Canadian Truckers Convoy 2022 - The Leaf calls you a Nazi as he gasses you

[Super-Chevy454]

This Twitterite, likely a government employee, has published a full list of MPs worth supporting down the road.

Memo to that twitterite, it'll be too sad if someone post online your house location and if something bad happen to your family....

 

[Dogfacefuke]

The Inquisition Begins

 

[Matt Damon]

Hmm, to think the murder of Harambe may have been the Franz Ferdinand that started clownworld...

A moment of silence for Harambe, heir to the Austro-Hungarian imperial throne.

 

[Netizennameless]

I'm going to ask something that I know is going to come off as incindiary, so I'd like to preface this whole post before I start by saying I'm not suggesting anyone do a terrorism in real life or Minecraft. If things weren't at such a boiling point around the world, I would probably not feel any reason to make such a statement. I'll probably x-post this in a couple of other threads because I want a wide swath of opinions and thoughts, as this is more a question that has been rolling around my head since I was a child (and I'm tired of getting the same answer of "look at history" because that's part of the issue I'm having). I'm fully willing to admit that I'm not very informed and definitely ignorant when it comes to this subject, so forgive me if I come off as crass or maybe too blunt.

Spoiler: At what point...

At what point do people, as a collective, decide that the only option is violence and turn on their leaders?

I always wondered this in class when we'd talk about Communism or the Third Reich, or really any other kind of monarchy or government overreach. It was easy to explain how a country go to that point and how a ruler or leader was able to easily usurp rights away from the people. But the part I never understood was how it always happened and was allowed to happen, and then one day everyone just decided they weren't alright with it. It's the middle area between the two events that I'm asking about specifically. When is everyone suddenly in agreement that it's gone too far. That's the answer that seems to vary from every tyranical situation, and why the answer "look at history" never sits well with me. The history doesn't look to be entirely consistent on that point.

There is never a time where everyone is suddenly agreement that it's gone too far. At some point enough people in the country decide they hate what's happening so much that they would rather die than keep up the status quo. That can be as little as 10-15% of the country. They either already have guns or they get them from an enemy of the state. Their will to fight is higher than the people loyal to the government, who often are only doing what they're told under threat of unpersoning. As soon as the government lackeys sense the tide turning they either try to switch sides, or if they were really part of the oppression they try to flee. The winning side usually kills all the extremists or the extremists suddenly change or get quiet about their views. When history is written, it's written by the new regime and everyone who wasn't personally there only gets the cliff-notes that support the winning worldview.

It's easy to answer how much it takes for one person to break. I think all of us could answer that question. But at what point does an entire country break? Is it when everyone's family and friends starts disappearing in the night? When money dries up? When the streets are lined with poverty? When promises of the rich and powerful to the poor and starved stay unfulfilled? When your kids are taken as property of the ruler and turned into workers/drones/tools? Is it when the missles start falling on your neighborhood? Is it when the tanks roll down your city block? When air raid sirens become another day that ends in "y"? When your church is targeted? When your politics are targeted? When your guns and weapons are taken?

it's when enough people, who are willing to kill and by and large have nothing to lose, form a coherent resistance. Usually it's when the military brass loses faith in its leaders but not always.

All of this stuff still happens in the modern day. We can look to any country in the world and see some enactment of the same things playing out that have played out throughout history. Not to sound condescending, but this is why the "look to history" answer bothers me and comes off as a non-answer. It implies that we solved the issues of the past and that we need only look to them for answers on how to prevent them in the present day. Except that isn't true at all; they're all still happening. Looking to history didn't prevent anything.

It's because we HAVE solved the problems of the past. The only way we get here is because most of the people around last time this happened are no longer here to warn people about it and educational systems today are designed to not teach the lessons to the next generation.

