Preston Poulter et al v. Ali "Dean" Assaf et al (2021)

I heard @WhimsicalTrolli got banned from there on Monday. He's like one of the few black people that follows Comicsgate. Vikki and Dean are racist confirmed. #BLACKLIVESMATTER. 🤣
No commentors can matter until black ones do.


Update

She's hiding and negrating because she's going have to clean dog anal glands for the rest of her menopausal childless life.

AddText_02-23-06.17.39.jpg
 
Last edited:
Spectre has apparently DFE'd the content from the "Spectre Report" channel.
1645658051400.png
This is your future, Dean. Spectre had a bigger audience than you and he deleted over 80 videos dating back 3 or 4 years, including the ones on this lawsuit. Was he concerned about his own legal liability, or was this part of a settlement with Preston?

It's been almost 5 months since his last YouTube video on the case, and he hasn't tweeted anything about it since early January despite all the updates and Preston pegging him. Maybe he's decided his reporting isn't important, and he's just going to livestream games from now on. Below is a short clip showing the apex of Dean's master plan--secretly have Spectre do all the hard work, and then once the motion to dismiss was granted, pull back the curtain and rub it in Preston's face. But Spectre couldn't keep his big mouth shut and blabbed before the reply brief had even been filed. He took off the Dean mask because he wanted everyone to know it was actually The Spectre who vanquished the evil Preston, and now he wishes they would forget.
1645658484700.png



FULL ARCHIVE: DA Talks' Reply Brief (Preston Poulter v. Ethan van Sciver Lolsuit)
Streamed live on Oct 3, 2021

 
Last edited:
In Nick's mind "under the guidance of a stolen valour idiot who roleplayed as a lawyer".
Probably, yeah.

To be completely fair, Rekieta did throw ONE lifeline to Spectre where he said he THINKS that Spectre didn't have a hand in Dean's first motion that failed to raise the jurisdiction issue. As if to say that Dean inflicted the most grievous wound upon himself. Because the jurisdiction argument is basically the Game Genie™ in this particular case. You plug it in, type in a simple code, and win.

But it's a shitty lifeline, because Spectre himself claims he wrote the second motion. And there were other arguments to be raised. The Magistrate Judge flatly rejected Spectre's "failure to state a claim" argument in determining that it appears Preston has a case. EXACTLY the opposite result of what happened in Vic's case.

All this would would really mean, if true, is that Dean did the ultimate fuckup himself, but that any attempt to unfuck that with the follow-on motion was dashed because the direct involvement of the attention whoring craterface.

Regardless, I'm pretty sure no lawyer would really condone Spectre's meddling like this. Lawyers have to go to school for long stretches of time, assume massive student debt doing so (usually), and have to follow an ethical code in order to remain in good standing with the bar.

But here comes Spectre... he's a genius. Hero of the Boston Marathon bombing! Marine Corps Captain! Stolen Valor.

He can't be arsed to do any of that edu-ma-cation and licensing shit. He's just gonna jump straight to the last step and do some LAWSPLAININ'.

How did that work out for you buddy? How did that work out for Dean?

How well did the tweet where you said you'd give better advice than Preston's shitass lawyers age? The Judge read your motion and the one from Preston's "shitass lawyers." Is a United States Majestrate Judge a member of Plate Gang? Is this a gay op?

Are you gonna purge your Twitter next?

You know, you probably should give that idea serious consideration, because according to you, the whole Spectre 06 persona derives from a radio callsign you claim you were assigned in the Marines. An E-3 truck driver with a SIX callsign? Really? Lance Corporal isn't even an NCO, retard. You were in command of jack shit. So where is the value in even keeping the persona now? A general reset across the board might be in your best interest now.

Spectre is a con man. A parasite. Like either of those, he inflicts damage on others for his own gain. But he's not even very good at it, because what does he have to show for it? And con men also change identities to keep the con going. Spectre isn't even smart enough to do that. That's why his thread is so hilarious.

As far as I can tell, Spectre hasn't tweeted anything about this case since early January despite Preston pegging him.
This is because Spectre failed, he knows he failed, and is therefore he's gonna pretend he didn't fail by ignoring the issue entirely.

Also, that video clip is both funny and cringe. I can guarantee you he's not that smug now.
 
This is your future, Dean. Spectre had a bigger audience than you and he deleted over 80 videos dating back 3 or 4 years, including the ones on this lawsuit. Was he concerned about his own legal liability, or was this part of a settlement with Preston?

