Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Similarly, unmarried women might become landowners and inherit property; These ‘Baugrygr’ or ‘Ringkvinna’ would be the head of the family occupying a traditionally masculine role in Viking society. At the very least, men and women in Viking society could break from traditional constructs of male and female roles and it is possible that we are talking about people who would today identify as transgender or nonbinary.
No lol. Albanian sworn virgins, ringkvinna, or whatever "third gender identity" you want to point to, only exist because those societies had strict gender roles and because that meant that women couldn't inherit property, fight or do male jobs, so they allowed women to defeminise (if that's a word) themselves and be referred to as men in order to do something other than being a housewife. They are not the progressive intersectional feminist girlbosses you think they are.

I mean, does Albania really seem like a hotbed of anti-patriarchal sentiment to you?
 
No lol. Albanian sworn virgins, ringkvinna, or whatever "third gender identity" you want to point to, only exist because those societies had strict gender roles and because that meant that women couldn't inherit property, fight or do male jobs, so they allowed women to defeminise (if that's a word) themselves and be referred to as men in order to do something other than being a housewife. They are not the progressive intersectional feminist girlbosses you think they are.

I mean, does Albania really seem like a hotbed of anti-patriarchal sentiment to you?
It's funny how the alphabets confuse genders with gender roles.
They never grasp that the Albanian virgins were all natal females, and the hijras and fafaines are all natal males.

@lolcow yoghurt thanks for the idea:
3fridges.jpeg
 
Anyone who makes their own checkbox on a form is destined to be a headache. What an obnoxious thing to do. The second the manager saw that they probably knew they made a fucking mistake and good on them for cleaning up the mess so efficiently.

I wonder what the other side of the story looks like. If his coworker was able to make "several write-ups" at the HR level then probably had a legitimate reason to let him go. I don't have a lot of experience with bad coworkers, but I'm pretty sure it takes more than going to your boss and saying "boss Tranny Joe is talking trash about Republicans again" in order to get them written up with a report in HR.

I also noticed the guy said he "hardly said anything except for when his manager would say stuff about Covid not being real". Since redditers are all unreliable narrators, I interpret that to mean "I argued with everyone about Covid and other political topics constantly".

Also found this from a commentrr in Germany who thought it was a Good Thing.

and even saying that employees complaining about a trans coworker will be disciplined and can even be fired.

Fucking yikes. Hopefully they are still allowed to complain if their trans coworker isn't pulling their weight, because that's a legitimate grievance.
 
Anyone who makes their own checkbox on a form is destined to be a headache. What an obnoxious thing to do. The second the manager saw that they probably knew they made a fucking mistake and good on them for cleaning up the mess so efficiently.
It's funny that so many people are willing to believe that this person did nothing to deserve being fired. My first instinct with sob stories like this on the internet is to assume the person is lying about how innocent they are.

Like Hot Allostatic Load for instance:

"INADMISSIBLE NARRATIVES OF ABUSE #1 The typical narrative of abuse on social media doesn’t include the problems of the most vulnerable, like how public verbal harassment may only be an ultimately minor part of a trans fem’s exile. The most skilled abusers know that a good exile is done with pure silence, through the whisper network, by having the person wake up one day and have every second or third person she knows or who practices her profession block her and/or stop talking to her. No one tells her why. She has to painstakingly talk to every friend, every contact, every person she would normally have a cheerful conversation with. The electric shocks of knowing that every simple human interaction you have with a friend or stranger could turn into a nightmare of victim blaming or worse, a cold iciness where they pretend nothing is wrong. Imagine repeating that experience hundreds and hundreds of times, with no way to end it. After the noise, the long years of silence are what kill us. The backchannels that should be used to protect people from abusers and rapists are instead used to protect abusers and rapists. Any usefulness these channels have is reserved for Real Women. No one warned me about any of the comically large number of predators in my professions. I was considered unrapeable, unabuseable, not worthy of protection. A trans fem can try to talk about her experiences of abuse for years and have no one listen, but the instant one of her abusers smears her, everyone is alert and awake. One reason it took me so long to talk about my experiences was that I associated being able to speak against abuse with being an abuser. Because every abuser throughout my life was so good at being believed, I thought that being believed was the exclusive domain of abusers. This is why my first months in therapy were spent convincing me that I wasn’t a sociopath, crazy, abusive, or any of the other terms I had been brainwashed with. Abusers don’t spend years disabled by those thoughts because they don’t care if they hurt other people.