Maybe that's the answer right there. Maybe everyone is always thinking the same thing, but they're waiting for someone else to fire the--metaphorical--first shot, and after that is when everyone unifies. I think that's honestly why there's an increase in fed-posts on every board and thread I've been in (aside from the standard edgy teens and actual glowniggery). I think there is a contigient of people on the internet that are venting what they can't say in public. In my personal life, many people have said the words "(x) needs to be hung/shot/guillotined," over the last couple of years. They're at the point of violence, but won't be the ones to start it. I don't think it's presumptuous to say that there's probably a lot of people that feel that way.

There's a reason people on this board say whites go from zero to lynching in no time. Also, when one of your friends or loved ones goes to war, it's easier for you to go to war too. Even if you don't care about the cause, you care about your loved ones.

So I guess in summation, what I'm asking is: in the modern age of tyranny, what is the final push before the inevitable violence? And...Are we living at the boiling point, or are we living in the hyphonated part of an reign of terror in someone else's text book; you know, those middle years that aren't worth remembering between the starting year and ending year where everyone went along with everything. Or are we finally at the end? Which part of the future children's history book are we?

It depends. Things are escalating though.

 

[Jarolleon]

This translator is fucking up the conservative ministers questions while flawlessly translating Trudeau.
Edit:
View attachment 3003881

There doesn't even have to be a direct order for this. If the translator is Liberal, she already knows what every Liberal is going to say.

I've long held this belief in quiet hope. The bugman movement is actually based. All they are doing is ending their bloodlines, or at the very least, making their offspring weak as fuck so as to not pose a problem for the real ones.
Granted this is a problem if we need a strong base of cannon fodder for some outside force (ie: china) but on a strictly domestic table resetting horizon, the kinderpilled will easily rise to power.

Ceding the future to the Quiverfull Movement?

 

[Kiwisee]

Memo to that twitterite, it'll be too sad if someone post online your house location and if something bad happen to your family....

I’m too poor to afford unlocking her info. But I get the feeling she has more than one property, given her income:

 

[a lurking leaf]

Liberals being so worried about war monuments when wearing a red poppy on Rememberance day isn't inclusive enough and possibly racist. This is an article from the UK, but we have something similar here.

Remembrance Day 2019: What are the LGBT poppies? Different colour poppy meanings revealed

TODAY is remembrance day and many people are commemorating the occasion by wearing a poppy as an emblem of respect for those who died fighting in the First World War. But what exactly are LGBT poppies?

www.express.co.uk

They hate all those white men who fought for Canada but suddenly a war monument is uber important.
Sure Jan.

Even just during this convoy protest they all flipped out over the vets (gasp) taking down the fences to clean the war monument
Like these same people just toppled an old white guy statue themselves not even a week(? maybe 2) ago but they suddenly care about a ~symbol of colonialism~ or whatever

 

[draggs]

Parliament is making me quite mad at the real world lol

The Liberal Party and their NPD lackeys and running dogs are building their case for tyranny imposed upon anyone who opposes them, including opposition MPs, based on the most ludicrous lies and delusions you couldn't convince a child of, and the Conservatives and Frogs keep dancing in response. I'm not asking for the ghost of Winston Churchill to manifest and spit some absolute fire, it would be nice to see someone in the opposition acknowledge the gravity of the moment though

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

Millennials and gen Z are gay, very, very fucking gay. While this seems like both a problem and a sign of the times, it's actually to our advantage. The left wing has, in droves, opted to make themselves non-reproductives in one way or another. They will not have kids, and sane people will. Now you might be thinking "who cares, most liberals of today also had conservative parents", but the difference is that they had milquetoast conservative boomer parents whose way of life was normalized in the culture. They didn't have to watch as the hungry caterpillar was replaced in public libraries by books about 4 year old trannies. These parents are collectivizing quietly, far more than their own parents ever did, and their aim to keep this shit away from their kids.

Agree - that path towards the future may be long and trying but the reproductives certainly have the home-field advantage.

