- Joined
- May 4, 2020
That's why the judge should grant the motion to compel, and stay the case pending the results of arbitration. That way Russ can't appeal.If the court dismisses this and orders it to arbitration, he'll appeal it as high as he can
Good point, and something I have not considered. I had, rather foolishly, assumed that once the mediation date was over, that the whole matter was tossed as failed. It is possible that while both sides could not come to an agreement, they agreed to keep talking about it.1. The Court views this as something that can be mediated between the parties, so the Mediation Office is providing more time of its own accord so the parties can settle and get this off of the Court's docket.
Two issues with this:
1. Mediation started in January. I believe had it resumed, they would have either come to an agreement (which would have been seen on the docket) or stopped trying.
2. Had the Mediation resumed, it should have shown the other dates in the docket.
Overall, I'm not quite sure this is the case
The court does not have a deadline on which it should have made its ruling. It could have received Russ' brief and just not read it until later instead of what it is doing now.The Court is completely swamped with other cases of greater importance, and has determined that delaying this appeal would not provide any prejudice to Shitlips.
Usually Court gives (or denies) time extensions when asked. They can, however, decide to grant it themselves without any motions from either party because it feels like the party they are granting more time to needs it. That is fairly rare. A lot more common is them granting time when asked (not as common as in the appellate courts). What is happening now is not particularly common, and I would like to know the reasoning behind itBy what process does a court issue time extensions? Do they regularly review their caseload and extend ongoing deadlines (or does a clerk)? Or has someone taken an interest in this case and made an effort to make a motion about it in particular?
The appellate court decided to give him more time, yes, without any request.Just to be clear... the appeals court decided to unilaterally grant Russhole more time to file his brief?
Why would this impact him in literally any way?Ahh, what the fuck. More legal fees for Null.
No.I'm a bit out of sync given the ddos-tomorrow is the day the fremantle judge has to make the call, right?