Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

There has been a seemingly magical rash of health problems in my family and their friends and it's only vaccinated people, but it's not immediate shit outside of achy arms, and it's not directly linkable. One with no signs of heart disease a year prior who eat healthier than is sane and are thin as a beanpole suddenly having heart attacks without any warning, that really perked my ears when I heard about it. That's the most bizarre one, but a couple other heart disease diagnoses happened without warning but under less suspicious circumstances to others in the fam as well.

That said, I'm the youngest of all of them, the only unvaccinated person, and most of them are over 65.

Could be a coincidence, could be COVID malaise, could be a combination...it didn't do anything to convince me to get the jab though.

All that said, at this point I'm less concerned about the safety of the vaccine itself and more concerned about the safety of how the virus evolves due to leaky vaccine pressures as vaccination rates approach 100%. I'm very not down with Marek's inspired in-womb vaccinations.

Edit:
People are mentioning cancer and tumors...I didn't consider that relevant to possible side effects but one of the people in my family did suddenly get a cancer screener come back with a lump that had to be removed this last year. They caught it early and no sign of cancer cells in the lymphs post operation so all is well in that regard. Their scans had come back clean the previous year. And yes, this person was vaccinated, boosters and all.
 
Last edited:
Cousin, his wife, and their kid came over for a visit. His wife decided to bring up vaccines while talking to my mom and my mom mentioned none of us are vaccinated and we don't intend to because of the side effects. Cousin's wife just starts spewing every single NPC talking point in regards to the vaccine and it fucking blew my mind. Not once have I met an actual NPC in real life and now I finally have. And it happens to be a woman I once respected. I had to walk away before I called her a retarded niggercattle when she started gleefully talking about how they force their son, who like six, to wear a mask to school and social distance from his friends.
 
So has anybody here actually met anybody who has had a severe reaction to one of the coronavirus vaccines? Back when they first came out the second dose of Moderna put my landlord in the ER because he couldn't breathe. He's the only one I've personally heard of though. Besides that, 2 of my unvaccinated coworkers were put in the hospital for over a week in the last 2 months because of this most recent covid wave, but they were both middle aged, and in the case of the woman, mildly overweight and asthmatic. Just wondering because it seems like it's really a good idea to get vaccinated if you're older or obese / asthmatic etc, but for younger people the benefit seems a lot more dubious, and reports about potential myocarditis, especially for younger men, make it seem like more of a risk than it's worth.
Not long term, but I took a friend to the ER for partial paralysis and inability to focus their eyes. And a female friend had month+ long periods after both doses. And at last two other friends missed a week of work.
Everybody's fine now though. The paralyzed friend was fine the next morning and in the vaccine's defense, he already had a lot of muscle and mobility issues.

Grandpa got the vaccine, went downhill, and is dead now... but he also was 90... and that's kinda when you die anyway if you aren't the queen of England.
 
Last edited:
WOW.

Screen Shot 2022-02-20 at 6.18.04 PM.png
 
E96kN3wVIAIpfNf.png

This is Congressman Mike Gallagher, from May of last year:




What is the Ground Truth Network and Peter Daszak's relationship to it?


Daszak’s research might be more hype14 and public relations than science, but the Department of Homeland Security’s National Biosurveillance Integration Center (NBIC) has chosen to rely on it. NBIC gave Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance a $2.2-million15 contract (2016-2019) to create a “Ground Truth Network”16 of “subject matter experts” who could provide “contextual information pertaining to biological events.”

We have the actual DHS files.


Who is Heather Poindexter?



A DHS contractor.

So, a couple years before the pandemic, Peter Daszak, the director of EcoHealth Alliance and now a known CIA asset, is receiving money from the DHS's "National Biosurveillance Integration Center" to create a network of subject matter experts to push a specific narrative.

That shows intent.
 

