Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[pr3nt177]

"Police Contacting Those Concerned About Trans Girlguiding Leader"
Any complaints about this beast are being forwarded on to the police who will want a "friendly chat" possibly with a threat of arrest for being a meanie.
Article Link / (archive site not working atm) Archive Link


Monica Sulley is the "lead Commissioner for the Southwell division of Girl Guides UK, known there as Girlguiding"

edit: Just noticed this creature has already been mentioned in the thread...will delete if need be.
added archive link

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

He’s 40?!!

I don’t understand how both testosterone and estrogen can make these people age so quickly.

He says he’s 40. He also says he’s a woman. Hmm.

A nerd, or group of nerds, kidnaps a woman, and force her through mind control to enact scenarios where she is humiliated for the sexual enjoyment of the nerds.

You forgot the OG example: The origins of the Slayer, herself.

In prehistoric Africa, a young girl named Sineya was taken against her will by three powerful mages — the Shadowmen — to become the ultimate weapon in the fight against the dark forces that plagued the world. They chained her to the floor of a cave and, using powerful magic, imbued her with the heart, soul, and spirit of a demon. Thus the first Slayer was created.[3]...the descendants of the Shadowmen and their subsequent apprentices would later form the Watchers Council, responsible for identifying, training, and guiding the Slayer, as well as Potential Slayers, giving continuity to the fight against evil.

Surely the mages, and now the Watchers, count as a group of nerds? I think they do. When a group of men tie/chain up ANY girl, there’s a sexual motive even if it doesn’t look like a sex act to normal people.

 

[behindyourightnow]

Saw this on the other farms. At this point getting marked with Shinigami Eyes is a badge of honor:

View attachment 2906515

Binary sex categories in women's sports seem to be working fine to me with only extraordinary exceptions over the past 100 years:

View attachment 2906517

Wow Erin, I wonder why disorders of sexual development (like being an XY female) occur at a much, much higher rate among elite female athletes than among the general population? Could it be that having XY chromosomes conveys some advantage even if you are phenotypically female? And that women with some DSDs disproportionately rise to the top of female athletic competitions?

Do you think discovering cases of XX male or XXY disorders among male athletes is just as common as the reverse? Gee, I wonder why not?

Funny how the only people who I hear talk about genital inspections are troons themselves. Almost as if they're the genital fetishists:

View attachment 2906519

And they are always pulling out the "genital inspection" or "chromosome check" argument as if anyone can't tell someone's sex at a glance 99.99% of the time lmao. And sure, a lot of kids are quite androgynous in appearance, but all you have to do in that case is look for the mom with the "MY KID IS TRANS" t-shirt following him around.

Surely the mages, and now the Watchers, count as a group of nerds? I think they do. When a group of men tie/chain up ANY girl, there’s a sexual motive even if it doesn’t look like a sex act to normal people.

Never watched Buffy but I remember Age of Ultron had a weird gratuitous kidnapping scene and Avengers had Scarlett Johansson being menaced in weirdly sexualized ways. Not to mention the weird scene in Age of Ultron where they visit Hawkeye's pregnant farm wife and Tony Stark says he wants to do the same thing to his own girlfriend? The movies sucked overall but those parts really stood out as slimy and creepy.

Oh yeah, and I remember him bragging somewhere about how smart he was because he'd managed to have a character call Black Widow a cunt without the censors noticing

Joss whedon troon arc when?

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

Surely the mages, and now the Watchers, count as a group of nerds? I think they do. When a group of men tie/chain up ANY girl, there’s a sexual motive even if it doesn’t look like a sex act to normal people.

No. If someone needs to be kept still against their will, like for robbery, kidnapping, prisoner or stopping them from hurting themselves, tieing or chaining up just makes sense as an option. It's low teck and so believe in many situations, allows interaction despite someone being contained and can change power positions witch can allow intresting dynamics and plot movement. Are there people who get off on it and do some of those people put it in media they produce because of that? Absolutely but that doesn't make the action automatically erotic in every situation. People get off on lots of things, there is pretty much a fetish for everything, but that doesn't mean we live in constant orgy.

