- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
In Nick's mind "under the guidance of a stolen valour idiot who roleplayed as a lawyer".[long sobering pause[ That's the summary of this case."![]()
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In Nick's mind "under the guidance of a stolen valour idiot who roleplayed as a lawyer".[long sobering pause[ That's the summary of this case."![]()
No commentors can matter until black ones do.I heard @WhimsicalTrolli got banned from there on Monday. He's like one of the few black people that follows Comicsgate. Vikki and Dean are racist confirmed. #BLACKLIVESMATTER.![]()
This is your future, Dean. Spectre had a bigger audience than you and he deleted over 80 videos dating back 3 or 4 years, including the ones on this lawsuit. Was he concerned about his own legal liability, or was this part of a settlement with Preston?
Probably, yeah.In Nick's mind "under the guidance of a stolen valour idiot who roleplayed as a lawyer".
This is because Spectre failed, he knows he failed, and is therefore he's gonna pretend he didn't fail by ignoring the issue entirely.As far as I can tell, Spectre hasn't tweeted anything about this case since early January despite Preston pegging him.
Dumb cunt is gonna be Preston's personal anal gland expresser when he is done with her.No commentors can matter until black ones do.
Update
She's hiding and negrating because she's going have to clean dog anal glands for the rest of her menopausal childless life.
View attachment 3010619
For anyone that's interested, and I really mean no one -- who wants to watch hundreds of hours of his streams?This is your future, Dean. Spectre had a bigger audience than you and he deleted over 80 videos dating back 3 or 4 years, including the ones on this lawsuit. Was he concerned about his own legal liability, or was this part of a settlement with Preston?
It's been almost 5 months since his last YouTube video on the case, and he hasn't tweeted anything about it since early January despite all the updates and Preston pegging him. Maybe he's decided his reporting isn't important, and he's just going to livestream games from now on. Below is a short clip showing the apex of Dean's master plan--secretly have Spectre do all the hard work, and then once the motion to dismiss was granted, pull back the curtain and rub it in Preston's face. But Spectre couldn't keep his big mouth shut and blabbed before the reply brief had even been filed. He took off the Dean mask because he wanted everyone to know it was actually The Spectre who vanquished the evil Preston, and now he wishes they would forget.
View attachment 3010623
View attachment 3010596
FULL ARCHIVE: DA Talks' Reply Brief (Preston Poulter v. Ethan van Sciver Lolsuit)
Streamed live on Oct 3, 2021
View attachment 3010863
![]()
DA Talks' Reply Brief (Preston Poulter v. Ethan van Sciver Lolsuit) -…
archived 7 Oct 2021 04:01:55 UTCarchive.ph
I dunno, but that's actually a complement. Turn on the news. Russia is winning. Just like Preston is technically winning against Dean and Vikki.For all the gossip about Trudeau being Fidel Castro's love-child does anyone know if Preston's mom ever spent time in Russia?
View attachment 3012936
View attachment 3012937
When will we see Preston's annexation of the dog grooming facility?I dunno, but that's actually a complement. Turn on the news. Russia is winning. Just like Preston is technically winning against Dean and Vikki.
Brigadier Admiral Fahey's leadership of the "Dean Defense Forces" fucking sucks ass. Incompetent lying faggot isn't even fit to run a third-rate tribal militia out of the blackest part of Africa.
View attachment 3014697
Uh huh. Sure.
She lies about people all the time & defames them. So in the grand scheme of things, she deserves this.In terms of what Vikki is known to have said and what is in the complaint, she did almost nothing that could rise to the level of defamation IMO. Dean and FROG both said worse things
from a legal point of view. (and I still don't think any of their stuff rises to defamation either).
The worst direct quotes they could find were the following:
“Created woman that looked like they were underage.”
“a woman that looks like that you would go to jail for f_______.”
“its Loli in 3D reflection.”
“just because Loli is legal it doesn’t mean it not child porn.” (a double negative)
“woman that are created young enough to look like they’re underage.”
I've yet to see anything attributed to her that defamed Preston at all. The only quotes they could come up with to defame Lamont
are those that offer an opinion that he draws characters that appear to be underaged.
From a strictly legal point of view, the lawsuit is within reason. Its within reason in the same way that the lawsuits of the mountain jews
are considered within reason by the federal courts. People have a right to bring legal actions that are bad and a waste of time & money.
But on the other side, these lawsuits were all stupid in that if properly defended, they would have all failed on the question of jurisdiction.
All the precedent in the 5th Circuit (including Texas) was against jurisdiction being granted in this case.
There are three kinds of people that go silent out of a sudden, Smart people that are confident, people that messed up and at the point of return who will learn their lesson and the last one is the same expect they're at the point of no return and haven't learnt jack shit.Dean has been very quiet, we don't know what happened Wednesday. Did you end up hiring a lawyer for the first time in 9 months? Are ya finally going to start winning son?
You're retarded. Kill yourself.She lies about people all the time & defames them. So in the grand scheme of things, she deserves this.
On a specific level, you aren’t a judge so you can’t be the one to say if this lawsuit is bullshit or not. Point is, vikki lies & defames people so it finally caught up to her. I’d hardly call this lawsuit “bullshit”. Your judgment is clouded by the general hatred for Preston. There is valid reason to accuse vikki of defamation, it’s up to a judge to see if in this particular case if it holds up in the court of law. It’s not like Preston made something up that is completely untrue just to sue. In his head, she is spreading lies & defamation about him (just as she does with literally EVERYONE, how anyone can deny this is insane) & figured he’d do something about it
Let me help you out here.She lies about people all the time & defames them. So in the grand scheme of things, she deserves this.
Disagree. If that were true, I don't think you'd see so many people pointing out here that their defense strategy was all sorts of retarded.Your judgment is clouded by the general hatred for Preston
People are free to opine that's it's bullshit. That's the point of Lolcow & Lolcow LLP. At least that's what I've come to understand.On a specific level, you aren’t a judge so you can’t be the one to say if this lawsuit is bullshit or not.
Ehhh... he included quotations in his complaint that are things they did indeed say... but the issue is whether those things are legally defamatory and actionable.It’s not like Preston made something up that is completely untrue just to sue.
Your judgment is clouded by the general hatred for Preston.
That's true. If you do something that ridiculous and stupid you deserve to get laughed at, more so if you can't laugh at yourself for the fuck up and accept it. Peggy is clearly still butthurt over getting pegged and Dean and Vick made the pain (rightfully) worse and then got themselves into a lolsuit they can't even defend themselves properly in. It's funny to see someone that got pegged and humiliated then go and gaining the advantage against 2 of the 3 defendants when all evidence pointed at one time to all 3 defendants being able to win against Peggy and owning him some more.I don't hate Preston, I LAUGH at Preston. I don't know how to take him or the things he does seriously anymore.
The same goes for his "knights". The same goes for how Vikki and Dean are defending themselves.
I'm going to give Dean the benefit of the doubt and assume he secured representation, because I don't know why you would continue to do this if you didn't.one way or another we'll probably know soon enough if Dean has a lawyer who entered an appearance, or the conference even happened.
Stupidity? Been plenty of that. But hey... I hope he does. For sure.I'm going to give Dean the benefit of the doubt and assume he secured representation, because I don't know why you would continue to do this if you didn't.