Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
r/egg_irl continues to be some kind of delusional hell scape. As is typical, they use a fictional character as a prime example of a feminine woman, without realizing that the only thing an MTF and Seamus have in common is that they are both not real women.

View attachment 2993501

https://www.reddit.com/r/egg_irl/co...urce=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
Samus Aaron is a mutant half bird alien reinforced by cybernetics and genetic engineering.

Fuckin troons appropriating my vidya and animus.
 
The unspoken assumption is that somehow women are marginalized in sports in a way that has nothing to do with biology. I just want someone to challenge these people to prove that. Prove that women need their own separate sports in a way that doesn't imply that trans women should be excluded. Otherwise, why shouldn't someone's race give them access to women's competitions, if that's the competition for "marginalized" people, and not specifically about biological differences?

It's so deliberately disingenuous, but at the same time I do wonder if any of these people have actually taken the time to think through the implications of anything they say.
I once had a (male) colleague argue with a straight face that women's sports records are only lower than men's because they lack the financial incentive to improve, since men's sports make so much more money.
It was like watching someone regurgitate a script he couldn't have possibly believed in, just to come off as appropriately progressive to the people we were with (and no, he wasn't being sarcastic).

The problem is that these people see the statement "men are stronger than women, on average" as an attack they have to defend against. But it isn't; it's ok for people to be biologically different. The only people it really impacts are competitive female athletes who have to put up with this shit, smiling and pretending they just participated in a fair contest.

They should either put their money where their mouths are and integrate *all* sports into a unified male-female league and see how catastrophically that fails, or do the obvious thing and continue to categorize people biologically.
 
r/egg_irl continues to be some kind of delusional hell scape. As is typical, they use a fictional character as a prime example of a feminine woman, without realizing that the only thing an MTF and Seamus have in common is that they are both not real women.

View attachment 2993501

https://www.reddit.com/r/egg_irl/co...urce=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
1645201191522.png

The reality of being over 6 foot and a MAN.
 
Come to think of it, the concept that some ideas are so obvious on their face that no one bothers investigating is a theme when dealing with trannies. They like to find long held, common sense assumptions and then challenge them on the basis that there's no evidence behind them.
It is incredibly frustrating trying to talk about this stuff, because it's like arguing with someone about whether the moon has a core made of cheese. Technically yes, we have no direct evidence that that isn't the case, but for that to be true, a lot of other things we do have evidence for would have to be untrue.
They've got a lot in common with creationists, moon landing hoaxers and flat earthers in this regard. There are two related tactics at work here: the first is what you both describe -- supporting absurd positions solely based on the absence of positive proof contradicting them -- and the other is endlessly arguing semantics and deliberately saying ridiculous things (knowing exactly how they'll be interpreted) and then crying "oh that's not what I meant, gosh!" when people object.

The former allows them to (try to) force people to accept their arguments unchallenged (as a bastardized interpretation of "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"). The latter allows them to make very aggressive, offensive, controversial and insulting statements while feigning ignorance and attacking the other side for "overreacting" to a "misunderstanding."

Both of these tactics serve the same purpose -- to frustrate the people trying to argue with them and exhaust their willingness to shoot down obvious stupidity so they'll eventually throw up their hands and storm away in disgust, having concluded they're just dealing with perverts and retards. They're right, but our twisted culture thinks it's bad now to resort to such reductionism when dismissing obviously stupid and ridiculous ideas. It's like a fucking toddler who won't stop asking "why?" no matter what you say to them. Suddenly you're the bad guy if you just say "shut up and eat your sandwich before I throw you into that volcano."

It's admittedly pretty effective. If you've ever engaged a creationist, hoaxer or flat earther in "debate," did it last very long? Did you convince them they were wrong? Did you eventually just get frustrated with the braindead stupidity of it all and either politely excuse yourself or tell them off and call them retards? And the most important question -- have you ever tried it again? For most people, the answer is "no." And how does one of them react now when they try to debate you and you blow them off? They act like they're right and you know you're wrong and won't debate them to avoid embarrassing yourself.