Attachments

My friend took the first dose in April or May of 2021 and ended up in the hospital a week later with a cancer recurrence requiring brain surgery. I am pretty sure the cancer had just never been totally eradicated before and that it was growing all along...but on the other hand I do think having her immune system focus on the shot in her arm probably wasn't great for keeping the cancer under control.

She had actually been imaged 12 months before that and that scan came up clean, so it wasn't the situation where someone wasn't going to the doctor in 2020 because pandemic and got diagnosed later. Maybe it was just too small to see.

Bad news: on discovery they rated it stage 4 and terminal. Good news: she is doing way better than they had expected so there is a good chance she will be around for years.
 
My friend took the first dose in April or May of 2021 and ended up in the hospital a week later with a cancer recurrence requiring brain surgery. I am pretty sure the cancer had just never been totally eradicated before and that it was growing all along...but on the other hand I do think having her immune system focus on the shot in her arm probably wasn't great for keeping the cancer under control.

She had actually been imaged 12 months before that and that scan came up clean, so it wasn't the situation where someone wasn't going to the doctor in 2020 because pandemic and got diagnosed later. Maybe it was just too small to see.

Bad news: on discovery they rated it stage 4 and terminal. Good news: she is doing way better than they had expected so there is a good chance she will be around for years.
She lost her Killer T-Cells that was keeping the cancer under control.
 
The way those things work is you stick the probe in the box with the plastic sheaths immediately before use, then hit a button to release them into the garbage immediately after use. The only way to "use the wrong one" is to either say "okay mr frequent flier drop them trousers" which you can absolutely refuse as a patient, or use a sheath you stuck up someone's ass previously. So if you ever go to a healthcare setting and have a nurse approach you for a temperature check and you don't personally watch them put a new clean sheath on the probe, you explicitly tell them to do it or you'll be the one doing some probing.
 
She lost her Killer T-Cells that was keeping the cancer under control.
The Spike protein has an affect that mimics RAG/BRCA1/53BP1 deficiency.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV–2) is responsible for the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic that has resulted in more than 2.3 million deaths. SARS–CoV–2 is an enveloped single positive–sense RNA virus that consists of structural and non–structural proteins [1]. After infection, these viral proteins hijack and dysregulate the host cellular machinery to replicate, assemble, and spread progeny viruses [2]. Recent clinical studies have shown that SARS–CoV–2 infection extraordinarily affects lymphocyte number and function [3,4,5,6]. Compared with mild and moderate survivors, patients with severe COVID–19 manifest a significantly lower number of total T cells, helper T cells, and suppressor T cells [3,4]. Additionally, COVID–19 delays IgG and IgM levels after symptom onset [5,6]. Collectively, these clinical observations suggest that SARS–CoV–2 affects the adaptive immune system. However, the mechanism by which SARS–CoV–2 suppresses adaptive immunity remains unclear.

As two critical host surveillance systems, the immune and DNA repair systems are the primary systems that higher organisms rely on for defense against diverse threats and tissue homeostasis. Emerging evidence indicates that these two systems are interdependent, especially during lymphocyte development and maturation [7]. As one of the major double-strand DNA break (DSB) repair pathways, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair plays a critical role in lymphocyte–specific recombination–activating gene endonuclease (RAG) –mediated V(D)J recombination, which results in a highly diverse repertoire of antibodies in B cell and T cell receptors (TCRs) in T cells [8]. For example, loss of function of key DNA repair proteins such as ATM, DNA–PKcs, 53BP1, et al., leads to defects in the NHEJ repair which inhibit the production of functional B and T cells, leading to immunodeficiency [7,9,10,11]. In contrast, viral infection usually induces DNA damage via different mechanisms, such as inducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and host cell replication stress [12,13,14]. If DNA damage cannot be properly repaired, it will contribute to the amplification of viral infection-induced pathology. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether SARS–CoV–2 proteins hijack the DNA damage repair system, thereby affecting adaptive immunity in vitro.




If the Spike generated by the vaccines is also capable of localizing in the nucleus and doing the same thing, then the vaccine is, itself, actually an anti-vaccine. An immune sensitizer that damages the adaptive immune system.

