Canadian Truckers Convoy 2022 - The Leaf calls you a Nazi as he gasses you

Kinda what makes this so great: the seat at the table is the first step to inevitable victory.

The only loss condition is going home early or violence. That's it. Everything else is a win.
Violence at this point from them would only embolden these people sure they might get props from the lefties on plebbit but if the state does violence and does it first yeah that's not a bright idea.
 
Remember that your average redditor is nothing more than a slacktivist, upvotes and reddit gold will bring the revolution some day. But of course never dare to tell BLM to do the same.
Brilliant thing about this whole thing. Dead ass winter, thousands of people congregate non stop for nearly 2 weeks. Counter protests are small in numbers, ineffectual and end hours after starting. BLM takes winter's off and they say it's a fucking systemic genocide. Really makes you think.

Will to power is a sonnuva bitch.
 
lmao when I was looking for more info about Coutts I stumbled across this tweet:
89percent.PNG
ok Kevin if it's 89% why the fuck aren't we open, what is the issue here

as expected all the comments are bashing Alberta lol

EDIT:
lolll.PNG
ok I laughed
 
Man, this part is so fucked:

They REALLY want recognition that they saved the day by taking the counterproductive vaccine, just like in their capeshits, huh? It's interesting to see that incredible level of pettiness. What the hell is wrong with these bugmen? They're okay with dropping mandates, but they're willing to maintain them out of spite because they hate "rednecks" and the working class? It's especially crazy with all the mandates and restrictions getting lifted in many countries across Europe. Just let me live my fucking life. With no vaccine passport, I've effectively spent the last two years in house arrest.

I heard an interesting take the other day, about underlying motivations. For the anti-vaccine side of the debate, you've got people saying that others should not take the mRNA jabs because they might be dangerous, i.e. you shouldn't take that because I'M WORRIED THAT YOU MIGHT GET HURT. For the mandatory vaccine side of the debate, they're talking about how the unvaccinated are a danger because they might be more likely to spread it to others (which is false, esp. w/ Omicron), my vax doesn't work unless you take it too, i.e. you must take the vaccine because I'M WORRIED THAT I MIGHT GET HURT. It kind of turns the "selfish anti-vax" narrative on its head.
It's not even that they want to keep mandates out of spite. You're giving them too much credit; they haven't thought about it that much. They're just okay doing whatever daddy government tells them. If mandates end, they end. If they don't, they don't. Just do as daddy says.
 
a

What do they expect to negotiate? The terms are clear.
I’m guessing hard dates to end vaccine mandates and a way to develop a plan to ensure they aren’t brought back once the truckers and their supporters leave, as well as making sure that nobody close to the truckers are hounded, and there’s no major blowback to the truckers that could ruin their lives. Alternatively, there could be a way where the government asks for a way where they give the truckers what they want while trying to give the impression that they aren’t bending the knee to the truckers. Not only that, but enough sports has taught me that just because negotiable will happen, there won’t be a deal forthcoming, especially since both sides won’t want the other to benefit (especially the government). And since Trudeau might just be “we don’t negotiate with terrorists”, I have my doubts about success.
If they do that, they should drive it into Parliament killing all inside.
And get a higher count and bill than the Killdozer? How many hours did you put into this game if we open your Steam account?
 
Oh man I hope somebody does a supercut of this meeting of the federal ministers and blasts it out there for everyone to see (there are under a thousand watching the stream). They really think they are still in control. They keep repeating "so that it won't happen again in the future" like if they just mop this up it won't happen again. Outta sight outta mind.

I'm bored and drinking rum (regulars on the Covid and Pictures of Birds threads know what that means) (also, that reminds me, I need to post more birds soon). I have the 6.5 hour Ottawa city council stream pulled down and can grab the federal one as well. Anyone who wants something clipped, PM me timestamps, or at least a ballpark on time and enough info I can ID the spicy clip you want. (I am not watching like 10+ hours combined of politiroaches ranting, I have neither enough rum nor autism for that.) (Well, I do, but my liver can't keep up and I'm pretty sure I need that to shitpost.) If I get enough, I'll splice them into a shitty highlights video, otherwise I'll post the single snippets.
 
We've got blockade inception going on

A RCMP blockade of the Milk River town followed by the RCMP blockade of the Milk River blockade of the RCMP blockade of the Coutts blockade
......if I have things right

Livestream from 20mins ago:

livestream video was being weird, fixed it
 
Last edited:
No. You need explosions and collateral damage for a siege. Waco was a siege. This is not that.
"Starve them out" is as old as the book on sieges. Classically sieges took months or even years (sometimes even decades) because constantly attacking wasn't sustainable in the same way sitting and staring at each other until someone blinked was.
 
Snapchat/Twitter scrape for Windsor and the Ambassador Bridge. All are from the last couple hours.

Snapchat

Checkpoint in Windsor:

View attachment 2966447

View attachment 2966449

On the bridge itself:

View attachment 2966450

View attachment 2966465

View attachment 2966464

View attachment 2966462

View attachment 2966467

BONUS CONTENT: Alaska is sending truckers! (News Article Direct / Archive)



View attachment 2966475
Canada will not forget what the americans have done for them. I already see more and more dem states noticing this oncoming shitstorm and ending or reducing the mandates early.
Trudeau and his govt are in the hilarious position of either doing something drastic and looking like a dictatorship, or doing nothing and looking incompetent. Even the lefties that love the liberals are PISSED at them.
I'm 100% certain focusing on Ottawa is intentional - they're ignoring the borders for now because they think if they can get the protest out of Ottawa, the other ones will give up or be easily crushed. But Coutts is becoming more entrenched and aside from some ticketing today, and I think maybe taking down license plates, the Alberta govt aren't doing anything about it.
And the Ottawa council earlier was talking about how they're calling in police and RCMP from other jurisdictions, as far away as BC, meaning these border situations will have even less policing. I imagine the plan is to go after them 1 at a time, but with every day another one could pop up lol
Tactical mistake of the highest calibur. Even if they fixed Ottawa (and they wont) that's not going to magic away the fact that most of the country hates these mandates. These people are just so hatefully stupid.
 