Everybody "just knows" those three groups are tards now and none of us bother correcting the idiots making asses of themselves. We only step in to correct them when they start getting in the way of useful activities (and seeing Buzz Aldrin punch out that Bart asshole was so satisfying) and otherwise just ignore and laugh at them.

Unfortunately, trannies are pushing their shit much harder and actually making inroads, so people are having to (slowly) sharpen those debate skills to start punishing lazy thinking again. Dammit. I wish just a few more people with some amount of authority would just say "no" to these fuckheads. Just a few times would be enough. This garbage only works because practically everybody just roll over and take it.
 
They just never responded to that particular question :story:

This is just unreal, they also stated that they won't release the author's names because of 'safety considerations'. The usual, crying "literally hunted down and murdered" to avoid any levelled criticism. Doubly retarded in this case, as they are calling out Emma as the author!

It's possible that this kind of approach may peak more people - it shows a deliberate attempt to be underhanded and unfair.
1645204454040.png

1645204347326.png


"Who wrote this paper saying I'm unqualified? I need to know who so I can determine whether this criticism is valid. Did you write it?"

"Why do you care? Just want to ad hominem everyone? Why can't you respond to the science? The SCIENCE of an anonymous person saying you're unqualified?"

Bonus response (in response to calling Emma a 'beetle researcher' or other lame joke):

1645204617880.png
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2993692
View attachment 2993688

"Who wrote this paper saying I'm unqualified? I need to know why so I can determine whether this criticism is valid. Did you write it?"

"Why do you care? Just want to ad hominem everyone? Why can't you respond to the science? The SCIENCE of an anonymous person saying you're unqualified?"

Bonus response (in response to calling Emma a 'beetle researcher' or other lame joke:

View attachment 2993698
At least there's *some* pushback. The authors/publishers probably didn't expect any at all, and honestly given past reactions to this kind of bullshit in the world of woke science I can't say I blame them for expecting smooth sailing.
 
At least there's *some* pushback. The authors/publishers probably didn't expect any at all, and honestly given past reactions to this kind of bullshit in the world of woke science I can't say I blame them for expecting smooth sailing.

Exactly, and this is good imo. This is pushback not of people saying YWNBAW, but people saying 'you cannot come into this area of science and just do whatever the fuck you want. There are standards of accountability and objective truth that must be upheld.'

I love that the "the entire of science agrees with us and it's just Being a Good Person™" crowd are being told to either buck up or shut up. Probably too optimistic to hope this kind of momentum continues.
 
That's because you are making the HUGE mistake of centering your feminism on ciswomen sweeety. That's a big nono. It's transphobic and very bad and that makes You a false feminist and a danger to the community. Transpeople are dying because of YOU. And you are excluding intersexes people on top of that!

It doesn't matter that transwomen have an advantage, it matter that they are sad when excluded from female team. It matters that performing in male teams would force them to out themselves. Clearly we couldn't tell Lia Thomas is trans without being told!

Sex is just that random factor that barely matters at all and absolutely isn't binary or even bimodal! It absolutely didn't influence the construction of gender roles!
(except when the community needs to pay for hrt and surgery)
And anyway science will find a way to abolish it in like six months, so get ahead of the curve! Only gender matters!

And so on.

... You are getting WAY too good at that... /side eye
 
They've got a lot in common with creationists, moon landing hoaxers and flat earthers in this regard. There are two related tactics at work here: the first is what you both describe -- supporting absurd positions solely based on the absence of positive proof contradicting them -- and the other is endlessly arguing semantics and deliberately saying ridiculous things (knowing exactly how they'll be interpreted) and then crying "oh that's not what I meant, gosh!" when people object.

The former allows them to (try to) force people to accept their arguments unchallenged (as a bastardized interpretation of "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"). The latter allows them to make very aggressive, offensive, controversial and insulting statements while feigning ignorance and attacking the other side for "overreacting" to a "misunderstanding."

