Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, it's just like the number of Covid cases since January 2020.

Absolutely meaningless numbers, only designed to push an agenda.

brah, I've seen most of the vids and photos as they came out. People repost shit from many days ago, twisting, taking out context non-stop ... I have no desire or will left to comment to every one of the dumb post people want to make.

Normies are getting involved and true autists need to pull back and get some sleep.
 
Cyrillic letter for Z is actually Q

It isn't. Letter З is for "z", "z" as a graph has no meaning in that alphabet.

It wasn't just "communists are bigger, let's give them seat" propagated by communist states. Even France and Great Britain wanted CCP to have UNSC seat because they knew that power of Taiwan was essentially non-existant compared to Mainland.
Of course there was much more shit involved. Sometimes I believe you must be very highly autistic to be involved in politics because half of the time it makes no sense.
True and honest question: you are stupid or just prettending? Someone asked for a mechanism to change a country in UN council, so I provide it. I'm not beating how much probable it is at this point.
 
This is just a guess, but I'd assume his ejector seat caught fire. Those things actually have no shit rockets on them which are meant to get the pilot away from the plane as fast as possible.

Yeah something happened there...his parachute was intact but his body caught fire in the air but nothing around him is burned on the ground.

Which means he burned to death in the sky but not so much that his parachute caught fire and the fire stopped before he hit the ground. Poor guy.

Strange
 
71A80850-C9D4-4456-8648-EB1B93EAC280.jpeg

It’s over. Russia is now confirmed to beat Ukraine
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I posted this in A&N but please forgive cross-posting. Maybe should have been here all along.

I'm trying to figure out Putin's behaviour. He has never appeared a fool to me, quite the contrary. But current course seems reckless at best, a catastrophic error quite probably. I think his attempt to capture Kiev is an attempt to put himself in a strong bargaining position before negotiations begin. Then he can fall back to the breakaway regions and take them under Russia's wing for evermore. When haggling, you always ask for more than you're willing to settle for or you don't even get that. This is what I think he wants to achieve. And if so then he likely thinks Russian forces can capture Kiev before negotiations begin. But, I could be wrong - maybe he wants the whole country. I don't know what Ukraine's forces and distribution are like - it may be that if he can capture Kiev and if the bulk of the Ukranian forces are isolated and cut off in the South like someone suggested last night, perhaps he thinks he can roll up the rest of the country once Kiev is occupied. But, the former goal seems more rational to me.

All of the above what I think Putin's game plan is, not necessarily what I think will work or how it will play out.

The deeper point is why go so far in the first place. I think Putin feels Russian sovreignty is genuinely under threat. We all speculate on these forums about "globohomo" and the globalist agenda is undeniable. It's also undeniable that there has been very aggressive economic and military pressure on Russia for a long time now. Whether that being US going all out on stopping Nordstream 2 or when they backed and formented the 2014 revolution that ousted the elected Ukranian govt. Or if it be encouraging Ukraine to be a "client state of the globalist agenda" as someone called it and raise NATO membership as a possibility. All of these things are real. The USA went pretty beserk when the Soviets started moving military forces into Cuba. And though it's surely largely a post-fact justification, Ukraine does have actual Nazis there (and not the "I believe there are two genders" kind) and around 14,000 people have died in the region's conflict in the last eight years or so.

My TL;DR of all this is that when you see someone acting irrationally or taking massive gambles, it's usually because they're desperate. It's in the endgame when you start trying desperate Hail Mary's. I'm not saying that the current course of action is right but I'm saying that the forces that have been encroaching on Russia are obviously real and that Putin's behaviour can perhaps be explained as a desperate gambit by a losing country player. What's the alternative? Slowly watch Russia collapse inward under Western backed NGOs, sanctions, fomented colour revolutions and missile bases on all sides? He's a Judo practitioner. He recognizes that the moment of defeat is when your opponent gets the lock on you, not when you actually pass out.
 
Are there even mechanisms to remove a security council member?
No. None. The whole point of the "permanent member" of the council thing is that its permanent.

You also can't remove them from the United Nations because that would require a vote of the security council which they would veto.

Just as there are people trying to figure out crazy ways to invoke NATO article 5 without a real attack on a NATO member, there
are other people dreaming up crazy ways to remove the Soviet Union from the UN. I've seen two so far:

1) People could argue that Russia is not a member of the UN because its holding the seat that belonged originally to the USSR.
and that Russia is not a valid successor state to the USSR. This has precedent in the case of Serbia in the 1990s and the seat
of Yugoslavia at the UN.

