Space_Dandy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2014
It's a good thing that Chris is in jail in the mean time, but what does this say about our justice system, where someone who may well be innocent can be held for half a year?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't necessarily call them evil. They're more like a destructive three year old who can live for 80 years and demands your constant attention.But parrots are smart.
Evil, but smart.
The biggest issue with welfare is it creates a cycle of dependence and it's almost impossible to break free of. And for some people it's literally their best way of being able to deal with the world. The problem is that while there are people who abuse the system, most them don't and simply can't function in society. Chris is one of them. What he needs is a tard wrangler with him. Somebody who controls his money, controls his spending habits and stops him from buying all this unnecessary crap.Ok, but that does not mean that Welfare created Chris. Welfare does help people who through no fault of their own need a helping hand.
Abolishing it because of Chris is not really a thorough justification, nor is it really the fault of the existence of welfare.
But I can see your mind is made up, so.....,..
People accused of far worse than Chris get out on bond. I have seen people speculate that Chris's lawyer is just letting him stay in jail so that if he gets sentenced, he will have his time in jail go towards time served. The end goal being to keep Chris out of prison.It's a good thing that Chris is in jail in the mean time, but what does this say about our justice system, where someone who may well be innocent can be held for half a year?
The bigger problem is that Bob told Chris that being on the Tugboat was going to get him more money than if he got a job. Chris has held on to this statement for his entire life as justification for not getting a job even though obviously the reality is far more complicated and having a job is simply far better.Well since it started with bob pretty much unintentionally teaching him of being a larper and that people should live of SS 24/7 and Chris at that time had never had a job minus the Wendy’s incident when in fact he should of gotten a job instead of larping of the government’s own money as a leech
There's no way Chris would ever be allowed out on bond if it got to that point. Nobody related to Chris gives enough of a fuck and I don't think weens would be stupid enough to put themselves on the line for the sake of Chris.People accused of far worse than Chris get out on bond. I have seen people speculate that Chris's lawyer is just letting him stay in jail so that if he gets sentenced, he will have his time in jail go towards time served. The end goal being to keep Chris out of prison.
Yes that is what I was trying to get acrossThe bigger problem is that Bob told Chris that being on the Tugboat was going to get him more money than if he got a job. Chris has held on to this statement for his entire life as justification for not getting a job even though obviously the reality is far more complicated and having a job is simply far better.
There's no way Chris would ever be allowed out on bond if it got to that point. Nobody related to Chris gives enough of a fuck and I don't think weens would be stupid enough to put themselves on the line for the sake of Chris.
More like what does it say about Chris’s “innocence” for them to keep a potential PR disaster of a semi-famous autistic tranny locked up for half a year without a second thought.It's a good thing that Chris is in jail in the mean time, but what does this say about our justice system, where someone who may well be innocent can be held for half a year?
Well I mean that's usually what happens when you sperg out at your own bond hearingIt's a good thing that Chris is in jail in the mean time, but what does this say about our justice system, where someone who may well be innocent can be held for half a year?
Chris has never been separated from his toys for so long.Well I mean that's usually what happens when you sperg out at your own bond hearing
Imagine having to have Chris as a co-workerhaving a job is simply far better.
will never happen. Chris and work don’t mix.Imagine having to have Chris as a co-worker
Basically, if you think Chris couldn't and wouldn't molest a child, you really haven't been paying attention. I don't necessarily believe that Chris would stand outside of daycare centers plotting how to abduct the kids inside. But all the same, I absolutely would not place Chris alone in a room with a child.
While all true, we’re pushing the “child” part of CP. The law just has to prove it’s a minor for him to catch some charges.I don't think Chris would have sex with a child. You're absolutely right that Chris is an opportunist and will mentally self-justify something he wants to do, but it still has to be something he *wants* to do.
For instance, Chris wanted to fuck Barb. A lot of us ignored the warning signs out of optimism or whatever (I'm guilty of this too), or assumed it was some sort of moral event horizon that he wouldn't cross, but he did. We're wiser about that today.