 

[Zyklon Ben's Poison Pen]

Binary sex categories in women's sports seem to be working fine to me with only extraordinary exceptions over the past 100 years:

Gee what happened? Oh thats right we learned how to synthesize sex hormones so troons can get high off the ones their body (((coincidentally))) cannot produce but the other half of the population can but *suddenly* there's no sex binary. So weird man.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

No. If someone needs to be kept still against their will, like for robbery, kidnapping, prisoner or stopping them from hurting themselves, tieing or chaining up just makes sense as an option. It's low teck and so believe in many situations, allows interaction despite someone being contained and can change power positions witch can allow intresting dynamics and plot movement. Are there people who get off on it and do some of those people put it in media they produce because of that? Absolutely but that doesn't make the action automatically erotic in every situation. People get off on lots of things, there is pretty much a fetish for everything, but that doesn't mean we live in constant orgy.

So let me ask you this: if you read about a group of adult men abducting and chaining up a teenage girl and we’re told they then committed additional crimes, would you be shocked to learn they didn’t do anything sexual to her, or that they did? The former, I’m pretty sure.

Criminals who falsely imprison someone are already criminals for doing so, and there is very little chance that if the criminals are men, and the victim is a girl, that there is no sexual motive. The men were already self-selected from the subgroup of men who wanted to commit crimes against a young girl, after all.

 

[behindyourightnow]

No. If someone needs to be kept still against their will, like for robbery, kidnapping, prisoner or stopping them from hurting themselves, tieing or chaining up just makes sense as an option. It's low teck and so believe in many situations, allows interaction despite someone being contained and can change power positions witch can allow intresting dynamics and plot movement. Are there people who get off on it and do some of those people put it in media they produce because of that? Absolutely but that doesn't make the action automatically erotic in every situation. People get off on lots of things, there is pretty much a fetish for everything, but that doesn't mean we live in constant orgy.

I agree, but if Joss Whedon is involved in any way it's ABSOLUTELY sexual. Using the Marvel movies as an example, the non-Whedon MCU films had dozens of occurrences of female characters being put in mortal danger (I mean, they're superhero movies) without it being sexualized, but as soon as he was at the helm, it was "any threat to any female character has a weird sexual overtone." Like I'm not saying the others are feminist masterpieces or that any sexual threat in a movie is always a result of a fetish, just that Joss's scenes all had that weird "I jerked off while writing this" sheen to them.

I wish I could go into more details, but I only saw his MCU movies once because they are terrible, so all I remember is that slimy "I am watching someone's jerkoff material" feeling.

 

[Timotei Lindeanu]

A gay Jew (?) has been whining about Graham Linehan noting how he wants a witches' museum to include transwomen. He's a queer historian and he is 'evidence based'. Twitter.

Also, if you're a patron of the arts or master-at-arms, you're really gay.

View attachment 2905815

Here is another photo. View attachment 2905823

He works at a Birmingham museum. The UK kind, not the hick kind. Here is another photo.

View attachment 2905834

This was the same queer who said a witches' museum would be fine by him if it included gender diverse 'women', AKA males.

Here is him acting all scared that those transphobes are going to give him a bad review:

View attachment 2905840

Yes, 'evidence based history' includes calling master-at-arms, a military term, a euphemism for faggots and cowering like a child when women call out your blatant disregard for the sheer shit women accused of witchcraft went through.

Website. Here is an example of his fair and balanced historical articles.


I just love how they talk about how import gender nonconformity is while saying that if you are gender nonconforming you MUST be trans or non binary.

The flak he got for his trans witches thing was pretty tame, and well deserved. Here is a gay man highlighting how his gayness and his maleness is important, while erasing female history.

Historians like him deserve to be called out, because he is not only lying by omission, he's lying straight up.