The immune system doesn't just look for bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites and remove them. It also patrols for cancer cells.


According to Cole, he conducts around 40,000 biopsies a year as a pathologist and he has been seeing more cancers pop up in people who ordinarily would not be susceptible to developing the kinds of cancers he has been seeing. The only similarity between all of these people is that they have all been vaccinated.

Cole collected all of his data and attempted to contact other laboratories to aggregate a bigger dataset. For pointing out what he has observed, Cole said he was ridiculed and maligned.

“I have oncologists, I have radiation oncologists [tell me] ‘I am seeing an uptick in cancers,’ ‘I’m seeing these odd stable cancers take off like wildfires after the vaccines,'” said Cole. “It is happening. We need federal funding. The NIH [National Institutes of Health] isn’t looking at this. Getting a grant to look at anything related to the vaccines is next to impossible.”

Vaccine-induced lymphopenia is actually happening. Dear god.

Remember that chiropractor last year, Nathan Thompson, who said his clients were ending up with lymphopenia after the vaccine?


Basically, if these new reports are correct, then he was 100% right, and the vaccine is basically giving people a form of immunodeficiency somewhat akin to SCID.
 
So has anybody here actually met anybody who has had a severe reaction to one of the coronavirus vaccines? Back when they first came out the second dose of Moderna put my landlord in the ER because he couldn't breathe. He's the only one I've personally heard of though. Besides that, 2 of my unvaccinated coworkers were put in the hospital for over a week in the last 2 months because of this most recent covid wave, but they were both middle aged, and in the case of the woman, mildly overweight and asthmatic. Just wondering because it seems like it's really a good idea to get vaccinated if you're older or obese / asthmatic etc, but for younger people the benefit seems a lot more dubious, and reports about potential myocarditis, especially for younger men, make it seem like more of a risk than it's worth.
I posted not long ago about the healthy young woman who suddenly developed a massive tumor. But not sure if I ever shared about the friend who got the Pfizer right at the start of the campaign, because she qualified due to being over 60, who within minutes of the second shot collapsed with a massive coronary. I'm guessing it was a combo of hypercoagulation state from the first shot then an immune reaction following the second exposure, that triggered the heart attack.


Literally have never seen a "rectal" unit in an exam room, even peds ER- and peds are really the only ones you are supposed to use rectal for, babies who are so young a slight fever can be a red flag and who you can't get to reliably hold it in their mouth.

This looks fake af. Fortunately.
 
So has anybody here actually met anybody who has had a severe reaction to one of the coronavirus vaccines? Back when they first came out the second dose of Moderna put my landlord in the ER because he couldn't breathe. He's the only one I've personally heard of though. Besides that, 2 of my unvaccinated coworkers were put in the hospital for over a week in the last 2 months because of this most recent covid wave, but they were both middle aged, and in the case of the woman, mildly overweight and asthmatic. Just wondering because it seems like it's really a good idea to get vaccinated if you're older or obese / asthmatic etc, but for younger people the benefit seems a lot more dubious, and reports about potential myocarditis, especially for younger men, make it seem like more of a risk than it's worth.

Well, it wasn't a life threatening one, probably, but I did have one friend who took the shot like a week or two after having covid. His covid case had been pretty mild, but the Moderna shot decommissioned him for about two more weeks. Wracking pain, extremely high fevers bordering on hospitalization. He admitted to being way sicker than when he had covid, but still went back for two more. They made him sick, but not as sick as that first time.

So far no one has had a heart attack or died from anyone I know. One old lady who had covid, but didn't get the shot does have bone cancer now, but she also is like nearly 90... so that's not terribly surprising. I heard she got covid again, but haven't heard any other updates. Given that she was going though chemo, I wouldn't be surprised if her immune system took it harder.
 
