US Hillary Clinton’s 2024 Election Comeback - Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have become unpopular. It may be time for a change candidate.

1641956544835.png

A perfect storm in the Democratic Party is making a once-unfathomable scenario plausible: a political comeback for Hillary Clinton in 2024.
Several circumstances—President Biden’s low approval rating, doubts over his capacity to run for re-election at 82, Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket in 2024—have created a leadership vacuum in the party, which Mrs. Clinton viably could fill.

She is already in an advantageous position to become the 2024 Democratic nominee. She is an experienced national figure who is younger than Mr. Biden and can offer a different approach from the disorganized and unpopular one the party is currently taking.

If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate.”

Based on her latest public statements, it’s clear that Mrs. Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to help her decide whether or not to run for president again. She recently warned of the electoral consequences in the 2022 midterms if the Democratic Party continues to align itself with its progressive wing and urged Democrats to reject far-left positions that isolate key segments of the electorate.

In a recent MSNBC interview, Mrs. Clinton called on Democrats to engage in “careful thinking about what wins elections, and not just in deep-blue districts where a Democrat and a liberal Democrat, or so-called progressive Democrat, is going to win.” She also noted that party’s House majority “comes from people who win in much more difficult districts.”

Mrs. Clinton also took a veiled jab at the Biden administration and congressional Democrats in an effort to create distance: “It means nothing if we don’t have a Congress that will get things done, and we don’t have a White House that we can count on to be sane and sober and stable and productive.”

Even Bill Clinton recently set the stage for his wife’s potential 2024 candidacy, referring to her in an interview with People magazine as “the most qualified person to run for office in my lifetime, including me,” adding that not electing her in 2016 was “one of the most profound mistakes we ever made.”

We can infer based on these recent remarks that Mrs. Clinton would seize the opportunity to run for president again if an opening presents itself. But what are the odds that an opportunity will arise?

The Democrats’ domestic agenda is in disarray given the failure of Mr. Biden’s Build Back Better plan in Congress. Senate Democrats’ latest desperate push to repeal the legislative filibuster to pass their secondary legislative priority, voting-rights reform, will likely weaken their agenda further.
Mr. Biden’s overall approval rating is low (40%), as is his rating on issues including the economy and jobs (38%) and taxes and government spending (33%), according to a recent Economist/YouGov poll. Nearly two-thirds of independent voters disapprove of the president.

Barring a major course correction, we can anticipate that some Democrats will lose important House and Senate races in 2022—in part for the reasons Mrs. Clinton identified—giving Republicans control of both chambers of Congress.

Polls generally show the GOP with a solid lead of at least 2 or 3 points in the 2022 generic congressional vote—a margin that likely would be enough to take back the House, given the narrow Democratic majority and the anticipated outcomes of redistricting in several states that could affect key races.

Given the likelihood that Democrats will lose control of Congress in 2022, we can anticipate that Mrs. Clinton will begin shortly after the midterms to position herself as an experienced candidate capable of leading Democrats on a new and more successful path.

Mrs. Clinton can spend the time between now and midterms doing what the Clinton administration did after the Democrats’ blowout defeat in the 1994 midterms: crafting a moderate agenda on both domestic and foreign policy. This agenda could show that Mrs. Clinton is the only credible alternative to Mr. Biden, Ms. Harris, and the entire Democratic Party establishment.

Hillary Clinton remains ambitious, outspoken and convinced that if not for Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey’s intervention and Russian interference that she would have won the 2016 election—and she may be right.

If Democrats want a fighting chance at winning the presidency in 2024, Mrs. Clinton is likely their best option.


 
If the what-ifs in this article actually come to fruition after the midtern, expect some real shit all the way up to election day. You think that pro-dem propaganda is bad now? You think the censorship on the clearnet is bad now? You think that the conveniently timed tragic events to distract us from the things that actually negatively affect us are obvious now?

Nigga, it was her turn. She's Soros in a blond wig. The alphabet agencies are her lap dogs. The only reason she didn't cheat harder in 2016 was because she genuinely believed that Trump didn't have any real following outside of smelly rural rednecks from tiny isolated rural villages that no one cares about. I mean who cares about charisma, physical and mental fitness, and actual sound proposals when Biden is in office right now? She wants to be president now now now now now! And you are going to give it to her you bigots one way or another.

Unless she takes another tumble down the stairs before then and puts herself in a coma. She seems even more frail than Biden at times.
 
If the what-ifs in this article actually come to fruition after the midtern, expect some real shit all the way up to election day. You think that pro-dem propaganda is bad now? You think the censorship on the clearnet is bad now? You think that the conveniently timed tragic events to distract us from the things that actually negatively affect us are obvious now?