Of course, of course he is a legend of zelda fan. The witches museum thing sound dope, can't wait for the troon crowd to gather outside the museum and screech transphobia at the museum staff for not including troon wizards.

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

So let me ask you this: if you read about a group of adult men abducting and chaining up a teenage girl and we’re told they then committed additional crimes, would you be shocked to learn they didn’t do anything sexual to her, or that they did? The former, I’m pretty sure.

Criminals who falsely imprison someone are already criminals for doing so, and there is very little chance that if the criminals are men, and the victim is a girl, that there is no sexual motive. The men were already self-selected from the subgroup of men who wanted to commit crimes against a young girl, after all.

No, not really but I wouldn't be surprised that they didn't do anything either. Most male criminals don't do sex crimes, they prefer consensual fun with girls into bad boys. They are happy enough with violence, robberies, drugs, cons and/or what ever crime is their thing. It's pretty similar that many sex criminals don't bother robbing people they are raping because they are there to rape not rob. They might take a trophy like panties or a picture but actually taking stuff just for monetary gains isn't in the agenda. People aren't automatically into all crime just because they like some crime.

 

[chiobu]

"Samsung pulls ad with drag queen after backlash" Article Link / archive
View attachment 2906499 View attachment 2906503
Seems to have upset many - from Muslims to normies complaining of it pushing LGBT ideology etc.

How long before boycotts are rallied by the trannies, claiming it hurts them the most...
View attachment 2906509
Tranny tears before bedtime.

LGB stuff is mostly fine here, it's... the troons people are not comfortable with. Even in local pride parades trannies are slowly pushing out the LGB folks/normie supporters with their sheer annoyance and narcissism.

It's a fucking retarded idea to go 0-100 from normie to drag queen in Singapore anyway, and of all the races we have over here they pick the one that's most likely to hate LGBTQ+ shit? lol

 

[Diesel Boogaloo]

Saw this on the other farms. At this point getting marked with Shinigami Eyes is a badge of honor:

View attachment 2906515

Binary sex categories in women's sports seem to be working fine to me with only extraordinary exceptions over the past 100 years:

View attachment 2906517

Funny how the only people who I hear talk about genital inspections are troons themselves. Almost as if they're the genital fetishists:

View attachment 2906519

Erin "Girl Scout" Mom:

View attachment 2906524

Granny tranny fashion icon!:

View attachment 2906525

So I decided to check what "Shinigami Eyes" actually does.

The first sentence of its description says:

Highlights transphobic/anti-LGBT and trans-friendly subreddits/users/facebook pages/groups with different colors.

– however, it then continues:

It's sometimes difficult to determine at a glance whether a feminist or LGB(T) page is trans-friendly or transphobic. This extension highlights known subreddits, facebook pages, and pages on various other social networks with different colors based on whether they're transphobic or t-friendly.

So by "highlighting anti-LGBT" they, as always ignore 3/4 of the letters, but they do not ignore them when mentioning a list of potential enemies. The extension allows marking people as either "good" or "bad", and the only criterion for good the author of the extension had in mind is being pro-troon.

There are several more troony Chrome extensions. There are a generic text replacement extensions called "True Self", "Dead Name Be Gone", "Deadname Remover" and "Deadname-B-Gon", which you can use to replace any mention of Joe Biden with "doofus poopyhead", but of course they're advertised in a much more specific way, and for some reason are limited to one replacement only (so you can't "replace deadnames" of multiple people). I thought troons are good at coding, so they could make an extension that can replace an arbitrary number of names. But then I realized that they are so self-centered that only one replacement pattern is enough.

 

[Pig Boss]

So I decided to check what "Shinigami Eyes" actually does.

The first sentence of its description says:

– however, it then continues:

So by "highlighting anti-LGBT" they, as always ignore 3/4 of the letters, but they do not ignore them when mentioning a list of potential enemies. The extension allows marking people as either "good" or "bad", and the only criterion for good the author of the extension had in mind is being pro-troon.

