Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

404'd, just curious if an archive or copy exists

Click on the actual post. It will take you back to the video posting

 

[The Dude]

Russ has the insufferability of Prince with the talent of Ed Wood, and the passion of neither.

That's not fair to Ed Wood. Ed Wood was far more talented and successful than Russ could ever dream to be. Ed Wood was actually able to make money with his films, his movies have their fans even today, he had a healthy social life with many friends, and he didn't have to pay for sex. Ed Wood is so far above Shit-Lips that it's like he's in a different galaxy.

 

[Offensive User Name]

That's not fair to Ed Wood. Ed Wood was far more talented and successful than Russ could ever dream to be. Ed Wood was actually able to make money with his films, his movies have their fans even today, he had a healthy social life with many friends, and he didn't have to pay for sex. Ed Wood is so far above Shit-Lips that it's like he's in a different galaxy.

Also, even thou he sucked at it, Ed Wood had actual passion and love for making movies. Something you can feel when watching them. He didn't do it just to be famous and to bang celeberties.

 

[BluntyBitch]

It's a shame that audition clip isn't better quality. Maybe if Rustie made it publically available, people would see how much of an amazingly talented disabled person he is and a whole group of people would petition Freemantle or the judges or whatever go let.the world see his talent and let him on the show! Things are always more persuasive in groups, I'm sure Rustee will have no problem finding supporters that can get the ball rolling on this, cuz so many people believe in him. The world can see this is totes unfair, why can't Freemantle? Good thing Russell is using his legal knowledge to correct this grave injustice, and publically suing so this doesn't happen to another disabled person.

WHO AM I KIDDING BAHAHA!

Even a shitty quality clip could not hide his complete lack of ability, talent, and even basic piano technique. Him smashing those keys is gold! look how his weird fucking arms move!!

Russell is ugly(er) on the inside than he is on the outside!

I bet as a baby child he was that biter in class too

Spoiler: Supreme gentleman

It is both sad and good that teachers take that oath seriously of not discussing their past students, at least they don't comment publically because bigNoNo. But All teachers gossip to someone whether it's family or colleagues or friends, oh wait No only to their thererapists lol right of course. Can u even fkn imagine the things Elliot Rogers teachers would say??

E: Ok I'm a dumb bitch I googled and one teacher wrote for Salon but usually teachers are told whatever oath it's called to not discuss students who like do crimes and end up prison and whatnot, because then any student will be untrusting of teachers. Teachers fucking gossip tho, sorry parents, your kids teacher prolly knows all your family dirt.

 

[Offensive User Name]

Russell is ugly(er) on the inside than he is on the outside!

Agree. And he's pretty darn ugly on the outside.

I just fucking hope that Russhole doesn't get away with his lawsuits without consequences, especially the one against Null. The Freemantle one will just drop anyway, since he's 100% signed a contract stating that he can't sue them anyway, and even if he could, Freemantle has the money and legal team to deal with it.

Null doesn't have those resources and the whole case is stupid in and off itself. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if Russholes new turd-mustached lawyers have already convinced him that he can't really win, but can still drag it out just to inflict economical punishment on Null.

I don't know that much about US laws, but is there any chance that Null can get all the lawyer fees paid for? Hopefully by Russ. Or is that futile just because Russ is broke?

 

[AnOminous]

That's not fair to Ed Wood. Ed Wood was far more talented and successful than Russ could ever dream to be. Ed Wood was actually able to make money with his films, his movies have their fans even today, he had a healthy social life with many friends, and he didn't have to pay for sex. Ed Wood is so far above Shit-Lips that it's like he's in a different galaxy.

He also generously continued to employ Bela Lugosi at the end of his life when he had basically burned out, was in failing health, and addicted to drugs. Lugosi would probably have ended up homeless or dead years earlier without Ed Wood.

 

[FernandoPooTragedy]

Pipsqueak is more like Tommy Wiseau without the business skill or sense of humor. Right down to being a misogynistic manlet who burns bridges left and right.

 

[RembrandtCourage]

Pipsqueak is more like Tommy Wiseau without the business skill or sense of humor. Right down to being a misogynistic manlet who burns bridges left and right.

Since when was Tommy Wiseau a self-sabotaging misogynist?

 

[Meat Target]

I don't know that much about US laws, but is there any chance that Null can get all the lawyer fees paid for? Hopefully by Russ. Or is that futile just because Russ is broke?

