US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Oh, so now Biden Ron Klain cares about cancer. Never mind how many people couldn't access cancer treatment during the lockdowns, or how many cancer patients are refused care because they won't get the jab. And that doesn't even count the ones who are afraid to go outside their house, much less to the doctor, because they're terrified of getting Covid because their immune systems are shot.

It's all just empty words. I think they've had the cure for cancer, or at least something that would dramatically reduce its incidence, for decades, but there's so much money to be made they keep it under wraps.
 
Oh, so now Biden Ron Klain cares about cancer. Never mind how many people couldn't access cancer treatment during the lockdowns, or how many cancer patients are refused care because they won't get the jab. And that doesn't even count the ones who are afraid to go outside their house, much less to the doctor, because they're terrified of getting Covid because their immune systems are shot.

It's all just empty words. I think they've had the cure for cancer, or at least something that would dramatically reduce its incidence, for decades, but there's so much money to be made they keep it under wraps.
Its gonna be some more mRNA vaccines now that people are not gonna get more COVID boosters.
 
Oh, so now Biden Ron Klain cares about cancer. Never mind how many people couldn't access cancer treatment during the lockdowns, or how many cancer patients are refused care because they won't get the jab. And that doesn't even count the ones who are afraid to go outside their house, much less to the doctor, because they're terrified of getting Covid because their immune systems are shot.

It's all just empty words. I think they've had the cure for cancer, or at least something that would dramatically reduce its incidence, for decades, but there's so much money to be made they keep it under wraps.
Cancers not this one catch all disease. it's thousands of different diseases based on mutations within specific genes that are either inherited, or occur over time in response to breakdown of genetic regulatory mechanisms or repeated exposure to carcinogenic material or energy. Ironically, gene therapies like the mRNA vaccines and CRISPR are probably the best bet for actually eliminating cancer.
 
View attachment 2945097

Called it. Maskfaggot NPCs are going to demand continued restrictions.
>"I Don't Want To Die"
You know, it almost makes you wonder what their lives were like before COVID.

Imagine being afraid of going outside, touching grass, and breathing air... WITHOUT a mask.

But I'm sure this has more to do with them wanting to continue to be lazy by not brushing their teeth, shaving their face, putting on make-up, etc...
 
Nigger can't even get a handle on COVID, and he wants to tackle cancer.

Put the fucking crack pipe down Biden and go for something more realistic (i.e. something your senile ass can handle without having a stroke)
We all know they'll never cure cancer, even if they could find one. How many billions of dollars is the cancer industry worth? Would the cure replace that? If not, why would Big Pharma shoot their profits in the foot?
 
We all know they'll never cure cancer, even if they could find one. How many billions of dollars is the cancer industry worth? Would the cure replace that? If not, why would Big Pharma shoot their profits in the foot?
How much money are Big Pharma making with all these jabs and boosters compared to anything cancer related?

If their making fucking bank on COVID, then that might explain why they are bringing up cancer all of a sudden. Replace an old "uncureable" threat with a new one that has many cures but none of them work but idiots will still take anyway. The scam of all scams.
 

Leaked notes from a White House Situation Room meeting the day before Kabul fell shed new light on just how unprepared the Biden administration was to evacuate Afghan nationals who'd helped the United States in its 20-year war against the Taliban.

Why it matters: Hours before the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan's capital on Aug. 15, 2021, senior Biden administration officials were still discussing and assigning basic actions involved in a mass civilian evacuation.

  • Outsiders were frustrated and suspicious the administration was having plenty of meetings but was stuck in bureaucratic inertia and lacked urgency until the last minute.
  • While the word "immediately" peppers the document, it's clear officials were still scrambling to finalize their plans — on the afternoon of Aug. 14.
  • For example, they'd just decided they needed to notify local Afghan staff "to begin to register their interest in relocation to the United States," the document says.
  • And they were still determining which countries could serve as transit points for evacuees.
The big picture: President Biden was determined to end the country's involvement in its longest war, and last April he announced his plans to withdraw all U.S. forces from Afghanistan by Sept. 11, 2021.

