Canadian Truckers Convoy 2022 - The Leaf calls you a Nazi as he gasses you

If Trudeau goes full fascist we're all pretty fucked. Even the pro-mandate weirdos.


So if this gets approval what exactly will they do? Is it just a precursor to involving the military and using force?
Like father, like son. The Emergencies Act is a watered down version of The War Measures Act (that Trudeau's father invoked back in the October Crisis).

I pulled this from the document of the Act:
Orders and regulations
  • 8(1) While a declaration of a public welfare emergency is in effect, the Governor in Council may make such orders or regulations with respect to the following matters as the Governor in Council believes, on reasonable grounds, are necessary for dealing with the emergency:
    • (a) the regulation or prohibition of travel to, from or within any specified area, where necessary for the protection of the health or safety of individuals;
    • (b) the evacuation of persons and the removal of personal property from any specified area and the making of arrangements for the adequate care and protection of the persons and property;
    • (c) the requisition, use or disposition of property;
    • (d) the authorization of or direction to any person, or any person of a class of persons, to render essential services of a type that that person, or a person of that class, is competent to provide and the provision of reasonable compensation in respect of services so rendered;
    • (e) the regulation of the distribution and availability of essential goods, services and resources;
    • (f) the authorization and making of emergency payments;
    • (g) the establishment of emergency shelters and hospitals;
    • (h) the assessment of damage to any works or undertakings and the repair, replacement or restoration thereof;
    • (i) the assessment of damage to the environment and the elimination or alleviation of the damage; and
    • (j) the imposition
      • (i) on summary conviction, of a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or imprisonment not exceeding six months or both that fine and imprisonment, or
      • (ii) on indictment, of a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars or imprisonment not exceeding five years or both that fine and imprisonment,
      • for contravention of any order or regulation made under this section.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2983413
Tweet
Well shit. An impromptu Cabinet meeting followed by a First Minister's meeting the very next morning points to the Emergencies Act. They'll still need to satisfy the 7/50 rule (approval of at least two thirds of the provinces (7) that have at least 50% of the population of Canada as a whole) to make it happen but things have escalated quickly.

EDIT: According to the tweet in @Used Homunculi Salesman 's post, satisfying the 7/50 Rule isn't required??
The tweet is correct, the only requirement is consultation with the provinces before invocation (which is supposedly being done tomorrow) and approval by Parliament (which the NDP will certainly provide support for).

This makes me legitimately sick, this little turd is so scared of the honking and unwilling to lead he's seriously considering suspending the constitution to provide cover for sending the military in to shut it down. It's absolutely disgusting and his father would be the first to ream his head in for such ludicrous and pusillanimous thought.
 
I'm not sure I believe the claim that the leaked list is fake.

View attachment 2983425
It's real but it might be incomplete.

My name is on it and I am not really concerned. While I am a public sector employee, my contract specifically protects political activity and political donations are a form of speech.

Last time some leftist HR bitch from Portland sent me a letter saying that I could not reference my profession when speaking against gun control, I printed out her warning letter then used it as a coaster for coffee and to kill a fly.

After, I filed a grievance with my union (with the letter with fly guts and coffee stains) and it was decided in my favor. I was awarded some extra money in my paycheck and she got an letter from the county saying she was at risk of being put into career remediation. She fucked on off to Portland soon after.
 
Jesus, I can't quite articulate what I find so unpleasant about that, but it's just horrible. It's like the aural equivalent of rubbing sandpaper on my skin.
Instead of your brain accepting the stimuli as a single moment of horror, the way this eldritch string of notes is gutturally uttered forces you to notice each disgustingly horrific note.
It's various cacophonious clarion calls creates an almost familiar sound, similiar to an orchestra - and yet the demands of the song is not symphonious. But discordant.
And the loudest voice demands you end this horror for yourself.

tl;dr - IT'S STUCK ON LOPP PLS KLL ME.
 
The trucks/vans full of guns are to populist protests what the stacks of bricks are to BLM. One gets used for media clicks and fear mongering, the other is actually used. Both are sus af
Cops have guns drawn. Trying to make arrests.
View attachment 2983483

Could some lovely kiwi please sit on buperac’s Twitter feed and archive videos? Thank you
We may soon find out who wins, a bunch of zogbots dressed in fagcam or canucks with SKSs and milsurp.
 