There are several more troony Chrome extensions. There are a generic text replacement extensions called "True Self", "Dead Name Be Gone", "Deadname Remover" and "Deadname-B-Gon", which you can use to replace any mention of Joe Biden with "doofus poopyhead", but of course they're advertised in a much more specific way, and for some reason are limited to one replacement only (so you can't "replace deadnames" of multiple people). I thought troons are good at coding, so they could make an extension that can replace an arbitrary number of names. But then I realized that they are so self-centered that only one replacement pattern is enough.

This video has a quick rundown of Shinigami Eyes, where the name comes from, why it was made, shows the kind of troonacy that it's used for, some examples of why it's susceptible to targeted interference by people with too much time on their hands and what happens when troons turn on their supposed allies.

 

[ForbiddenVelma960]

Like I said I am neither, but I think it is unfair perhaps to label all transpeople as that, this site tends to focus on the worst examples the movement has to offer, it’s the same with any fandom, they focus on the absolute worst people from that group that In reality only take up a minuscule proportion of the actual fandom as a whole. They aren’t representative of the community’s as a whole and In turn trick people’s opinions into thinking the whole culture is like that.

It’s a really hacky thing to do to blame a few freaks misdoings and behaviour on an entire group when it’s not the main majority that are like that. Makes them all collectively seem bad as a culture when really it’s just a couple of fringe douchebags that have taken power in abusing their sexual identity to become a deviant and make everyone know and suffer in the name of making some stupid political power statement that only has any meaning to them. I wish it would stop.

"It is impossible to describe what it necessary to those who do not understand horror... Horror has a name... Has a face... You must make a friend of horror..horror and moral terror.. Else they are enemies to be feared."

You cannot judge me.

The entire movement is based on sexist stereotypes. No one is born in the wrong body. Every person who claims a transgender or non binary identity is complicit in the cult.

Transitioning is self hatred and an attempt to destroy the self.

This is not funny, these poor people were literally raped and murdered by Matt Walsh and now cannot function:

Now show me on the Doll where Matt Walsh hurt you?

 

[Random Access Humour]

Hooboy. Andy "Lily" Wachowski is literally an AGP who had his mind raped by a dominatrix who would sexually torture him for hours, then inject him intramuscularly with ketamine right as he would cum to extend his orgasm for what seemed like hours, while he disassociated while wearing women's clothes. That dominatrix, Ilsa Strix, was at the time married to Buck Angel, a FtM who did "dude with a pussy" porn. She left her "husband" for Wachowski, who left his wife for Ilsa. Andy Wachowski is literally a kink-sick pervert who after his fame and money from The Matrix, got into the underground LA sex dungeon scene, and got mentally fucked by a sex demoness into mental depravity. He likes being humiliated and his wife making him go to premieres dressed as a woman is part of that. Literally the worst example of a stable normal tranny possible. (fun fact: Ilsa Strix had heavy influence on the second and third Matrix movies, which is part of the reason they suck. The underground orgy rave scene was her idea.)

Wasn't it Larry Wachowski who ended up with Ilsa Strix? Andy is married to somebody else

 

[Jhonson Jhonson]

Of course, of course he is a legend of zelda fan. The witches museum thing sound dope, can't wait for the troon crowd to gather outside the museum and screech transphobia at the museum staff for not including troon wizards.

Lol'ed at troon wizards. I imagine it so much.
And since I'm bored right now before work:

Spoiler: Autistic ugly drawing

 

[moocow]

So let me ask you this: if you read about a group of adult men abducting and chaining up a teenage girl and we’re told they then committed additional crimes, would you be shocked to learn they didn’t do anything sexual to her, or that they did? The former, I’m pretty sure.

Criminals who falsely imprison someone are already criminals for doing so, and there is very little chance that if the criminals are men, and the victim is a girl, that there is no sexual motive. The men were already self-selected from the subgroup of men who wanted to commit crimes against a young girl, after all.

