- Joined
- Dec 3, 2020
The russian stance is that they won WWII alone when the fact is that if it wasnt for all the free shit we gave them they would've at best signed another surrender like during WWI or get wiped out leaving a crippled germany that could be taken out with a fraction of the actual forces we had to employ.Isn't the Russian stance that the Werwolf campaign was made unnecessary because the allies started working with the nazis?
View attachment 3012882
If anything we're the real retards for helping these commies back then just like we did during the commie-caused famine of 1921 which basically saved the commie regime from total collapse.
2nd strike its easier than it seems, ukraine already has a rocket industry and it would be relatively easy for them to build their own ICBMs. Then there's cruise missiles which are far easier to make. Even a single low-flying cruise missile with a decent warhead would deal far too much damage to moscow for the russians to take the risk, and you can launch tens if not hundreds of those missiles from a few reinforced bunkers.That wasnt an Issue till the coup of 2014 also nukes are not a good deterrent as long as you dont have 2nd strike capabilities, thats alot of investment for a poor country like ukraine.
If anything not propping up ukraine since the fall of the ussr was a massive fuckup from our part, we wouldn't be having any issues with russia if they had a nuclear-capable neighbor with a lot of bad blood with them.