So has anybody here actually met anybody who has had a severe reaction to one of the coronavirus vaccines? Back when they first came out the second dose of Moderna put my landlord in the ER because he couldn't breathe. He's the only one I've personally heard of though. Besides that, 2 of my unvaccinated coworkers were put in the hospital for over a week in the last 2 months because of this most recent covid wave, but they were both middle aged, and in the case of the woman, mildly overweight and asthmatic. Just wondering because it seems like it's really a good idea to get vaccinated if you're older or obese / asthmatic etc, but for younger people the benefit seems a lot more dubious, and reports about potential myocarditis, especially for younger men, make it seem like more of a risk than it's worth.
I have someone who was literally texting me about a health issue they developed after the vaccine before I dropped in this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria

Malaysia's study on ineffectiveness of Ivermectin treatment now in medical journal

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's clinical trial study on the ineffectiveness of a five-day Ivermectin treatment in reducing the risk of developing severe illness from Covid-19 has been published in an international peer-reviewed medical journal.

The study, titled "Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on Disease Progression Among Adults With Mild to Moderate Covid-19 and Comorbidities" was published on Feb 18 in the JAMA Internal Medicine, a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal published by the American Medical Association.

Health Minister Khairy Jamaluddin, in sharing the news, congratulated the Institute for Clinical Research (ICR) (one of the research institutes under the ministry's National Institute of Health) and its director Dr Kalaiarasu Periasamy.

"Malaysia's clinical trial on Ivermectin's ineffectiveness in reducing severe Covid-19 has been published in an international peer-reviewed medical journal. Congratulations @drkalai61 (https://twitter.com/drkalai61) and @ICR_NIH (https://twitter.com/ICR_NIH)", Khairy tweeted.

The Ivermectin Treatment Efficacy in Covid-19 High-Risk Patients (I-TECH) study was an open-label randomised clinical trial conducted at 20 public hospitals and a Covid-19 quarantine centre in Malaysia between May 31 and Oct 25, 2021.

Within the first week of patients' symptom onset, the study enrolled patients 50 years and older with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19, comorbidities, and mild to moderate disease.

The I-TECH study, which involved 490 patients researched if adding ivermectin, an inexpensive and widely available antiparasitic drug, to the standard of care reduces the risk of severe disease in patients with Covid-19 and comorbidities.

The findings of this clinical trial found that a five-day course of oral ivermectin administered during the first week of illness did not reduce the risk of developing the severe disease compared with the standard of care alone.

"In this randomised clinical trial of high-risk patients with mild to moderate Covid-19, ivermectin treatment during early illness did not prevent progression to severe disease. The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with Covid-19," the study concluded.

Health director-general Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah had on Nov 3, 2021, said based on the outcomes of the I-TECH study, Ivermectin cannot be recommended for inclusion in the current Covid-19 treatment guidelines.

This, he said was because Ivermectin did not reduce the risk of severe Covid-19 disease.

Noor Hisham had said the results of the I-TECH study were in line with the large-scale studies such as IVERCOR-Covid-19 from Argentina and TOGETHER from Brazil that does not support the routine use of Ivermectin in the clinical practice of Covid-19 treatment.

Didn't India had some success containing the virus by using Ivermectin and HCQ?
Can't we, like, ask them for the clinical test results or something? I mean, we already use folks from their region for cheap labour, would save us some money and time too.

Khairy: Malaysia still studying need for second booster dose

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is still studying if there is a need to administer a second round of Covid-19 booster jabs in order to curb the spread of the virus following the emergence of new and highly transmissible variants such as the Omicron.

Health Minister Khairy Jamaluddin said it is still unknown if a person's immunity against Covid-19 will still wane even after he or she has received their booster jab (third Covid-19 vaccine shot).

"From the very beginning, even the manufacturers (of Covid-19 vaccines) do not know whether the vaccines will be effective for a period of six months or more.

"However, we now know that some (portfolios of the) vaccines have shown a slight drop in their immunity against the virus after six months and that it must be topped-up (a person must be administered with a booster shot) to restore their level of immunity against the virus.

