Snowflake Pokimane / Pokimanelol / Imane Anys / OfflineTV - Abuses men for social climbing, hypocrite with double standards, doesn't own up to mistakes, lies about relationships, 'not like the other girls'

HisShadowX said:
Pokimane is annoying but she is hot.
Click to expand...
She really isn't. She is just a pro
at makeup, filters, and working angles.

d196819f-maxresdefault-14-1024x576.jpgZXRVq2lVvofrtHZR2YFQ3o1g2P6wo_JKp8yxhHOv4a4.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: electric mouse, Ebony Way, Melonie and 36 others
dilettante said:
Why would a platform want to ban any "content creator" that makes them literal millions of dollars for more than a couple days? TOS or not, the thot is too valuable to the site to let go. Twitch has always bent the rules for top 100 streamers because they bring in big cash. Any 'ban' on these streamers are just for show. Whats the point of even having rules in the first place if this whore can break them and get away with it? What a joke of a website.
Click to expand...
Because platforms are not liable for their users' copyright infringements as long as they enforce DMCA gay shit. If they don't enforce it (and Twitch most definitely doesn't) - mr. Shekelberg from Universal/WB/Viacom can sue them for HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars and take down the website with a court order. Remember, in copyright lawsuit, every infraction (i.e. unique viewer on stream/VOD) is counted separately when calculating (((damages))).

I find it baffling that streamers like Poki haven't been sued yet. They have money (unlike the dude torrenting "Capeshit: the Movie" from his parents' house) and the case is a slam-dunk for mr. Shekelbergs of the world (you literally record yourself committing crime lol, good luck fighting that in court). This would be a win-win situation for us:
1) Thot gets patrolled and bankrupted
2) On a :optimistic: :optimistic: chance that it's declared fair use - huge win for the anti-copyright crowd.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Redd, Falcos_Commisar, Chandler Bing and 1 other person
A.Shitposter said:
Trying to triangulate the fuckability of some random chick online because you're mad about her making money online is more autistic than simping over her.
Click to expand...
It's really not. Simps need the bullet. They all fall for stupid shit like camera angles and photoshop and instagram filters. The average IQ slips a few points and the value of women drops as much. Wait until you find out that precisely 0 trannies pass in real life.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Delicious Clouds, Lightbringer430, Dante Alighieri and 61 others
tulskij_tochnyj said:
Because platforms are not liable for their users' copyright infringements as long as they enforce DMCA gay shit. If they don't enforce it (and Twitch most definitely doesn't) - mr. Shekelberg from Universal/WB/Viacom can sue them for HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars and take down the website with a court order. Remember, in copyright lawsuit, every infraction (i.e. unique viewer on stream/VOD) is counted separately when calculating (((damages))).
Click to expand...
The DMCA doesn't even require them to remove the user; literally just the user's allegedly infringing content, and only then after they receive a DMCA takedown notice for it.

As long as they do that, they're not liable for the user's content.

Short of something like Content ID flagging copyrighted material mid-stream, or some copyright troll watching for their content and striking it immediately, literally just deleting the streamer's VOD after the fact should be sufficient to shield Twitch from liability. And even if a streamer's content is struck mid-stream, there's a question of how fast Twitch is legally required to respond to remove it to reasonably stay within the requirements of the DMCA.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Chandler Bing, Jew Lover 1488 and BlueSpark
InteracialBowelSyndrome said:
I find it hilarious that Twitch employs literal pedophiles and a grown man who thinks he's a fucking deer and allows groomers and sex workers to use their platform for their activities, yet showing a copyrighted cartoon is where they draw the line.
Click to expand...
It makes perfect sense in a sick way. The pedos and other mentally ill weirdos working for them can be paid minimum wage plus a few food vouchers every week. Copyright lawsuits can cost them actual money to defend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar, Good King Mog XII and Jew Lover 1488
FatFlamingo said:
Pokimane has been banned from twitch for watching episodes of Avatar The Last Air Bender and finally getting DMCA'd for abusing the copyright system by never providing transformative context to her "content". She would go 30-40 minutes without saying anything besides reacting or doing anything besides making noises, sometimes eating food for whole episodes.
View attachment 2868954
View attachment 2868965
https://twitter.com/StreamerBans/status/1479621872383893504 https://archive.md/bDBv8
https://twitter.com/pokimanelol/status/1479622627111030785 https://archive.md/qCxBD

https://www.invenglobal.com/articles/16104/pokimane-banned-from-twitch-dmca-avatar https://archive.md/lpeya
Click to expand...
Good fucking riddance, I’ve always hated how this NEET rich middle class streamers can think they have the right to skirt around copyright laws to stream entire movies Tv shows and give thirsty simps their daily dose of arse and tits while mainly sitting on their backs doing mainly fuck all. Fuck this wench and this whole lazy ass generation.
 
  • Late
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lime Rogue, Falcos_Commisar, Nate Higgers and 2 others
Neil said:
She doesn't "own" EVO. She's just the face of EVO's marketing. The actual decisions are made by non-LA ethot adults. She just gets paid to push a #girlboss #yasskween "we're not sexist" girls-in-gaming image for EVO.
Click to expand...
If by 'non-LA ethot adults" you mean the Cannon Bros who used to pal around with McRibs until he became a liability? Those adults?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back