Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 13.9%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 115 24.6%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 84 18.0%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 197 42.2%
  • Total voters
    467
Side note but during the FNT stream Ryan and Nick had a good laugh over Pippa the Vtuber going in on Ethan Ralph earlier this week. I've been slack on watching the late night streams but has Nick meme on this in any of this week's streams?

Cause you know its your time to gunt waddle into the sunset when a pink animated rabbit demolishes you.
 
Archive:
Nick is on the Saturday Night Shitshow. Guess someone got excommunicated and I hope they go into the pippa roast.

:Edit Nick reconfirmed he did reach out to Pippa and her management to get her on the show but he hasn't heard back from management.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Least Concern
Nick's simply wrong about the mod thing.

They have wrenches because you gave them wrenches.

Nick, you, along with YouTube, gave them authority and power. You make a big show out of not censoring your viewers, but if the mods, whom you gave power, do it you might as well do it yourself.

Oh maybe it is a petty concern - "so what you were timed out on a YouTube stream?" In my opinion, a measure of principles is if you stand by them even when the concerns are "petty."

I think everyone understands the spam thing, but your wrenches absolutely do take action against viewers for personal non-violative reasons, and if you have principles you shouldn't stand for that. You should at least listen to your viewers - your paying viewers - when they make a complaint. If you don't want to be bothered with managing the complaints, then

1) don't have mods or
2) don't claim that you're principled on freedom of expression

The mods can be "who they are" all they want in my opinion too, but not when they are petty authoritarians. Considering your supposed problem with authority, surely you can put yourself in the shoes of your viewers who have been timed out because of a spat with your self-important loser mods.

You admonish Rumble about perhaps not holding to their promise to respect freedom of expression while you discount the complaints of your viewers when they complain about your pretty-authoritarian mods, mods who wouldn't have authority in your space without your permission.

I love you Nick, so don't be a hypocrite.

*I fully expect neg ratings.

PS Forgot to make this point - ALWAYS look askance at ANYONE who craves to have the power to silence others, which is what mods on YouTube - and anywhere else - do.
 
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: feral cat #6385 and Fat Gay Riker
anionfarflung said:
Nick's simply wrong about the mod thing.

They have wrenches because you gave them wrenches.

Nick, you, along with YouTube, gave them authority and power. You make a big show out of not censoring your viewers, but if the mods, whom you gave power, do it you might as well do it yourself.

Oh maybe it is a petty concern - "so what you were timed out on a YouTube stream?" In my opinion, a measure of principles is if you stand by them even when the concerns are "petty."

I think everyone understands the spam thing, but your wrenches absolutely do take action against viewers for personal non-violative reasons, and if you have principles you shouldn't stand for that. You should at least listen to your viewers - your paying viewers - when they make a complaint. If you don't want to be bothered with managing the complaints, then

1) don't have mods or
2) don't claim that you're principled on freedom of expression

The mods can be "who they are" all they want in my opinion too, but not when they are petty authoritarians. Considering your supposed problem with authority, surely you can put yourself in the shoes of your viewers who have been timed out because of a spat with your self-important loser mods.

You admonish Rumble about perhaps not holding to their promise to respect freedom of expression while you discount the complaints of your viewers when they complain about your pretty-authoritarian mods, mods who wouldn't have authority in your space without your permission.

I love you Nick, so don't be a hypocrite.

*I fully expect neg ratings.

PS Forgot to make this point - ALWAYS look askance at ANYONE who craves to have the power to silence others, which is what mods on YouTube - and anywhere else - do.
Click to expand...
I think you might be taking a youtube chat a little too seriously.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dixieland Buckaroo, GhostButt, Teignmouth Electron and 1 other person
DelusionTree said:
I think you might be taking a youtube chat a little too seriously.
Click to expand...


Just the nihilistic dismissal of principles I was expecting on Kiwi Farms.

DumDum Did Nothing Wrong said:
Nah his mods have been extra gay as of late. Especially Cgoody.
Click to expand...

I haven't noticed his actions because I stopped caring about participating in chat ever since the utterly impressive Syron-JAG-off showed his ass.

If you think you have status because you're a mod on a YouTube channel, - or a mod on Kiwi Farms - kill yourself.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: feral cat #6385 and DelusionTree
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back