That's precisely what Null is trying to do. He knows it'll be pennies on the dollar at best, but that's not the point. The point is that Russ will not stop with his frivolous lawsuits unless he faces financial consequences.

Null and his lawyers have tried everything else. There's no way, federally or at the state level, to have Russ declared a vexatious litigant.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I don't know that much about US laws, but is there any chance that Null can get all the lawyer fees paid for? Hopefully by Russ. Or is that futile just because Russ is broke?

Yes. Despite the jokes suggesting othervise, Russ, at least, has a stable job which finances many of his attempts at fame. That means there is wealth to take by Null, and wages to possibly be garnished. Utah (where this lawsuit takes place) allows for a maximum of 25% garnishment of the wages but no larger than 30 times the amount by which your disposable earnings for the week exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage. See Utah Code Ann. §70C-7-103, Rule 64D of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure

Null and his lawyers have tried everything else.

They haven't tried Mediation yet. Who knows, maybe Skordas can convince Russ' lawyers that Russ is in the wrong. They haven't filed a motion for fees yet, either. Neither in the district court nor appellate.

There's no way, federally or at the state level, to have Russ declared a vexatious litigant.

That's factually false. Now, I do think it is unlikely that he will get declared one, but to say it's impossible is incorrect

 

[Meat Target]

That's factually false. Now, I do think it is unlikely that he will get declared one, but to say it's impossible is incorrect

There are, to my knowledge no federal statutes that address vexatious litigation. There are some states that have them, but they do not include Utah or Nevada.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

There are, to my knowledge no federal statutes that address vexatious litigation. There are some states that have them, but they do not include Utah or Nevada.

That is a complete move of the goal post. You talked about ways to declare him vexatious on "federal or state level" and concluded it was impossible. Now you are only talking about specific statutes.

There have been people declared vexatious litigants in Utah, and such determination draws power from both the Rules of Civil Procedure of Utah, and the inherent power of the courts to ensure their processes are not abused.

You might want to read up on Cox v. Hefley, 441 P.3d 769, 2019 UT App. 60 (Utah Ct. App. 2019), Strand v. Nupetco Assocs. LLC, 397 P.3d 724, 2017 UT App. 55 (Utah Ct. App. 2017), Utah R. Civ. P. 83

Likewise same facts hold true for Nevada. See NV Rev Stat § 155.165 (2013), their gov site listing on Vexatious litigants (which is currently down for repairs).

 

[Meat Target]

That is a complete move of the goal post. You talked about ways to declare him vexatious on "federal or state level" and concluded it was impossible. Now you are only talking about specific statutes.

There have been people declared vexatious litigants in Utah, and such determination draws power from both the Rules of Civil Procedure of Utah, and the inherent power of the courts to ensure their processes are not abused.

You might want to read up on Cox v. Hefley, 441 P.3d 769, 2019 UT App. 60 (Utah Ct. App. 2019), Strand v. Nupetco Assocs. LLC, 397 P.3d 724, 2017 UT App. 55 (Utah Ct. App. 2017), Utah R. Civ. P. 83

Likewise same facts hold true for Nevada. See NV Rev Stat § 155.165 (2013), their gov site listing on Vexatious litigants (which is currently down for repairs).

I stand corrected.

 

[Rustled Jimmies]

I don't know that much about US laws, but is there any chance that Null can get all the lawyer fees paid for? Hopefully by Russ. Or is that futile just because Russ is broke?

The reason he can sue Null so often is because he is a sped with a small grasp of the legal process, just knowing how to serve Null and file informa paupis is enough knowledge for him to abuse the legal system for free forever.
Russ is a broke bitch so trying to get fees out of him is like squeezing blood from a stone, even the $1500 penalty from the Ariana trial was paid in installments of $50 per month, Nulls fees must be close to 10x that penalty by now.

 

[AnOminous]

There have been people declared vexatious litigants in Utah, and such determination draws power from both the Rules of Civil Procedure of Utah, and the inherent power of the courts to ensure their processes are not abused.

Courts also have nearly limitless powers under the All Writs Act (28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)) to preserve their jurisdiction. These can require pre-filing review of any new lawsuits in any federal court, such that only by leave of court can the litigant file more legal actions, as well as the requirement that the litigant attach a copy of the order to any new lawsuit. Then there are Rule 11 sanctions, as well as the statute authorizing punishment of conduct "multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously[.]" (28 U.S.C. § 1927). Both of these authorize fee-shifting to the prevailing party.

