Piece of shit software - Crappy software/apps/programs that make you MATI

Just as an FYI for my fellow Kiwi's, it is possible that the current perpetual version of Office Professional Plus 2021 is the last version of its kind to exist. Microsoft has promised one more perpetual version of office, but they don't say which edition. For all we know, they intend to only offer the crappy Home/Student & Home/Business and discontinue Pro Plus. You can currently get Office Pro Plus 2021 for ~$15 (you can get it for much less than that if you are willing to live with the 1 PC/1 Installation, No Transfer policy of some types)
I just use libreoffice cause I'm a broke nigga. I'd prefer if people stopped using microsoft formats in general tbh. I can think of quite a few times in highschool when opening a word document that was broke to all hell & back inside microsoft word. Even their own fucking file format fucks itself like windows does.
 
I just use libreoffice cause I'm a broke nigga. I'd prefer if people stopped using microsoft formats in general tbh. I can think of quite a few times in highschool when opening a word document that was broke to all hell & back inside microsoft word. Even their own fucking file format fucks itself like windows does.

Unfortunately, Office is the standard, and it would take a change of monumental proportions for anything else to replace it.
 
IIRC they responded to the outrage by saying that it's not turned on by default. I still think this doesn't top "Alice" & "Bob" being banned in one university's computer science course.

Another check for shitty software, site requires a subscription.
 
Another check for shitty software, site requires a subscription.

Whoops, here's the article or alternatively it's not paywalled on the archive: https://archive.is/DxRet

The names Alice and Bob should not be used, computer science lecturers have been told, in the latest decolonisation drive at the University of Edinburgh.

The top-flight Russell Group university’s school of informatics claims there are “problematic issues related to computing terminology”.

Staff should “avoid using predominantly Western names such as Alice/Bob, as is common in the computer security literature”, according to internal documents seen by The Telegraph.

In cryptography and digital culture, Alice and Bob are a fictional couple widely used as placeholders to illustrate how protocols and systems work.

The terms “master/slave” to represent computing agents are also being discouraged in the faculty’s courses, with staff urged to “instead use coordinator or workers”.

It forms part of intensifying decolonisation efforts at the institution, which has formed a steering group of academics to identify “controversial elements of the university’s past” so that “reparatory recommendations” can be made.

On Saturday night, a former education minister branded the moves “preposterous” and a “tyrannical” attempt to police thoughts.

The faculty, which runs various computer science courses, said it “must challenge and rework the current pedagogy (approach to teaching), which was rooted in imperial and colonial ideas about knowledge and learning”.

Lecturers in the faculty have been asked to consider whether there is “any terminology used in the course that can be offensive or exclusionary”, to spotlight the work of “under-represented pioneers” and ensure case studies are “diverse”.

In a recent review of decolonising actions taken in informatics, course leaders said they were “instructing markers to not penalise grammar/English issues in the coursework” to increase diversity.

Senior managers are also carrying out an “inclusivity impact assessment” of any new courses before they can be approved to ensure “every new course will have to explicitly consider decolonisation”, the documents said.

Sir John Hayes, the chairman of the Common Sense Group of more than 50 Tory MPs, said: “The distortion of language has been used by tyrants through time because when you distort language you begin to control thought.

“I will be writing to Edinburgh University to make clear that no public money ought to be spent on this kind of nonsense.

“The silent majority of people in the United Kingdom regard this as the pedantics of those people who spend too much time in a common room and not enough in the real world.”

The latest decolonisation drive comes after the University of Edinburgh renamed the David Hume Tower because activists dug out comments the Scottish enlightenment philosopher made about race in the 18th century.

And earlier this year an Edinburgh social anthropology lecturer, Dr Neil Thin, was subject to a lengthy disciplinary probe – and cleared – after students complained about his “problematic” views, notably his opposition to the renaming decision.

The two incidents prompted staff to call for Edinburgh’s principal, Prof Peter Mathieson, to step down, alleging an “intolerant and illiberal” culture hostile to free speech on campus.

Academics at Edinburgh have told this newspaper that they feel “alienated” by the university’s decolonisation. They claim it is “predicated on the bizarre assumption that only white people are racist” and riddled with inconsistencies that ignores countries accused of modern-day rights abuses, such as China.

A University of Edinburgh spokesperson said: “As an institution we are committed to addressing contemporary and historic inequalities with respect to race and our schools are aware of this. In this case the school have developed guidance to ensure that materials produced reflect the diverse and international nature of our community.”
 
Never heard of this terminology, but still a massive waste of everyone's time to be replacing all terms like this. Surely this breaks backwards compatibility?

Alice & Bob are just terms used mostly to teach cryptography & security stuff, so it's found mostly in teaching materials.

1643041111001.png



It's all just some crazy levels of mental gymnastics from those diversity experts lol
 
Unfortunately, Office is the standard, and it would take a change of monumental proportions for anything else to replace it.
I've been at places where they are deeply entrenched in old Lotus and can't change it because it would mean uprooting everything and retraining every crusty boomer engineer they employ. The dumbest thing I've seen was a place that were the only people left in the world using a particular piece of niche as fuck software that was at the point abandonware that they still paid a license for. It wasn't even a complicated program but the information they had fed it for decades could not be exported and migrated to something new by any means other than pen and paper because it used a home brewn proprietary database cooked up in the 90's.
 
