Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

BlueSnowman said:
Challenge: Find a commie with his chin in front of or at least lined up with his nasion. Ugly and disgusting failed spawns of our decadent elite the lot of them.

And yeah, Taftaj is kinda hot. Only the ugly trannys seem to be commies. Makes sense, transitioning takes effort, after all and our lardencrusted friends can't abide that.

I think thats just mental illness manifesting in the bodylanguage.
That is a common thing with cisgendered commies, too. I find Manbunpig himself kinda uncanny in his facial movements.
View attachment 2970423
These people are usually mentally ill and it shows. I talked about my commie ex before and even my normie gf noticed something beign kinda...off when meeting her. The commie kinda looks like Taftaj, too.
Taftaj, while kinda based politically, is not quite all there herself. Thats obvious from her twitter profile alone. I think that is what you notice.
Click to expand...
1644411293249.png

"Evolution is fake" - Chad Soviet scientist
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Arthur_Schopenhauer, Tronathon242, Jonah Hill poster and 4 others
BlueSnowman said:
Nah. Taftaj has a chin and her face is somewhat proportional to her skull. She doesn't look too different from some zoomer girl you see on the street. Manbunpig is a dysgenic masterpiece. Again, name a commie other than Hassan whose chin at least aligns with his nasion.
Click to expand...
download (2).jpg

I think this one meets your criteria
Bro for someone who hates nazis so much and calls them subhuman you like physiognomy shit quite a bit and don't seem to like commies and muzzies in europe. always time on the winning team loljk.
etcetcetc said:
ManBunPig's downfall is going to be how easily triggered and tilted he can be with his chat. It is a weakness of his and it very quickly showcases how he can't improvise when being confronted our countered (correctly or not) by his chat.

Click to expand...
they lead him. he's only the figured head as long as he says what they like
 
  • Like
Reactions: Embaby Cumjar, ABE LINN COHN and Troonologist PhD
ABE LINN COHN said:
View attachment 2970726
"Evolution is fake" - Chad Soviet scientist
Click to expand...
Prior to the 60s almost every politician kinda looked like a Chad. Those commies would have put Manbunpig and his ilk on a spit, though. The softening of the average leftist seems to be linked to Gramsci, Adorno and Horkheimer, the softened but more malicious upper class academic leftists. Soviets and classical commies are a mixed bag. Lysenko was quite handsome, but there was that dysgenic mess known as Beria and that total abomination Trotzky (seriously, did he have a head or a balloon)
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Embaby Cumjar, Tronathon242 and 4 others
BlueSnowman said:
I think thats just mental illness manifesting in the bodylanguage.
That is a common thing with cisgendered commies, too. I find Manbunpig himself kinda uncanny in his facial movements.
1643350794249.jpg

These people are usually mentally ill and it shows. I talked about my commie ex before and even my normie gf noticed something beign kinda...off when meeting her. The commie kinda looks like Taftaj, too.
Taftaj, while kinda based politically, is not quite all there herself. Thats obvious from her twitter profile alone. I think that is what you notice.
Click to expand...
They do tend to over emote, probably in part because their audience is composed of retards and need drastic facial queues to comprehend very basic emotions and tones, but I'm not talking just about that, there's something about the jaw that becomes really masculine. In the picture the dude posted she has a very V shaped jawline like women tend to do, probably because the angle is capturing the side of the face but in the video he has a very square jaw.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Embaby Cumjar, Brain Problems, Lobster Cult High Priest and 4 others
Who here seen Vaush say that parents who teach their children climate-skepticism should have their kids taken away by the State?

This dumbfuck calls himself a libertarian socialist, yet he’s weirdly comfortable with having the State enforce his worldview.

Is this guy retarded, does he not realize that words have meaning and you can’t just call yourself a libertarian because you like the aesthetic? Fucking Commie.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Globoxeno, Wünderkind and 7 others
Khalid Batoun said:
Who here seen Vaush say that parents who teach their children climate-skepticism should have their kids taken away by the State?

This dumbfuck calls himself a libertarian socialist, yet he’s weirdly comfortable with having the State enforce his worldview.