Both of these tactics serve the same purpose -- to frustrate the people trying to argue with them and exhaust their willingness to shoot down obvious stupidity so they'll eventually throw up their hands and storm away in disgust, having concluded they're just dealing with perverts and retards. They're right, but our twisted culture thinks it's bad now to resort to such reductionism when dismissing obviously stupid and ridiculous ideas. It's like a fucking toddler who won't stop asking "why?" no matter what you say to them. Suddenly you're the bad guy if you just say "shut up and eat your sandwich before I throw you into that volcano."

It's admittedly pretty effective. If you've ever engaged a creationist, hoaxer or flat earther in "debate," did it last very long? Did you convince them they were wrong? Did you eventually just get frustrated with the braindead stupidity of it all and either politely excuse yourself or tell them off and call them retards? And the most important question -- have you ever tried it again? For most people, the answer is "no." And how does one of them react now when they try to debate you and you blow them off? They act like they're right and you know you're wrong and won't debate them to avoid embarrassing yourself.

Everybody "just knows" those three groups are tards now and none of us bother correcting the idiots making asses of themselves. We only step in to correct them when they start getting in the way of useful activities (and seeing Buzz Aldrin punch out that Bart asshole was so satisfying) and otherwise just ignore and laugh at them.

Unfortunately, trannies are pushing their shit much harder and actually making inroads, so people are having to (slowly) sharpen those debate skills to start punishing lazy thinking again. Dammit. I wish just a few more people with some amount of authority would just say "no" to these fuckheads. Just a few times would be enough. This garbage only works because practically everybody just roll over and take it.
You are very much correct, but one of the most successful tactics they employ is the Motte and Bailey. They cloak the ridiculous demands and theories behind easy to defend empty rhetoric. This works especially well on social media which is built on precisely that at this point. Most normies would frown at the statement 'men have no inherent advantages over women in sport'. They will trot out that ridiculous argument until it gets attacked, at which point they retreat and the much more defensible (if empty) statement is offered: "We just want trans kids to be able to play sports". Someone who has no clue would think that's a perfectly fair thing to fight for. Everyone should be able to play sports right?

My own country is about to pass a law that bans conversion therapy. The vast majority of people hear that and think preachers trying to 'turn' gay people back to straight. The problem is that activists have managed to make this law apply not just to sexual orientation but als 'gender identity' (no, it's not defined in the text of the law what that means). So the public at large thinks all is well while the activists in the background are already planning lawsuits targeting therapists who don't toe the line and may tell 'trans' kids that puberty blockers are a bad idea.
 
Shameful post:

Gay porn sites have been infested with gross tifs and shemales, I guarantee it's gonna fuck up young guys and make them think that men will have to literally fuck anything.

You'll see those ftm gif ads from studios with them on the side bar of the videos, you can be watching something and those ads will creep up on you and kill your boner, I can only understate the gross factor of seeing a gif of ftm porn, it's vomit inducing and seeing them has made me gag. The actual men on those ads are actually degenerates and do straight porn, shemale porn, granny porn, whatever porn.


The amount of ftms freakshow ads and thumbnails I saw with their gross ass scars grossed me out of watching gay porn.

Straight porn sites don't have them though, the companies that run both straight and gay porn sites will never feature trans shit on straight men. So gay porn gets the burden of mtfs and ftms..

Even with watching straight porn I couldn't deny that if you're willing to do any porn you're probably already a degenerate willing to do that shit. It's going to happen, so I stopped contributing to it.
But I'd like to hear the contrary.

I'm not watching porn anymore, even speaking as a single man with needs, I honestly hate the industry all together but they never talk about how awfully normalized for us it is now that it's a click away, if you DON'T watch porn you're seen as weird. Awful. It's just as much as a tool for coercing people that fucking the clitcock is fine, or its normal to suck the girldick
I respect you based gaybro. Browsing porn sites without Adblock is the like Dark Souls of cooming.

Well coomed sir.
 