That's simply not true. For example, the majority of serial killers don't do anything sexual to/with their victims. They do sometimes imprison or bind up their victims for some period prior to killing them, all without committing any sex-related crimes. In the overwhelming majority of crimes of opportunity (burglaries, muggings, kidnapping for ransoms, etc.) even when violence and restraint are both involved, the perpetrators don't sexually assault the victim; they're too busy committing the original crime.

Granted sexual assault does sometimes go along with murder, frequently enough to justify checking every suspected homicide for DNA "donations" from the killer in the hopes that 1) the killer was male, 2) diddled the victim before killing them, 3) was careless enough to rawdog it and 4) didn't bother cleaning up afterwards. Often though, they either find no DNA (and no evidence of sexual assault) or they find DNA elsewhere on the body in another form (someone else's hair, the skin of the attacker under the fingernails of the victim following a failed effort to fight back, etc.).

Contrary to popular belief, men do not automatically think "oooh hole tied down must fuck hole" if they see someone in physical restraints, even if they put the victim there themselves. The chief motivation in restraining someone while committing a crime is to prevent interference or intervention. A tied-up victim or witness can't call the police, run away, pick up a weapon to attack you or even tell anyone where they (or you) are if you've blindfolded them.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

Of course, of course he is a legend of zelda fan. The witches museum thing sound dope, can't wait for the troon crowd to gather outside the museum and screech transphobia at the museum staff for not including troon wizards.

I think I got a great nominee for that witch museum. We can just dip him in hot Acrylic to preserve and display his disgusting image.

 

[Mellow Malevolent]

Wow Erin, I wonder why disorders of sexual development (like being an XY female) occur at a much, much higher rate among elite female athletes than among the general population? Could it be that having XY chromosomes conveys some advantage even if you are phenotypically female? And that women with some DSDs disproportionately rise to the top of female athletic competitions?

Do you think discovering cases of XX male or XXY disorders among male athletes is just as common as the reverse? Gee, I wonder why not?

They sure do love to pull from this particular well, but the Caster Semenya decision was the right one. If as a woman, your body produces male levels of testosterone and responds to it, ie. not CAIS, then you should not be competing against other women. Natural testosterone production is simply too much of an absolute advantage to allow in women's sports. It is discriminatory, but only in the same way weight classes are in MMA. Equity between the sexes requires the understanding that 90% of men will have more upper body strength than 95% of women. This is the same reason why having trans women in women's spaces is dangerous. Even if most trans women do not commit crimes (though with the ones going to women's prison, this doesn't even apply), a statistically male amount of them do, and in those cases they have an extremely high chance of being stronger than their victim.


Also, I mentioned this before, but the prison rape thing as a reason to protect trans women does piss me off. Because gay men, especially those with smaller builds, are also at extremely elevated risk of prison rape. Except then, it's treated like a joke. People still joke about how fun it must be for gay men in prison to be "prison ho's", but the reality is far more brutal. But even trying to advocate for something like gay only tiers in prisons is an uphill battle. But trans women get an easy free pass out of the system, and they don't even need to do anything to prove their trans status other than saying they identify as women. This is very much a "what about the men" situation, since the group we're all supposed to be super worried about are also men, very often men who don't read as particularly effeminate or gay. It's fucking infuriating the way that victimhood narrative just skips over the vast majority of the people being raped in prison.

 

[Shig O'nella]

So let me ask you this: if you read about a group of adult men abducting and chaining up a teenage girl and we’re told they then committed additional crimes, would you be shocked to learn they didn’t do anything sexual to her, or that they did? The former, I’m pretty sure.

Nah. It's one of the typical tropes for "villains with a moral code" so it isn't that surprising when it happens. Cheap trick in a different way.

 

[Pinga]

@thegooddoctor
The scientific evidence for the pop culture concept of transgenderism is basically non-existent. It's like homeopathy tier science.

Hey, that's not fair. At least homeopathy still has the placebo effect.