It's been almost 5 months since his last YouTube video on the case, and he hasn't tweeted anything about it since early January despite all the updates and Preston pegging him. Maybe he's decided his reporting isn't important, and he's just going to livestream games from now on. Below is a short clip showing the apex of Dean's master plan--secretly have Spectre do all the hard work, and then once the motion to dismiss was granted, pull back the curtain and rub it in Preston's face. But Spectre couldn't keep his big mouth shut and blabbed before the reply brief had even been filed. He took off the Dean mask because he wanted everyone to know it was actually The Spectre who vanquished the evil Preston, and now he wishes they would forget.
View attachment 3010623
View attachment 3010596

FULL ARCHIVE: DA Talks' Reply Brief (Preston Poulter v. Ethan van Sciver Lolsuit)
Streamed live on Oct 3, 2021
View attachment 3010863
For anyone that's interested, and I really mean no one -- who wants to watch hundreds of hours of his streams?

@BlackGorillaPerson posted pretty much all the archived videos in the Spectre thread under the Gunt subforum. Everyone knows we've had our dumbass spats but I do thank him for that.
 
For all the gossip about Trudeau being Fidel Castro's love-child does anyone know if Preston's mom ever spent time in Russia?

View attachment 3012936

View attachment 3012937
I dunno, but that's actually a complement. Turn on the news. Russia is winning. Just like Preston is technically winning against Dean and Vikki.

Brigadier Admiral Fahey's leadership of the "Dean Defense Forces" fucking sucks ass. Incompetent lying faggot isn't even fit to run a third-rate tribal militia out of the blackest part of Africa.

1645744014458.png

Uh huh. Sure.
 
I dunno, but that's actually a complement. Turn on the news. Russia is winning. Just like Preston is technically winning against Dean and Vikki.

Brigadier Admiral Fahey's leadership of the "Dean Defense Forces" fucking sucks ass. Incompetent lying faggot isn't even fit to run a third-rate tribal militia out of the blackest part of Africa.

View attachment 3014697
Uh huh. Sure.
When will we see Preston's annexation of the dog grooming facility?
 
In terms of what Vikki is known to have said and what is in the complaint, she did almost nothing that could rise to the level of defamation IMO. Dean and FROG both said worse things
from a legal point of view. (and I still don't think any of their stuff rises to defamation either).

The worst direct quotes they could find were the following:

“Created woman that looked like they were underage.”
“a woman that looks like that you would go to jail for f_______.”
“its Loli in 3D reflection.”
“just because Loli is legal it doesn’t mean it not child porn.” (a double negative)
“woman that are created young enough to look like they’re underage.”

I've yet to see anything attributed to her that defamed Preston at all. The only quotes they could come up with to defame Lamont
are those that offer an opinion that he draws characters that appear to be underaged.

From a strictly legal point of view, the lawsuit is within reason. Its within reason in the same way that the lawsuits of the mountain jews
are considered within reason by the federal courts. People have a right to bring legal actions that are bad and a waste of time & money.

But on the other side, these lawsuits were all stupid in that if properly defended, they would have all failed on the question of jurisdiction.
All the precedent in the 5th Circuit (including Texas) was against jurisdiction being granted in this case.
She lies about people all the time & defames them. So in the grand scheme of things, she deserves this.

On a specific level, you aren’t a judge so you can’t be the one to say if this lawsuit is bullshit or not. Point is, vikki lies & defames people so it finally caught up to her. I’d hardly call this lawsuit “bullshit”. Your judgment is clouded by the general hatred for Preston. There is valid reason to accuse vikki of defamation, it’s up to a judge to see if in this particular case if it holds up in the court of law. It’s not like Preston made something up that is completely untrue just to sue. In his head, she is spreading lies & defamation about him (just as she does with literally EVERYONE, how anyone can deny this is insane) & figured he’d do something about it
 
Last edited:
Dean has been very quiet, we don't know what happened Wednesday. Did you end up hiring a lawyer for the first time in 9 months? Are ya finally going to start winning son?
There are three kinds of people that go silent out of a sudden, Smart people that are confident, people that messed up and at the point of return who will learn their lesson and the last one is the same expect they're at the point of no return and haven't learnt jack shit.
 
She lies about people all the time & defames them. So in the grand scheme of things, she deserves this.

On a specific level, you aren’t a judge so you can’t be the one to say if this lawsuit is bullshit or not. Point is, vikki lies & defames people so it finally caught up to her. I’d hardly call this lawsuit “bullshit”. Your judgment is clouded by the general hatred for Preston. There is valid reason to accuse vikki of defamation, it’s up to a judge to see if in this particular case if it holds up in the court of law. It’s not like Preston made something up that is completely untrue just to sue. In his head, she is spreading lies & defamation about him (just as she does with literally EVERYONE, how anyone can deny this is insane) & figured he’d do something about it
You're retarded. Kill yourself.
 
She lies about people all the time & defames them. So in the grand scheme of things, she deserves this.
Let me help you out here.

Basically what you're saying here, if you read between the lines, is that you think she defamed you, and you think this is her just deserts.

