Trashfire Adam Kovic & Ryan Haywood (The Dead Pixel / Koko / Pikovic, and James Ryan Haywoood / Iron Ryan / The Mad King / Vagabond) - Rooster Teeth associates who've sent horrifying nudes behind their families' backs in what looks like a gay catfish

How many accusers will there be by the 23rd?

  • 9

    Votes: 5 0.7%
  • 10 ~ 12

    Votes: 91 12.0%
  • 13 ~ 15

    Votes: 273 36.0%
  • 16 ~ 18

    Votes: 185 24.4%
  • 19 or 20

    Votes: 44 5.8%
  • More than 20

    Votes: 161 21.2%

  • Total voters
    759
  • Poll closed .
On page 2 it still lists his address as 3604 John Simpson Trail which is where he lived with Laurie. Would that mean that it's his most recent known address or definitely his current address? If it's his current address how the hell is he still affording to live there unless Laurie is there too?

According to the TCAD link I just posted, he still is the co-owner of the property and has been since 2013.
 
According to the TCAD link I just posted, he still is the co-owner of the property and has been since 2013.
But that alone doesn't mean that he's living there, right? But does the fact the notice was served there indicate that? When you move house in America do you need to legally declare your primary residence? Is there a chance he's just part owner but is living in some bedsit under a motorway or something?
 
On page 2 it still lists his address as 3604 John Simpson Trail which is where he lived with Laurie. Would that mean that it's his most recent known address or definitely his current address? If it's his current address how the hell is he still affording to live there unless Laurie is there too?
He has a lot of experience in IT, and probably saved up money from his RT days. I dunno how the pay is in the USA for IT support (2nd/3rd level), but in Germany you can comfortably live with that (50-60k USD, depending on skill, experience and what company). Companies over here also desperately want IT personal, so perhaps some company thought him being some higher tier support goon with little interaction with customers (that's mostly first level) would be alright.

And there's always the option that his wife knew about it all and just didn't care. We barely know her, and she could be a shitty person too for all we know. Or she's a kind, sweet angel who forgave her embarrassment of a husband so their kids won't grow up without a father. Because, again, for all we know he could be addicted to sex and be irrational about that, but otherwise be a decent human. So she might want to try and make it work. People are complicated.
 
In the places I'm familiar with, you can plead the 5th in a civil trial if it's testimony that could result in criminal prosecution. Pleading the 5th doesn't just cover during a criminal trial, it covers EVERYTHING. The only thing you can't plead the 5th on during a civil trial is if it's testimony that might render you liable for damages, but not criminally responsible. (For example two people playing baseball and they accidentally break a neighbor's window. No crime has been committed, just damages, so they can't plead the 5th. Two people vandalize a house breaking all the windows. If taken to civil court, they could plead the 5th since it involved a potentially criminal act.)

EDIT: That said, unlike in a criminal trial, some civil courts allow holding the fact that you invoked the 5th amendment as evidence of liability.

When someone takes an immunity deal, they lose 5th amendment protections and thus can be compelled to testify, even if it causes them to testify against themselves in a civil case. This is what happened with Cosby. This is also how Cosby got off, because the prosecutor reneged on that immunity.
Sorry, I didn’t really explain that very well.

You can, but it’s under specific circumstances and it can be used against you. You can draw adverse inference from the 5th in a civil trial (in certain states, not all states have this) whereas you’re not supposed to in a criminal one. Iirc there’s also some situations in a civil one where a 5th isn’t as all encompassing as I’m in a criminal trial.

Tldr you can plead the 5th but they can then turn around and say “you’re pleading the 5th Bc you’re guilty/want to get out of something/lying” whatever, this is forbidden in criminal court. You’d be smarter to get a deal that nothing can be used against you in criminal proceedings, but that defeats the point a bit, yeah?

Here’s more info, from a civil attorney website

You’re 100% right, I just typed wo thinking (and while playing tug of war with my rope obsessed puppy). You can but there’s different restrictions and outcomes attached to it, and there’s some limitations as to when you can.
 
