Black supremacists are always good for a laugh. There's a certain degree of self-loathing within black American cultures. I suppose it makes sense; they've had generations of being told black was 'ugly' or 'inferior,' and that Africa was 'pagan,' 'primitive' and 'bad.' Black supremacists have internalized these prejudices to a surprising degree. They hate whites, they hate Asians, they hate Latinos, but they also hate themselves. The fact that no small number of them seem to actually idolize Hitler is hilarious, given
the way he treated black Germans.
This twat repeats a frequent trope of "all the good black men" being "stolen" by women of other races. Part of it is because the standards of Western beauty heavily favour more or less Caucasian features, but also I can't blame many black men for not wanting to be tied down by some of the women you see in black communities here. There are (unfortunately) a lot of welfare queens, high school drop outs, single moms and (honestly) morbidly obese land whales who think they're just "sassy." For a lot of black guys, marrying a white woman is a social step upwards. Certainly in the UK nearly half the Afro-Caribbean men marry outside their own ethnicity (though obviously that includes whites, Asians and anyone else). That doesn't seem to be the case in the US. Of course, if she wasn't such a racist twat, she wouldn't have to worry about that. She could marry Asian, Latino, Native, Jewish, white, whatever.
I'm honestly not surprised she hates Asians. There is a lot of anti-Asian prejudice that gets spewed by black supremacists too. As I said, they've internalized most of the anti-African prejudices that were current in Western society up until the 19th or even early 20th century. I believe that's part of the reason so many Afrocentrists are eager to claim Egypt (and even Greece) as 'black.' It also applies to Asia. Most notably, Nation of Islam and similiar movements refer to the 'blackman of Asia,' often adopting all manner of Orientalist imagery. Hell, I've seen some of them try to claim the Dravidians, or even all of India, are 'black.' I even worked at a place that put up a photo of Gandhi for Black History Month (which is extra hilarious when you consider
Gandhi's attitudes towards black Africans and Coloureds).
Of course, the best part is where she talks about going to Africa and just setting up a black state, which is basically colonialism. She doesn't speak any indigenous African languages like kiSwahili, Amharic, Lingala or Wolof, she doesn't have any connection to an actual African ethnic group, she's just a black American woman with delusions of grandeur. Hell MY people have more connection to Africa than her thanks to 19th century British colonialism and the construction of the Kenya-Uganda Railway (:powerlevel:; and hint hint it wasn't black people who built that railroad). That's before we get to the fact that not everyone in Africa is 'black.' I'm guessing her head would explode at the thought of lighter skinned Berbers, Arabs, Jews and Copts in the north (along with more recent communities of Turkish, Greek, Armenian, Albanian, Gypsy,even Spanish, Italian and French descent), not to mention Asian, Boer and Coloured communities in South Africa. Hell even the definition of 'black' has fluctuated, so that at various times peoples like the Somalis, Tuareg, Hausa, Ethiopians and Malagasy have been considered both 'black' and 'other.'
And of course that's before we get into African diasporic communities in the Americas, Europe and even Asia. Why would they want to go back to Africa? Is a black guy in Cuba or Brazil the same as a recent African migrant in London simply because of his skin colour? There's centuries of cultural heritage that makes things different between them. Assuming all black people are the same, let alone buy into your racist dreck, goes beyond simple prejudice and into the realm of the comically absurd.