I've been at places where they are deeply entrenched in old Lotus and can't change it because it would mean uprooting everything and retraining every crusty boomer engineer they employ. The dumbest thing I've seen was a place that were the only people left in the world using a particular piece of niche as fuck software that was at the point abandonware that they still paid a license for. It wasn't even a complicated program but the information they had fed it for decades could not be exported and migrated to something new by any means other than pen and paper because it used a home brewn proprietary database cooked up in the 90's.
I fucking hate shit like this. Alot of managers are fucking idiots when it comes to this kind of shit. Though it begs the question, how much of this retarded ass implementation was managers vs HR.
 
I just use libreoffice cause I'm a broke nigga. I'd prefer if people stopped using microsoft formats in general tbh. I can think of quite a few times in highschool when opening a word document that was broke to all hell & back inside microsoft word. Even their own fucking file format fucks itself like windows does.
I always use OpenOffice, just because I refuse to pay a fee for needing to type a document.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Aidan and Toolbox
Docker really pisses me off. Its a great way for developers to shovel shit into a "container". If someone doesn't work, its a pain to debug. Instead of having a nice package manager with dependencies being tracked, and auto updating, now I need to do it all.

It was never securely designed, but people thinks it adds "security". Its a dumpster fire of shit, that masks complexity and issues with its opaqueness.
 
Docker really pisses me off. Its a great way for developers to shovel shit into a "container". If someone doesn't work, its a pain to debug. Instead of having a nice package manager with dependencies being tracked, and auto updating, now I need to do it all.

It was never securely designed, but people thinks it adds "security". Its a dumpster fire of shit, that masks complexity and issues with its opaqueness.
Are you enjoying your ~2GB containers? Having to run apt-get update or yum update in a billion of them because the business is too terrified to stop and/or rebuild them. Oh yes, much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wood
Are you enjoying your ~2GB containers? Having to run apt-get update or yum update in a billion of them because the business is too terrified to stop and/or rebuild them. Oh yes, much better.

Worse, I'm trying to use OSS and the options are docker, or manually run random python shit via pip which doesn't work on centos, so realistically the only option is docker (and I've been avoiding docker for years because of shit like this). The other thing is the Unifi controller its provider as a deb package that references an end of support version of mongodb, so it only really works in a docker container, and then for some reason when I was testing that, I had loads of weird network issues.

I think the concept of Docker could be really useful, a different way of doing package management, and isolating software that might conflict. But in practice its a pile of shit, and everyone involved in it, should be forced to eat shit until it is good.
 
Worse, I'm trying to use OSS and the options are docker, or manually run random python shit via pip which doesn't work on centos, so realistically the only option is docker (and I've been avoiding docker for years because of shit like this). The other thing is the Unifi controller its provider as a deb package that references an end of support version of mongodb, so it only really works in a docker container, and then for some reason when I was testing that, I had loads of weird network issues.

I think the concept of Docker could be really useful, a different way of doing package management, and isolating software that might conflict. But in practice its a pile of shit, and everyone involved in it, should be forced to eat shit until it is good.
I'm kinda curious, why does pip, especially with venv, not work in your case? I've made simple chroot jails for personal things that require exotic dependencies, maybe that's an alternative in some cases.
 
Docker really pisses me off. Its a great way for developers to shovel shit into a "container". If someone doesn't work, its a pain to debug. Instead of having a nice package manager with dependencies being tracked, and auto updating, now I need to do it all.

It was never securely designed, but people thinks it adds "security". Its a dumpster fire of shit, that masks complexity and issues with its opaqueness.
I'm more or less convinced that Docker was invented as a way for programmers to dodge oversight from sysadmins complaining about pesky irrelevancies like "maintainable infrastructure" and "critical security patches".
 
Im starting to think that Microsoft thorugh Windows thinks it has more privilege and control over its operating system on my computer than I have over it. I once made an attempt to make it stop updating itself to the extent that I spent 2 days on it, removing various privileges and what not.


And it worked for a while. Then suddenly it started again.

You aren't wrong. There are several Windows areas and processes that have higher level access than the human "Administrator" and which you cannot override.

Just wait, once Intel and AMD start integrating the Microsoft designed security core into their processors, they plan to control not only how you use Windows, but all the software that you run on Windows. Want to run a modded version of a piece of software? Nope. It doesn't pass the secure core security check, so you can't run it, and there is no way around it, literally, since the security check is in the actual processor itself.
 
You aren't wrong. There are several Windows areas and processes that have higher level access than the human "Administrator" and which you cannot override.

Just wait, once Intel and AMD start integrating the Microsoft designed security core into their processors, they plan to control not only how you use Windows, but all the software that you run on Windows. Want to run a modded version of a piece of software? Nope. It doesn't pass the secure core security check, so you can't run it, and there is no way around it, literally, since the security check is in the actual processor itself.
"Trusted computing." They used to have a cartel for that crap (business association), then people got mad, now they pushing it with underhand methods.
 
Back