If the information on the court website is correct then the Rt. Hon. Rhonda Hurley is the presiding judge, right? So she can choose to take the case. She looks like a mom, whatever Ryan is being sued for if it involves what he did with young girls I don't see it being very well received by her.
View attachment 2902049

View attachment 2902067
View attachment 2902134

Welp, get fucked Ryan.

I'm not American so I'm not 100% sure if that means she gets first dibs on cases but if so then it might be a real bad time to be Ryan Haywood.
Rest in piss, never miss
 
Tldr you can plead the 5th but they can then turn around and say “you’re pleading the 5th Bc you’re guilty/want to get out of something/lying” whatever, this is forbidden in criminal court. You’d be smarter to get a deal that nothing can be used against you in criminal proceedings, but that defeats the point a bit, yeah?

Deals like the Cosby deal are pretty rare. If that's off the table, unless the crime is small, you're usually better off just keeping your mouth shut and not giving them ammunition for the criminal trial.. You might want to talk if the penalties for the crime are very small but the testimony would somehow reduce your liability for the civil lawsuit.
 
Nice, I vaguely remember a few of the girls talking lawsuits. The plaintiff listed as Jane Doe doesn’t bode well, the means it’s a minor or the case is of a sexual assault nature(or both) and not just one of his old twitch mods suing for back pay.
Or a groupie dealing with guilt or remorse. We’re not dealing with that either.
Every time I see something in regards to Rooster Teeth, it just gets worse.
And RWBY V9 doesn’t even have a release date yet.
 
On the one hand, I think stupid sluts deserve nothing more than a life lesson due to their own regrettable stupid slut actions. But on the other hand, this is Rooster Teeth who's been dragged into the mix. And seeing their woke, "believe all wahman" bullshit company get torn a new asshole would be funny to me. So I'm unsure of who to really root for here? 🤔
 
Here's some other cases that the lawyer on retainer (Ajay Ketkar) has participated in, at least in Travis County. Archive is being mean, so I'll just say that I've found all my info here - https://odysseyweb.traviscountytx.gov/Portal/

Against "FIESTA RESTAURANT GROUP INC", dismissed with prejudice: D-1-GN-16-003085
Against "ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS INC", transferred as a tag-along case: D-1-GN-21-001666
Against "GAVIOLIV ENTERPRISES INC", still open and hasn't moved since June 2021: D-1-GN-21-002769
Against "HOME DEPOT INTERNATIONAL INC", answered by Home Depot and hasn't moved since September 2021: D-1-GN-21-001168

His twitter has virtually no interactions, and he seems to have passed the bar in 2016. https://twitter.com/attorneyajay https://www.texasbar.com/AM/Templat...ry/MemberDirectoryDetail.cfm&ContactID=351516
 
But that alone doesn't mean that he's living there, right? But does the fact the notice was served there indicate that? When you move house in America do you need to legally declare your primary residence? Is there a chance he's just part owner but is living in some bedsit under a motorway or something?
Generally, there's "Permanent Address" and "Current Address" in many legal documents, but you're not obligated to declare a Current Address except for legal reasons (background checks, jury duty, etc.), and even then, it usually only counts if your name is on it somehow (bills, etc.), not just paying cash to sleep on the couch and use the Wi-fi.

Either way, this won't be a problem unless he doesn't show up to court or otherwise avoids fees...and even if that happens, if you aren't a wanted criminal, owe huge sums of money, or considered a threat by the alphabet agencies, you can basically disappear...but you can't easily get a job or credit. It's doubtful that Haywood would go that extreme.
 
On the one hand, I think stupid sluts deserve nothing more than a life lesson due to their own regrettable stupid slut actions. But on the other hand, this is Rooster Teeth who's been dragged into the mix. And seeing their woke, "believe all wahman" bullshit company get torn a new asshole would be funny to me. So I'm unsure of who to really root for here? 🤔
Just get a bucket of popcorn.
 
Deals like the Cosby deal are pretty rare. If that's off the table, unless the crime is small, you're usually better off just keeping your mouth shut and not giving them ammunition for the criminal trial.. You might want to talk if the penalties for the crime are very small but the testimony would somehow reduce your liability for the civil lawsuit.
Off topic but I absolutely couldn’t believe 1. They gave Cosby that deal and 2. They just.. ignored it. That was absolutely insane to me. I followed that whole rigamarole fairly closely but there were just so many accusers.
-on topic-
Hopefully the girl kept her receipts, I know a lot of them did. I need to go back through the thread but he pretty much targeted 16-19 yo, and was pretty hell bent on virgins, right?
 
