Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Donetsk People's Republic is attacking Azov-held Mariupol
View attachment 3033377


It's 1945 all over again
I could be wrong, but I don't think there will be much of an actual battle. If you look at the city on satellite images, there are ODAs to the west, east, and north and of course the sea to the south. I'd suspect that they'll station besiegers in the towns around the city like Sartan, move ships into the area, and then force the defenders to come out so they can use arty and airstrikes. My suspicion is that they didn't think the Ukrainian forces would try to hold the city because of this, and that's why they drug their feet over the last couple of days.
 
The reliability argument has historically been about mechanical function more than accuracy, but as has been pointed out this is mostly a fuddlore thing due to most people's exposure to real AK's being some burned out gun from the 80's that has fought off both the Soviets and the Americans and hasn't been cleaned once since it was delivered.
American AK sperging is a sight to see.
 
It's the same fucking debate when our ancestors debated if the Miquelet, Wheelock or flintlock musket was superior or trash.

It's a retarded discussion full of autism from people that get boners or hateboners when they see a weapon they like or don't like.
Less that, more AK internet circlejerk.

The AK and Glock crowds on the gun parts of the internet are just like the JDM crowd on the car parts of the internet. They think their shit doesn't stink and if you tell them it does they get upset.

Ive got nothing against AKs and have been looking for an SKS for some time, but head to head in battle the M4 platform is gunna take the win.
 
It's the same fucking debate when our ancestors debated if the Miquelet, Wheelock or flintlock musket was superior or trash.

It's a retarded discussion full of autism from people that get boners or hateboners when they see a weapon they like or don't like.
And even if the AR platform were somehow objectively better, you piss with the cock you got - there's a hell of a lot of AKs in eastern Europe.

It's such an unnecessary, out-of-touch argument.
 
Russian column rolling through the Balakleya district southeast of Kharkov, aiming to outflank the Ukrainian army units still remaining in the Donbass
1646196322123.png
 
Its not fuddlore. In fact most US gun guys will tell you the M16 was actually worse.
The original M16 had teething issues when it debuted in Vietnam.
In reality, old school AKs are dead reliable, but anything past the late 60s begins so really suffer from soviet engineering. And most of the ones being used now are made of subpar metals, have manufacturing inconsistencies, and other issues.
Are you basing that off legit Kalashnikovs, or knock-offs made by Norinco, Century, PSA, Brandon Herrera's garage, et al?
 
I like you, and your posts on average are either highly generalized but alright, or well thought out. That being said, the most annoying thing anyone can ever post on the internet is "What are your credentials?!" - you are better than this, even if you are keeping with your namesake. This isn't Reddit my man.
You need some tampons for your lady vagina, dude?
 
The original M16 had teething issues when it debuted in Vietnam.

Are you basing that off legit Kalashnikovs, or knock-offs made by Norinco, Century, PSA, or Brandon Herrera's garage?

Legit Kalashnikovs. Like I said, the knockoffs are fucking junk, especially Norinco. Knock off any gun is junk. Exclusing PSA here.

Brandon Herrera is a soyfag
 
There's no solving it lol. The only people who think AKs are some sort of god tier guns are poeple stuck 70 years ago. On top of that, most the ones used today are Chineseum shit.
Pretty sure the Ukrainian army uses the AK-74. But it's irrelevant, modern optics are a bigger difference-maker than caliber or action these days. All shipping the Ukrainian army M4s would do is put unfamiliar weapons with poor ammunition supplies into the hands of the infantry. And FWIW, there is no meaningful practical difference between the AK-74 and the AR platform when equipped with similar sights and in the hands of a reasonably competent shooter. At that point, victory is going to be determined by logistics and tactics, not equipment.
 
It's the same fucking debate when our ancestors debated if the Miquelet, Wheelock or flintlock musket was superior or trash.

It's a retarded discussion full of autism from people that get boners or hateboners when they see a weapon they like or don't like.
oh god, now I have to imagine what a 19th century /k/ meetup would have looked like...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back