Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
You fools! The life insurance needs to have the body to pay out. The skills you're looking for here aren't the 'hide the corpse' skills, they're the 'make it look like an accident' skills. Y'all are going to end up widowed with nothing to show for it but a dirty shovel while the insurance company argues that she could still be alive out there somewhere.
I was a fool :(
 
He can never go dark. He thinks that's how he's going to be "discovered."
I've heard "You Won't Ever Have to Play Another Sad Song" before, mainly because I remember the half-arsed Michael Jackson impression in the middle.

"Safari Ride" is a new one to me, though. Y'know how Christian music is obviously Christian music even if it doesn't mention Jesus? Yeah, it sounds like that. Mainly because Christian pop music has the innate characteristic of sounding not quite right and the harder it tries to not sound like Christian music, the more it sounds like Christian music.
Safari Ride was something he wrote for Arianna. It’s about a girl who got jungle fever and regretted it. Not even kidding.
 
Safari Ride was something he wrote for Arianna. It’s about a girl who got jungle fever and regretted it. Not even kidding.
And before that, he was going to try to get Taylor to do it.

I've had the start of a video sitting around for it for probably 2 years, but it's just such a bland and boring song I can't get the motivation to really work on it.

The "pop rock" version of it is ridiculously lame. He had at least 3 versions recorded.
 
And paralegal courses need to repeatedly tell students: YOU ARE NOT A FUCKING LAWYER. Over and over.
The kind of normal, non-retarded person usually in a paralegal course doesn't need to be told that because they aren't gourd-headed mush-mouthed droolers.
At what point does the judge actually make a decision? Does she have a deadline or timetable, or can this just continue on forever until she finally moves things along?
The matter, and by that I mean the whole case, is as fully briefed as it should be (more so because of Russhole's frivolous sur-reply). The judge need not wait a single minute. Honestly the quickest and easiest thing would be to dash off a quick opinion cribbing heavily from the defense briefing, which is more or less an introductory text called "Compelling Arbitration for Dummies."

Honestly if the judge is big on a clean docket this has to be one of the easiest cases to fob off on someone else.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how many people are like me when I see these updates literally written out in plain fucking english, and all I hear in my head is sounds. I know I deserve trash can ratings for this but other than the really juicy tidbits, the plain English descriptions of legal goings-on are just like "yeah, yeah I know some of those words" :trump:

I wonder if that's part of the reason sometimes us fairweather watchers ask the same questions over and over again like "so uhh when does Russell/fremantle have to respond".

Better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
I'm right there with ya bud
 
My favorite part:
View attachment 3029385
View attachment 3029387


Of course.

Fremantle raises two points:
1. You can't file your Opposition, then do research after, and ask the court for permission to supplement your Opposition with the new research you made. Fremantle points out that Greer admits that he hasn't done his research properly (and he had 12 days left to file it that he could have used for research) and then attempts to game the deadlines by submitting a supplemental memorandum. You can't do that. Therefore his memorandum should not be considered

2. Even if the court decided it will consider it, all the issues Russ raised are issues that the court is not allowed to address, they must be adressed by an arbitrator.

Hope this helps.
To add to this or remind everyone that we were looking at Peak Russhole with his response. This was a few weeks back when Freemantle dropped their absolutely BRUTAL response to his lawsuit. The one that laid out his celebrity stalking sex pest history as an asside before moving to compel arbitration. They dropped it late on a Thursday if I recall. Russ spent the weekend seething with rage and pounding out his resoonse to send it in first thing Monday Morning. They just had to let him explain. So he rage posted his initial response and wants a do over.
 
"Greer concedes he has not been reasonably diligent -> Nothing prevented Greer from conducting this research before filing his opposition -> Moreover, Greer chose to file his opposition early -> Put simply, Geer had time to fully research and prepare his opposition; he simply chose not to use it."

"Greer misses the point."

"Greer then concedes that his position has no merit."

I can just HEAR that head tightening all the way from here!
 
"Safari Ride" is a new one to me, though. Y'know how Christian music is obviously Christian music even if it doesn't mention Jesus? Yeah, it sounds like that. Mainly because Christian pop music has the innate characteristic of sounding not quite right and the harder it tries to not sound like Christian music, the more it sounds like Christian music.
Except that song is really about how much Russ hates black people.
 
I believe Mocha Man was mostly a slur against Obama in response to people calling Trump Orange Man.

But Russ is totally not a Trump supporter.
He supported Trump at first, up until he mailed his book to the entire Trump family and never got an invite to the white house.

The Chocolate-in-Chief was his name for Obama.
 
Back