Nigga, it was her turn. She's Soros in a blond wig. The alphabet agencies are her lap dogs. The only reason she didn't cheat harder in 2016 was because she genuinely believed that Trump didn't have any real following outside of smelly rural rednecks from tiny isolated rural villages that no one cares about. I mean who cares about charisma, physical and mental fitness, and actual sound proposals when Biden is in office right now? She wants to be president now now now now now! And you are going to give it to her you bigots one way or another.

Unless she takes another tumble down the stairs before then and puts herself in a coma. She seems even more frail than Biden at times.
Keyword is seems: despite overheating at mildly sunny weather and her odd glitches, Hillary never blew a literal gasket mid-debate and bled out her eyeball like Biden did.

If she had half the maintenance Biden is on 24/7 just to barely function, Hillary would look like she came all the way from 2008.

... wait she lost then too. :story:
 
Hillary Clinton, the "change candidate." Dear God, my sides are in orbit. Or they would be, if they hadn't already been put into orbit by the TFS parody of DBZ.

...anyway...

In what universe is this moldering corpse more popular either than the current meat puppet in the Oval Office or the spray-tanned reptilian in a human suit masquerading as his VP? I know you have to be doing some hard fucking drugs to be a journalist DNC shill these days but hot damn. Even for these fucksticks, this is such a reach I think they might be scraping moon dust with their fingernails.
The Dems are all out of ideas. Besides, forcing Hillary down our collective throats is the ultimate "fuck you" to U.S. society at large.

If the DNC decides that 2024 is the year she finally gets Her Turn™, then the GOP had better take advantage by putting up someone who'll knock the ball right out of the park. That means you, Mr. DeSantis. Either that or Trump pulls a repeat of 2016, with the added bonus of finally breaking the Dems.

Either way, I'll love seeing the exact moment, live and in HD, that HilDawg realizes she's a three-time loser ready for history's dustbin.
 
Push Satan 2024 and you'd probably get more public support. Hillary is the concept of ugly made flesh. I'd rather vote for Aileen Wuornos, at least she's killed less people.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak
They need to establish a new option on the ballot in every state, called "none of the above".

Then they need to make a rule that if "none of the above" gets the most votes nationwide, the existing candidates are all disqualified and all parties have to redo the election with different candidates.

This would solve the issues we've had the last few elections where nobody likes the candidates.

This of course makes the very optimistic assumption that our votes still matter.
I've argued for this exact thing in multiple venues. It'll never happen because the political class knows that everybody hates their fucking guts and without the ability to tell them to fuck off for good, we're stuck with whatever shit options the Uniparty offers each cycle.
 
lol do it woman

Then they need to make a rule that if "none of the above" gets the most votes nationwide, the existing candidates are all disqualified and all parties have to redo the election with different candidates.
If instead of redoing the election they just abolish that political position altogether, I'd be up for it.

Hillary's slogan should be "Know Your Place, Nigger."
Appropriate for the party that was basically the political wing of the Klan.
 
Had a conversation with an American which seemed odd to me. I said I blamed Hillary for "Libya" and she thought I was referring to some embassy bombing which to her was the big political problem. I had to explain that no, I meant how Hillary is one of the people chiefly responsible for destroying the country with a bombing campaign and backing a group of militants from Benghazi who ethnically cleansed their way across the country and turned it from one of the most successful countries in North Africa (or all of Africa) to a failed state with catastrophic debt, multiple competing governments and an endless, murderous state of war. It had the highest literacy rates in North Africa, the highest number of doctors per capita, very little debt and a nationalized oil industry that actually funded major public works and social programs. Now it's one giant terrorist factory and it's because Hillary pushed and pushed for it to be bombed.

Is the destruction of a country really so small in American public awareness?
 
Is the destruction of a country really so small in American public awareness?
Yes. If it has nothing to do with America, it's not our problem. That's the general philosophy of neoliberalism with our shortsightedness.


who ethnically cleansed their way across the country and turned it from one of the most successful countries in North Africa (or all of Africa) to a failed state with catastrophic debt, multiple competing governments and an endless, murderous state of war. It had the highest literacy rates in North Africa, the highest number of doctors per capita, very little debt and a nationalized oil industry that actually funded major public works and social programs. Now it's one giant terrorist factory and it's because Hillary pushed and pushed for it to be bombed.
Hey, it gives people an excuse to say "nigger" while boasting about how uncivilized a whole continent is and how much more advanced Europeans are from centuries ago.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak
I wish I could say she stands no chance but, at this point, the people have proven to be disturbingly ok with a known criminal take the presidency as long its not "the other guy" that they dont like. Also you want freebies

Its not just in America but everywhere.

Sometimes I wonder if America would have been better off if Hillary won, because, hear me, shit would be so bad in those years that people would have already gotten the message and that other "trump guy" would have been preferable. So the "orange man bad" narrative wouldnt have stuck as strongly as it did.
 
Back