On the other hand, we're still pretty sure Chris was not fucking his pets. He didn't bring up fucking his pets, and he didn't even really want to talk about the idea when weens pressured him into it. He had plenty of unsupervised access to his pets, so if he wanted to fuck them he probably would have, and he would have definitely spilled the beans about it by now.
Chris has never shown interest in children. He *has* shown some interest in biological adult minors on a few occasions, so would he commit statutory rape given the opportunity and nothing to dissuade him in the moment? Probably.
The only time he's even brought up something remotely involving actual children was his Jenkins Jinkies backstory, and it was presented as something very negative that disturbed him -- probably because he thought a backstory like that is what caused trolls to be the way they are.
So would Chris rape a child? No. Not because he has a good sense of morality, but simply because he doesn't want to, in the same way he doesn't fuck Clover even though he can.
Never say never.
This is of course a true statement but it also hinges on Chris being able to find stable employment and not get fired over and over. Which is, and was already at the time Bob got him on the tugboat, very doubtful. I can't see 00:s Chris not managing to fuck up a job as a janitor or grocery bagger for instance.even though obviously the reality is far more complicated and having a job is simply far better.
I don't think Chris would have sex with a child. You're absolutely right that Chris is an opportunist and will mentally self-justify something he wants to do, but it still has to be something he *wants* to do.
For instance, Chris wanted to fuck Barb. A lot of us ignored the warning signs out of optimism or whatever (I'm guilty of this too), or assumed it was some sort of moral event horizon that he wouldn't cross, but he did. We're wiser about that today.
On the other hand, we're still pretty sure Chris was not fucking his pets. He didn't bring up fucking his pets, and he didn't even really want to talk about the idea when weens pressured him into it. He had plenty of unsupervised access to his pets, so if he wanted to fuck them he probably would have, and he would have definitely spilled the beans about it by now.
Chris has never shown interest in children. He *has* shown some interest in biological adult minors on a few occasions, so would he commit statutory rape given the opportunity and nothing to dissuade him in the moment? Probably.
The only time he's even brought up something remotely involving actual children was his Jenkins Jinkies backstory, and it was presented as something very negative that disturbed him -- probably because he thought a backstory like that is what caused trolls to be the way they are.
So would Chris rape a child? No. Not because he has a good sense of morality, but simply because he doesn't want to, in the same way he doesn't fuck Clover even though he can.
I don’t think Chris has any truly tacit knowledge of what empathy is. He knows emotions purely through a “slice of life” lens. He talks about all this shit but he punches holes in the walls and rapes his mother. Dude has no sense.A very important amendment to this post is that Chris is the most easily influenced being ever. His entire life is basically just him copying whatever media was in front of him and morphing it so that he was the center of the universe in it. Sonic, Pokemon, Rick and Morty, the initial SJW outbreak movement, the friggin' Bible...you name it, he's obsessed over it and inserted himself to be the center of attention in it.
I've said this before, but the simple fact we're having this conversation and discussing the possibility of Chris being a pedophile means it's entirely possible for Chris to be a pedophile, simply because some ill-meaning trolls would cling to the idea and tell Chris that diddling kids is "totes cool" just to get their 5 minutes of fame, and Chris in his infinite capacity to fuck up, would absolutely have a strong chance of listening to them.
Is Chris a pedophile? No he isn't, I agree. Left to his own devices, he would never diddle kids. He's rarely left to his own devices though, and so we cannot safely say Chris would never diddle a kid, because the moment some woman with Double-Ds is telling him all the cool kids are doing it or the moment Chris is bunking in a jail cell with other pedophiles, he is absolutely at risk of being influenced to diddle kids.
Is Chris a pedophile? No he isn't, I agree. Left to his own devices, he would never diddle kids. He's rarely left to his own devices though, and so we cannot safely say Chris would never diddle a kid, because the moment some woman with Double-Ds is telling him all the cool kids are doing it or the moment Chris is bunking in a jail cell with other pedophiles, he is absolutely at risk of being influenced to diddle kids.
So do we have a new hearing date yet?