Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

axyj7peuj7f81.jpg

qj7qeiluj7f81.jpg
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Late
Reactions: Bixnood, Nuns with guns, Kikomi and 40 others
Relinquish said:
View attachment 2960688
View attachment 2960689
Click to expand...
So the definition of "tree" is arbitrary and therefore it's meaningless. Gotcha.

Note that the same argument may be used to justify:
- zoophilia (the difference between human and non-human is arbitrary),
- pedophilia (age of consent is an arbitrary number),
- rape (the definition of consent is arbitrary),
- murder (we have arbitrarily decided that killing people is bad)

Among other horrible things. This is what happens when you have an entirely postmodern view of the world, in which nothing can ever be defined because definitions are arbitrary and therefore invalid.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: A Left Elbow, Kikkan_Lollicc, Inverted Shenis and 82 others
Relinquish said:
View attachment 2960688
View attachment 2960689
Click to expand...
See my previous example on continents. You don't need to define a tree exactly to know that violets aren't trees. If a botanical anarchist told me he thinks violets are trees, I could say that he is wrong, because their size and the hardness of their stems make them "un-treelike". The fact that there aren't a single taxonomic group doesn't mean that the concept of tree is meaningless.

God, this shit almost makes me want to get a new twitter account, just to pointlessly argue with these people. I hate these stupid linguistic arguments so much.

If the concept of woman is arbitrary, I will choose to call certain women "he", because scientists certainly can't define what pronouns are correct.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: stupid frog, sanguis draconis, Tittynope and 35 others
Corn Flakes said:
That's one of these things I've wondered about on occasion. The concept of "identity" as something not only defined by you and you alone, but also completely sacrosanct, is very new. And it's also very damaging.

Allow me to put my boomer hat on for a moment and say this: when I was growing up everybody had a nickname at school. Barely anyone was called by their name, even if the nickname was just a variation on it. Your name is Brooke? Congratulations, everybody calls you Brooks now. Kid transferred in whose name is actually Brooks? Well, he's got a bowl cut so we're calling him Lloyd (from Dumb & Dumber). The just about only time you'd hear someone's real name was when school staff was talking to them. But I digress: my point is that you didn't pick your nickname. It was something assigned to you by the kids around you (and occasionally by one of the teachers). Was it rife for bullying? Sometimes, yeah. I spent my freshman year of high school dodging a really embarrassing nickname, and some people were just plain unlucky. But for good or bad your "identity" was also affected by your community, because that's where you were at, physically. What you did, and the consequences of your actions, affected your "identity".

There were absolutely more rebellious kids who insisted that they "wouldn't be labeled", but even within their own cliques they had their own nicknames and their own roles to play. But once the internet became popular and everybody in it realized they could just not use their real names and instead embrace whatever pseudonyms they wanted, and use different "identities" in different places if they wanted to. This disconnection from reality feels like it was the first step towards the plague of troons we are wading through now: these people who started experimenting with different "identities" in secret on the early internet (preserving one's anonymity was important back then) paved the way to people whose identity is so completely internet-centric they don't accept the idea of being assigned anything by the people around them (see: AMAB/AFAB). And now these people are trying to enforce their internet identity upon the real world, and they're screeching when they realize it's a lot harder than just putting a checkmark on "female" on a social media website signup page.

This is just too fucking dumb. I'm going to stop waving my cane at the internet now. Where's my rocking chair? Why are these dang kids on my lawn?
Click to expand...
Remember when you were out and about and the friends you would make as a teenager (not at school) you would flat out not know their real name- a whole name and surname was like a formal school thing, and if your mum or whatever talks about someone from school, fifty years ago, she will still say the Full Name in a really official sense-

That kind of returned with Facebook and it’s insistence on full names, so everyone’s online choice based presentation of “identity” was now linked with their actual full legal name ... I wonder if all these little things about how social media has changed the way people view their identity has contributed a bit.

It’s hard to imagine it hasn’t, especially now it’s the kids who came of age never not knowing it who are lining up to get the tits off at 19.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: bored loser, biozeminadae1, luigismanslave and 14 others
ash9990 said:
View attachment 2960634 View attachment 2960636
Click to expand...
Hilarious. It's always the non-binary trying to put abstract concepts into the binary.

Mens shirt + feminine shorts = Gender Neutral!
But they forgot to factor in the power of female body shape!

Gay Socks is negated by the coefficient factor of femininity, as women are allowed to wear rainbows without it being instantly attributed to being gay.

If you multiply that by the single earring, which again. Is negated by the factor of femininity, the female quotient pushes the masculine variable into the negatives.

Then you know, that's probably a gynecologist (100% female use) or a mammogram office(99% female use. Men need them too sometimes.) where the expectation of user is to be female.