The first is a drastic remedy generally only used on conduct more extreme than Russhole's, although the more he continues his nonsense, the more likely he is to run aroul of it. As he is already filing pro se, he is also subject to the dismissal of his lolsuits without the other side having to respond (28 U.S. Code § 1915(e)(2)).

 

[Useful_Mistake]

New Russ v Fremantle doc

Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Deadlines by Defendant Fremantle Production

Tldr: Russ wants to do more shit (like add more people to the lawsuit, amend the complaint, and his motion for preliminary injunction) and Fremantle asks to not be required to respond to that shit until they and Russ agree on further deadlines

Fremantle intends to compel Russ to obey his contract

 

[Russketeer]

RE: Milk for Kiwis to Ponder LOL

Kiwis -

The email chain from the end of the PDF is gold!! The contrast between the tone and professionalism of a real lawyer and Russ is *chef's kiss*. He can't even be unboomer enough to remove the iphone ad signature line lol and then links to his useless website. He doesn't even use the full word regarding or bother with a period at the end of his sentence fragment. Is the terse tone a sign of upsetti spaghetti gourdhead knowing he is being backed into the pay to play arbitration corner? I imagine he will not be prompt in submitting the form and is looking forward to a conversation with Molly. If it requires an ink and pen signature and scan of course he will harass some poor lady at an office store instead of owning a $25 scanner or using an iPhone scanner app.

Thanks,

Russkateer

 

[DrJonesHat]

New Russ v Fremantle doc

Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Deadlines by Defendant Fremantle Production

Tldr: Russ wants to do more shit (like add more people to the lawsuit, amend the complaint, and his motion for preliminary injunction) and Fremantle asks to not be required to respond to that shit until they and Russ agree on further deadlines

Fremantle intends to compel Russ to obey his contract

View attachment 2881475

So he's aware of the arbitration clause now if he wasn't before. There's no way they'll let him on the show because that would establish precedent that someone can sue and be a contestant, regardless of how awful their act is. I dunno if Freemantle is of the "give the idiots some money so he'll go away" school of frivolous lawsuits, or the "fight tooth and nail to avoid developing a reputation for paying out for settling frivolous lawsuits" line of thinking.

 

[Bridgeburner]

So he's aware of the arbitration clause now if he wasn't before. There's no way they'll let him on the show because that would establish precedent that someone can sue and be a contestant, regardless of how awful their act is. I dunno if Freemantle is of the "give the idiots some money so he'll go away" school of frivolous lawsuits, or the "fight tooth and nail to avoid developing a reputation for paying out for settling frivolous lawsuits" line of thinking.

Probably the latter. Why on Earth would they let a mong like Russ bully them into anything?

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

That's precisely what Null is trying to do. He knows it'll be pennies on the dollar at best, but that's not the point. The point is that Russ will not stop with his frivolous lawsuits unless he faces financial consequences.

Null and his lawyers have tried everything else. There's no way, federally or at the state level, to have Russ declared a vexatious litigant.

As @Useful_Mistake said, Russ can be declared a vexatious litigant in Nevada (here is a list of vexatious litigants in Nevada), but the problem is twofold. First, being declared vexatious is a high bar to clear. Second, being declared vexatious in one state doesn't carry over to another, meaning if Russ is declared vexatious in Nevada, he can move to another state and continue (the Mountain Jews threatened to do exactly that, as I recall.)

It all goes back to your original point: Russ needs to suffer financially, and it needs to be impressed on him that if he tries to fuck with Null and the Farms like this again, he will not only lose the case, but he'll lose money and possibly possessions.

So he's aware of the arbitration clause now if he wasn't before. There's no way they'll let him on the show because that would establish precedent that someone can sue and be a contestant, regardless of how awful their act is. I dunno if Freemantle is of the "give the idiots some money so he'll go away" school of frivolous lawsuits, or the "fight tooth and nail to avoid developing a reputation for paying out for settling frivolous lawsuits" line of thinking.

I don't think Russ is the only person who's tried to pull a stunt like this. I think Freemantle is the sort to crush people who bring lawsuits against them, as a warning to other would-be litigants.