Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
Official Ukraine government account on Twitter is now taking cryptocurrency donations.
Ukraine.jpg
 
Another case of shills screaming genocide when if it is a genocide it is the slowest most inefficient genocide in history

Ukraine isn't genociding Russians Russia isn't genociding Ukrainians it is all just reeeing

Genocide ? Not by eastern european standards. A Genocide was the Russification program of the soviet union, or the Holodomor.
But still bombing the living fuck out of Russian civvies ? Yes. Denying this is retarded as the war in Ukraine is well documented (by the west btw.)
Or do you think that every "separatist" Russian babushka living in Ukraine that gets Baytaktarded into paste is a KGB special glow-in-the-dark partisan unit ?
That the entire war that was there before was nice and clean and 100% wasnt full of messy revenge for previously mentioned genocides ?
The Separatists are 100% reeeing more than they really should, but are you surprised ? Id do the same after some fucker just bombed me.
 
>Russia hostile takesover land
>thousands of people died, including civilians
>livelihood and wealth of many more destroyed
>Putin have open intention to dismantlement whole state and put current leader on trail
>But
>Both sides bad

:story:
@Strix454, for your sake I hope you get paid. Because this is olympic medal in mental gymnastics.
Keep in mind the US have started this conflict
 
I don't really understand why every other country is starting to make this their business, is it because Russia? Virtue signaling on a macro scale? Stating the obvious but the hypocrisy is disgustingly blatant, especially from the countries that effectively do the same thing in the shadows or pretend not to see the shit china does on the daily. This really isn't their business to get involved in and they're going to make it worse, but maybe that's what they want.
 
Okay, serious question for military, poli-sci and historians.

IIRC, the Geneva convention has provisions that any actor aiding and abetting the enemy can legally be considered an enemy combatant?

If true and correct, then would that not apply to nations giving military aid and entities promoting propaganda? So NATO nations sending weapons. CNN, twitter etc.

Enemy combatant applies to individuals and groups on the battlefield. The appropriate term for a country in this situation
is belligenrent. There are no rules regulating what you call "propaganda". Weapons sales to countries do not themselves
make a country into a belligenrent in a war.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Granate37
Putin using this war is control/reduce the gopnik (Russian chav) population as fodder, then use the "real" soldiers afterwards.
 
Reports are saying that's actually AA smoke. Seems like it's too few "parachutes" to be paratroopers as well.
this doesn't look like paratroopers to me, there's way too few of them (who drops 12 paratroopers at a time?) and the parachutes look too big, but the jpeg is so crusty I can't really say for sure what it is

My source also corrected the information immediately, apologies for the false info.
correction.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Delicious Diversity
Here is a video of two armored vehicles attacking each in the streets of Kiev and people just go driving by like normal.
View attachment 3020493

View attachment 3020505
Hold on...are we sure this isn't related to that video of a "Russian" MT-LB (technically an SA-13 SP-SAM) swerving and running over a civilian car from a few days ago? Because they look like exactly the same vehicle, and that was apparently in Kyiv as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back