:story: Trudeau goes through with that and he's done, period. Implement the War Measures Act (fuck the new euphemistic label) over this, a bunch of blue collar workers peacefully protesting and blocking crossings that the cops would normally deal with? After not doing the same during the railway blockades? Might not be immediately, but he's ensured the next Canada-wide crisis just moved forward in the timeline.

No one will miss the implications of it, including Liberal party members. It's outright admission that the managerial class cares little about democracy, all they want are the uppity peasants to keep on working for a pittance. Going through with it is a surefire way of ensuring this situation blows up hard.

Fully agree. There is absolutely no justification for it in the slightest from what I saw in Ottawa, and the Ambassador Bridge was cleared peacefully.

That being said, a public announcement of a stolen gun shipment, and now this?

MUH TRUCKER INSURRECTION ARE ARMING THEMSELVES!

Good odds, that's the messaging we might see tomorrow if it is the Emergencies Act.
 
Question for Canadians - does anyone see a point where armed resistance could happen?
Take this with a grain of salt as it's hearsay, but there are quite a few veterans and similar (retired cops etc) that have been saying for the past year that they were preparing for that. I think this trucker revolt gave them a different path out of this, because once a revolution starts, you can't exactly go back.
EDIT: that is, IF it stays peaceful - once the govt pushes too far I can't imagine things going well
Like father, like son. The Emergencies Act is a watered down version of The War Measures Act (that Trudeau's father invoked back in the October Crisis.

I pulled this from the document of the Act:
Orders and regulations
  • 8(1) While a declaration of a public welfare emergency is in effect, the Governor in Council may make such orders or regulations with respect to the following matters as the Governor in Council believes, on reasonable grounds, are necessary for dealing with the emergency:
    • (a) the regulation or prohibition of travel to, from or within any specified area, where necessary for the protection of the health or safety of individuals;
    • (b) the evacuation of persons and the removal of personal property from any specified area and the making of arrangements for the adequate care and protection of the persons and property;
    • (c) the requisition, use or disposition of property;
    • (d) the authorization of or direction to any person, or any person of a class of persons, to render essential services of a type that that person, or a person of that class, is competent to provide and the provision of reasonable compensation in respect of services so rendered;
    • (e) the regulation of the distribution and availability of essential goods, services and resources;
    • (f) the authorization and making of emergency payments;
    • (g) the establishment of emergency shelters and hospitals;
    • (h) the assessment of damage to any works or undertakings and the repair, replacement or restoration thereof;
    • (i) the assessment of damage to the environment and the elimination or alleviation of the damage; and
    • (j) the imposition
      • (i) on summary conviction, of a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or imprisonment not exceeding six months or both that fine and imprisonment, or
      • (ii) on indictment, of a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars or imprisonment not exceeding five years or both that fine and imprisonment,
      • for contravention of any order or regulation made under this section.
Tbh now I'm wondering if they wanted an excuse to bring this in earlier and this the convenient cover for it. Being able to confiscate property, move people around at will and prohibit all travel? Sounds like a dictator wet dream
 
Like father, like son. The Emergencies Act is a watered down version of The War Measures Act (that Trudeau's father invoked back in the October Crisis.

I pulled this from the document of the Act:
Orders and regulations
  • 8(1) While a declaration of a public welfare emergency is in effect, the Governor in Council may make such orders or regulations with respect to the following matters as the Governor in Council believes, on reasonable grounds, are necessary for dealing with the emergency:
    • (a) the regulation or prohibition of travel to, from or within any specified area, where necessary for the protection of the health or safety of individuals;
    • (b) the evacuation of persons and the removal of personal property from any specified area and the making of arrangements for the adequate care and protection of the persons and property;
    • (c) the requisition, use or disposition of property;
    • (d) the authorization of or direction to any person, or any person of a class of persons, to render essential services of a type that that person, or a person of that class, is competent to provide and the provision of reasonable compensation in respect of services so rendered;
    • (e) the regulation of the distribution and availability of essential goods, services and resources;
    • (f) the authorization and making of emergency payments;
    • (g) the establishment of emergency shelters and hospitals;
    • (h) the assessment of damage to any works or undertakings and the repair, replacement or restoration thereof;
    • (i) the assessment of damage to the environment and the elimination or alleviation of the damage; and
    • (j) the imposition
      • (i) on summary conviction, of a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or imprisonment not exceeding six months or both that fine and imprisonment, or
      • (ii) on indictment, of a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars or imprisonment not exceeding five years or both that fine and imprisonment,
      • for contravention of any order or regulation made under this section.
This would simply spray 100-octane gasoline on the anger already burning. I don't believe Canada has enough reliable police, and they sure as hell don't have enough troops, to control an angry country from coast to coast. Jesus, even Gorbachev turned away from keeping Eastern Europe by force of arms. Far as being a leader goes, neither of the Trudeaus makes a pimple on Gorbachev's ass.
 