INADMISSIBLE NARRATIVES OF ABUSE #2 And when verbal harassment does occur, it’s often cloaked in feminist language, making it impossible to fight. If they call a woman a bitch, people comprehend that as misogyny. But they call trans fems things that are harder to respond to. Rapist, pedophile, male conditioning, etc. They call us things so bad that even denying them is destructive. Who wants to stand up in public and say they aren’t those things? Who has the privilege to not get called those things in the first place? When I look at a cis woman these days, the first thing I think is, I bet no one ever casually called her a rapist. "

I got introduced to this in the NostalgiaChick thread, because she quoted it when she QuiT ThE InTeRNeT recently. I had a hunch and went looking around, and there's quite a few tweets out there saying that Porpentine was not driven out of these circles without reason

Clipboard Image.jpg


Porpetine is also a terrible writer:

Ed3yjghUMAAePD1.jpg


I bet they have a lolcow thread here, and I haven't checked. But yeah, there's absolutely no way these people are innocent the way they claim.
 
No lol. Albanian sworn virgins, ringkvinna, or whatever "third gender identity" you want to point to, only exist because those societies had strict gender roles and because that meant that women couldn't inherit property, fight or do male jobs, so they allowed women to defeminise (if that's a word) themselves and be referred to as men in order to do something other than being a housewife. They are not the progressive intersectional feminist girlbosses you think they are.

I mean, does Albania really seem like a hotbed of anti-patriarchal sentiment to you?
Ringkvinna wasn't even that. If someone died without a male heir but with a unmarried adult (over 20) female relative then she could inherit the land and take over her relatives responsibilities. When/if she married all male responsibilities would go to her husband and she'd return to being a typical woman. No actual contemporary sources claims that these women were less women.

It's funny how people in the 9th century would see a woman as a woman even when performing "male" duties , while modern people will see the same woman as lesser.
 
And even men with complete CAIS still have the advantage of male pelvis positioning, male extremities proportions, male response times, male spacial perception and male muscles, like Maria Rodriguez Patino. I really feel for these people as individuals. But they aren't women.
Unless you believe in tranny style gender identity, and thus believe the CAIS individuals who "identify" as men, there are no men with CAIS. Individuals with CAIS are female. The effects of SRY have virtually zero effect on them because they cannot process androgens. Their bodies convert all testosterone to estrogen.

Edit: well also Caster doesn't have CAIS.
 
Last edited:
Hollywood is incapable of coming up with any sad backstory for a female character that isn't 'I can't make babbies'. Apparently even serial killing superspies have nothing else to worry about than their maternal instinct. Just once I would like to see a female character who for some reason or other is infertile and just shrugs and goes 'cool, wasn't planning on having kids anyway' and her life continues. Even the most insufferable wannabe-breeders in real life don't make so much of a constant fuss about it if they had their uterus yanked.
It's that or rape. Or rape but saved at the last nanosecond by the hero or something.
I'm not even making social commentary when I say that stuff sucks. It's really lazy storytelling, and it's hardly ever used effectively. It's either too big a deal or too little. You'd get the same effect with "and then a killer drone emerged from the toilet. I managed to destroy it, but I cannot go pee without a gun anymore" or "My father trooned out and since then all I want is the sweet kiss of death".
 
FtM devil chick
In there she says "identity is difficult" and that's what all of this really boils down to. Identity is not difficult. It really isn't. You are not a blog that needs to find the right tags to assign to yourself. Once you're out of high school and don't have to worry about which rigidly structured social group to fit in with, you just exist. You're just walking around being the person you are whether or not you've got a name for all of your human qualities. Maybe I'm being too empathetic or whatever but it's really sad that people think they need to figure out which Hogwarts house they belong to before they can get on with the business of being alive.
 
