" if this shit was just half truth Sam would be in so much legal trouble it wouldn't even be funny.

And no, lolchan posts and captioned pictures aren't proof of anything. You can hate Sam for being a retard and a worthless unfunny person all you want but use your brain before moralfagging.
 
Is there even any evidence that this person was 16 when she met Hyde or is that part hearsay too?
I'll be the first to admit I fell for all of this and thought it was funny as shit, now I think it's mostly fake or staged because look at the lengths Sam will go to in order to fuck with someone, and the leaks are some of the funniest shit that could be found out about him, period.

The iDubbbz release is all too coincidental, a bunch of weird photoshop looking texts with the worlds most embarrassing and disgusting details drop anonymously on Internet gossip forums just days before this... It was to push Sam's name into the mind of every Internet austist around. It worked.

Forget about the age of the women, how do we even know it wasn't sam's crew that wrote all of it? He hired an actress to shave her head and act like a crack addict for 2 weeks, he setup a fake office and trashed it...

At this point I say just enjoy the content for what it is, comedy gold. We will never know what part of it is true and what isn't... It's completely plausible for Sam leak his real dick pic online for attention, and that is some next level shit that I cannot applaud, but respect for committing to the bit.
 
I'll be the first to admit I fell for all of this and thought it was funny as shit, now I think it's mostly fake or staged because look at the lengths Sam will go to in order to fuck with someone, and the leaks are some of the funniest shit that could be found out about him, period.

The iDubbbz release is all too coincidental, a bunch of weird photoshop looking texts with the worlds most embarrassing and disgusting details drop anonymously on Internet gossip forums just days before this... It was to push Sam's name into the mind of every Internet austist around. It worked.

Forget about the age of the women, how do we even know it wasn't sam's crew that wrote all of it? He hired an actress to shave her head and act like a crack addict for 2 weeks, he setup a fake office and trashed it...

At this point I say just enjoy the content for what it is, comedy gold. We will never know what part of it is true and what isn't... It's completely plausible for Sam leak his real dick pic online for attention, and that is some next level shit that I cannot applaud, but respect for committing to the bit.

This stuff has been going around for a few years at least. I remember first seeing many of these allegations back in 2015/2016 or thereabouts. The photo of Marky especially has been going around since then (though I remember seeing the censored version and coping that it could have been an of-age woman). It isn't some kind of 4d chess promo material for an idubbz video.

I was a fan of the guy so I didn't want to believe any of this stuff either, but the evidence is pretty solid at this point. You can date that photo of him and Marky reasonably and see that she was underage, has blood on her face, and they are both in some state of undress. Normal people don't have photos of them out there like this. If you think it's just peachy, whatever, but don't pretend this stuff isn't reasonably proven. People keep mentioning the texts/8chan screenshots/etc as evidence, but IMO you don't need to rely on them at all - just rely on what he said himself on the Boston Ross video, see the screenshots those directly line up with, and then see the photographic evidence that those two were involved with eachother.
 
Oh no guess I won't invite Sam Hyde over for my birthday party because of some uncorroborated accusations on the internet.
Nothing like some uncorroborated evidence to ruin someone’s chance at something, and not inviting him to your birthday party might be the biggest upset.
 
People were asking for the actual gaslighting doc
 

Attachments

Here's the thing. You said ephebophilia is pedophilia.

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a diddler who studies children, I am telling you, specifically, in diddling, no one calls ephebophilia pedophilia. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "pedophile family" you're referring to the paraphilia grouping of chronophilia, which includes things from nepiophibilia to hebepohilia to gerontophilia.

So your reasoning for calling ephebophilia pedophilia is because random people "call the ephebopophile ones pedophiles?" Let's get teleiophiles and mesophiles in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. An ephebophile is an ephebophile and a member of the chronophilia classification. But that's not what you said. You said ephebophilia is pedophilia, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the chronophilia class ephebophiles, which means you'd call nepiophiles, teliophiles, and other sexual attractions pedophilia, too. Which you said you don't.

It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?
What the fuck are you on about with this horrifying dichotomy of trash? No one wants a dissertation on appropriate linguistics relating to pedophilia. A-logging over a copypasta.
 
Last edited:
Back