Is this guy retarded, does he not realize that words have meaning and you can’t just call yourself a libertarian because you like the aesthetic? Fucking Commie.
Click to expand...
That is their warped understanding of liberty, though. From a leftist perspective the manbunned shitstain is a perfect socialist.
Its Rousseau to a t. In Rousseau's understanding of freedom and more precisely a free society, the collective has a public will. That public will, decided by consensus, is absolute and sacrosanct. Everyone will be subordinated to it and has to obey it. Beign in violation of the public will (there is no opting out) means you are not free and have to be forced to be free (literally what he wrote).

This public will essentially becomes this societies quran. The only difference beign, that the quran was assembled by a man (more likely men) knowledgeable in warfare, politics, at least early medieval economics and human nature. The tremendous success of Mohammed lends islam some credence. The marxist dogma was cobbled together by maniacs and detatched intellectuals that treated a failed hypothesis, that class warfare drives history and made it into dogma. Thats why communists call citing Marx at you as an argument and think that their favourite leftist philosopher writing something makes it true. Replace Marx Marx with Mohammed and Adorno with Mose or Aquinas and you will see.

For Manbunpig liberty and freedom mean beign taken care of and protected from harm (that starts with speech) by a higher power, said public will, while at the same time beign allowed to indulge in ones own vices, since he is a coomer with a pornaddled mind. In practice the collective will decides what you want to indulge in and you will indulge in it, otherwise you infringe on freedom.

I said it multiple times before, but they want to turn society into a big school, with the supervision of daycare mixed in, basically. The curriculum is substituted with a flavour of marxism that can explain everything in society and the primary way of distinguishing oneself will be ones conformity with the dogma.
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Winner
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Far Queue, Embaby Cumjar and 6 others
Manly_Brony said:
I don't know if this has been mentioned already but I have a theory: Vaushski chose the username IrishLaddie back in the day because he hates his Polish heritage, Poles are too based for his taste.
Click to expand...
his name is ian Kochinski his first name is irish and his last name is Polish.
if anything, he's a Mic,Polack amerimutt crossbreed and because of his American up bringing he became a faggot

​

 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Embaby Cumjar, Brain Problems and 3 others
Troonologist PhD said:
It's amazing how much better men look with short hair. He even looks less fat.
Click to expand...
I don't think we even need to decide on short vs. long hair in this case. If you just
1) get a normal haircut, and
2) don't look gross (practice hygiene and have a healthy body composition)
you will look better than Vaush. Guys like Vaush want to always do something "special" and unique, even when it comes to their hair. Normal haircuts are normal because they look flattering on most people. Normal long hair looks a lot better than this 3/4 buzz and long on the top style, which I've never seen on anyone who didn't look like either white trash or an autist.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Globoxeno, Brain Problems and 5 others
etcetcetc said:
ManBunPig's downfall is going to be how easily triggered and tilted he can be with his chat. It is a weakness of his and it very quickly showcases how he can't improvise when being confronted our countered (correctly or not) by his chat.

Click to expand...
i will never understand how you can use consequentialism to simultaneously chastise critics while also saying it doesnt matter the significantly worse outcome of socialists never actually taking any steps to improve the world in their minds ever. thats not really a consequentialist question youre being asked to weigh the value of the outcome of giving credence to criticism that could hurt socialist movements vs letting socialist movements devolve into arm chair clout chasing in name only activism. just saying "consequences" doesnt give a good indication of which outcome is worse and why.

also hes a fucking retard to do the fuck optics destiny thing, destiny does that because he doesnt care about persuasion. you do vaush if someone successfully clips you and makes that the narrative it kinda does really matter if people believe it from your pov of left wing advocacy.

Khalid Batoun said:
Who here seen Vaush say that parents who teach their children climate-skepticism should have their kids taken away by the State?

This dumbfuck calls himself a libertarian socialist, yet he’s weirdly comfortable with having the State enforce his worldview.

