Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Pat's exposure to the public goes great as always

View attachment 3020674
lol it is really delightful watching unwitting strangers interact with him.
1.png3.png2.png
 

To be fair, that could be the premise for a Stanhope or Jefferies joke. To also be fair, Stanhope and to a much lesser extent Jefferies are talented comedians who can craft a laugh out of a dark or even psychopathic premise. To be still fairer, we have seen the "jokes" Patrick is capable of crafting, and something without a "please give this sad divorced man some pity laughs" subtext is simply not in his comedy wheelhouse
It's not a terrible joke premise, though it's written exceptionally poorly. But what really kills it is using 'gaslight' instead of 'convince' or even 'lie to'. It turns the joke malicious and sad. Which is a very good summary of Pat generally.
 
War is not fun, Patrick. War is a senseless waste of human life.
Every single metabolic process of Fat Rick from the cellular to the organic is a senseless waste of human life.
Of course he does. Pat literally believes there's a woman Ukrainian pilot going around in a "highly upgraded, customized 40 year old plane" shooting down Russian jets who goes by "Ghost of Kyiv", like some stupid woke remake of a cheesy 80s action movie. He probably believes they're a black woman or a lesbian, too. So of course he thinks that beating tanks and stormtroopers is that easy. I mean his side are the good guys after all, they have plot armor.
Is that shit even remotely plausible? I have no real clue on the subject, other than mil geeks seem to have a generally low opinion of most Russian military capabilities but think that they're specifically top-notch on anti-aircraft shit. If they wanted a specific plane they'd get it. Is there some (exaggerated) factual basis for this or is it just pure mythology?
- Throw paint balloons at tanks. Presumably with the accuracy of an MLB pitcher (you ain't going to get a second throw)
Since Pat thinks that's a good idea, he should be drafted into service in the official Ukrainian paint balloon squad and go take out tanks with his foolproof method. He can also bring along as many troons as he likes, and they can all carry paint in the color of one or more troon flag colors.
 
Last edited:
The "Ghost of Kyiv" rumor turned out to be totally fake.

As far as I know it's still in the "unlikely but possible" territory.
Aren't those things recessed and protected by mesh to prevent this sort of thing anyway?

This would never work for a number of reasons:
1. Tanks have multiple periscopes. The Driver, gunner, and commander all have one, and the gunner and the commander each have a machine gun on some tanks.
2. Tanks don't just run around on thier own, they have infantry and other tanks with them.
3. Periscopes are recessed to keep them put of the rain IIRC, and the military has probably considered the fact that mud or dirt might get on the periscope and devised a way to clean it.


Also, the "throw molotov cocktails at the engine" is very iffy advice, that worked on WW2 tanks I have no idea if it does on modern ones (the Abrams in particular is supposedly immune due to its engine running hotter than any molotov could possibly burn, but Russia tanks don't have turbine engines).

Is that shit even remotely plausible? I have no real clue on the subject, other than mil geeks seem to have a generally low opinion of most Russian military capabilities but think that they're specifically top-notch on anti-aircraft shit. If they wanted a specific plane they'd get it. Is there some (exaggerated) factual basis for this or is it just pure mythology?

It's plausible, yes. The MIG 29 is an older model aircraft, but most of Russia's air force is of a similar vintage and the 29 is not sold it's totally out classed.
 
He's stopped fighting the commies openly, and is now blocking everyone and hiding their replies.
This shows he can comprehend the form of how to handle people making fun of you on twitter while being a massive pussy (block, hide replies, don't engage), but can't figure it out when the pests and their nightmare world of Patrick's wittier possessions clown him on twitter...like, that's intentional, so when he's engaging with his toilet like a lunatic it is because he actually thinks it benefits him to do so.

That's so much worse than just being plain ol' tarded and not knowing how to handle getting clowned in general. :story:
 
He's encouraging Ukrainian citizens to put themselves in danger...

View attachment 3018905

He's actually enjoying this war. What a psychopath, fat too.

Someone points out how stupid it is to encourage civilians to sabotage tanks, Pat counts their followers in response.

View attachment 3018927

Edit: Now he's making the war all about himself.

View attachment 3018953
Pat is advocating putting human beings in ovens? what a fucking (fat) Nazi!
 
Remember this is someone who thinks that replying to every single interaction with "No U" will somehow win a war of attrition against an army of trolls who massively outnumber him, don't take the interaction as seriously as he does, collectively have near-infinite resources and actively want him to engage with them as much as possible.

What I'm saying is that Fatrick has never been a particularly good conflict strategist.
 
Remember this is someone who thinks that replying to every single interaction with "No U" will somehow win a war of attrition against an army of trolls who massively outnumber him, don't take the interaction as seriously as he does, collectively have near-infinite resources and actively want him to engage with them as much as possible.

What I'm saying is that Fatrick has never been a particularly good conflict strategist.
Wrong as always, stalker. Please come back when you have more than ten followers, little baby child.
 
Back