Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Department of Homeland Security 4 days ago said:The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. (...) the convergence of the following factors has increased the volatility, unpredictability, and complexity of the threat environment: (1) the proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions;
Truedeau already thinks we are, so why not. It's a win-win if we transfer our retards in exchange for their truckers.
It wouldn’t be surprising if they did, especially if someone else is stupid enough to throw nukes first. It’s always worth remember that all of the middle kingdom’s neighbors absolutely hate them.Okay so..lets say we go to Super Clown World and China invades Taiwan.
Do...The Indians and the Pakis look at each other (both border China) and say "Uhhh..we nuking these chinks"?
look, your choices areOh this is fucking rich. They are back tracking on how many kids they killed with that ISIS guy
https://thepalmierireport.com/biden-admin-starts-backtracking-on-isis-raid-details/
We uh.. dont know who triggered that bomb, but it couldn't have been us, no sir.
View attachment 2978578
https://conservativebrief.com/white-3-59723/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=ProTrumpNews
Here's the thing, if China absorbs Pakistan, they now have 220 million Pakis in their country....The Pakis are retards then, do they really think the CCP isn't going to start looking to gobble them up if they eat Taiwan?
Cindy Sheehan. I don't think it's fair to lump her in with those others, because she was consistent in her anti-war stance and wasn't just protesting for political convenience. She tried to protest Obama's warmongering as well, getting herself arrested sevral times for protests in front of the white house. Te only reason you don't hear much about it is because the media dropped her like a slimy dog shit after Barry's election. She also openly voiced concern that anti-war protests during Trump's term would only happen because he wasn't a democrat.Casey what's-her-fucking-name camped out across the road from Biden's residence?
And if they do, you know what will come next.Okay so..lets say we go to Super Clown World and China invades Taiwan.
Do...The Indians and the Pakis look at each other (both border China) and say "Uhhh..we nuking these chinks"?
He's insufferable as a person and is absolutely broken at a fundamental level. Very good at grifting though, but imagine if he put his apparent brilliance to actually useful endeavors instead of scamming for attention and clout.He does seem competent in the area he is supposed to work in, so nothing about his competence/job to be upset about.
We can still mock him for his appearance.
Cindy Sheehan. I don't think it's fair to lump her in with those others, because she was consistent in her anti-war stance and wasn't just protesting for political convenience. She tried to protest Obama's warmongering as well, getting herself arrested sevral times for protests in front of the white house. Te only reason you don't hear much about it is because the media dropped her like a slimy dog shit after Barry's election. She also openly voiced concern that anti-war protests during Trump's term would only happen because he wasn't a democrat.
Fun fact: she also opposes all the vaccine and mask mandate shit.
It was a step up for both of them. I mean you've seen her face, right?That is truly informative, thank you. Of course she also went down to Venezuela and gave Chavez big sloppy kisses too so...
Must be fun for all those Bush-era lefties to discover they have zero actual clout.Cindy Sheehan. I don't think it's fair to lump her in with those others, because she was consistent in her anti-war stance and wasn't just protesting for political convenience. She tried to protest Obama's warmongering as well, getting herself arrested sevral times for protests in front of the white house. Te only reason you don't hear much about it is because the media dropped her like a slimy dog shit after Barry's election. She also openly voiced concern that anti-war protests during Trump's term would only happen because he wasn't a democrat.
Fun fact: she also opposes all the vaccine and mask mandate shit.
Not many, I'm sure they'd blame white supremacists.How many Americans would actually be angry if the Canadians decided to burn down the Whitehouse again.
The Biden administration on Friday released its official Indo-Pacific strategy, which warns that there is only a narrow window of time remaining to prevent China from transforming the region into its own sphere of influence.
Why it matters: Biden is the third consecutive president to classify Asia as a top geostrategic priority, hoping to complete the "pivot to Asia" initiated under former President Obama.
Zoom in: The document, which is the first regional strategy that the Biden administration has released, cites the "mounting challenges" posed by the rise of China as a key driver of the "intensifying American focus" on the Indo-Pacific.
Details: The strategy outlines fives primary objectives that the U.S. intends to pursue in concert with allies and regional institutions:
- "The PRC is combining its economic, diplomatic, military, and technological might as it pursues a sphere of influence in the Indo-Pacific and seeks to become the world’s most influential power."
- "Our collective efforts over the next decade will determine whether the [People's Republic of China] succeeds in transforming the rules and norms that have benefitted the Indo-Pacific and the world," the document reads.
The big picture: "Our objective is not to change China but to shape the strategic environment in which it operates," the document states.
- Advance a free and open Indo-Pacific
- Build connections within and beyond the region
- Drive regional prosperity
- Bolster Indo-Pacific security
- Build regional resilience to transnational threats
Like the Trump-era Indo-Pacific framework, Biden's strategy strongly emphasizes working together with U.S. allies and partners in the region, especially the Quad — which is made up of the U.S., India, Japan and Australia.
- This represents a continuation of the Trump-era rejection of engagement as a means to make China itself become more open and democratic, recognizing that the best the U.S. can hope for right now is a defense of the regional status quo.
- The strategy also lists climate change, pandemic recovery and North Korea as other major challenges facing the region.
- "We will not have the luxury of choosing between power politics and combatting transnational threats; we will rise to our leadership charge on diplomacy, security, economics, climate, pandemic response, and technology," the strategy states.
Between the lines: A senior administration official told reporters that Secretary of State Antony Blinken's travel to Australia, Fiji and Hawaii this week shows that the U.S. recognizes the importance of "sustained engagement" with the region — even as it faces the more acute crisis of Russia's possible invasion of Ukraine.
- Citing China's economic coercion of Australia, border disputes with India, and threats against Taiwan and other neighbors in the East and South China Sea, the strategy notes that U.S. allies "bear much of the cost of the PRC’s harmful behavior."
- "We are deepening our five regional treaty alliances—with Australia, Japan, the [Republic of Korea], the Philippines, and Thailand—and strengthening relationships with leading regional partners, including India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mongolia, New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam, and the Pacific Islands," the strategy reads.
The bottom line: The U.S. is entering a new era of foreign policy that will "demand more of the United States in the Indo-Pacific than has been asked of us since the Second World War," the strategy contends.
- "The United States doesn't have the luxury to only focus on one region or one problem at a time," the official stressed.
- Russia's threats to invade Ukraine — and Europe's ongoing reliance on the U.S. as a security guarantor — have disrupted the Biden administration's efforts to focus more of its attention and resources on the Indo-Pacific.
Having not looked into him and everything I've seen about him being on Kiwifarms, I am still dubious. The thing with people like this is that they are guided on stacking a resume and get placed into positions with fancy names but it doesn't necessarily mean shit.He does seem competent in the area he is supposed to work in, so nothing about his competence/job to be upset about.
We can still mock him for his appearance.