You're entitled to that opinion, but I think the issue you're gonna run into is a lot of people are gonna take umbrage at the idea that Preston's lawsuit can be held up as an example of Vikki defaming people. This, in turn, will only hurt the credibility of whatever claims you want to make that she defamed you.

Your judgment is clouded by the general hatred for Preston
Disagree. If that were true, I don't think you'd see so many people pointing out here that their defense strategy was all sorts of retarded.

A small clique of people are gonna go to bat for them regardless, but those more interested in taking an objective look at the trajectory of this shitshow is going to mete their criticism out more evenly. And indeed they are.

On a specific level, you aren’t a judge so you can’t be the one to say if this lawsuit is bullshit or not.
People are free to opine that's it's bullshit. That's the point of Lolcow & Lolcow LLP. At least that's what I've come to understand.

Right now, NOBODY in a position of authority can say whether Preston's lawsuit is bullshit after she defaulted. That's kind of the problem. The judge didn't even have anything to look at. It wasn't judged on either procedure or merits, other than the fact that service was returned, and there was no reply.

It’s not like Preston made something up that is completely untrue just to sue.
Ehhh... he included quotations in his complaint that are things they did indeed say... but the issue is whether those things are legally defamatory and actionable.

However, Preston did indeed make shit up. Like claiming Angel of Darkness was rejected by Kickstarter, because of the controversy over Demonatrix. That's demonstrably untrue. Angel of Darkness was on Kickstarter even as they wrote that tripe in their complaint.

1645992327740.png

1645992693263.png


To me, he flat out lied in his complaint.

EDIT: Typo.
 
Last edited:
I don't hate Preston, I LAUGH at Preston. I don't know how to take him or the things he does seriously anymore.
The same goes for his "knights". The same goes for how Vikki and Dean are defending themselves.
That's true. If you do something that ridiculous and stupid you deserve to get laughed at, more so if you can't laugh at yourself for the fuck up and accept it. Peggy is clearly still butthurt over getting pegged and Dean and Vick made the pain (rightfully) worse and then got themselves into a lolsuit they can't even defend themselves properly in. It's funny to see someone that got pegged and humiliated then go and gaining the advantage against 2 of the 3 defendants when all evidence pointed at one time to all 3 defendants being able to win against Peggy and owning him some more.

I find it hilarious to see some people screw so badly against a pegged clown and easy target that they are on the receiving end of getting legally pegged, especially when a crater faced, wannabe lawyer/former Marine with stolen valor screws over someone's chance to waver the lolsuit. It's a good clusterfuck to watch while eating some Nachos, that's for sure.
 
one way or another we'll probably know soon enough if Dean has a lawyer who entered an appearance, or the conference even happened.
I'm going to give Dean the benefit of the doubt and assume he secured representation, because I don't know why you would continue to do this if you didn't.

1646023245900.png

1646023687500.png

 
I'm going to give Dean the benefit of the doubt and assume he secured representation, because I don't know why you would continue to do this if you didn't.
Stupidity? Been plenty of that. But hey... I hope he does. For sure.

I got something perhaps funnier than that though.

The lawsuit came up on FlashCast again. A show Rekieta frequents. There was more dabbing on @Spectre_06 and Dean. However, there was a twist this time. Dean's brother, Crow of Judgment, was there to join in. I'm not joking. Here's a clip, and I've provided a transcript.



Rekieta (with intentional robot voice): "Heeeeeey Crow... how's your brother dooooin?"
*ALL LAUGH*
Crow: "Oh God, I saw some interesting stuff about that. That @Spectre_06 guy... whoever the fuck that idiot is... was..."
Flash: "That's his lawyer!"
Crow: "Yeah, well I guess he tried to delete a bunch of stuff on Kiwifarms about how he drafted his motion. They got reposted there. So that's pretty interesting."
Rekieta: "Yeah, probably not the best move."
Crow: "No, no, no... he's fucked. I mean, he's gonna have to spend so much money to get out of this.... that he doesn't have... so....I dunno man"
Rekieta: "He needed to hire a lawyer from the start and file that fucking motion. Or just join EVS' (@FROG)."
Flash: "So he had... how much was his Gofundme?"
Crow: "It was like $1,150. The thing is, the Gofundme said it was for his legal fees and the rest would be donated. Well, he went for free advice, and according to him he donated it to some sort of free speech initiative, or whatever. I don't even know what he's fucking talking about. The Institute for Free Speech...."
Flash: "Any receipt for that?"
Crow: "No, no.. but..."
Rekieta: "Why would he donate it anyway?"
Crow (through laughter): "I don't know..."
Rekieta (incredulously): "He needs that money for legal fees."
*CROW AND REKIETA LAUGH*
Rekieta: "What the fuck are you doing? You're not out of the woods yet!"
Flash: "I don't think he donated it. I think it's wrapped up in something."

Then Cecil starts talking about some unrelated shit. Video ends.
 
Last edited:
Back