Therefore, we do not know if the immunity level will still decline (even after a person has received their booster jab) and if they need to be topped up (again). This we do not know yet," he told reporters here today.

Khairy, however, stressed this does not mean that Covid-19 vaccines do not curb the spread of the virus.

He said there are several indicators such as when Covid-19 cases reached their peak in August last year, and subsequently declined due to the acceleration of the Covid-19 National Immunisation Programme, leading to wider vaccination coverage among the population.

"This is strong evidence that the vaccine works (in the battle against Covid-19)," he said.

"From the very beginning, even the manufacturers (of Covid-19 vaccines) do not know whether the vaccines will be effective for a period of six months or more.
Then why make it mandatory in the first place?

"This is strong evidence that the vaccine works (in the battle against Covid-19)," he said.
How about for those who developed all sorts of health issues, or even dropped dead shortly after the jab?
I guess it does work, by removing the weak from the gene pool.

Got my booster the other day, the vaccination center lets you choose between the 3 flavours.
I stuck with Sinovac because I don't feel like knowing what's it like to mix-and-match stuff from a syringe.

The first few hours I felt like a fever coming in, which is easily handled by paracetamol.
Next day, every little ache/breathing issues I had was intensified. Went to a doctor, and got 2 days off out of it.
 
Plus the state of small business associations, wtf like really, even the small business owners activist groups are faggots as well.
I have family who owns a small business and the way they've talked about the NFIB makes me think they are to small business activism what the NRA is to gun rights. Ironically, this family member was an NRA member and was terminally addicted to Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.

@Rollin' On My Cadillac - Most studies that claim ivermectin is ineffective are structured like that. Basically, ivermectin must be taken immediately after exposure to the virus (and preferentially you're low-dosing on ivermectin constantly), or else it isn't effective. This is because ivermectin fights the virus itself, and the viral load is highest right around the onset of symptoms. Apparently this study may have been up 6-7 days after symptoms appeared, which is when the virus is mostly gone and the disease is primarily working through a runaway cascade of what it's done to your body.

I'm not sure how many studies have been properly done regarding ivermectin, but when you properly conduct a study that scientifically makes sense given how ivermectin medically works, they tend to show the effectiveness of the drug. I'd like to see opposing opinions, but you get shouted down, censored, and banned for "conspiracy theories" and "misinformation" pretty much everywhere (including here).

Oh yeah, get Sinovac no matter what you do if you absolutely must get vaxxed for whatever reason, it's generally regarded as the safest vaxx since it's a mostly ineffective placebo. The risk for harm, especially long-term, is clearly less than Pfizer, Moderna, or any of that garbage.
 
@Rollin' On My Cadillac

The Ivermectin Treatment Efficacy in Covid-19 High-Risk Patients (I-TECH) study was an open-label randomised clinical trial conducted at 20 public hospitals and a Covid-19 quarantine centre in Malaysia between May 31 and Oct 25, 2021.

Within the first week of patients' symptom onset, the study enrolled patients 50 years and older with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19, comorbidities, and mild to moderate disease.

All charts of COVID-19's clinical course show the same exact thing:

erj.ersjournals.png
www.acsh.png
www.frontiersin.png

Peak viral load occurs at day 0 to 2. The vast majority of people sick with moderate to severe COVID-19 come into the hospital by day 5 to 7. The viral load has already tapered off to almost nothing by that point.

The ideal time for people to take antivirals for COVID-19 is before any viral replication has occurred at all. That's only possible if they're taking them prophylactically, all the time. This is true of every antiviral that could conceivably be used for COVID-19. It doesn't matter which one. Remdesivir, Kaletra, HCQ, Ivermectin, whatever. If it's not being administered before peak viral load has occurred, it's not going to do anything beneficial at all. The treatment is very time-sensitive.

Imagine if someone tested defibrillators only on people who had already flatlined, and then decided that defibrillators have no medical utility whatsoever. That's what the people running these clinical trials are doing, and the media is going right along with them.


 
Back