This is so stupid that I can't even create an entire shitpost out of it.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Nuns with guns, Kikomi, toothbrush and 16 others
ash9990 said:
View attachment 2960634 View attachment 2960636
Click to expand...
Ooh, that is fucking tragic.

That sort of behavior, trying to reduce complex social elements to simple values to compare and add up expecting repeatable results... is textbook autism. That girl is living proof of the industrial-scale grooming of teenage girls going on these days. Instead of the anxiety of trying to "balance out" her outfit, she should have been encouraged to accept her femininity and just wear whatever the fuck she thinks looks best that day.

The final irony is that her fussing over her looks in order to get people to see her in a very specific (and in this case unrealistic) way isn't nonbinary. It's a very feminine-coded behavior. Men do it as well, of course, but metrosexuals aside most guys don't bother to do it every single day.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pretty Sneaky Cis, Tittynope, Dead Eye and 28 others
Corn Flakes said:
Ooh, that is fucking tragic.

That sort of behavior, trying to reduce complex social elements to simple values to compare and add up expecting repeatable results... is textbook autism. That girl is living proof of the industrial-scale grooming of teenage girls going on these days. Instead of the anxiety of trying to "balance out" her outfit, she should have been encouraged to accept her femininity and just wear whatever the fuck she thinks looks best that day.

The final irony is that her fussing over her looks in order to get people to see her in a very specific (and in this case unrealistic) way isn't nonbinary. It's a very feminine-coded behavior. Men do it as well, of course, but metrosexuals aside most guys don't bother to do it every single day.
Click to expand...
Yes, and I wonder if face or body blindness has something to do with this shit. The idea that these people genuinely do not think that people can tell if they're a male or a female is baffling to me. How can you be so delusional?

It is a 1 + 1 = 2 way of viewing very complex social information that is pure autism and just bizarre to the rest of the world. No one looks at a woman and thinks, "that's a woman because she is wearing a dress." They just know that it is a woman because of the combination of dozens of different factors and a million or so years of evolution.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: s0mbra, Kikomi, UselessIdiot and 20 others
I’m sure this one has been posted here before but he’s seriously terrifying
F3095DA5-D999-4FB2-AEBE-147D3D463E71.jpeg
266A9665-62AB-4C6B-A185-18A8C8809585.jpeg
9A163DC5-9175-474E-A8CB-89274E27EE74.jpeg
E313B33A-2FBC-4806-8332-C6DE344B6B06.jpeg
C210D2AE-B7A3-4C44-AF55-146913C5DCC5.jpeg

Old ahh man doing quirky poses at his Neanderthal age:
C3F872A3-57DB-4A90-A7C0-C213A76013B3.jpeg
84612219-3DF5-4796-9344-CCDE947A6DAD.jpeg
D7F277F3-E101-49AF-89CD-31F3A274DB1C.jpeg
48955453-9952-4697-91FF-C53B10B3F13E.jpeg

And old but gold:
7F752258-C3A5-4909-8BB4-C04464B4B781.jpeg
1BA37CA6-0636-496D-B0F1-4536E340BA3D.jpeg
232D0A92-A9F2-4E3F-90D1-1C998D14DB5C.jpeg

This mf is tee-heeing!
5760E9AC-7406-4B86-BCC7-9DDF23B0B1DE.jpeg

Yes, he put the watermarks on those himself.

The irony of this one is not lost on me:
56703FB9-CA32-49DB-A553-D0D2106BA9E1.jpeg

:story:
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
Reactions: A Left Elbow, stupid frog, Inverted Shenis and 67 others
I just thought of something.

Douching has fallen out of favor with actual women, but unlike real female humans, MTF troons have to constantly douche to clean out the festering hole that is the neovagina as it has no innate ability to control bacterial growth.

Because of this, will the makers of Summer's Eve and Massengil douche products start catering to the troon market as that is becoming the main demographic that uses them? It would have to be extra-strength due to how putrid and uncontrollable the odor is coming from a troon's stink ditch.

Imagine something like those stupid douche commercials that were on television during the 1970s and 1980's only featuring a pair of troons.


"I use Extra-Cleansing to keep my neovagina extra-fresh, when regular douches just won't do!"
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Tittynope, Nuns with guns, Chao Garden and 26 others
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Lil Miku, luigismanslave, Ona Quest and 4 others
fax machine said:
View attachment 2960742

My heart breaks a little every time I see Elliot Page. This is supposed to be the face of a happy man? She looks so hollow, so worn, it's disconcerting — especially in conjunction with a body that looks much younger.

The tattoo under her collarbone says MR, like an amulet against misgendering, as if that will help.
Click to expand...
Well, if she wanted to look like a 16-year Russian boy halfway into a Krokodil addiction, she's got it.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Inverted Shenis, sanguis draconis, blue gopher snakes and 32 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back