However, this doesn't necessarily guarantee a quick victory. Marxism/collectivism has always been a non-reproductive ideology (e.g. believers generally die out faster than they reproduce). The issue is the ideology is very infectious, which is why it's been able to continue growing in spite of its end result leading inevitably to famine and genocide. Marxism is a disease of the mind that turns people into non-reproductive bugmen and becomes fatal when a country reaches a critical mass of infected.

There is currently no long-term victory condition for the bugmen. If the reproductives can start inoculating their children faster than they can be infected with the bugman virus, it will definitely die out in a generation like you said. If the bugman virus reaches globalhomo wet dream levels of infection, then we're in for a rough few hundred years but, ultimately, the reproductives will rise from the ashes of the destroyed global society and rebuild.

The really scary future is where the globohomos fix the bugmen reproduction problem - maybe through cloning and an expansion of the public educational system to parent the next generation in coom, consoom, and troon. In this sense, the reproductives waking up might be a race against the clock.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

View attachment 3003989

View attachment 3003990
I hate polls but this is still interesting
Attached the pdf

edit: more interesting ones
View attachment 3003992
View attachment 3003993
View attachment 3003995

I don't understand how the govt/media can be distrusted but science/healthcare is trusted lol

Oh boy, the majority of people in Canada now know what we've always known all along, that the media makes shit up. This is by itself a huge win.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

I’m too poor to afford unlocking her info. But I get the feeling she has more than one property, given her income:
View attachment 3004018

Looks like it's only the tip of the iceberg. What a socialist hypocrite.

 

[LeChampion1992]

WWI kicked off because of some irrelevant prince from a backwater state with a vague connection to German royalty got murked by a fucking gypsy which sparked off a chain of events that dragged the entire world into it. Don't think for a second that if shit pops off in Canada that the US and China won't get involved. If the Liberals don't deescalate and stop with the inflammatory language right now things there is a very real chance something will pop off. The working class Canadian people aren't nearly as broken and complacent as the urban bugmen seem to think they are.

If the liberals don't end the emergencies act and continue to roll out these authoritarian measures I mean they will push themselves into a war and worse then that they risk dragging the US into a civil conflict too.

 

[DumbDude42]

I've long held this belief in quiet hope. The bugman movement is actually based. All they are doing is ending their bloodlines, or at the very least, making their offspring weak as fuck so as to not pose a problem for the real ones.
Granted this is a problem if we need a strong base of cannon fodder for some outside force (ie: china) but on a strictly domestic table resetting horizon, the kinderpilled will easily rise to power.

for every 1 right wing family having 3+ kids, there are 20 third world immigrant families having 6+ kids each.
demographics are NOT in your favor.

 

[naffatune]

It's time.

Two convoys have just appeared in:

Montana... (EDIT: Ignore! This is old footage. Go to my postings for details)

...and Colorado.

BONUS: Here's a clip of Daniel Bulford detailing his arrest.

(courtesy of @VigilantFox)

 

[CognitiveDeficiency]

A moment of silence for Harambe, heir to the Austro-Hungarian imperial throne.

Dicks out for Harambe

 

[FightenGnome]

The Liberal Party just implied that the Conservatives are supporting an armed plot to murder RCMP officers.
View attachment 3003895

Shit is getting spicy. People are yelling over one another, they are going to start ejecting people if this keeps up.

These parliament proceedings are increasingly looking like the Star Wars prequels. It won't be long now until Trudeau reforms Canada into the first Galactic Empire.

 

[LeChampion1992]

I'm going to ask something that I know is going to come off as incindiary, so I'd like to preface this whole post before I start by saying I'm not suggesting anyone do a terrorism in real life or Minecraft. If things weren't at such a boiling point around the world, I would probably not feel any reason to make such a statement. I'll probably x-post this in a couple of other threads because I want a wide swath of opinions and thoughts, as this is more a question that has been rolling around my head since I was a child (and I'm tired of getting the same answer of "look at history" because that's part of the issue I'm having). I'm fully willing to admit that I'm not very informed and definitely ignorant when it comes to this subject, so forgive me if I come off as crass or maybe too blunt.