President Trump had previously cut a deal for a U.S. withdrawal by May 2021.

  • Biden's approval ratings still haven't recovered from the chaotic scenes of those final moments, with Afghans falling to their death from military transports and a suicide blast that killed 13 U.S. service members and scores of Afghans outside the gates of Hamid Karzai airport.
  • The Atlantic reported this week that thousands of vulnerable Afghans remain stuck in bureaucratic hell, terrified the Taliban they fought for years will hunt them down.
  • Later this month, Congress will name members to a bipartisan, 12-person commission that will study the war and issue a report similar to the 9/11 Commission.
The details: Axios obtained the NSC's "summary of conclusions" for a meeting of the so-called Deputies Small Group.

It assembles top aides to various Cabinet members, and usually lays the groundwork for Deputies' or Principals' sessions, or works out practical details for executing decisions already made by their bosses.

  • The document regarded "Relocations out of Afghanistan," and the meeting was held from 3:30-4:30pm on the afternoon of Aug. 14, Washington time.
  • At that moment, Taliban fighters were descending upon Kabul.
  • The meeting was chaired by National Security Council official Liz Sherwood-Randall and included senior officials across multiple agencies, including Gen. John Hyten, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Between the lines: The meeting notes highlight how many crucial actions the Biden administration was deciding at the last minute — just hours before Kabul would fall and former Afghan President Ashraf Ghani would flee his palace in a helicopter.

Action items decided in meeting included:

  • "State will work to identify as many countries as possible to serve as transit points. Transit points need to be able to accommodate U.S. citizens, Afghan nationals, third country nationals, and other evacuees. (Action: State, immediately)"
  • "Embassy Kabul will notify LES [locally employed staff] to begin to register their interest in relocation to the United States and begin to prepare immediately for departure... (Action: Embassy Kabul, immediately)"
What they're saying: "While we're not going to comment on leaked internal documents, cherry-picked notes from one meeting do not reflect the months of work that were already underway," NSC spokesperson Emily Horne told Axios.

  • "Earlier that summer, we launched Operation Allies Refuge and had worked with Congress to pass legislation that gave us greater flexibility to quickly relocate Afghan partners," Horne said.
  • "It was because of this type of planning and other efforts that we were able to facilitate the evacuation of more than 120,000 Americans, legal permanent residents, vulnerable Afghans and other partners."
Behind the scenes: By the time the Saturday afternoon meeting happened, senior Biden officials across the government had been meeting around the clock to deal with the high-speed unraveling of Afghanistan.

  • The administration had taken some measures that would help them ultimately evacuate more than 120,000 people out of Kabul airport by Aug. 31 — the president's revised withdrawal deadline.
  • Amid chaos and death, the effort to remove both U.S. citizens and cooperative Afghan nationals was executed in partnership with allies and many desperate improvised efforts from the private sector and veterans groups.
  • Troops were pre-positioned in the region so they could get quickly to Kabul airport to run the evacuation. The administration had accelerated the Special Immigrant Visa [SIV] approvals. And Biden officials had explored with other countries the possibilities of them serving as transit points for evacuees — which ultimately led to a network that hosted tens of thousands of Afghans waiting for processing.
  • Nonetheless, many of the key decisions hadn't been made on the eve of Kabul's fall.
The president himself — and his intelligence community — overestimated the ability of the Afghan military to defend their territory against the Taliban.

  • And complicating the situation further, Ghani had personally pleaded with Biden not to do mass evacuations of Afghans earlier in the year.
  • He feared it would signal a loss of faith in his government.
The bottom line: Many outside advisers were sounding the alarm as the Taliban swept through provincial capitals heading into August.