Is this guy retarded, does he not realize that words have meaning and you can’t just call yourself a libertarian because you like the aesthetic? Fucking Commie.
Click to expand...
he really is very authoritarian in his thinking. i think hes disillusioned with the idea that freedom will lead to the proles making good choices from his pov or really any pov vs them being bumbling dumbfucks led by emotion and smooth talking shysters but i think alot of the value he sees in life is the idea humans are thinking creatures who ought to be independent so he has to reconcile this desire for humans motivated by higher ideas and free to act on them vs the fact theyll mostly instead in reality take choices that are bad especially from his pov.

freedom of speech to vaush can now no longer include opinions that are too wrong or mean or dangerous and he has this strange idea that preserving democracy and free speech means suppressing anti democratic ideas. the idea that one ought to be forced by state violence into accepting a "free" and "democratic" state with no push back is really really fucking odd especially if youre a libertarian. yeah it can lead to crazies opting out to start oppressive compounds but someone influenced by fucking marx of all people should realize the fucking value of allowing a transition in government and economy.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, SubarashiiRage, Jonah Hill poster and 3 others
BlueSnowman said:
That is their warped understanding of liberty, though. From a leftist perspective the manbunned shitstain is a perfect socialist.
Its Rousseau to a t. In Rousseau's understanding of freedom and more precisely a free society, the collective has a public will. That public will, decided by consensus, is absolute and sacrosanct. Everyone will be subordinated to it and has to obey it. Beign in violation of the public will (there is no opting out) means you are not free and have to be forced to be free (literally what he wrote).

This public will essentially becomes this societies quran. The only difference beign, that the quran was assembled by a man (more likely men) knowledgeable in warfare, politics, at least early medieval economics and human nature. The tremendous success of Mohammed lends islam some credence. The marxist dogma was cobbled together by maniacs and detatched intellectuals that treated a failed hypothesis, that class warfare drives history and made it into dogma. Thats why communists call citing Marx at you as an argument and think that their favourite leftist philosopher writing something makes it true. Replace Marx Marx with Mohammed and Adorno with Mose or Aquinas and you will see.

For Manbunpig liberty and freedom mean beign taken care of and protected from harm (that starts with speech) by a higher power, said public will, while at the same time beign allowed to indulge in ones own vices, since he is a coomer with a pornaddled mind. In practice the collective will decides what you want to indulge in and you will indulge in it, otherwise you infringe on freedom.

I said it multiple times before, but they want to turn society into a big school, with the supervision of daycare mixed in, basically. The curriculum is substituted with a flavour of marxism that can explain everything in society and the primary way of distinguishing oneself will be ones conformity with the dogma.
Click to expand...

Vaush has an extremely warped idea of what “freedom” means. By that logic, a man who lives on the Western frontier during the 1800’s isn’t “free” because he doesn’t have a Nanny State looking after him.

Being protected from the harsh reality of the real world while being allowed to be a degenerate Coomer doesn’t mean you’re “free”….it just means you want your degenerate lifestyle to be normalized. “Libertarian” doesn’t simply mean you get to stick your dick in whatever you want.

By Vaush’s own logic, an Islamist can call himself a Libertarian as well. Since an Islamist believes in following Allah’s Laws, he is actually “free” from the injustice of following oppressive man-made laws and customs. Allah created us, and thus He knows us best. So by following Allah’s Commands, we have freed ourselves from submitting to oppressive rulers or ideologies. An Islamist who adheres to Islamic Sharia is thus more “free” than a Liberal living under American law. That is the true liberty; obeying your Creator.

Therefore all Islamists can call themselves “libertarians.”

All Conservatives and Liberals and Fascists and Communists can also call themselves “libertarian” by using Vaush’s reasoning.

Obviously we would reject that reasoning.

Words have meaning. And this meaning comes from political realities.

No dumbfuck Communist can ever call himself a libertarian. You can’t believe in mob justice and the State taking away your children and be a libertarian. It doesn’t work that way
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Globoxeno, Embaby Cumjar and 9 others
Khalid Batoun said:
Being protected from the harsh reality of the real world while being allowed to be a degenerate Coomer doesn’t mean you’re “free”….it just means you want your degenerate lifestyle to be normalized. “Libertarian” doesn’t simply mean you get to stick your dick in whatever you want.
Click to expand...
Has Vaush ever heard that a man has as many masters as he does Vices? Vaush has all the vices.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch, Flaming Insignias, Woke Blue Muttlema and 7 others
  • Like
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Juan's Sombrero, Jonah Hill poster and 3 others
BlueSnowman said:
Nooo! Manbunpig, my moniker...
Im gonna cope with saying it was us making him stop having one.
Still looks ugly and weak, though. He has such a strange and frail facial structure.
Click to expand...
You can always have the Fuentes' Fat Gay Retard moniker.

Hell, he's been trying to lose weight for months and he's hardly made any progress lately.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Globoxeno, Brain Problems and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back