US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2968908
Losing hundreds of thousands of jobs = more people now depend on gubmint money = more votes.
Gas skyrocketing to all time highs = what's the point of cars? Gotta Uber rideshare your way to school/work/wherever now!

"You will own nothing, and you will be happy."
There is a limit to gubmint money since a lot of boomers and other elites hate giving out more money beyond just pandering to nogs.
 
Midterms are around the corner and the approval ratings are in the dumps so maybe the plan is to spin a narrative that the Republican Party and Trump are responsible for all the lockdowns and mandates. I think someone earlier predicted this as a possibility. If I recall they said that if the Democratic Party did this the Republican Party wouldn't really know how to react because it makes things more complicated then rightfully blaming the other party for pushing all of this restrictive lockdown policy in the first place.
They know people will start digging and find out that the lockdowns were state-based AND the mandates happened on THEIR terms right?

Then again these are the retards that thought canceling Rogan would make the horse dewormer shit disappear before the research in Japan is done.
 
AKA we are concerned if you expose us RINOs we won't get elected anymore

The fact they are raising concern and trying this 'stronger together' bullshit makes me slightly more hopeful.
Nay I'm happy that Cheney is getting called out by the RNC and I really am happy that that it looks like she will lose her seat in the primaries.

The senate Republicans need to realized that Liz Cheney is hurting their base. It would be awsome if the RNC endorses her challanger
 
Last edited:
And they wonder why people don't trust the media anymore... Snopes says that it was "mostly false"

View attachment 2970503



You've got to see for yourselves the amount of mental gymnastics done in the piece


I love that it is "mostly false" because it was one small piece of a larger problem. Also, it wasn't technically "for racial equity", but would "focus on marginalized groups."

Literally nowhere does it actually state that the claim is false. Just that in their opinion it was "overblown", so it's "mostly false."
 
I love that it is "mostly false" because it was one small piece of a larger problem. Also, it wasn't technically "for racial equity", but would "focus on marginalized groups."

Literally nowhere does it actually state that the claim is false. Just that in their opinion it was "overblown", so it's "mostly false."
STAY OFF THE CRACK MAN
 
STAY OFF THE CRACK MAN
This is what infuriates me as a black man. We knew crack was bad in 1991. I'm pretty sure every black man my age has watched New Jack City at least once.

Now, 30 years later, we need to give out free crack pipes FOR EQUITY.

Like, I would much rather those evil racist Republicans call me a nigger than hand out free crack pipes to black neighborhoods that are already fucked up. But no, I'm wrong again.

 
This is what infuriates me as a black man. We knew crack was bad in 1991. I'm pretty sure every black man my age has watched New Jack City at least once.

Now, 30 years later, we need to give out free crack pipes FOR EQUITY.
I'm still waiting for the political commentary. This is actuality that WE voted for. We, meaning the Black voting bloc. God help us. We're STILL dealing with the aftermath of the crack epidemic. Now they're just rubbing it to our faces as policy.
 
I'm still waiting for the political commentary. This is actuality that WE voted for. We, meaning the Black voting bloc. God help us. We're STILL dealing with the aftermath of the crack epidemic. Now they're just rubbing it to our faces as policy.
You're right; this is what we voted for. And it pisses me off.
 
And they wonder why people don't trust the media anymore... Snopes says that it was "mostly false"

View attachment 2970503



You've got to see for yourselves the amount of mental gymnastics done in the piece


What's True
In 2022, a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services substance abuse harm reduction grant did require recipients to provide safer smoking kits to existing drug users. In distributing grants, priority would be given to applicants serving historically underserved communities. However...
What's False
This was just one of around 20 components of the grant program and far from its most prominent or important one, despite being the primary focus of outraged news reports. The purpose of the program was to reduce harm and the risk of infection among drug users, not to advance racial equity, although that was a secondary consideration.
Amazing. How can you not laugh at the absurdity of clown world?
:story:
I went over to the covidiot thread on this site. They still believe the only reason for worldwide lockdowns was because people didn't do what they are told.
The bright side is those retards are a tiny minority that is getting smaller. Even among normie liberals I know, they do not think Republicans are responsible for lockdowns or that lockdowns happened only because people did not listen. Almost everyone except the NEETs and Bay Area Californians are done with the coof.
 
Amazing. How can you not laugh at the absurdity of clown world?
:story:

The bright side is those retards are a tiny minority that is getting smaller. Even among normie liberals I know, they do not think Republicans are responsible for lockdowns or that lockdowns happened only because people did not listen. Almost everyone except the NEETs and Bay Area Californians are done with the coof.
I swear liberal Californians are basically "Harder government daddy harder!!"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back