Here's some other cases that the lawyer on retainer (Ajay Ketkar) has participated in, at least in Travis County. Archive is being mean, so I'll just say that I've found all my info here - https://odysseyweb.traviscountytx.gov/Portal/

Against "FIESTA RESTAURANT GROUP INC", dismissed with prejudice: D-1-GN-16-003085
Against "ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS INC", transferred as a tag-along case: D-1-GN-21-001666
Against "GAVIOLIV ENTERPRISES INC", still open and hasn't moved since June 2021: D-1-GN-21-002769
Against "HOME DEPOT INTERNATIONAL INC", answered by Home Depot and hasn't moved since September 2021: D-1-GN-21-001168

His twitter has virtually no interactions, and he seems to have passed the bar in 2016. https://twitter.com/attorneyajay https://www.texasbar.com/AM/Templat...ry/MemberDirectoryDetail.cfm&ContactID=351516

The first case seems to be a case where someone tripped and fell in a Taco Cabana restaurant...can't find anything on the second but it might have to do with the winter storm outages. Third one is against a cocktail bar in Austin (Saint Genevieve) that closed back in February 2019, which is weird since someone filed a personal injury claim over two and a half years after its closure.
 
You got sauce on that? Shit sounds depressing.
For the sake of adding context to how shitty RT has been prior to Ryan:

This entire thing is just hilarious:
I don't have the highlights, but 20 minutes in Geoff is just a beaten dog and just flagellating for BLM bs.

Someone probably has the cuck montage for Geoff. I would guess @Dumpster dived waifu, @SteelPlatedHeart, or @Insalubrious as they're more regular posters in the RT thread.

There's a lot of bullshit that just is schadenfreude to me because of how crappy the company is when it seemed like a quirky small company in the Obama years.
There's a few of these and the background basically is that Geoff's wife is a whore who wanted an open relationship and they never should have pushed their daughter in front of a camera at an early age.
 
Incidentally, regarding the interstate travel, people misunderstand the law. US law makes it illegal to cross state lines for *commercial* sex with someone under 18. This usually doesn't need to be enforced since it's already illegal in every state, it's more meant to prosecute people who travel to other countries where they might not be prosecuted by local authorities for having sex with a 17-year-old prostitute.

For non-commercial sex, it is only illegal to travel for the purpose of having sex with someone under 16 or where the law prohibits it. This means that they won't prosecute someone going to see their 16-year-old girlfriend who lives across a town that happens to straddle a state line, provided it's legal there. This is kind of important as most states have an age of consent of 16, and no state has had it lower since Hawaii raised it from 14 in 2001, Georgia from 14 in 1996, and New Mexico from 13 in 1987. Thus 16 doesn't affect domestic travel at all, but only focuses on international travel.
The Mann act applies if you transport a minor across state lines to skirt age of consent (example taking a 17 year old from California with a AOC of 18 to Nevada with an AOC of 16 to 'legally' have sex), you can be Federally prosecuted, now if you do the inverse that is taking that 17 year old from Nevada to Cali and getting busted for statutory rape then you can get double prosecuted by both the state and feds.

Now if the 17 year old minor is a Nevada resident and you cross state lines from California into Nevada to fuck her then it's Kosher under fed and state law, likewise if the minor is a California resident and of her own means travels to Nevada and you fuck her there (example: some dumb 16 year old thot on vacation in Las Vegas with her family fucks some guy she met on the strip) then that's also kosher.

That's why Onision crossing state lines into Pennsylvania to fuck that 16 year old was a nothingburger from a prosecutorial stand point criminally.
 
Last edited:
Jesus H. Christ how can you love something so soul crushing and life draining that you have multiple videos of montages of you being cucked.

I can’t wait until Geoff’s daughter takes the company away from him then fills it with troons. Not because she cares but because it is in the fate of Geoff’s life that every woman he loves destroys him.
 
Back