Fully agree. There is absolutely no justification for it in the slightest from what I saw in Ottawa, and the Ambassador Bridge was cleared peacefully.

That being said, a public announcement of a stolen gun shipment, and now this?

MUH TRUCKER INSURRECTION ARE ARMING THEMSELVES!

Good odds, that's the messaging we might see tomorrow if it is the Emergencies Act.
I think that could very well be the spark that lights things off. And I don't say that in a flippant or happy way.
 
Here's another video of the Coutts counter-convoy. This time, @SydFizzard walks through the whole counter-convoy to show you who's there. In addition to the police cars, you can see lots of SWAT officers and some military personnel put there as a cherry on top. Very similar situation when compared to the Ambassador Bridge standoff



Military guys.png


BONUS: The GiveSendGo donation page is back up (at least, for the time being)

Givesendgo back up.png
 
I highly doubt anyone was looking at the Ambassador Bridge blockade as a "drop in the bucket." If that went on indefinitely, it would have a severe economic impact to both Canada and the United States. Just look at how the governor of Michigan, as well as Joe Biden intervened as soon as it started happening; got Trudeau on the horn and made him promise to unblock the bridge immediately.

It seemed to be an effective PR move though, on the part of the protesters. It showed the Canadian government what kind of power they could wield if they mean business, and also started an international incident, which is embarrassing for Trudeau. I noticed that the point at which the White House started to intervene on the Ambassador Bridge matter marked a discernable shift in media coverage. Prior, they would bring up those bullshit Confederate/Nazi false flag incidents from Day 1 in just about every single article, as well as using pejorative language like "anti-vaxxers," which is a dirty word (at least for the bugman), which has been demonized to no end in MSM. After US involvement in the bridge situation, they seem to have largely cooled off on the racism/misogyny/etc smears, and even started calling them more neutral terms such as "mandate protesters." Makes me wonder what spurred it. Hypothetically, I could see someone on Trudeau's team at long last pushing for a more conciliatory tone, because their old lines only seemed to be fanning the flames, but I am not sure that's it. I see it as more plausible that the US deep state might be more concerned about the same thing firing up in the United States, the economic impact of that, the chance of that ruining Great Reset, risk of trucker convoy fucking up the US midterms, and so on--so maybe they sent out some memos or something. Whatever the impetus, the way a bunch of outlets all shifted their coverage overnight did not appear to be an organic choice they all made at once.
The US is watching what is happening in Canada really hard. Our politics have already become explosive and is just looking for a match to kick things off. You saw it reflected in what happened with the GoFundMe where the vanguard of State opposition to the status quo in Texas, West Virginia and Florida piled on to "Do something about it".

What is happening in Canada has grave ramifications for the political situation here in America because Canadians have taken to the streets for pretty much the same issues that have embittered Americans towards their own Central government. The US government absolutely wants this over and done with, but Trudeau is a total incompetent. Especially once he started bitching about "foreign interference". America and Canada have a very complicated relationship and at times it is very hard to extricate one from the other.

In this case though the Canadians are at the front and this has to be making the Biden Administration furious. Ever since January 6 they have had America on lockdown and have been successfull in browbeating their opposition into sullen compliance. There is a very real danger that if the Canada crisis gets worse Americans will start counting heads and taking sides.

For example, what if Trudeau invokes his war measures act, deploys the Army to Coutts, only to discover the protesters standing 50 meters away from the US border with the Montana National Guard on the other side to "keep the peace". It's hypothetical right now, but Trudeaus options are limiting fast. Either he caves or he cracks down. The center cannot hold. And if he cracks down he risks the peace and stability in North America.