They should either put their money where their mouths are and integrate *all* sports into a unified male-female league and see how catastrophically that fails, or do the obvious thing and continue to categorize people biologically.
That would be funny to see ngl, we only get glimpses of something like that
1645207477505.png


Is never gonna happen though, institutions have an incentive to put males in the female teams for the same reason they give full scholarships to any low iq nigger that can put a ball through a hoop: they want to win.

Thinking about it, there's very little talk about FTMs in male sports, probably because no male is competitively threatened by them but is a matter of time before a female boxer or ufc fighter transitions and gets killed by a knockout in the male division.
 
That would be funny to see ngl, we only get glimpses of something like that
View attachment 2993788

I wish some 7-foot dude who couldn't make it in men's basketball would start identifying as a woman and play in the WNBA. A dude dunking more in one game than all actual woman in all of WNBA history would be hilarious.
 
That would be funny to see ngl, we only get glimpses of something like that
View attachment 2993788

Is never gonna happen though, institutions have an incentive to put males in the female teams for the same reason they give full scholarships to any low iq nigger that can put a ball through a hoop: they want to win.

Thinking about it, there's very little talk about FTMs in male sports, probably because no male is competitively threatened by them but is a matter of time before a female boxer or ufc fighter transitions and gets killed by a knockout in the male division.
We can only hope. I’d rather a ftm get killed before a mtf kills an actual woman.
 
Shameful post:

Gay porn sites have been infested with gross tifs and shemales, I guarantee it's gonna fuck up young guys and make them think that men will have to literally fuck anything.
Specifically to the shemales - It's something "straight men" definitely fetishize, and pre-ops hate it because they aren't wanted the way a woman would be wanted. I read some pre-op talking about how the men interested in them wanted to be anally railed and all they would let them have is to suck their dick.

The FTM is probably some other kind of fetish we're less familiar with. It's not something with as much porn out there (yet). The ultimate "well actually" of not being gay, or being christian and gay or something.

Shemale porn is surprisingly popular going off torrent numbers, and I think the porn producers decided to plop it down on your side of the aisle because straight men would just go to another site.
 
it occurs to me that some of these dingbats don‘t realize that, while hideous in straight terms, they are hideous and fundamentally unloveable by lesbians.

This dude has been posting his Ls in true Britbong fashion:

View attachment 2993393

View attachment 2993391

View attachment 2993390

Someone tries to reason with him:
View attachment 2993395

And this muppet blocks his ears and shouts jansphobia:
View attachment 2993396

Also, this:
View attachment 2993397

:story:

This brave and honest young lesbian:
View attachment 2993410
Made this post:
View attachment 2993412
And I wish I could comment this:
View attachment 2993407

I hope in 10 years the internet is just all men sending dick pics and badgering each other.
A porn sick man not having his lesbian fantasy fulfilled, shame.
 
It is incredibly frustrating trying to talk about this stuff, because it's like arguing with someone about whether the moon has a core made of cheese. Technically yes, we have no direct evidence that that isn't the case, but for that to be true, a lot of other things we do have evidence for would have to be untrue.
This is just so spot on it's insane.

1645210707569.png


"I am answering many questions - perhaps you could provide your conclusions as to what 'cheese' actually means? Only if it's relevant to the core of the moon. I know I didn't define 'cheese' in my paper but perhaps it's actually up to you to do so?"
These stupid fucking girls. They're giving him his full on AGP fantasy. I'm sure he had to jerk off his gender euphoria boner after this.
View attachment 2993887
Oh for fucks sake. Look at that picture. Just sums it up. MATI.
 
Thinking about it, there's very little talk about FTMs in male sports, probably because no male is competitively threatened by them but is a matter of time before a female boxer or ufc fighter transitions and gets killed by a knockout in the male division.

We can only hope. I’d rather a ftm get killed before a mtf kills an actual woman.

Probably not, only because those in the fighting, wrestling and boxing games had the damn good sense to institute weight classes. Not saying TiFs won't eventually try for it, just that we probably won't have to witness them getting put into intensive care by a grown ass man - it will happen at the hands of a manlet instead.
 
Back