There is a phenomenon I've been noticing more and more as time goes on that I've dubbed "The religion of Science" or "Science worshippers", I won't claim that I'm the first person to make that observation but it's something that I at least started to notice on my own. The phenomenon is identical to religious fundamentalism but replaces religious deities with the idea of Science and replaces religious figures and leaders such as imams, rabbis, priests, and saints, with "Scientists" and "Researchers". Instead of doing the responsible thing and questioning, rethinking, and testing in order to constantly expand their understanding as science traditionally demands they have instead given themselves over blindly to these new spiritual leaders and accepted their teachers as The Way, The Truth, and The Life, identically to how a religious fundamentalist will give themselves over entirely to a religious leader or text.

I believe that many of these people follow the Religion of Science and will not allow the "redneck truckers and blue collar proles" to take the credit for this since their Scientists and Researchers declared the vaccine good and so to admit they were wrong would be to admit a flaw in scripture, to admit that their beliefs are fallible and their leaders fallible.
The weird part is that they don't "worship" any particular thing. Like, they clearly idolize politicians and doctors now; but no single one as if they're a unified cult.

I fully agree that their behavior is falling further and further into straight cult shit, but at the same time, their masks slip so often and they reveal what they are underneath that I can't help but wonder if their belief is just an act. They have enough awareness to try and paint their actions as moral instead of just outright worshipping the state; the election-rigging policy in the US is called the "Voter Rights Act." And they still pretend to fight racism because they know racism in the West was socially unacceptable for a time.

It's like when you see a hardcore Leftie "man" shitting on incels to get with chicks; why does he do that? Is it because he genuinely hates incels, or is it because he's acting in a way that he expects to be rewarded?
I think the scientism worldview is promoted by elites because it shuts down a big part of what would be up for discussion. The bugman nigger cattle seem to harbour a fundamental misunderstanding about epistemology. They're all about "WE HAVE TO DO THIS BECAUSE SCIENTIST/EXPERT SAID SO," but the question to that should be "WHY?" One of Hume's more famous contributions was to assert that you cannot derive an "ought" from an "is." An empirical scientist's job is to understand what is, or what effect might arrive as a consequence of a given action--NOT what ought to be, as that is the domain of the likes of philosophers and theologians. A scientist or expert discusses the means to an end, and so to try and dispute the assertions of The ScienceTM is only to dispute the means to the end, but not the end itself, which is a given.

What is the benefit of this? Just look at what has been going on with covid these past two years. My opinion on covid, in brief, is that coronaviruses are the common cold. Strains of it got engineered to be more dangerous in a lab, then it got out, and because it is evolutionarily disadvantageous for the cold to be too deadly, it is evolving back into the regular old common cold. It is becoming less deadly and more contagious over time, see: omicron. People spend a lot of time and energy disputing the means. ACKCHYUALLY masks don't work. ACKCHYUALLY there is no scientific basis for vaccine passports or curfews. ACKCHYUALLY the vaccine has this bad side effect. But we get so fixated on these means that there's no discussion of what the end goals are; why are we doing this, even the purported end goals? Are they trying to permanently remove the common cold? Is it the curve flattening thing, where they don't want hospitals to get overwhelmed? It can't possibly really be hospital related, because actual hospital capacity usage data suggests usage might actually be down, maybe due to people not seeking care for non-covid issues. And if it were about hospital capacity being overwhelmed, wouldn't the first and most obvious thing be to simply build out hospital capacity such that it is possible to accommodate the new seasonal spikes? Unbelievably, my premier announced he was shutting down some of this province's ICU beds, like our ICU capacity is going down, along with other nonsense like dismissing unvaccinated nurses during a plandemic when you'd think they might need nurses. But all this discussion about what the end goal should be goes right out the window when all you're allowed to discuss or dispute is the means to that end. I don't think this problem goes all the way to the top, but it seems to be an effective tactic to keep the plebs in line.

I think one of the underlying reasons they have latched onto The ScienceTM is that, in the past, people used science to undermine their ideology:
>biological sex vs troon headcanon
>DSM-IV says that's a mental illness

They've put a lot of time and energy in converting science into a conduit for their ideology/religion, so they can cite their ideology/religion as fact. A lot of science is still subjective and political. Like a lot of the decision making for whether something is or is not a mental illness can be flipped just by stacking committees with true believer zealots.

So what do they actually believe or worship? It seems as though, archetypally, the Sacrificial 6M are "Their Christ," collectively (antichrist?), and the Climate Apocalypse is their millenarian Book of Revelation. The so-called "Enlightenment" as the dawn of a Luciferian age. Sometimes they express interest in tabula rasa egalitarianism, along with efforts to implement an inverted caste system as redress to perceived unfair history/society as perpetrated by perceived fundamentally evil people. Their worldview seems predicated on some sort of Gnostic or Manichean Dualism (condemned as heretical by nearly every religion ever, which tend to be monist), with both a Manichean sense of good and evil, as well as a Satanic inversion of what constitutes good and evil. For example, see:

abortion human sacrifice.jpg
 
Who don't respect the rule of law.
Fuck these assholes. The government doesn't respect the rule of law. Each of the piss-ants know what the constitution states and have enacted polices that violate it because it gave them erections to gaslight the peasantry into welcoming their own oppression.

Keep pushing, losers. This doesn't end the way you think it does.
 
Back