That is why the US government is shitting bricks right now. Trudeau should have taken this seriously 2 weeks ago. It's too late now.
 
It sure is weird seeing so many of these "Marxist" dipshits who so fundamentally misunderstand a philosophy of which they purport to be ardent supporters. A big part of Marx's worldview is related to his idea about the alienation of capital and labour, i.e. a master/boss who owns equipment (capital), and a slave/employee who operates the equipment (labour). People attending these protests are almost exclusively labourers who work with their own equipment, which Marx would see as basically the ideal form. Companies are not allowing employees to drive corporate vehicles down to the protest.

The people who Marx describes as the "bourgeoisie" are not maligned because they are a successful labourers who managed to scrape together enough for their own tools; it does not merely mean "rich" or something like that, but rather it is about one's role within the economy. Marx sees people who own tools, and who pay wagies the wage to use them, as something of a parasitic social class, akin to someone engaged in rent-seeking or usury. Truckers who are owner-operators, who own and operate their own rig, cannot be parasitic against themselves or their own labour; that proposition is absurd.

Who is Marx talking about when he describes the "bourgeoisie?" What does that word mean? "Bourgeoisie" is a French word that refers to urbanites, analogous to what one might call, in Medieval English, the Burghers. In more modern English, you could call them city slickers (sneed). In other words, much like these urbanite bugman soyim, who contribute nothing of value to society, who are presently complaining about this grassroots workers' uprising, and demanding that the neolib state deploy the army to gun down all these pesky peaceful protesters.

I'm not even pro-Marx, especially when you look at derivative systems like Marxist-Leninism that would be fucking this same type of guys over as kulaks or whatever. But the "lefty" arguments against these protests are just utterly incoherent. No, urbanite bunkertranny, the farmer rolling into the protest on his own tractor is not a vampiric city slicker like yourself.
You are 100% correct about this. I didn't know why leaf redditors call them the petite bourgeoisie but I know one cannot argue with these clowns, since they think prostitutes are also the working class Marx and Engels wrote of (they are in a way but they were considered an undesirable consequence of free market capitalism). They were not to be shunned and shamed for being forced to engage in that trade but it was also not something to be emulated and aspire to. Certainly not a profession which would exist in the socialist worker's paradise, yet these faggots use the euphemism sex worker and mistakenly consider them a true and ideal representative of the working class Marx and Engels described. It's like saying 19th century teamsters were not considered working class simply because they owned horses and a wooden cart but a streetwalker was. Both are independent contractors dependent on others to make their living, except teamsters didn't risk venereal disease, degradation and humiliation every time they made a delivery, and were not often forced into the profession by the owners of a teamster cooperative. One was a worker victimized by owners of factories and business, the other a victim forced into prostitution. They are not the same thing in a socialist setting.

In the late 19th century it was something women were forced to do since they had neither the education or opportunity to participate in the labor force that men had. Even upper class women resorted to being high class escorts, or courtesans if they had no money. Today's commies consider prostitution liberating and even representative of the revolutionary and true and honest working class, unlike those dirty truckers. As for the meltdown over Americans donating funds to the tuckers in Canada, what about the communist slogan "Workers of the world, unite!"? Oh, I guess truck drivers aren't capable of solidarity and organizational skills, unlike OnlyFans thots. Truly, this is Clown World.

t. child of true believers of the world according to Marx, Engels, Lenin, Mao and Che
(I would argue trafficked men and women are victims of capitalism and members of the working class, but these make believe communist morons ignore them and that's a discussion best done elsewhere).
 
I'm wondering if he's angling to try and use the military to keep the borders open. The EMA will have to be specifically worded for that.
 
Why are so many of the elite alcoholics? Justin here, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, etc.

None, because a bunch of soyboys and Karens skipping work to block the street with their Prius is just an annoyance while truckers going on strike and doing the same is a life-threatening logistics crisis. But it would have total institutional support so you'd be arrested for trying to move the vehicles and no court would grant an injunction.

Although note that at least some soyboys and Karens don't even have cars anymore, because they're so into the urban bugman lifestyle they only use public transportation and Uber and shit.

IIRC they often do get protested on but for obvious reasons people usually step out of the way of trains.
Because you can afford to be an alcoholic if you're rich? John A. Macdonald was an infamous drunk too.
 
Back