  • "I kept being told by people in the [White House] the thing they were most concerned about was the optics of a chaotic evacuation," said Matt Zeller, a former CIA officer who contacted administration officials in February 2021 about protecting Afghans who worked with the Americans. "They treated us like we were Chicken Little. They didn’t believe the sky was falling."
  • "On the 13th of July, we offered to work with them to help evacuate our partners," Zeller added. "We all saw this disaster coming before the inevitable occurred. They didn’t get back to us until Aug 15, the day Kabul fell."
Mark Jacobson, deputy NATO representative in Afghanistan during the Obama administration, told Axios: "That so much planning, prioritizing and addressing of key questions had not been completed, even as Kabul was about to fall, underscores the absence of adequate interagency planning."
 
How much money are Big Pharma making with all these jabs and boosters compared to anything cancer related?

If their making fucking bank on COVID, then that might explain why they are bringing up cancer all of a sudden. Replace an old "uncureable" threat with a new one that has many cures but none of them work but idiots will still take anyway. The scam of all scams.
Could be they're anticipating an end to free government money for jabs and are moving back to free government money for cancer research that goes nowhere. Got to keep those profits up.
 
How desperate can they get?

Biden aims to reduce cancer deaths by 50% over next 25 years​

https://apnews.com/article/coronavi...nion-address-122f2d0782a30d7cf766f2892fc5962a (https://archive.ph/8O86S)

President Joe Biden is committing to reduce the cancer death rate by 50% — a new goal for the “moonshot” initiative against the disease that was announced in 2016 when he was vice president.

Biden has set a 25-year timeline for achieving that goal, part of his broader effort to end cancer as we know it, according to senior administration officials who previewed Wednesday’s announcement on the condition of anonymity.

The issue is deeply personal for Biden: He lost his elder son, Beau, to brain cancer in 2015.

The pain experienced by the president is shared by many Americans. The American Cancer Society estimates that there will be 1,918,030 new cancer cases and 609,360 cancer deaths this year. What Biden is aiming to do is essentially save more than 300,000 lives annually from the disease, something the administration believes is possible because the age-adjusted death rate has already fallen by roughly 25% over the past two decades.

Biden was scheduled to give remarks Wednesday from the East Room of the White House, along with his wife, Jill, and Vice President Kamala Harris. Also scheduled to attend the speech: members of Congress and the administration and about 100 members of the cancer community including patients, survivors, caregivers, families, advocacy groups and research organizations.

As part of the effort, Biden will assemble a “cancer Cabinet” that includes 18 federal departments, agencies and offices, including leaders from the Departments of Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs, Defense, Energy and Agriculture.

There were no plans to announce new funding commitments on Wednesday, though the administration will outline why it believes it can curb cancer through efforts such as increased screening and removing inequities in treatment. The coronavirus pandemic has consumed health care resources and caused people to miss more than 9.5 million cancer screenings.

The White House also will host a summit on the cancer initiative and continue a roundtable discussion series on the subject. The goal is to improve the quality of treatment and people’s lives, something with deep economic resonance as well. The National Cancer Institute reported in October that the economic burden of treatment was more than $21 billion in 2019, including $16.22 billion in patient out-of-pocket costs.

President Barack Obama announced the cancer program during his final full year in office and secured $1.8 billion over seven years to fund research. Obama designated Biden, then his vice president, as “mission control,” a recognition of Biden’s grief as a parent and desire to do something about it. Biden wrote in his memoir “Promise Me, Dad” that he chose not to run for president in 2016 primarily because of Beau’s death.

When Biden announced he wasn’t seeking the Democratic nomination in 2016, he said he regretted not being president because “I would have wanted to have been the president who ended cancer, because it’s possible.”

The effort fell somewhat out of the public focus when Donald Trump became president, though Trump, a Republican, proposed $500 million over 10 years for pediatric cancer research in his 2019 State of the Union address.

Biden continued the work as a private citizen by establishing the Biden Cancer Initiative to help organize resources to improve cancer care. When Biden did seek the presidency in 2020, he had tears in his eyes as he said in an interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that “Beau should be running for president, not me.”
Just write off the deaths as malpractice and they’ll disappear from the records entirely!
 