Ringkvinna wasn't even that. If someone died without a male heir but with a unmarried adult (over 20) female relative then she could inherit the land and take over her relatives responsibilities. When/if she married all male responsibilities would go to her husband and she'd return to being a typical woman. No actual contemporary sources claims that these women were less women.

It's funny how people in the 9th century would see a woman as a woman even when performing "male" duties , while modern people will see the same woman as lesser.
That's the stupid thing. Bringing up these examples of violations of traditional gender roles makes the exact opposite point from what these "historians" think it does. None of these people "identified" as non-binary or trans or whatever. The label is assigned to them due to either a) gender variant behavior (like the hirja) or b) social circumstances that results in a breaking of traditional gender roles (as was the case with the Ringkvinna). It's the exact opposite of trans people, it proves that genders roles are socially generated and aren't related to some sort of intrinsic "internal" gender. In fact, if gender identity were real, you'd think owning property would cause the Ringkvinna gender dysphoria
 
Unless you believe in tranny style gender identity, and thus believe the CAIS individuals who "identify" as men, there are no men with CAIS. Individuals with CAIS are female. The effects of SRY have virtually zero effect on them because they cannot process androgens. Their bodies convert all testosterone to estrogen.
Yes but technically all CAIS individuals are males. Let's get this clear from the start, I don't mean they shouldn't be treated as women, that's not something I'm arguing here. They did grow up as girls and naturally grow most but not all secondary female characteristics so women category makes most sense socially but biologically they are males. They have XY chromosomes, they have internal balls, balls that create sperm that can't mature and male hormone production. It's just their bodies can't react to those hormones. Reason they get so close females that the condition tends stay hidden till puberty and missing periods is that testosterone if not used turns into estrogen. This still isn't the same as female hormonal production and so CIAS don't grow completely like females but get very close. So like I said treating them as women makes sense but they are still males, males with screwed up hormones but males.
 
Yes but technically all CAIS individuals are males. Let's get this clear from the start, I don't mean they shouldn't be treated as women, that's not something I'm arguing here. They did grow up as girls and naturally grow most but not all secondary female characteristics so women category makes most sense socially but biologically they are males. They have XY chromosomes, they have internal balls, balls that create sperm that can't mature and male hormone production. It's just their bodies can't react to those hormones. Reason they get so close females that the condition tends stay hidden till puberty and missing periods is that testosterone if not used turns into estrogen. This still isn't the same as female hormonal production and so CIAS don't grow completely like females but get very close. So like I said treating them as women makes sense but they are still males, males with screwed up hormones but males.
No, I'm specifically arguing they're technically females. If SRY can't do its job, they're female. I'll agree that because SRY was able to do its job far enough that they have testes does make it legitimately debatable, but I think it's significant that the development doesn't go beyond that point. They're not functional testes and they otherwise have significantly female health considerations beyond that.

Well and, no, they cannot produce sperm. Spermatogenesis shuts down at high temperatures. (and probably requires testosterone? Idk)
 
.In there she says "identity is difficult" and that's what all of this really boils down to. Identity is not difficult. It really isn't. You are not a blog that needs to find the right tags to assign to yourself. Once you're out of high school and don't have to worry about which rigidly structured social group to fit in with, you just exist. You're just walking around being the person you are whether or not you've got a name for all of your human qualities. Maybe I'm being too empathetic or whatever but it's really sad that people think they need to figure out which Hogwarts house they belong to before they can get on with the business of being alive.
I think it's a holdover from the teenage years of wanting so badly to belong, and some people like her never break away from it
 
No, I'm specifically arguing they're technically females. If SRY can't do its job, they're female. I'll agree that because SRY was able to do its job far enough that they have testes does make it legitimately debatable, but I think it's significant that the development doesn't go beyond that point. They're not functional testes and they otherwise have significantly female health considerations beyond that.

Well and, no, they cannot produce sperm. Spermatogenesis shuts down at high temperatures. (and probably requires testosterone? Idk)
No, they do produce sperm, it just doesn't mature beyond first stage so isn't anyway viable and just get reabsorbed. So they are sterile but that sperm production is still kinda there.
 
Back