2) The UN could choose to seat a non-Putin delegation at the UN to represent Russia. This would effectively take away Russia's
seat at the UN without taking it away.

From a legal point of view, if you actually remove a country from the United Nations it effectively becomes Nazi Germany
in international law. Any member of the United Nations could do anything it wanted to that non-member state and it
would be acceptable under international law. That is how the US went to Serbia in the 1990s. Serbia was not a member of
the UN after the break-up of Yugoslavia which gave the US the right to go to war with it and to rearrange its borders in a way
that would have been clearly illegal if it had been a member of the UN.

But all this is kind of pointless. If Joe Biden wants to go to war with Russia, legal matters of the UN charter are not going to
stop him. Same with article 5 and NATO. The American population has been mentally prepared for war now. If Biden
makes a choice for war now, nothing will stop it.

We are collectively doomed.
 
Isn't he the guy who was routinely wrong about the stock market? The one who would wave a bat around all the time?

Why the fuck is he talking about military strategy now? I'm more likely to trust CoD tubers than this faggot.
Oh wait, fuck, from back in the day that was essentially a paid TV shill for certain markets? How is he A. Alive and B. Aware of what the fuck is going on across the world from the bomb shelter he crawled into when everyone pointed out he was a fucking moron?
 
I posted this in A&N but please forgive cross-posting. Maybe should have been here all along.

I'm trying to figure out Putin's behaviour. He has never appeared a fool to me, quite the contrary. But current course seems reckless at best, a catastrophic error quite probably.

The problem with understanding Putin's behavior is that nobody knows the end-game he has mind for Ukraine. Until we know what his ultimate intentions for
ending the conflict are, we cannot understand his behavior.
 
Is actual nukes bring primed, or is this fog of war as usual? I don't even get it because Putin's goal is acquiring Ukraine and making it a puppet country. How do that when its gone or fallout radiation is blasted so high its unhabitable? There's also Chernobyl there.
1645978632287.png

Please for the love of God Putin, nuke Detroit. And San Francisco, LA, pretty much all of the West Coast, NYC, Miami, Orlando, Tampa, OKC, Austin, New Orleans, and Minneapolis.
 
I posted this in A&N but please forgive cross-posting. Maybe should have been here all along.

I'm trying to figure out Putin's behaviour. He has never appeared a fool to me, quite the contrary. But current course seems reckless at best, a catastrophic error quite probably. I think his attempt to capture Kiev is an attempt to put himself in a strong bargaining position before negotiations begin. Then he can fall back to the breakaway regions and take them under Russia's wing for evermore. When haggling, you always ask for more than you're willing to settle for or you don't even get that. This is what I think he wants to achieve. And if so then he likely thinks Russian forces can capture Kiev before negotiations begin. But, I could be wrong - maybe he wants the whole country. I don't know what Ukraine's forces and distribution are like - it may be that if he can capture Kiev and if the bulk of the Ukranian forces are isolated and cut off in the South like someone suggested last night, perhaps he thinks he can roll up the rest of the country once Kiev is occupied. But, the former goal seems more rational to me.

All of the above what I think Putin's game plan is, not necessarily what I think will work or how it will play out.

The deeper point is why go so far in the first place. I think Putin feels Russian sovreignty is genuinely under threat. We all speculate on these forums about "globohomo" and the globalist agenda is undeniable. It's also undeniable that there has been very aggressive economic and military pressure on Russia for a long time now. Whether that being US going all out on stopping Nordstream 2 or when they backed and formented the 2014 revolution that ousted the elected Ukranian govt. Or if it be encouraging Ukraine to be a "client state of the globalist agenda" as someone called it and raise NATO membership as a possibility. All of these things are real. The USA went pretty beserk when the Soviets started moving military forces into Cuba. And though it's surely largely a post-fact justification, Ukraine does have actual Nazis there (and not the "I believe there are two genders" kind) and around 14,000 people have died in the region's conflict in the last eight years or so.

My TL;DR of all this is that when you see someone acting irrationally or taking massive gambles, it's usually because they're desperate. It's in the endgame when you start trying desperate Hail Mary's. I'm not saying that the current course of action is right but I'm saying that the forces that have been encroaching on Russia are obviously real and that Putin's behaviour can perhaps be explained as a desperate gambit by a losing country player. What's the alternative? Slowly watch Russia collapse inward under Western backed NGOs, sanctions, fomented colour revolutions and missile bases on all sides? He's a Judo practitioner. He recognizes that the moment of defeat is when your opponent gets the lock on you, not when you actually pass out.
my tl;dr answer is that putin is a subhuman retard monkey

1645980204182.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back