View attachment 2944175
Journo: "You talked about the potential, if it's appropriate, of pardoning some of the 1/6ers..."
Trump: "Yeah."
Journo: "Lindsey Graham said a couple days later he thinks that's inappropriate. What do you think?"
Trump: "Lindsey Graham's wrong. I mean, Lindsey's a nice guy but he's a RINO. Lindsey's wrong."

Biden's planning to get a nominee chosen by the end of the month. So if Breyer retires at the end of this current term, which should be around July, the fun would begin in August and September... ideal time to turn it into a circus.
Based Trump.
I love how their openly admitting that Biden is the one escalating shit.
How desperate can they get?

Biden aims to reduce cancer deaths by 50% over next 25 years​

https://apnews.com/article/coronavi...nion-address-122f2d0782a30d7cf766f2892fc5962a (https://archive.ph/8O86S)

President Joe Biden is committing to reduce the cancer death rate by 50% — a new goal for the “moonshot” initiative against the disease that was announced in 2016 when he was vice president.

Biden has set a 25-year timeline for achieving that goal, part of his broader effort to end cancer as we know it, according to senior administration officials who previewed Wednesday’s announcement on the condition of anonymity.

The issue is deeply personal for Biden: He lost his elder son, Beau, to brain cancer in 2015.

The pain experienced by the president is shared by many Americans. The American Cancer Society estimates that there will be 1,918,030 new cancer cases and 609,360 cancer deaths this year. What Biden is aiming to do is essentially save more than 300,000 lives annually from the disease, something the administration believes is possible because the age-adjusted death rate has already fallen by roughly 25% over the past two decades.

Biden was scheduled to give remarks Wednesday from the East Room of the White House, along with his wife, Jill, and Vice President Kamala Harris. Also scheduled to attend the speech: members of Congress and the administration and about 100 members of the cancer community including patients, survivors, caregivers, families, advocacy groups and research organizations.

As part of the effort, Biden will assemble a “cancer Cabinet” that includes 18 federal departments, agencies and offices, including leaders from the Departments of Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs, Defense, Energy and Agriculture.

There were no plans to announce new funding commitments on Wednesday, though the administration will outline why it believes it can curb cancer through efforts such as increased screening and removing inequities in treatment. The coronavirus pandemic has consumed health care resources and caused people to miss more than 9.5 million cancer screenings.

The White House also will host a summit on the cancer initiative and continue a roundtable discussion series on the subject. The goal is to improve the quality of treatment and people’s lives, something with deep economic resonance as well. The National Cancer Institute reported in October that the economic burden of treatment was more than $21 billion in 2019, including $16.22 billion in patient out-of-pocket costs.

President Barack Obama announced the cancer program during his final full year in office and secured $1.8 billion over seven years to fund research. Obama designated Biden, then his vice president, as “mission control,” a recognition of Biden’s grief as a parent and desire to do something about it. Biden wrote in his memoir “Promise Me, Dad” that he chose not to run for president in 2016 primarily because of Beau’s death.

When Biden announced he wasn’t seeking the Democratic nomination in 2016, he said he regretted not being president because “I would have wanted to have been the president who ended cancer, because it’s possible.”

The effort fell somewhat out of the public focus when Donald Trump became president, though Trump, a Republican, proposed $500 million over 10 years for pediatric cancer research in his 2019 State of the Union address.

Biden continued the work as a private citizen by establishing the Biden Cancer Initiative to help organize resources to improve cancer care. When Biden did seek the presidency in 2020, he had tears in his eyes as he said in an interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that “Beau should be running for president, not me.”
The old "I promise to cure cancer" routine is as old as time for politics.
 
Someone needs to to make a meme of this fat pig behind the curtain with the slogan, Der Maskkaren, like that one propaganda poster that is either Nazi or Soviet.

I am now on Team Boomer Remover, do your thing Corona Chan, finish them all off. Also take the bleeding heart christ cucks with you as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back