Spoiler: At what point...

At what point do people, as a collective, decide that the only option is violence and turn on their leaders?

I always wondered this in class when we'd talk about Communism or the Third Reich, or really any other kind of monarchy or government overreach. It was easy to explain how a country go to that point and how a ruler or leader was able to easily usurp rights away from the people. But the part I never understood was how it always happened and was allowed to happen, and then one day everyone just decided they weren't alright with it. It's the middle area between the two events that I'm asking about specifically. When is everyone suddenly in agreement that it's gone too far. That's the answer that seems to vary from every tyranical situation, and why the answer "look at history" never sits well with me. The history doesn't look to be entirely consistent on that point.

It's easy to answer how much it takes for one person to break. I think all of us could answer that question. But at what point does an entire country break? Is it when everyone's family and friends starts disappearing in the night? When money dries up? When the streets are lined with poverty? When promises of the rich and powerful to the poor and starved stay unfulfilled? When your kids are taken as property of the ruler and turned into workers/drones/tools? Is it when the missles start falling on your neighborhood? Is it when the tanks roll down your city block? When air raid sirens become another day that ends in "y"? When your church is targeted? When your politics are targeted? When your guns and weapons are taken?

All of this stuff still happens in the modern day. We can look to any country in the world and see some enactment of the same things playing out that have played out throughout history. Not to sound condescending, but this is why the "look to history" answer bothers me and comes off as a non-answer. It implies that we solved the issues of the past and that we need only look to them for answers on how to prevent them in the present day. Except that isn't true at all; they're all still happening. Looking to history didn't prevent anything.

Maybe that's the answer right there. Maybe everyone is always thinking the same thing, but they're waiting for someone else to fire the--metaphorical--first shot, and after that is when everyone unifies. I think that's honestly why there's an increase in fed-posts on every board and thread I've been in (aside from the standard edgy teens and actual glowniggery). I think there is a contigient of people on the internet that are venting what they can't say in public. In my personal life, many people have said the words "(x) needs to be hung/shot/guillotined," over the last couple of years. They're at the point of violence, but won't be the ones to start it. I don't think it's presumptuous to say that there's probably a lot of people that feel that way.

So I guess in summation, what I'm asking is: in the modern age of tyranny, what is the final push before the inevitable violence? And...Are we living at the boiling point, or are we living in the hyphonated part of an reign of terror in someone else's text book; you know, those middle years that aren't worth remembering between the starting year and ending year where everyone went along with everything. Or are we finally at the end? Which part of the future children's history book are we?

I mean we're in the escalation stages right before the conflict and actual fighting breaks out. Now is the time to lookout for things.
Police stations being overthrown, riots/protests continue on for weeks on end, there seems to be a sense of desperation from the government.

Unironically look at the vice videos on Ukraine from 2013/2014 from December to May vice had been doing a good series of videos documenting what a civil war might look like.

If Canada were to be compared to Ukraine right now where in the low part. This is around the part where the protesters are either ousted or the government thinks they have full control.

As for wars to occur you don't need the populace starving en masse to have a revolution. All you need is either a sense that the government isn't fair and needs to be replaced as well as the sense that things will only get worse when you comply. The way how Canada went full mask off. There is a very good chance the government thinks you're all disarmed bugmen.

However I think they're going to underestimate our side so to speak.

 

[ulsterscotsman]

When is enough, enough for Canadians at this point?

 

[Check Your Roof]

It's time.

Two convoys have just appeared in:

Montana...

View attachment 3004043

...and Colorado.

View attachment 3004044

BONUS: Here's a clip of Daniel Bulford detailing his arrest.

View attachment 3004051

(courtesy of @VigilantFox)

LET'S FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

[Ser Prize]

I hate the NDP so fucking much. It's like they exist to be the second liberals.